summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/sh/kernel/syscalls
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-02-07y2038: use time32 syscall names on 32-bitArnd Bergmann
This is the big flip, where all 32-bit architectures set COMPAT_32BIT_TIME and use the _time32 system calls from the former compat layer instead of the system calls that take __kernel_timespec and similar arguments. The temporary redirects for __kernel_timespec, __kernel_itimerspec and __kernel_timex can get removed with this. It would be easy to split this commit by architecture, but with the new generated system call tables, it's easy enough to do it all at once, which makes it a little easier to check that the changes are the same in each table. Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2019-01-25arch: add pkey and rseq syscall numbers everywhereArnd Bergmann
Most architectures define system call numbers for the rseq and pkey system calls, even when they don't support the features, and perhaps never will. Only a few architectures are missing these, so just define them anyway for consistency. If we decide to add them later to one of these, the system call numbers won't get out of sync then. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
2019-01-25arch: add split IPC system calls where neededArnd Bergmann
The IPC system call handling is highly inconsistent across architectures, some use sys_ipc, some use separate calls, and some use both. We also have some architectures that require passing IPC_64 in the flags, and others that set it implicitly. For the addition of a y2038 safe semtimedop() system call, I chose to only support the separate entry points, but that requires first supporting the regular ones with their own syscall numbers. The IPC_64 is now implied by the new semctl/shmctl/msgctl system calls even on the architectures that require passing it with the ipc() multiplexer. I'm not adding the new semtimedop() or semop() on 32-bit architectures, those will get implemented using the new semtimedop_time64() version that gets added along with the other time64 calls. Three 64-bit architectures (powerpc, s390 and sparc) get semtimedop(). Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
2019-01-25sh: add statx system callArnd Bergmann
statx is available on almost all other architectures but got missed on sh, so add it now. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2018-12-19sh: add system call table generation supportFiroz Khan
The system call tables are in different format in all architecture and it will be difficult to manually add, modify or delete the syscall table entries in the res- pective files. To make it easy by keeping a script and which will generate the uapi header and syscall table file. This change will also help to unify the implemen- tation across all architectures. The system call table generation script is added in kernel/syscalls directory which contain the scripts to generate both uapi header file and system call table files. The syscall.tbl will be input for the scripts. syscall.tbl contains the list of available system calls along with system call number and corresponding entry point. Add a new system call in this architecture will be possible by adding new entry in the syscall.tbl file. Adding a new table entry consisting of: - System call number. - ABI. - System call name. - Entry point name. syscallhdr.sh and syscalltbl.sh will generate uapi header unistd_32.h and syscall_table.h files respectively. Both .sh files will parse the content syscall.tbl to generate the header and table files. unistd_32.h will be included by uapi/asm/unistd.h and syscall_table.h is included by kernel/syscall_32.S - the real system call table. Please note, this support is only available for 32-bit kernel, not 64-bit kernel. As I came across the 64-bit kernel is not active for long time. ARM, s390 and x86 architecuture does have similar support. I leverage their implementation to come up with a generic solution. Signed-off-by: Firoz Khan <firoz.khan@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>