| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Change the way netfslib collects read results to do all the collection for
a particular read request using a single work item that walks along the
subrequest queue as subrequests make progress or complete, unlocking folios
progressively rather than doing the unlock in parallel as parallel requests
come in.
The code is remodelled to be more like the write-side code, though only
using a single stream. This makes it more directly comparable and thus
easier to duplicate fixes between the two sides.
This has a number of advantages:
(1) It's simpler. There doesn't need to be a complex donation mechanism
to handle mismatches between the size and alignment of subrequests and
folios. The collector unlocks folios as the subrequests covering each
complete.
(2) It should cause less scheduler overhead as there's a single work item
in play unlocking pages in parallel when a read gets split up into a
lot of subrequests instead of one per subrequest.
Whilst the parallellism is nice in theory, in practice, the vast
majority of loads are sequential reads of the whole file, so
committing a bunch of threads to unlocking folios out of order doesn't
help in those cases.
(3) It should make it easier to implement content decryption. A folio
cannot be decrypted until all the requests that contribute to it have
completed - and, again, most loads are sequential and so, most of the
time, we want to begin decryption sequentially (though it's great if
the decryption can happen in parallel).
There is a disadvantage in that we're losing the ability to decrypt and
unlock things on an as-things-arrive basis which may affect some
applications.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241216204124.3752367-28-dhowells@redhat.com
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
|
|
A rolling buffer is a series of folios held in a list of folio_queues. New
folios and folio_queue structs may be inserted at the head simultaneously
with spent ones being removed from the tail without the need for locking.
The rolling buffer includes an iov_iter and it has to be careful managing
this as the list of folio_queues is extended such that an oops doesn't
incurred because the iterator was pointing to the end of a folio_queue
segment that got appended to and then removed.
We need to use the mechanism twice, once for read and once for write, and,
in future patches, we will use a second rolling buffer to handle bounce
buffering for content encryption.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241216204124.3752367-6-dhowells@redhat.com
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
|
|
When the caching for a cookie is temporarily disabled (e.g. due to a DIO
write on that file), future copying to the cache for that file is disabled
until all fds open on that file are closed. However, if netfslib is using
the deprecated PG_private_2 method (such as is currently used by ceph), and
decides it wants to copy to the cache, netfs_advance_write() will just bail
at the first check seeing that the cache stream is unavailable, and
indicate that it dealt with all the content.
This means that we have no subrequests to provide notifications to drive
the state machine or even to pin the request and the request just gets
discarded, leaving the folios with PG_private_2 set.
Fix this by jumping directly to cancel the request if the cache is not
available. That way, we don't remove mark3 from the folio_queue list and
netfs_pgpriv2_cancel() will clean up the folios.
This was found by running the generic/013 xfstest against ceph with an
active cache and the "-o fsc" option passed to ceph. That would usually
hang
Fixes: ee4cdf7ba857 ("netfs: Speed up buffered reading")
Reported-by: Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAKPOu+_4m80thNy5_fvROoxBm689YtA0dZ-=gcmkzwYSY4syqw@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241213135013.2964079-11-dhowells@redhat.com
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
cc: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
|
|
Because it uses DIO writes, cachefiles is unable to make a write to the
backing file if that write is not aligned to and sized according to the
backing file's DIO block alignment. This makes it tricky to handle a write
to the cache where the EOF on the network file is not correctly aligned.
To get around this, netfslib attempts to tell the driver it is calling how
much more data there is available beyond the EOF that it can use to pad the
write (netfslib preclears the part of the folio above the EOF). However,
it tries to tell the cache what the maximum length is, but doesn't
calculate this correctly; and, in any case, cachefiles actually ignores the
value and just skips the block.
Fix this by:
(1) Change the value passed to indicate the amount of extra data that can
be added to the operation (now ->submit_extendable_to). This is much
simpler to calculate as it's just the end of the folio minus the top
of the data within the folio - rather than having to account for data
spread over multiple folios.
(2) Make cachefiles add some of this data if the subrequest it is given
ends at the network file's i_size if the extra data is sufficient to
pad out to a whole block.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240814203850.2240469-22-dhowells@redhat.com/ # v2
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
|
|
Improve the efficiency of buffered reads in a number of ways:
(1) Overhaul the algorithm in general so that it's a lot more compact and
split the read submission code between buffered and unbuffered
versions. The unbuffered version can be vastly simplified.
(2) Read-result collection is handed off to a work queue rather than being
done in the I/O thread. Multiple subrequests can be processes
simultaneously.
(3) When a subrequest is collected, any folios it fully spans are
collected and "spare" data on either side is donated to either the
previous or the next subrequest in the sequence.
Notes:
(*) Readahead expansion is massively slows down fio, presumably because it
causes a load of extra allocations, both folio and xarray, up front
before RPC requests can be transmitted.
(*) RDMA with cifs does appear to work, both with SIW and RXE.
(*) PG_private_2-based reading and copy-to-cache is split out into its own
file and altered to use folio_queue. Note that the copy to the cache
now creates a new write transaction against the cache and adds the
folios to be copied into it. This allows it to use part of the
writeback I/O code.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
cc: netfs@lists.linux.dev
cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240814203850.2240469-20-dhowells@redhat.com/ # v2
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
|
