summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2025-03-07 12:22:41 -1000
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2025-03-07 12:22:41 -1000
commit21e4543a2e2f8538373d1d19264c4bae6f13e798 (patch)
treecbf6e8b157c4c1a4935131d5bca1aea6b60bf829
parentd4fd25b6f883db41194e1760041560779d412d98 (diff)
parentdfd3df31c9db752234d7d2e09bef2aeabb643ce4 (diff)
Merge tag 'slab-for-6.14-rc5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vbabka/slab
Pull slab fix from Vlastimil Babka: - Stable fix for kmem_cache_destroy() called from a WQ_MEM_RECLAIM workqueue causing a warning due to the new kvfree_rcu_barrier() (Uladzislau Rezki) * tag 'slab-for-6.14-rc5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vbabka/slab: mm/slab/kvfree_rcu: Switch to WQ_MEM_RECLAIM wq
-rw-r--r--mm/slab_common.c14
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/mm/slab_common.c b/mm/slab_common.c
index 4030907b6b7d..4c9f0a87f733 100644
--- a/mm/slab_common.c
+++ b/mm/slab_common.c
@@ -1304,6 +1304,8 @@ module_param(rcu_min_cached_objs, int, 0444);
static int rcu_delay_page_cache_fill_msec = 5000;
module_param(rcu_delay_page_cache_fill_msec, int, 0444);
+static struct workqueue_struct *rcu_reclaim_wq;
+
/* Maximum number of jiffies to wait before draining a batch. */
#define KFREE_DRAIN_JIFFIES (5 * HZ)
#define KFREE_N_BATCHES 2
@@ -1632,10 +1634,10 @@ __schedule_delayed_monitor_work(struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp)
if (delayed_work_pending(&krcp->monitor_work)) {
delay_left = krcp->monitor_work.timer.expires - jiffies;
if (delay < delay_left)
- mod_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq, &krcp->monitor_work, delay);
+ mod_delayed_work(rcu_reclaim_wq, &krcp->monitor_work, delay);
return;
}
- queue_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq, &krcp->monitor_work, delay);
+ queue_delayed_work(rcu_reclaim_wq, &krcp->monitor_work, delay);
}
static void
@@ -1733,7 +1735,7 @@ kvfree_rcu_queue_batch(struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp)
// "free channels", the batch can handle. Break
// the loop since it is done with this CPU thus
// queuing an RCU work is _always_ success here.
- queued = queue_rcu_work(system_unbound_wq, &krwp->rcu_work);
+ queued = queue_rcu_work(rcu_reclaim_wq, &krwp->rcu_work);
WARN_ON_ONCE(!queued);
break;
}
@@ -1883,7 +1885,7 @@ run_page_cache_worker(struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp)
if (rcu_scheduler_active == RCU_SCHEDULER_RUNNING &&
!atomic_xchg(&krcp->work_in_progress, 1)) {
if (atomic_read(&krcp->backoff_page_cache_fill)) {
- queue_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq,
+ queue_delayed_work(rcu_reclaim_wq,
&krcp->page_cache_work,
msecs_to_jiffies(rcu_delay_page_cache_fill_msec));
} else {
@@ -2120,6 +2122,10 @@ void __init kvfree_rcu_init(void)
int i, j;
struct shrinker *kfree_rcu_shrinker;
+ rcu_reclaim_wq = alloc_workqueue("kvfree_rcu_reclaim",
+ WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM, 0);
+ WARN_ON(!rcu_reclaim_wq);
+
/* Clamp it to [0:100] seconds interval. */
if (rcu_delay_page_cache_fill_msec < 0 ||
rcu_delay_page_cache_fill_msec > 100 * MSEC_PER_SEC) {