summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2023-10-24x86/microcode: Provide new control functionsThomas Gleixner
The current all in one code is unreadable and really not suited for adding future features like uniform loading with package or system scope. Provide a set of new control functions which split the handling of the primary and secondary CPUs. These will replace the current rendezvous all in one function in the next step. This is intentionally a separate change because diff makes an complete unreadable mess otherwise. So the flow separates the primary and the secondary CPUs into their own functions which use the control field in the per CPU ucode_ctrl struct. primary() secondary() wait_for_all() wait_for_all() apply_ucode() wait_for_release() release() apply_ucode() Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115903.377922731@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode: Add per CPU control fieldThomas Gleixner
Add a per CPU control field to ucode_ctrl and define constants for it which are going to be used to control the loading state machine. In theory this could be a global control field, but a global control does not cover the following case: 15 primary CPUs load microcode successfully 1 primary CPU fails and returns with an error code With global control the sibling of the failed CPU would either try again or the whole operation would be aborted with the consequence that the 15 siblings do not invoke the apply path and end up with inconsistent software state. The result in dmesg would be inconsistent too. There are two additional fields added and initialized: ctrl_cpu and secondaries. ctrl_cpu is the CPU number of the primary thread for now, but with the upcoming uniform loading at package or system scope this will be one CPU per package or just one CPU. Secondaries hands the control CPU a CPU mask which will be required to release the secondary CPUs out of the wait loop. Preparatory change for implementing a properly split control flow for primary and secondary CPUs. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115903.319959519@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode: Add per CPU result stateThomas Gleixner
The microcode rendezvous is purely acting on global state, which does not allow to analyze fails in a coherent way. Introduce per CPU state where the results are written into, which allows to analyze the return codes of the individual CPUs. Initialize the state when walking the cpu_present_mask in the online check to avoid another for_each_cpu() loop. Enhance the result print out with that. The structure is intentionally named ucode_ctrl as it will gain control fields in subsequent changes. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231017211723.632681010@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode: Sanitize __wait_for_cpus()Thomas Gleixner
The code is too complicated for no reason: - The return value is pointless as this is a strict boolean. - It's way simpler to count down from num_online_cpus() and check for zero. - The timeout argument is pointless as this is always one second. - Touching the NMI watchdog every 100ns does not make any sense, neither does checking every 100ns. This is really not a hotpath operation. Preload the atomic counter with the number of online CPUs and simplify the whole timeout logic. Delay for one microsecond and touch the NMI watchdog once per millisecond. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115903.204251527@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode: Clarify the late load logicThomas Gleixner
reload_store() is way too complicated. Split the inner workings out and make the following enhancements: - Taint the kernel only when the microcode was actually updated. If. e.g. the rendezvous fails, then nothing happened and there is no reason for tainting. - Return useful error codes Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115903.145048840@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode: Handle "nosmt" correctlyThomas Gleixner
On CPUs where microcode loading is not NMI-safe the SMT siblings which are parked in one of the play_dead() variants still react to NMIs. So if an NMI hits while the primary thread updates the microcode the resulting behaviour is undefined. The default play_dead() implementation on modern CPUs is using MWAIT which is not guaranteed to be safe against a microcode update which affects MWAIT. Take the cpus_booted_once_mask into account to detect this case and refuse to load late if the vendor specific driver does not advertise that late loading is NMI safe. AMD stated that this is safe, so mark the AMD driver accordingly. This requirement will be partially lifted in later changes. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115903.087472735@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode: Clean up mc_cpu_down_prep()Thomas Gleixner
This function has nothing to do with suspend. It's a hotplug callback. Remove the bogus comment. Drop the pointless debug printk. The hotplug core provides tracepoints which track the invocation of those callbacks. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115903.028651784@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode: Get rid of the schedule work indirectionThomas Gleixner
Scheduling work on all CPUs to collect the microcode information is just another extra step for no value. Let the CPU hotplug callback registration do it. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231017211723.354748138@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode: Mop up early loading leftoversThomas Gleixner
Get rid of the initrd_gone hack which was required to keep find_microcode_in_initrd() functional after init. As find_microcode_in_initrd() is now only used during init, mark it accordingly. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231017211723.298854846@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode/amd: Use cached microcode for AP loadThomas Gleixner
Now that the microcode cache is initialized before the APs are brought up, there is no point in scanning builtin/initrd microcode during AP loading. Convert the AP loader to utilize the cache, which in turn makes the CPU hotplug callback which applies the microcode after initrd/builtin is gone, obsolete as the early loading during late hotplug operations including the resume path depends now only on the cache. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231017211723.243426023@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode/amd: Cache builtin/initrd microcode earlyThomas Gleixner
There is no reason to scan builtin/initrd microcode on each AP. Cache the builtin/initrd microcode in an early initcall so that the early AP loader can utilize the cache. The existing fs initcall which invoked save_microcode_in_initrd_amd() is still required to maintain the initrd_gone flag. Rename it accordingly. This will be removed once the AP loader code is converted to use the cache. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231017211723.187566507@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode/amd: Cache builtin microcode tooThomas Gleixner
save_microcode_in_initrd_amd() fails to cache builtin microcode and only scans initrd. Use find_blobs_in_containers() instead which covers both. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231010150702.495139089@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode/amd: Use correct per CPU ucode_cpu_infoThomas Gleixner
find_blobs_in_containers() is invoked on every CPU but overwrites unconditionally ucode_cpu_info of CPU0. Fix this by using the proper CPU data and move the assignment into the call site apply_ucode_from_containers() so that the function can be reused. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231010150702.433454320@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode: Remove pointless apply() invocationThomas Gleixner
Microcode is applied on the APs during early bringup. There is no point in trying to apply the microcode again during the hotplug operations and neither at the point where the microcode device is initialized. Collect CPU info and microcode revision in setup_online_cpu() for now. This will move to the CPU hotplug callback later. [ bp: Leave the starting notifier for the following scenario: - boot, late load, suspend to disk, resume without the starting notifier, only the last core manages to update the microcode upon resume: # rdmsr -a 0x8b 10000bf 10000bf 10000bf 10000bf 10000bf 10000dc <---- This is on an AMD F10h machine. For the future, one should check whether potential unification of the CPU init path could cover the resume path too so that this can be simplified even more. tglx: This is caused by the odd handling of APs which try to find the microcode blob in builtin or initrd instead of caching the microcode blob during early init before the APs are brought up. Will be cleaned up in a later step. ] Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231017211723.018821624@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode/intel: Rework intel_find_matching_signature()Thomas Gleixner
Take a cpu_signature argument and work from there. Move the match() helper next to the callsite as there is no point for having it in a header. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115902.797820205@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode/intel: Reuse intel_cpu_collect_info()Thomas Gleixner
No point for an almost duplicate function. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115902.741173606@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode/intel: Rework intel_cpu_collect_info()Thomas Gleixner
Nothing needs struct ucode_cpu_info. Make it take struct cpu_signature, let it return a boolean and simplify the implementation. Rename it now that the silly name clash with collect_cpu_info() is gone. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231017211722.851573238@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode/intel: Unify microcode apply() functionsThomas Gleixner
Deduplicate the early and late apply() functions. [ bp: Rename the function which does the actual application to __apply_microcode() to differentiate it from microcode_ops.apply_microcode(). ] Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231017211722.795508212@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode/intel: Switch to kvmalloc()Thomas Gleixner
Microcode blobs are getting larger and might soon reach the kmalloc() limit. Switch over kvmalloc(). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115902.564323243@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode/intel: Save the microcode only after a successful late-loadThomas Gleixner
There are situations where the late microcode is loaded into memory but is not applied: 1) The rendezvous fails 2) The microcode is rejected by the CPUs If any of this happens then the pointer which was updated at firmware load time is stale and subsequent CPU hotplug operations either fail to update or create inconsistent microcode state. Save the loaded microcode in a separate pointer before the late load is attempted and when successful, update the hotplug pointer accordingly via a new microcode_ops callback. Remove the pointless fallback in the loader to a microcode pointer which is never populated. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115902.505491309@linutronix.de
2023-10-24x86/microcode/intel: Simplify early loadingThomas Gleixner
The early loading code is overly complicated: - It scans the builtin/initrd for microcode not only on the BSP, but also on all APs during early boot and then later in the boot process it scans again to duplicate and save the microcode before initrd goes away. That's a pointless exercise because this can be simply done before bringing up the APs when the memory allocator is up and running. - Saving the microcode from within the scan loop is completely non-obvious and a left over of the microcode cache. This can be done at the call site now which makes it obvious. Rework the code so that only the BSP scans the builtin/initrd microcode once during early boot and save it away in an early initcall for later use. [ bp: Test and fold in a fix from tglx ontop which handles the need to distinguish what save_microcode() does depending on when it is called: - when on the BSP during early load, it needs to find a newer revision than the one currently loaded on the BSP - later, before SMP init, it still runs on the BSP and gets the BSP revision just loaded and uses that revision to know which patch to save for the APs. For that it needs to find the exact one as on the BSP. ] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231017211722.629085215@linutronix.de
2023-10-19x86/microcode/intel: Cleanup code furtherThomas Gleixner
Sanitize the microcode scan loop, fixup printks and move the loading function for builtin microcode next to the place where it is used and mark it __init. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115902.389400871@linutronix.de
2023-10-19x86/microcode/intel: Simplify and rename generic_load_microcode()Thomas Gleixner
so it becomes less obfuscated and rename it because there is nothing generic about it. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115902.330295409@linutronix.de
2023-10-19x86/microcode/intel: Simplify scan_microcode()Thomas Gleixner
Make it readable and comprehensible. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231002115902.271940980@linutronix.de
2023-10-19x86/microcode/intel: Rip out mixed stepping support for Intel CPUsAshok Raj
Mixed steppings aren't supported on Intel CPUs. Only one microcode patch is required for the entire system. The caching of microcode blobs which match the family and model is therefore pointless and in fact is dysfunctional as CPU hotplug updates use only a single microcode blob, i.e. the one where *intel_ucode_patch points to. Remove the microcode cache and make it an AMD local feature. [ tglx: - save only at the end. Otherwise random microcode ends up in the pointer for early loading - free the ucode patch pointer in save_microcode_patch() only after kmemdup() has succeeded, as reported by Andrew Cooper ] Originally-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231017211722.404362809@linutronix.de
2023-10-18x86/microcode/32: Move early loading after paging enableThomas Gleixner
32-bit loads microcode before paging is enabled. The commit which introduced that has zero justification in the changelog. The cover letter has slightly more content, but it does not give any technical justification either: "The problem in current microcode loading method is that we load a microcode way, way too late; ideally we should load it before turning paging on. This may only be practical on 32 bits since we can't get to 64-bit mode without paging on, but we should still do it as early as at all possible." Handwaving word salad with zero technical content. Someone claimed in an offlist conversation that this is required for curing the ATOM erratum AAE44/AAF40/AAG38/AAH41. That erratum requires an microcode update in order to make the usage of PSE safe. But during early boot, PSE is completely irrelevant and it is evaluated way later. Neither is it relevant for the AP on single core HT enabled CPUs as the microcode loading on the AP is not doing anything. On dual core CPUs there is a theoretical problem if a split of an executable large page between enabling paging including PSE and loading the microcode happens. But that's only theoretical, it's practically irrelevant because the affected dual core CPUs are 64bit enabled and therefore have paging and PSE enabled before loading the microcode on the second core. So why would it work on 64-bit but not on 32-bit? The erratum: "AAG38 Code Fetch May Occur to Incorrect Address After a Large Page is Split Into 4-Kbyte Pages Problem: If software clears the PS (page size) bit in a present PDE (page directory entry), that will cause linear addresses mapped through this PDE to use 4-KByte pages instead of using a large page after old TLB entries are invalidated. Due to this erratum, if a code fetch uses this PDE before the TLB entry for the large page is invalidated then it may fetch from a different physical address than specified by either the old large page translation or the new 4-KByte page translation. This erratum may also cause speculative code fetches from incorrect addresses." The practical relevance for this is exactly zero because there is no splitting of large text pages during early boot-time, i.e. between paging enable and microcode loading, and neither during CPU hotplug. IOW, this load microcode before paging enable is yet another voodoo programming solution in search of a problem. What's worse is that it causes at least two serious problems: 1) When stackprotector is enabled, the microcode loader code has the stackprotector mechanics enabled. The read from the per CPU variable __stack_chk_guard is always accessing the virtual address either directly on UP or via %fs on SMP. In physical address mode this results in an access to memory above 3GB. So this works by chance as the hardware returns the same value when there is no RAM at this physical address. When there is RAM populated above 3G then the read is by chance the same as nothing changes that memory during the very early boot stage. That's not necessarily true during runtime CPU hotplug. 2) When function tracing is enabled, the relevant microcode loader functions and the functions invoked from there will call into the tracing code and evaluate global and per CPU variables in physical address mode. What could potentially go wrong? Cure this and move the microcode loading after the early paging enable, use the new temporary initrd mapping and remove the gunk in the microcode loader which is required to handle physical address mode. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231017211722.348298216@linutronix.de
2023-10-17x86/microcode/amd: Fix snprintf() format string warning in W=1 buildPaolo Bonzini
Building with GCC 11.x results in the following warning: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c: In function ‘find_blobs_in_containers’: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c:504:58: error: ‘h.bin’ directive output may be truncated writing 5 bytes into a region of size between 1 and 7 [-Werror=format-truncation=] arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/amd.c:503:17: note: ‘snprintf’ output between 35 and 41 bytes into a destination of size 36 The issue is that GCC does not know that the family can only be a byte (it ultimately comes from CPUID). Suggest the right size to the compiler by marking the argument as char-size ("hh"). While at it, instead of using the slightly more obscure precision specifier use the width with zero padding (over 23000 occurrences in kernel sources, vs 500 for the idiom using the precision). Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308252255.2HPJ6x5Q-lkp@intel.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231016224858.2829248-1-pbonzini@redhat.com
2023-08-26x86/microcode: Remove remaining references to CONFIG_MICROCODE_AMDLukas Bulwahn
Commit e6bcfdd75d53 ("x86/microcode: Hide the config knob") removed the MICROCODE_AMD config, but left some references in defconfigs and comments, that have no effect on any kernel build around. Clean up those remaining config references. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230825141226.13566-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com
2023-08-13x86/microcode/intel: Remove pointless mutexThomas Gleixner
There is no concurrency. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230812195728.069849788@linutronix.de
2023-08-13x86/microcode/intel: Remove debug codeThomas Gleixner
This is really of dubious value. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230812195728.010895747@linutronix.de
2023-08-13x86/microcode: Move core specific defines to local headerThomas Gleixner
There is no reason to expose all of this globally. Move everything which is not required outside of the microcode specific code to local header files and into the respective source files. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230812195727.952876381@linutronix.de
2023-08-13x86/microcode/intel: Rename get_datasize() since its used externallyAshok Raj
Rename get_datasize() to intel_microcode_get_datasize() and make it an inline. [ tglx: Make the argument typed and fix up the IFS code ] Suggested-by: Boris Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230812195727.894165745@linutronix.de
2023-08-13x86/microcode: Make reload_early_microcode() staticThomas Gleixner
fe055896c040 ("x86/microcode: Merge the early microcode loader") left this needlessly public. Git archaeology provided by Borislav. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230812195727.834943153@linutronix.de
2023-08-13x86/microcode: Include vendor headers into microcode.hAshok Raj
Currently vendor specific headers are included explicitly when used in common code. Instead, include the vendor specific headers in microcode.h, and include that in all usages. No functional change. Suggested-by: Boris Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230812195727.776541545@linutronix.de
2023-08-13x86/microcode/intel: Move microcode functions out of cpu/intel.cThomas Gleixner
There is really no point to have that in the CPUID evaluation code. Move it into the Intel-specific microcode handling along with the data structures, defines and helpers required by it. The exports need to stay for IFS. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230812195727.719202319@linutronix.de
2023-08-13x86/microcode: Hide the config knobThomas Gleixner
In reality CONFIG_MICROCODE is enabled in any reasonable configuration when Intel or AMD support is enabled. Accommodate to reality. Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230812195727.660453052@linutronix.de
2023-08-08x86/microcode: Remove microcode_mutexSebastian Andrzej Siewior
microcode_mutex is only used by reload_store(). It has a comment saying "to synchronize with each other". Other user of this mutex have been removed in the commits 181b6f40e9ea8 ("x86/microcode: Rip out the OLD_INTERFACE"). b6f86689d5b74 ("x86/microcode: Rip out the subsys interface gunk") The sysfs interface does not need additional synchronisation vs itself because it is provided as kernfs_ops::mutex which is acquired in kernfs_fop_write_iter(). Remove the superfluous microcode_mutex. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Reviewed-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230804075853.JF_n6GXC@linutronix.de
2023-07-27x86/microcode/AMD: Rip out static buffersBorislav Petkov (AMD)
Load straight from the containers (initrd or builtin, for example). There's no need to cache the patch per node. This even simplifies the code a bit with the opportunity for more cleanups later. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Tested-by: John Allen <john.allen@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230720202813.3269888-1-john.allen@amd.com
2023-06-12x86/microcode/AMD: Load late on both threads tooBorislav Petkov (AMD)
Do the same as early loading - load on both threads. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230605141332.25948-1-bp@alien8.de
2023-05-08x86/microcode/amd: Remove unneeded pointer arithmeticNathan Fontenot
Remove unneeded pointer increment arithmetic, the pointer is set at the beginning of the loop. Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot <nathan.fontenot@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230502174232.73880-1-nathan.fontenot@amd.com
2023-05-08x86/microcode/AMD: Get rid of __find_equiv_id()Borislav Petkov (AMD)
Merge it into its only call site. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230227160352.7260-1-bp@alien8.de
2023-04-27Merge tag 'driver-core-6.4-rc1' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core Pull driver core updates from Greg KH: "Here is the large set of driver core changes for 6.4-rc1. Once again, a busy development cycle, with lots of changes happening in the driver core in the quest to be able to move "struct bus" and "struct class" into read-only memory, a task now complete with these changes. This will make the future rust interactions with the driver core more "provably correct" as well as providing more obvious lifetime rules for all busses and classes in the kernel. The changes required for this did touch many individual classes and busses as many callbacks were changed to take const * parameters instead. All of these changes have been submitted to the various subsystem maintainers, giving them plenty of time to review, and most of them actually did so. Other than those changes, included in here are a small set of other things: - kobject logging improvements - cacheinfo improvements and updates - obligatory fw_devlink updates and fixes - documentation updates - device property cleanups and const * changes - firwmare loader dependency fixes. All of these have been in linux-next for a while with no reported problems" * tag 'driver-core-6.4-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core: (120 commits) device property: make device_property functions take const device * driver core: update comments in device_rename() driver core: Don't require dynamic_debug for initcall_debug probe timing firmware_loader: rework crypto dependencies firmware_loader: Strip off \n from customized path zram: fix up permission for the hot_add sysfs file cacheinfo: Add use_arch[|_cache]_info field/function arch_topology: Remove early cacheinfo error message if -ENOENT cacheinfo: Check cache properties are present in DT cacheinfo: Check sib_leaf in cache_leaves_are_shared() cacheinfo: Allow early level detection when DT/ACPI info is missing/broken cacheinfo: Add arm64 early level initializer implementation cacheinfo: Add arch specific early level initializer tty: make tty_class a static const structure driver core: class: remove struct class_interface * from callbacks driver core: class: mark the struct class in struct class_interface constant driver core: class: make class_register() take a const * driver core: class: mark class_release() as taking a const * driver core: remove incorrect comment for device_create* MIPS: vpe-cmp: remove module owner pointer from struct class usage. ...
2023-03-30docs: move x86 documentation into Documentation/arch/Jonathan Corbet
Move the x86 documentation under Documentation/arch/ as a way of cleaning up the top-level directory and making the structure of our docs more closely match the structure of the source directories it describes. All in-kernel references to the old paths have been updated. Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230315211523.108836-1-corbet@lwn.net/ Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
2023-03-17x86/microcode: move to use bus_get_dev_root()Greg Kroah-Hartman
Direct access to the struct bus_type dev_root pointer is going away soon so replace that with a call to bus_get_dev_root() instead, which is what it is there for. Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230313182918.1312597-9-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-02-06x86/microcode/core: Return an error only when necessaryBorislav Petkov (AMD)
Return an error from the late loading function which is run on each CPU only when an error has actually been encountered during the update. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230130161709.11615-5-bp@alien8.de
2023-02-06x86/microcode/AMD: Fix mixed steppings supportBorislav Petkov (AMD)
The AMD side of the loader has always claimed to support mixed steppings. But somewhere along the way, it broke that by assuming that the cached patch blob is a single one instead of it being one per *node*. So turn it into a per-node one so that each node can stash the blob relevant for it. [ NB: Fixes tag is not really the exactly correct one but it is good enough. ] Fixes: fe055896c040 ("x86/microcode: Merge the early microcode loader") Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # 2355370cd941 ("x86/microcode/amd: Remove load_microcode_amd()'s bsp parameter") Cc: <stable@kernel.org> # a5ad92134bd1 ("x86/microcode/AMD: Add a @cpu parameter to the reloading functions") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230130161709.11615-4-bp@alien8.de
2023-02-06x86/microcode/AMD: Add a @cpu parameter to the reloading functionsBorislav Petkov (AMD)
Will be used in a subsequent change. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230130161709.11615-3-bp@alien8.de
2023-02-06x86/microcode/amd: Remove load_microcode_amd()'s bsp parameterBorislav Petkov (AMD)
It is always the BSP. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230130161709.11615-2-bp@alien8.de
2023-01-31x86/microcode: Allow only "1" as a late reload trigger valueAshok Raj
Microcode gets reloaded late only if "1" is written to the reload file. However, the code silently treats any other unsigned integer as a successful write even though no actions are performed to load microcode. Make the loader more strict to accept only "1" as a trigger value and return an error otherwise. [ bp: Massage commit message. ] Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230130213955.6046-3-ashok.raj@intel.com
2023-01-21x86/microcode/intel: Print old and new revision during early bootAshok Raj
Make early loading message match late loading message and print both old and new revisions. This is helpful to know what the BIOS loaded revision is before an early update. Cache the early BIOS revision before the microcode update and have print_ucode_info() print both the old and new revision in the same format as microcode_reload_late(). [ bp: Massage, remove useless comment. ] Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230120161923.118882-6-ashok.raj@intel.com