| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
selinux_getselfattr() doesn't properly initialize the string pointer
it passes to selinux_lsm_getattr() which can cause a problem when an
attribute hasn't been explicitly set; selinux_lsm_getattr() returns
0/success, but does not set or initialize the string label/attribute.
Failure to properly initialize the string causes problems later in
selinux_getselfattr() when the function attempts to kfree() the
string.
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Fixes: 762c934317e6 ("SELinux: Add selfattr hooks")
Suggested-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
[PM: description changes as discussed in the thread]
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
Add the idmap parameter to the definition, so that evm_inode_setattr() can
be registered as this hook implementation.
Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
Extended attribute copy-up functionality added via 19472b69d639d
("selinux: Implementation for inode_copy_up_xattr() hook") sees
"security.selinux" contexts dropped, instead relying on contexts
applied via the inode_copy_up() hook.
When copy-up takes place during early boot, prior to selinux
initialization / policy load, the context stripping can be unwanted
and unexpected.
With this change, filtering of "security.selinux" xattrs will only occur
after selinux initialization.
Signed-off-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
Instead of returning -EINVAL if any type of error occurs, limit
-EINVAL to only those errors caused by passing a bad/invalid socket
or packet/skb. In other cases where everything is correct but there
isn't a valid peer label we return -ENOPROTOOPT.
This helps make selinux_socket_getpeersec_dgram() more consistent
with selinux_socket_getpeersec_stream().
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
We only need to call inode_mode_to_security_class() once in
selinux_inode_init_security().
Reviewed-by: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
Utilize newly added bpf_token_create/bpf_token_free LSM hooks to
allocate struct bpf_security_struct for each BPF token object in
SELinux. This just follows similar pattern for BPF prog and map.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240124022127.2379740-18-andrii@kernel.org
|
|
Similarly to bpf_prog_alloc LSM hook, rename and extend bpf_map_alloc
hook into bpf_map_create, taking not just struct bpf_map, but also
bpf_attr and bpf_token, to give a fuller context to LSMs.
Unlike bpf_prog_alloc, there is no need to move the hook around, as it
currently is firing right before allocating BPF map ID and FD, which
seems to be a sweet spot.
But like bpf_prog_alloc/bpf_prog_free combo, make sure that bpf_map_free
LSM hook is called even if bpf_map_create hook returned error, as if few
LSMs are combined together it could be that one LSM successfully
allocated security blob for its needs, while subsequent LSM rejected BPF
map creation. The former LSM would still need to free up LSM blob, so we
need to ensure security_bpf_map_free() is called regardless of the
outcome.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240124022127.2379740-11-andrii@kernel.org
|
|
Based on upstream discussion ([0]), rework existing
bpf_prog_alloc_security LSM hook. Rename it to bpf_prog_load and instead
of passing bpf_prog_aux, pass proper bpf_prog pointer for a full BPF
program struct. Also, we pass bpf_attr union with all the user-provided
arguments for BPF_PROG_LOAD command. This will give LSMs as much
information as we can basically provide.
The hook is also BPF token-aware now, and optional bpf_token struct is
passed as a third argument. bpf_prog_load LSM hook is called after
a bunch of sanity checks were performed, bpf_prog and bpf_prog_aux were
allocated and filled out, but right before performing full-fledged BPF
verification step.
bpf_prog_free LSM hook is now accepting struct bpf_prog argument, for
consistency. SELinux code is adjusted to all new names, types, and
signatures.
Note, given that bpf_prog_load (previously bpf_prog_alloc) hook can be
used by some LSMs to allocate extra security blob, but also by other
LSMs to reject BPF program loading, we need to make sure that
bpf_prog_free LSM hook is called after bpf_prog_load/bpf_prog_alloc one
*even* if the hook itself returned error. If we don't do that, we run
the risk of leaking memory. This seems to be possible today when
combining SELinux and BPF LSM, as one example, depending on their
relative ordering.
Also, for BPF LSM setup, add bpf_prog_load and bpf_prog_free to
sleepable LSM hooks list, as they are both executed in sleepable
context. Also drop bpf_prog_load hook from untrusted, as there is no
issue with refcount or anything else anymore, that originally forced us
to add it to untrusted list in c0c852dd1876 ("bpf: Do not mark certain LSM
hook arguments as trusted"). We now trigger this hook much later and it
should not be an issue anymore.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/9fe88aef7deabbe87d3fc38c4aea3c69.paul@paul-moore.com/
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240124022127.2379740-10-andrii@kernel.org
|
|
Pull io_uring updates from Jens Axboe:
"Mostly just come fixes and cleanups, but one feature as well. In
detail:
- Harden the check for handling IOPOLL based on return (Pavel)
- Various minor optimizations (Pavel)
- Drop remnants of SCM_RIGHTS fd passing support, now that it's no
longer supported since 6.7 (me)
- Fix for a case where bytes_done wasn't initialized properly on a
failure condition for read/write requests (me)
- Move the register related code to a separate file (me)
- Add support for returning the provided ring buffer head (me)
- Add support for adding a direct descriptor to the normal file table
(me, Christian Brauner)
- Fix for ensuring pending task_work for a ring with DEFER_TASKRUN is
run even if we timeout waiting (me)"
* tag 'for-6.8/io_uring-2024-01-08' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux:
io_uring: ensure local task_work is run on wait timeout
io_uring/kbuf: add method for returning provided buffer ring head
io_uring/rw: ensure io->bytes_done is always initialized
io_uring: drop any code related to SCM_RIGHTS
io_uring/unix: drop usage of io_uring socket
io_uring/register: move io_uring_register(2) related code to register.c
io_uring/openclose: add support for IORING_OP_FIXED_FD_INSTALL
io_uring/cmd: inline io_uring_cmd_get_task
io_uring/cmd: inline io_uring_cmd_do_in_task_lazy
io_uring: split out cmd api into a separate header
io_uring: optimise ltimeout for inline execution
io_uring: don't check iopoll if request completes
|
|
Pull header cleanups from Kent Overstreet:
"The goal is to get sched.h down to a type only header, so the main
thing happening in this patchset is splitting out various _types.h
headers and dependency fixups, as well as moving some things out of
sched.h to better locations.
This is prep work for the memory allocation profiling patchset which
adds new sched.h interdepencencies"
* tag 'header_cleanup-2024-01-10' of https://evilpiepirate.org/git/bcachefs: (51 commits)
Kill sched.h dependency on rcupdate.h
kill unnecessary thread_info.h include
Kill unnecessary kernel.h include
preempt.h: Kill dependency on list.h
rseq: Split out rseq.h from sched.h
LoongArch: signal.c: add header file to fix build error
restart_block: Trim includes
lockdep: move held_lock to lockdep_types.h
sem: Split out sem_types.h
uidgid: Split out uidgid_types.h
seccomp: Split out seccomp_types.h
refcount: Split out refcount_types.h
uapi/linux/resource.h: fix include
x86/signal: kill dependency on time.h
syscall_user_dispatch.h: split out *_types.h
mm_types_task.h: Trim dependencies
Split out irqflags_types.h
ipc: Kill bogus dependency on spinlock.h
shm: Slim down dependencies
workqueue: Split out workqueue_types.h
...
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/lsm
Pull security module updates from Paul Moore:
- Add three new syscalls: lsm_list_modules(), lsm_get_self_attr(), and
lsm_set_self_attr().
The first syscall simply lists the LSMs enabled, while the second and
third get and set the current process' LSM attributes. Yes, these
syscalls may provide similar functionality to what can be found under
/proc or /sys, but they were designed to support multiple,
simultaneaous (stacked) LSMs from the start as opposed to the current
/proc based solutions which were created at a time when only one LSM
was allowed to be active at a given time.
We have spent considerable time discussing ways to extend the
existing /proc interfaces to support multiple, simultaneaous LSMs and
even our best ideas have been far too ugly to support as a kernel
API; after +20 years in the kernel, I felt the LSM layer had
established itself enough to justify a handful of syscalls.
Support amongst the individual LSM developers has been nearly
unanimous, with a single objection coming from Tetsuo (TOMOYO) as he
is worried that the LSM_ID_XXX token concept will make it more
difficult for out-of-tree LSMs to survive. Several members of the LSM
community have demonstrated the ability for out-of-tree LSMs to
continue to exist by picking high/unused LSM_ID values as well as
pointing out that many kernel APIs rely on integer identifiers, e.g.
syscalls (!), but unfortunately Tetsuo's objections remain.
My personal opinion is that while I have no interest in penalizing
out-of-tree LSMs, I'm not going to penalize in-tree development to
support out-of-tree development, and I view this as a necessary step
forward to support the push for expanded LSM stacking and reduce our
reliance on /proc and /sys which has occassionally been problematic
for some container users. Finally, we have included the linux-api
folks on (all?) recent revisions of the patchset and addressed all of
their concerns.
- Add a new security_file_ioctl_compat() LSM hook to handle the 32-bit
ioctls on 64-bit systems problem.
This patch includes support for all of the existing LSMs which
provide ioctl hooks, although it turns out only SELinux actually
cares about the individual ioctls. It is worth noting that while
Casey (Smack) and Tetsuo (TOMOYO) did not give explicit ACKs to this
patch, they did both indicate they are okay with the changes.
- Fix a potential memory leak in the CALIPSO code when IPv6 is disabled
at boot.
While it's good that we are fixing this, I doubt this is something
users are seeing in the wild as you need to both disable IPv6 and
then attempt to configure IPv6 labeled networking via
NetLabel/CALIPSO; that just doesn't make much sense.
Normally this would go through netdev, but Jakub asked me to take
this patch and of all the trees I maintain, the LSM tree seemed like
the best fit.
- Update the LSM MAINTAINERS entry with additional information about
our process docs, patchwork, bug reporting, etc.
I also noticed that the Lockdown LSM is missing a dedicated
MAINTAINERS entry so I've added that to the pull request. I've been
working with one of the major Lockdown authors/contributors to see if
they are willing to step up and assume a Lockdown maintainer role;
hopefully that will happen soon, but in the meantime I'll continue to
look after it.
- Add a handful of mailmap entries for Serge Hallyn and myself.
* tag 'lsm-pr-20240105' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/lsm: (27 commits)
lsm: new security_file_ioctl_compat() hook
lsm: Add a __counted_by() annotation to lsm_ctx.ctx
calipso: fix memory leak in netlbl_calipso_add_pass()
selftests: remove the LSM_ID_IMA check in lsm/lsm_list_modules_test
MAINTAINERS: add an entry for the lockdown LSM
MAINTAINERS: update the LSM entry
mailmap: add entries for Serge Hallyn's dead accounts
mailmap: update/replace my old email addresses
lsm: mark the lsm_id variables are marked as static
lsm: convert security_setselfattr() to use memdup_user()
lsm: align based on pointer length in lsm_fill_user_ctx()
lsm: consolidate buffer size handling into lsm_fill_user_ctx()
lsm: correct error codes in security_getselfattr()
lsm: cleanup the size counters in security_getselfattr()
lsm: don't yet account for IMA in LSM_CONFIG_COUNT calculation
lsm: drop LSM_ID_IMA
LSM: selftests for Linux Security Module syscalls
SELinux: Add selfattr hooks
AppArmor: Add selfattr hooks
Smack: implement setselfattr and getselfattr hooks
...
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/selinux
Pull selinux updates from Paul Moore:
- Add a new SELinux initial SID, SECINITSID_INIT, to represent
userspace processes started before the SELinux policy is loaded in
early boot.
Prior to this patch all processes were marked as SECINITSID_KERNEL
before the SELinux policy was loaded, making it difficult to
distinquish early boot userspace processes from the kernel in the
SELinux policy.
For most users this will be a non-issue as the policy is loaded early
enough during boot, but for users who load their SELinux policy
relatively late, this should make it easier to construct meaningful
security policies.
- Cleanups to the selinuxfs code by Al, mostly on VFS related issues
during a policy reload.
The commit description has more detail, but the quick summary is that
we are replacing a disconnected directory approach with a temporary
directory that we swapover at the end of the reload.
- Fix an issue where the input sanity checking on socket bind()
operations was slightly different depending on the presence of
SELinux.
This is caused by the placement of the LSM hooks in the generic
socket layer as opposed to the protocol specific bind() handler where
the protocol specific sanity checks are performed. Mickaël has
mentioned that he is working to fix this, but in the meantime we just
ensure that we are replicating the checks properly.
We need to balance the placement of the LSM hooks with the number of
LSM hooks; pushing the hooks down into the protocol layers is likely
not the right answer.
- Update the avc_has_perm_noaudit() prototype to better match the
function definition.
- Migrate from using partial_name_hash() to full_name_hash() the
filename transition hash table.
This improves the quality of the code and has the potential for a
minor performance bump.
- Consolidate some open coded SELinux access vector comparisions into a
single new function, avtab_node_cmp(), and use that instead.
A small, but nice win for code quality and maintainability.
- Updated the SELinux MAINTAINERS entry with additional information
around process, bug reporting, etc.
We're also updating some of our "official" roles: dropping Eric Paris
and adding Ondrej as a reviewer.
- Cleanup the coding style crimes in security/selinux/include.
While I'm not a fan of code churn, I am pushing for more automated
code checks that can be done at the developer level and one of the
obvious things to check for is coding style.
In an effort to start from a "good" base I'm slowly working through
our source files cleaning them up with the help of clang-format and
good ol' fashioned human eyeballs; this has the first batch of these
changes.
I've been splitting the changes up per-file to help reduce the impact
if backports are required (either for LTS or distro kernels), and I
expect the some of the larger files, e.g. hooks.c and ss/services.c,
will likely need to be split even further.
- Cleanup old, outdated comments.
* tag 'selinux-pr-20240105' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/selinux: (24 commits)
selinux: Fix error priority for bind with AF_UNSPEC on PF_INET6 socket
selinux: fix style issues in security/selinux/include/initial_sid_to_string.h
selinux: fix style issues in security/selinux/include/xfrm.h
selinux: fix style issues in security/selinux/include/security.h
selinux: fix style issues with security/selinux/include/policycap_names.h
selinux: fix style issues in security/selinux/include/policycap.h
selinux: fix style issues in security/selinux/include/objsec.h
selinux: fix style issues with security/selinux/include/netlabel.h
selinux: fix style issues in security/selinux/include/netif.h
selinux: fix style issues in security/selinux/include/ima.h
selinux: fix style issues in security/selinux/include/conditional.h
selinux: fix style issues in security/selinux/include/classmap.h
selinux: fix style issues in security/selinux/include/avc_ss.h
selinux: align avc_has_perm_noaudit() prototype with definition
selinux: fix style issues in security/selinux/include/avc.h
selinux: fix style issues in security/selinux/include/audit.h
MAINTAINERS: drop Eric Paris from his SELinux role
MAINTAINERS: add Ondrej Mosnacek as a SELinux reviewer
selinux: remove the wrong comment about multithreaded process handling
selinux: introduce an initial SID for early boot processes
...
|
|
The IPv6 network stack first checks the sockaddr length (-EINVAL error)
before checking the family (-EAFNOSUPPORT error).
This was discovered thanks to commit a549d055a22e ("selftests/landlock:
Add network tests").
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>
Cc: Konstantin Meskhidze <konstantin.meskhidze@huawei.com>
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0584f91c-537c-4188-9e4f-04f192565667@collabora.com
Fixes: 0f8db8cc73df ("selinux: add AF_UNSPEC and INADDR_ANY checks to selinux_socket_bind()")
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
Tested-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
Some ioctl commands do not require ioctl permission, but are routed to
other permissions such as FILE_GETATTR or FILE_SETATTR. This routing is
done by comparing the ioctl cmd to a set of 64-bit flags (FS_IOC_*).
However, if a 32-bit process is running on a 64-bit kernel, it emits
32-bit flags (FS_IOC32_*) for certain ioctl operations. These flags are
being checked erroneously, which leads to these ioctl operations being
routed to the ioctl permission, rather than the correct file
permissions.
This was also noted in a RED-PEN finding from a while back -
"/* RED-PEN how should LSM module know it's handling 32bit? */".
This patch introduces a new hook, security_file_ioctl_compat(), that is
called from the compat ioctl syscall. All current LSMs have been changed
to support this hook.
Reviewing the three places where we are currently using
security_file_ioctl(), it appears that only SELinux needs a dedicated
compat change; TOMOYO and SMACK appear to be functional without any
change.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 0b24dcb7f2f7 ("Revert "selinux: simplify ioctl checking"")
Signed-off-by: Alfred Piccioni <alpic@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>
[PM: subject tweak, line length fixes, and alignment corrections]
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
A trivial correction to convert an 'unsigned' parameter into an
'unsigned int' parameter so the prototype matches the function
definition.
I really thought that someone submitted a patch for this a few years
ago but sadly I can't find it now.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and
provide more tools for individual developers to validate their
patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code
"clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our
style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their
patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their
changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code.
Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
|
|
list_head is in types.h, not list.h., and the uapi header wasn't needed.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
|
|
This code is rarely (never?) enabled by distros, and it hasn't caught
anything in decades. Let's kill off this legacy debug code.
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
|
|
linux/io_uring.h is slowly becoming a rubbish bin where we put
anything exposed to other subsystems. For instance, the task exit
hooks and io_uring cmd infra are completely orthogonal and don't need
each other's definitions. Start cleaning it up by splitting out all
command bits into a new header file.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7ec50bae6e21f371d3850796e716917fc141225a.1701391955.git.asml.silence@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
|
