| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Ensure that user_watch_state can be set correctly by the user.
Signed-off-by: Qing Zhang <zhangqing@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
|
|
This is done in order to easily calculate the number of breakpoints in
hw_break_get()/hw_break_set().
Signed-off-by: Qing Zhang <zhangqing@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
|
|
Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com> says:
This patchset intends to improve tlb utilization by using hugepages for
the linear mapping.
As reported by Anup in v6, when STRICT_KERNEL_RWX is enabled, we must
take care of isolating the kernel text and rodata so that they are not
mapped with a PUD mapping which would then assign wrong permissions to
the whole region: it is achieved the same way as arm64 by using the
memblock nomap API which isolates those regions and re-merge them afterwards
thus avoiding any issue with the system resources tree creation.
arch/riscv/include/asm/page.h | 19 ++++++-
arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
arch/riscv/mm/physaddr.c | 16 ++++++
drivers/of/fdt.c | 11 ++--
4 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
* b4-shazam-merge:
riscv: Use PUD/P4D/PGD pages for the linear mapping
riscv: Move the linear mapping creation in its own function
riscv: Get rid of riscv_pfn_base variable
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230324155421.271544-1-alexghiti@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
During the early page table creation, we used to set the mapping for
PAGE_OFFSET to the kernel load address: but the kernel load address is
always offseted by PMD_SIZE which makes it impossible to use PUD/P4D/PGD
pages as this physical address is not aligned on PUD/P4D/PGD size (whereas
PAGE_OFFSET is).
But actually we don't have to establish this mapping (ie set va_pa_offset)
that early in the boot process because:
- first, setup_vm installs a temporary kernel mapping and among other
things, discovers the system memory,
- then, setup_vm_final creates the final kernel mapping and takes
advantage of the discovered system memory to create the linear
mapping.
During the first phase, we don't know the start of the system memory and
then until the second phase is finished, we can't use the linear mapping at
all and phys_to_virt/virt_to_phys translations must not be used because it
would result in a different translation from the 'real' one once the final
mapping is installed.
So here we simply delay the initialization of va_pa_offset to after the
system memory discovery. But to make sure noone uses the linear mapping
before, we add some guard in the DEBUG_VIRTUAL config.
Finally we can use PUD/P4D/PGD hugepages when possible, which will result
in a better TLB utilization.
Note that:
- this does not apply to rv32 as the kernel mapping lies in the linear
mapping.
- we rely on the firmware to protect itself using PMP.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> # DT bits
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Tested-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230324155421.271544-4-alexghiti@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
No change intended, it just splits the linear mapping creation from
setup_vm_final: this prepares for upcoming additions to the linear
mapping creation.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Tested-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230324155421.271544-3-alexghiti@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
Use directly phys_ram_base instead, riscv_pfn_base is just the pfn of
the address contained in phys_ram_base.
Even if there is no functional change intended in this patch, actually
setting phys_ram_base that early changes the behaviour of
kernel_mapping_pa_to_va during the early boot: phys_ram_base used to be
zero before this patch and now it is set to the physical start address of
the kernel. But it does not break the conversion of a kernel physical
address into a virtual address since kernel_mapping_pa_to_va should only
be used on kernel physical addresses, i.e. addresses greater than the
physical start address of the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Tested-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230324155421.271544-2-alexghiti@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
Other extensions only capitalise the first letter in the text visible
in Kconfig menus, and provide a short comment about the extension's
meaning. Do the same for Svnapot & Svpbmt.
The precedent for capitalisation in the Kconfig text was set by Zicbom
& sorta followed for Zicboz. The RVI styling used for multi-letter
extensions only capitalises the first letter, so do the same here.
If nothing else, my OCD likes it when the extensions follow a consistent
pattern.
While editing one of the lines, reformat the "spelling" of 64-bit.
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230405-pucker-cogwheel-3a999a94a2f2@wendy
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
RISC-V now builds the sched domain based on the simple possible map.
Enable SCHED_MC to make the building based on cpu_coregroup_mask()
which also takes care of the NUMA and cores with LLC.
Signed-off-by: Song Shuai <suagrfillet@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230310110336.970985-1-suagrfillet@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
RISC-V now manages CPU topology using arch_topology which provides
CPU capacity and frequency related interfaces to access the cpu/freq
invariant in possible heterogeneous or DVFS-enabled platforms.
Here adds topology.h file to export the arch_topology interfaces for
replacing the scheduler's constant-based cpu/freq invariant accounting.
Signed-off-by: Song Shuai <suagrfillet@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230323123924.3032174-1-suagrfillet@gmail.com
[Palmer: Fix the whitespace issues.]
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com> says:
There's been a bunch of off-list discussions about this, including at
Plumbers. The original plan was to do something involving providing an
ISA string to userspace, but ISA strings just aren't sufficient for a
stable ABI any more: in order to parse an ISA string users need the
version of the specifications that the string is written to, the version
of each extension (sometimes at a finer granularity than the RISC-V
releases/versions encode), and the expected use case for the ISA string
(ie, is it a U-mode or M-mode string). That's a lot of complexity to
try and keep ABI compatible and it's probably going to continue to grow,
as even if there's no more complexity in the specifications we'll have
to deal with the various ISA string parsing oddities that end up all
over userspace.
Instead this patch set takes a very different approach and provides a set
of key/value pairs that encode various bits about the system. The big
advantage here is that we can clearly define what these mean so we can
ensure ABI stability, but it also allows us to encode information that's
unlikely to ever appear in an ISA string (see the misaligned access
performance, for example). The resulting interface looks a lot like
what arm64 and x86 do, and will hopefully fit well into something like
ACPI in the future.
The actual user interface is a syscall, with a vDSO function in front of
it. The vDSO function can answer some queries without a syscall at all,
and falls back to the syscall for cases it doesn't have answers to.
Currently we prepopulate it with an array of answers for all keys and
a CPU set of "all CPUs". This can be adjusted as necessary to provide
fast answers to the most common queries.
An example series in glibc exposing this syscall and using it in an
ifunc selector for memcpy can be found at [1].
I was asked about the performance delta between this and something like
sysfs. I created a small test program and ran it on a Nezha D1
Allwinner board. Doing each operation 100000 times and dividing, these
operations take the following amount of time:
- open()+read()+close() of /sys/kernel/cpu_byteorder: 3.8us
- access("/sys/kernel/cpu_byteorder", R_OK): 1.3us
- riscv_hwprobe() vDSO and syscall: .0094us
- riscv_hwprobe() vDSO with no syscall: 0.0091us
These numbers get farther apart if we query multiple keys, as sysfs will
scale linearly with the number of keys, where the dedicated syscall
stays the same. To frame these numbers, I also did a tight
fork/exec/wait loop, which I measured as 4.8ms. So doing 4
open/read/close operations is a delta of about 0.3%, versus a single vDSO
call is a delta of essentially zero.
[1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/glibc/list/?series=343050
* b4-shazam-merge:
RISC-V: Add hwprobe vDSO function and data
selftests: Test the new RISC-V hwprobe interface
RISC-V: hwprobe: Support probing of misaligned access performance
RISC-V: hwprobe: Add support for RISCV_HWPROBE_BASE_BEHAVIOR_IMA
RISC-V: Add a syscall for HW probing
RISC-V: Move struct riscv_cpuinfo to new header
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230407231103.2622178-1-evan@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
So Intel introduced the FSRS ("Fast Short REP STOS") CPU capability bit,
because they seem to have done the (much simpler) REP STOS optimizations
separately and later than the REP MOVS one.
In contrast, when AMD introduced support for FSRM ("Fast Short REP
MOVS"), in the Zen 3 core, it appears to have improved the REP STOS case
at the same time, and since the FSRS bit was added by Intel later, it
doesn't show up on those AMD Zen 3 cores.
And now that we made use of FSRS for the "rep stos" conditional, that
made those AMD machines unnecessarily slower. The Intel situation where
"rep movs" is fast, but "rep stos" isn't, is just odd. The 'stos' case
is a lot simpler with no aliasing, no mutual alignment issues, no
complicated cases.
So this just sets FSRS automatically when FSRM is available on AMD
machines, to get back all the nice REP STOS goodness in Zen 3.
Reported-and-tested-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
The old 'copy_user_generic_unrolled' function was oddly implemented for
largely historical reasons: it had been largely based on the uncached
copy case, which has some other concerns.
For example, the __copy_user_nocache() function uses 'movnti' for the
destination stores, and those want the destination to be aligned. In
contrast, the regular copy function doesn't really care, and trying to
align things only complicates matters.
Also, like the clear_user function, the copy function had some odd
handling of the repeat counts, complicating the exception handling for
no really good reason. So as with clear_user, just write it to keep all
the byte counts in the %rcx register, exactly like the 'rep movs'
functionality that this replaces.
Unlike a real 'rep movs', we do allow for this to trash a few temporary
registers to not have to unnecessarily save/restore registers on the
stack.
And like the clearing case, rename this to what it now clearly is:
'rep_movs_alternative', and make it one coherent function, so that it
shows up as such in profiles (instead of the odd split between
"copy_user_generic_unrolled" and "copy_user_short_string", the latter of
which was not about strings at all, and which was shared with the
uncached case).
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
The old version was oddly written to have the repeat count in multiple
registers. So instead of taking advantage of %rax being zero, it had
some sub-counts in it. All just for a "single word clearing" loop,
which isn't even efficient to begin with.
So get rid of those games, and just keep all the state in the same
registers we got it in (and that we should return things in). That not
only makes this act much more like 'rep stos' (which this function is
replacing), but makes it much easier to actually do the obvious loop
unrolling.
Also rename the function from the now nonsensical 'clear_user_original'
to what it now clearly is: 'rep_stos_alternative'.
End result: if we don't have a fast 'rep stosb', at least we can have a
fast fallback for it.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
This does the same thing for the user copies as commit 0db7058e8e23
("x86/clear_user: Make it faster") did for clear_user(). In other
words, it inlines the "rep movs" case when X86_FEATURE_FSRM is set,
avoiding the function call entirely.
In order to do that, it makes the calling convention for the out-of-line
case ("copy_user_generic_unrolled") match the 'rep movs' calling
convention, although it does also end up clobbering a number of
additional registers.
Also, to simplify code sharing in the low-level assembly with the
__copy_user_nocache() function (that uses the normal C calling
convention), we end up with a kind of mixed return value for the
low-level asm code: it will return the result in both %rcx (to work as
an alternative for the 'rep movs' case), _and_ in %rax (for the nocache
case).
We could avoid this by wrapping __copy_user_nocache() callers in an
inline asm, but since the cost is just an extra register copy, it's
probably not worth it.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
This is preparatory work for inlining the 'rep movs' case, but also a
cleanup. The __copy_user_nocache() function was mis-used by the rdma
code to do uncached kernel copies that don't actually want user copies
at all, and as a result doesn't want the stac/clac either.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
The modern target to use is FSRS (Fast Short REP STOS), and the other
cases should only be used for bigger areas (ie mainly things like page
clearing).
Note! This changes the conditional for the inlining from FSRM ("fast
short rep movs") to FSRS ("fast short rep stos").
We'll have a separate fixup for AMD microarchitectures that have a good
'rep stosb' yet do not set the new Intel-specific FSRS bit (because FSRM
was there first).
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
The modern target to use is FSRM (Fast Short REP MOVS), and the other
cases should only be used for bigger areas (ie mainly things like page
clearing).
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
The modern target to use is FSRS (Fast Short REP STOS), and the other
cases should only be used for bigger areas (ie mainly things like page
clearing).
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
The modern target to use is FSRM (Fast Short REP MOVS), and the other
cases should only be used for bigger areas (ie mainly things like page
copying and clearing).
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Now we use ARCH_WANT_HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP config option to
indicate devdax and hugetlb vmemmap optimization support. Hence rename
that to a generic ARCH_WANT_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230412050025.84346-2-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Tarun Sahu <tsahu@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
on 64bit
On sparc64, there is no HW modified bit, therefore, SW tracks via a SW bit
if the PTE is dirty via pte_mkdirty(). However, pte_mkdirty() currently
also unconditionally sets the HW writable bit, which is wrong.
pte_mkdirty() is not supposed to make a PTE actually writable, unless the
SW writable bit -- pte_write() -- indicates that the PTE is not
write-protected. Fortunately, sparc64 also defines a SW writable bit.
For example, this already turned into a problem in the context of THP
splitting as documented in commit 624a2c94f5b7 ("Partly revert "mm/thp:
carry over dirty bit when thp splits on pmd""), and for page migration, as
documented in commit 96a9c287e25d ("mm/migrate: fix wrongly apply write
bit after mkdirty on sparc64").
Also, we might want to use the dirty PTE bit in the context of KSM with
shared zeropage [1], whereby setting the page writable would be
problematic.
But more general, any code that might end up setting a PTE/PMD dirty
inside a VM without write permissions is possibly broken,
Before this commit (sun4u in QEMU):
root@debian:~/linux/tools/testing/selftests/mm# ./mkdirty
# [INFO] detected THP size: 8192 KiB
TAP version 13
1..6
# [INFO] PTRACE write access
not ok 1 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# [INFO] PTRACE write access to THP
not ok 2 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# [INFO] Page migration
ok 3 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# [INFO] Page migration of THP
ok 4 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# [INFO] PTE-mapping a THP
ok 5 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# [INFO] UFFDIO_COPY
not ok 6 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
Bail out! 3 out of 6 tests failed
# Totals: pass:3 fail:3 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
Test #3,#4,#5 pass ever since we added some MM workarounds, the
underlying issue remains.
Let's fix the remaining issues and prepare for reverting the workarounds
by setting the HW writable bit only if both, the SW dirty bit and the SW
writable bit are set.
We have to move pte_dirty() and pte_write() up. The code patching
mechanism and handling constants > 22bit is a bit special on sparc64.
The ASM logic in pte_mkdirty() and pte_mkwrite() match the logic in
pte_mkold() to create the mask depending on the machine type. The ASM
logic in __pte_mkhwwrite() matches the logic in pte_present(), just
using an "or" instead of an "and" instruction.
With this commit (sun4u in QEMU):
root@debian:~/linux/tools/testing/selftests/mm# ./mkdirty
# [INFO] detected THP size: 8192 KiB
TAP version 13
1..6
# [INFO] PTRACE write access
ok 1 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# [INFO] PTRACE write access to THP
ok 2 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# [INFO] Page migration
ok 3 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# [INFO] Page migration of THP
ok 4 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# [INFO] PTE-mapping a THP
ok 5 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# [INFO] UFFDIO_COPY
ok 6 SIGSEGV generated, page not modified
# Totals: pass:6 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
This handling seems to have been in place forever.
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/533a7c3d-3a48-b16b-b421-6e8386e0b142@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230411142512.438404-4-david@redhat.com
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
As noticed by Geert, commit b5c88f21531c ("microblaze/mm: support
__HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE") modified m68k code by accident. While
replacing 0x080 by CF_PAGE_NOCACHE is correct, although it should have
been part of commit ed4154067a08 ("m68k/mm: support
__HAVE_ARCH_PTE_SWP_EXCLUSIVE"), replacing "bit 7" by "bit 24" in the
comment was wrong.
Let's revert to the previous, correct, comment.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230404085636.121409-1-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to
describe this configuration option.
Update both to actually describe what this option does.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-15-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to
describe this configuration option.
Update both to actually describe what this option does.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-14-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
sh defines insane ranges for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER allowing MAX_ORDER up to
63, which implies maximal contiguous allocation size of 2^63 pages.
Drop bogus definitions of ranges for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER and leave it a
simple integer with sensible defaults.
Users that *really* need to change the value of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER will
be able to do so but they won't be mislead by the bogus ranges.
[rppt@kernel.org: untweak ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER's `range']
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230325060828.2662773-13-rppt@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-13-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to
describe this configuration option.
Update both to actually describe what this option does.
[rppt@kernel.org: tweak ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER's `range']
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230325060828.2662773-12-rppt@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-12-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
PowerPC defines ranges for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER some of which are insanely
allowing MAX_ORDER up to 63, which implies maximal contiguous allocation
size of 2^63 pages.
Drop bogus definitions of ranges for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER and leave it a
simple integer with sensible defaults.
Users that *really* need to change the value of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER will
be able to do so but they won't be mislead by the bogus ranges.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-11-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to
describe this configuration option.
Update both to actually describe what this option does.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-10-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
nios2 defines range for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER allowing MAX_ORDER up to 19,
which implies maximal contiguous allocation size of 2^19 pages or 2GiB.
Drop bogus definition of ranges for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER and leave it a
simple integer with sensible default.
Users that *really* need to change the value of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER will
be able to do so but they won't be mislead by the bogus ranges.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-9-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to
describe this configuration option.
Update both to actually describe what this option does.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-8-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to
describe this configuration option.
Update both to actually describe what this option does.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-7-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
It is enough to keep default values for base and huge pages without
letting users to override ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER.
Drop the prompt to make the option unvisible in *config.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-6-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
The default value of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER matches the generic default
defined in the MM code, the architecture does not support huge pages, so
there is no need to keep ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER option available.
Drop it.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-5-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to
describe this configuration option.
Update both to actually describe what this option does.
[rppt@kernel.org: change ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER dependencies]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230325060828.2662773-4-rppt@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-4-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
It is not a good idea to change fundamental parameters of core memory
management. Having predefined ranges suggests that the values within
those ranges are sensible, but one has to *really* understand implications
of changing MAX_ORDER before actually amending it and ranges don't help
here.
Drop ranges in definition of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER and make its prompt
visible only if EXPERT=y
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-3-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Patch series "arch,mm: cleanup Kconfig entries for ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER",
v3.
Several architectures have ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER in their Kconfig and
they all have wrong and misleading prompt and help text for this option.
Besides, some define insane limits for possible values of
ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER, some carefully define ranges only for a subset of
possible configurations, some make this option configurable by users for no
good reason.
This set updates the prompt and help text everywhere and does its best to
update actual definitions of ranges where applicable.
kbuild generated a bunch of false positives because it assigns -1 to
ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER, hopefully this will be fixed soon.
This patch (of 14):
The prompt and help text of ARCH_FORCE_MAX_ORDER are not even close to
describe this configuration option.
Update both to actually describe what this option does.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230325060828.2662773-1-rppt@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-1-rppt@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230324052233.2654090-2-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
clang produces a build failure on x86 for some randconfig builds after a
change that moves around code to mm/mm_init.c:
Cannot find symbol for section 2: .text.
mm/mm_init.o: failed
I have not been able to figure out why this happens, but the __weak
annotation on arch_has_descending_max_zone_pfns() is the trigger here.
Removing the weak function in favor of an open-coded Kconfig option check
avoids the problem and becomes clearer as well as better to optimize by
the compiler.
[arnd@arndb.de: fix logic bug]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230415081904.969049-1-arnd@kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230414080418.110236-1-arnd@kernel.org
Fixes: 9420f89db2dd ("mm: move most of core MM initialization to mm/mm_init.c")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Tested-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
Add a vDSO function __vdso_riscv_hwprobe, which can sit in front of the
riscv_hwprobe syscall and answer common queries. We stash a copy of
static answers for the "all CPUs" case in the vDSO data page. This data
is private to the vDSO, so we can decide later to change what's stored
there or under what conditions we defer to the syscall. Currently all
data can be discovered at boot, so the vDSO function answers all queries
when the cpumask is set to the "all CPUs" hint.
There's also a boolean in the data that lets the vDSO function know that
all CPUs are the same. In that case, the vDSO will also answer queries
for arbitrary CPU masks in addition to the "all CPUs" hint.
Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230407231103.2622178-7-evan@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
This allows userspace to select various routines to use based on the
performance of misaligned access on the target hardware.
Rather than adding DT bindings, this change taps into the alternatives
mechanism used to probe CPU errata. Add a new function pointer alongside
the vendor-specific errata_patch_func() that probes for desirable errata
(otherwise known as "features"). Unlike the errata_patch_func(), this
function is called on each CPU as it comes up, so it can save
feature information per-CPU.
The T-head C906 has fast unaligned access, both as defined by GCC [1],
and in performing a basic benchmark, which determined that byte copies
are >50% slower than a misaligned word copy of the same data size (source
for this test at [2]):
bytecopy size f000 count 50000 offset 0 took 31664899 us
wordcopy size f000 count 50000 offset 0 took 5180919 us
wordcopy size f000 count 50000 offset 1 took 13416949 us
[1] https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc#L353
[2] https://pastebin.com/EPXvDHSW
Co-developed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230407231103.2622178-5-evan@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
We have an implicit set of base behaviors that userspace depends on,
which are mostly defined in various ISA specifications.
Co-developed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
Reviewed-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230407231103.2622178-4-evan@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
We don't have enough space for these all in ELF_HWCAP{,2} and there's no
system call that quite does this, so let's just provide an arch-specific
one to probe for hardware capabilities. This currently just provides
m{arch,imp,vendor}id, but with the key-value pairs we can pass more in
the future.
Co-developed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
Reviewed-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230407231103.2622178-3-evan@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
In preparation for tracking and exposing microarchitectural details to
userspace (like whether or not unaligned accesses are fast), move the
riscv_cpuinfo struct out to its own new cpufeatures.h header. It will
need to be used by more than just cpu.c.
Signed-off-by: Evan Green <evan@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
Tested-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@vrull.eu>
Reviewed-by: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230407231103.2622178-2-evan@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
Fundamentally semaphores are a counted primitive, but
DEFINE_SEMAPHORE() does not expose this and explicitly creates a
binary semaphore.
Change DEFINE_SEMAPHORE() to take a number argument and use that in the
few places that open-coded it using __SEMAPHORE_INITIALIZER().
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
[mcgrof: add some tribal knowledge about why some folks prefer
binary sempahores over mutexes]
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
|
|
Virtual Trust Levels (VTL) helps enable Hyper-V Virtual Secure Mode (VSM)
feature. VSM is a set of hypervisor capabilities and enlightenments
offered to host and guest partitions which enable the creation and
management of new security boundaries within operating system software.
VSM achieves and maintains isolation through VTLs.
Add early initialization for Virtual Trust Levels (VTL). This includes
initializing the x86 platform for VTL and enabling boot support for
secondary CPUs to start in targeted VTL context. For now, only enable
the code for targeted VTL level as 2.
When starting an AP at a VTL other than VTL0, the AP must start directly
in 64-bit mode, bypassing the usual 16-bit -> 32-bit -> 64-bit mode
transition sequence that occurs after waking up an AP with SIPI whose
vector points to the 16-bit AP startup trampoline code.
Signed-off-by: Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Kinsburskii <stanislav.kinsburskii@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1681192532-15460-6-git-send-email-ssengar@linux.microsoft.com
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
|
|
Move hv_get_nmi_reason to .h file so it can be used in other
modules as well.
Signed-off-by: Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1681192532-15460-4-git-send-email-ssengar@linux.microsoft.com
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
|
|
Add structs and hypercalls required to enable VTL support on x86.
Signed-off-by: Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanislav Kinsburskii <stanislav.kinsburskii@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1681192532-15460-3-git-send-email-ssengar@linux.microsoft.com
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
|
|
Make get/set_rtc_noop() to be public so that they can be used
in other modules as well.
Co-developed-by: Tianyu Lan <tiala@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Tianyu Lan <tiala@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Saurabh Sengar <ssengar@linux.microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1681192532-15460-2-git-send-email-ssengar@linux.microsoft.com
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
|
|
Per-vcpu flags are updated using a non-atomic RMW operation.
Which means it is possible to get preempted between the read and
write operations.
Another interesting thing to note is that preemption also updates
flags, as we have some flag manipulation in both the load and put
operations.
It is thus possible to lose information communicated by either
load or put, as the preempted flag update will overwrite the flags
when the thread is resumed. This is specially critical if either
load or put has stored information which depends on the physical
CPU the vcpu runs on.
This results in really elusive bugs, and kudos must be given to
Mostafa for the long hours of debugging, and finally spotting
the problem.
Fix it by disabling preemption during the RMW operation, which
ensures that the state stays consistent. Also upgrade vcpu_get_flag
path to use READ_ONCE() to make sure the field is always atomically
accessed.
Fixes: e87abb73e594 ("KVM: arm64: Add helpers to manipulate vcpu flags among a set")
Reported-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230418125737.2327972-1-maz@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
|
|
Rockchip RK3588/RK3588s GIC600 integration does not support the
sharability feature. Rockchip assigned Erratum ID #3588001 for this
issue.
Note, that the 0x0201743b ID is not Rockchip specific and thus
there is an extra of_machine_is_compatible() check.
The flags are named FORCE_NON_SHAREABLE to be vendor agnostic,
since apparently similar integration design errors exist in other
platforms and they can reuse the same flag.
Co-developed-by: XiaoDong Huang <derrick.huang@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: XiaoDong Huang <derrick.huang@rock-chips.com>
Co-developed-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
Co-developed-by: Lucas Tanure <lucas.tanure@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Lucas Tanure <lucas.tanure@collabora.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230418142109.49762-2-sebastian.reichel@collabora.com
|
|
It is preferred to use typed property access functions (i.e.
of_property_read_<type> functions) rather than low-level
of_get_property/of_find_property functions for reading properties.
Convert reading boolean properties to to of_property_read_bool().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230310144700.1541345-1-robh@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
|
