| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The perf tool allows users to create event groups through following
cmd [1], but the driver does not check whether the array index is out of
bounds when writing data to the event_group array. If the number of events
in an event_group is greater than HISI_PCIE_MAX_COUNTERS, the memory write
overflow of event_group array occurs.
Add array index check to fix the possible array out of bounds violation,
and return directly when write new events are written to array bounds.
There are 9 different events in an event_group.
[1] perf stat -e '{pmu/event1/, ... ,pmu/event9/}'
Fixes: 8404b0fbc7fb ("drivers/perf: hisi: Add driver for HiSilicon PCIe PMU")
Signed-off-by: Junhao He <hejunhao3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jijie Shao <shaojijie@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240425124627.13764-2-hejunhao3@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
SBI v2.0 SBI introduced PMU snapshot feature which adds the following
features.
1. Read counter values directly from the shared memory instead of
csr read.
2. Start multiple counters with initial values with one SBI call.
These functionalities optimizes the number of traps to the higher
privilege mode. If the kernel is in VS mode while the hypervisor
deploy trap & emulate method, this would minimize all the hpmcounter
CSR read traps. If the kernel is running in S-mode, the benefits
reduced to CSR latency vs DRAM/cache latency as there is no trap
involved while accessing the hpmcounter CSRs.
In both modes, it does saves the number of ecalls while starting
multiple counter together with an initial values. This is a likely
scenario if multiple counters overflow at the same time.
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Reviewed-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240420151741.962500-10-atishp@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
|
|
For RV32, used_hw_ctrs can have more than 1 word if the firmware chooses
to interleave firmware/hardware counters indicies. Even though it's a
unlikely scenario, handle that case by iterating over all the words
instead of just using the first word.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240420151741.962500-9-atishp@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
|
|
It is a good practice to use BIT() instead of (1 << x).
Replace the current usages with BIT().
Take this opportunity to replace few (1UL << x) with BIT() as well
for consistency.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240420151741.962500-5-atishp@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
|
|
SBI v2.0 introduced a explicit function to read the upper 32 bits
for any firmware counter width that is longer than 32bits.
This is only applicable for RV32 where firmware counter can be
64 bit.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240420151741.962500-4-atishp@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
|
|
The counter overflow CSR name is "scountovf" not "sscountovf".
Fix the csr name.
Fixes: 4905ec2fb7e6 ("RISC-V: Add sscofpmf extension support")
Reviewed-by: Clément Léger <cleger@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240420151741.962500-2-atishp@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
|
|
Currently the PMU device appears directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parent to be the platform device.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/
Acked-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-24-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently the PMU device appears directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parent to be the platform device.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-23-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently the PMU device appears directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parent to be the platform device.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-22-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently the PMU device appears directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parent to be the platform device.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-21-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently the PMU device appears directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parent to be the platform device.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/
Acked-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-20-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently the PMU device appears directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parent to be the platform device.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-19-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently the PMU device appears directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parent to be the platform device.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/
Reviewed-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-18-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently the PMU device appears directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parent to be the platform device.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-17-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently all this device appear directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parent to be the platform device.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/
Cc: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-16-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently all these devices appear directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parents to be the platform devices.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-15-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently all these devices appear directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parents to be the appropriate platform devices.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/
Cc: Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>
CC: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-13-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently all these devices appear directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parents to be the platform device.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/
Cc: Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-12-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently all these devices appear directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parents to be the hardware related struct device.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/
Cc: Khuong Dinh <khuong@os.amperecomputing.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-10-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently all these devices appear directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parents to be the platform device.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-8-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently all these devices appear directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parents to be the platform device.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/
Reviewed-by: Jiucheng Xu <jiucheng.xu@amlogic.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-7-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently the PMU device appears directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parent to be the PCI device.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-6-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently the PMU device appears directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parent to be the platform device.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-4-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Currently the PMU device appears directly under /sys/devices/
Only root busses should appear there, so instead assign the pmu->dev
parent to be the PCI device.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/ZCLI9A40PJsyqAmq@kroah.com/
Reviewed-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240412161057.14099-2-Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Now that perf supports giving the PMU device a parent, we can use our
platform device to make the relationship between CMN instances and PMU
IDs trivially discoverable, from either nominal direction:
root@crazy-taxi:~# ls /sys/devices/platform/ARMHC600:00 | grep cmn
arm_cmn_0
root@crazy-taxi:~# realpath /sys/bus/event_source/devices/arm_cmn_0/..
/sys/devices/platform/ARMHC600:00
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/25d4428df1ddad966c74a3ed60171cd3ca6c8b66.1712682917.git.robin.murphy@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
In general it's preferable to avoid placing cpumasks on the stack, as
for large values of NR_CPUS these can consume significant amounts of
stack space and make stack overflows more likely.
Use cpumask_any_and_but() to avoid the need for a temporary cpumask on
the stack.
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240403155950.2068109-11-dawei.li@shingroup.cn
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
In general it's preferable to avoid placing cpumasks on the stack, as
for large values of NR_CPUS these can consume significant amounts of
stack space and make stack overflows more likely.
Use cpumask_any_and_but() to avoid the need for a temporary cpumask on
the stack.
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240403155950.2068109-10-dawei.li@shingroup.cn
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
In general it's preferable to avoid placing cpumasks on the stack, as
for large values of NR_CPUS these can consume significant amounts of
stack space and make stack overflows more likely.
Use cpumask_any_and_but() to avoid the need for a temporary cpumask on
the stack.
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240403155950.2068109-9-dawei.li@shingroup.cn
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
In general it's preferable to avoid placing cpumasks on the stack, as
for large values of NR_CPUS these can consume significant amounts of
stack space and make stack overflows more likely.
Use cpumask_any_and_but() to avoid the need for a temporary cpumask on
the stack.
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240403155950.2068109-8-dawei.li@shingroup.cn
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
In general it's preferable to avoid placing cpumasks on the stack, as
for large values of NR_CPUS these can consume significant amounts of
stack space and make stack overflows more likely.
Use cpumask_any_and_but() to avoid the need for a temporary cpumask on
the stack.
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Reviewed-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240403155950.2068109-7-dawei.li@shingroup.cn
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
In general it's preferable to avoid placing cpumasks on the stack, as
for large values of NR_CPUS these can consume significant amounts of
stack space and make stack overflows more likely.
Use cpumask_any_and_but() to avoid the need for a temporary cpumask on
the stack.
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240403155950.2068109-6-dawei.li@shingroup.cn
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
In general it's preferable to avoid placing cpumasks on the stack, as
for large values of NR_CPUS these can consume significant amounts of
stack space and make stack overflows more likely.
Use cpumask_any_and_but() to avoid the need for a temporary cpumask on
the stack.
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240403155950.2068109-5-dawei.li@shingroup.cn
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
In general it's preferable to avoid placing cpumasks on the stack, as
for large values of NR_CPUS these can consume significant amounts of
stack space and make stack overflows more likely.
Use cpumask_any_and_but() to avoid the need for a temporary cpumask on
the stack.
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240403155950.2068109-4-dawei.li@shingroup.cn
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
In general it's preferable to avoid placing cpumasks on the stack, as
for large values of NR_CPUS these can consume significant amounts of
stack space and make stack overflows more likely.
Use cpumask_any_and_but() to avoid the need for a temporary cpumask on
the stack.
Suggested-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dawei Li <dawei.li@shingroup.cn>
Reviewed-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240403155950.2068109-3-dawei.li@shingroup.cn
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
Replace open coded acpi_match_acpi_device() in get_tx2_pmu_type().
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240404170016.2466898-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
This commit comes at the tail end of a greater effort to remove the
empty elements at the end of the ctl_table arrays (sentinels) which will
reduce the overall build time size of the kernel and run time memory
bloat by ~64 bytes per sentinel (further information Link :
https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZO5Yx5JFogGi%2FcBo@bombadil.infradead.org/)
Remove sentinel from sbi_pmu_sysctl_table
Signed-off-by: Joel Granados <j.granados@samsung.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240328-jag-sysctl_remset_misc-v1-7-47c1463b3af2@samsung.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
RISC-V perf driver does not yet support branch sampling. Although the
specification is in the works [0], it is best to disable such events
until support is available, otherwise we will get unexpected results.
Due to this reason, two riscv bpf testcases get_branch_snapshot and
perf_branches/perf_branches_hw fail.
Link: https://github.com/riscv/riscv-control-transfer-records [0]
Fixes: f5bfa23f576f ("RISC-V: Add a perf core library for pmu drivers")
Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240312012053.1178140-1-pulehui@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux
Pull RISC-V updates from Palmer Dabbelt:
- Support for various vector-accelerated crypto routines
- Hibernation is now enabled for portable kernel builds
- mmap_rnd_bits_max is larger on systems with larger VAs
- Support for fast GUP
- Support for membarrier-based instruction cache synchronization
- Support for the Andes hart-level interrupt controller and PMU
- Some cleanups around unaligned access speed probing and Kconfig
settings
- Support for ACPI LPI and CPPC
- Various cleanus related to barriers
- A handful of fixes
* tag 'riscv-for-linus-6.9-mw2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux: (66 commits)
riscv: Fix syscall wrapper for >word-size arguments
crypto: riscv - add vector crypto accelerated AES-CBC-CTS
crypto: riscv - parallelize AES-CBC decryption
riscv: Only flush the mm icache when setting an exec pte
riscv: Use kcalloc() instead of kzalloc()
riscv/barrier: Add missing space after ','
riscv/barrier: Consolidate fence definitions
riscv/barrier: Define RISCV_FULL_BARRIER
riscv/barrier: Define __{mb,rmb,wmb}
RISC-V: defconfig: Enable CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_CPUFREQ
cpufreq: Move CPPC configs to common Kconfig and add RISC-V
ACPI: RISC-V: Add CPPC driver
ACPI: Enable ACPI_PROCESSOR for RISC-V
ACPI: RISC-V: Add LPI driver
cpuidle: RISC-V: Move few functions to arch/riscv
riscv: Introduce set_compat_task() in asm/compat.h
riscv: Introduce is_compat_thread() into compat.h
riscv: add compile-time test into is_compat_task()
riscv: Replace direct thread flag check with is_compat_task()
riscv: Improve arch_get_mmap_end() macro
...
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux
Pull arm64 fixes from Catalin Marinas:
- Re-instate the CPUMASK_OFFSTACK option for arm64 when NR_CPUS > 256.
The bug that led to the initial revert was the cpufreq-dt code not
using zalloc_cpumask_var().
- Make the STARFIVE_STARLINK_PMU config option depend on 64BIT to
prevent compile-test failures on 32-bit architectures due to missing
writeq().
* tag 'arm64-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux:
perf: starfive: fix 64-bit only COMPILE_TEST condition
ARM64: Dynamically allocate cpumasks and increase supported CPUs to 512
|
|
ARCH_STARFIVE is not restricted to 64-bit platforms, so while Will's
addition of a 64-bit only condition satisfied the build robots doing
COMPILE_TEST builds, Palmer ran into the same problems with writeq()
being undefined during regular rv32 builds.
Promote the dependency on 64-bit to its own `depends on` so that the
driver can never be included in 32-bit builds.
Reported-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Fixes: c2b24812f7bc ("perf: starfive: Add StarLink PMU support")
Fixes: f0dbc6d0de38 ("perf: starfive: Only allow COMPILE_TEST for 64-bit architectures")
Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Acked-by: Ji Sheng Teoh <jisheng.teoh@starfivetech.com>
Acked-by: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240318-emphatic-rally-f177a4fe1bdc@spud
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux
Pull arm64 updates from Catalin Marinas:
"The major features are support for LPA2 (52-bit VA/PA with 4K and 16K
pages), the dpISA extension and Rust enabled on arm64. The changes are
mostly contained within the usual arch/arm64/, drivers/perf, the arm64
Documentation and kselftests. The exception is the Rust support which
touches some generic build files.
Summary:
- Reorganise the arm64 kernel VA space and add support for LPA2 (at
stage 1, KVM stage 2 was merged earlier) - 52-bit VA/PA address
range with 4KB and 16KB pages
- Enable Rust on arm64
- Support for the 2023 dpISA extensions (data processing ISA), host
only
- arm64 perf updates:
- StarFive's StarLink (integrates one or more CPU cores with a
shared L3 memory system) PMU support
- Enable HiSilicon Erratum 162700402 quirk for HIP09
- Several updates for the HiSilicon PCIe PMU driver
- Arm CoreSight PMU support
- Convert all drivers under drivers/perf/ to use .remove_new()
- Miscellaneous:
- Don't enable workarounds for "rare" errata by default
- Clean up the DAIF flags handling for EL0 returns (in preparation
for NMI support)
- Kselftest update for ptrace()
- Update some of the sysreg field definitions
- Slight improvement in the code generation for inline asm I/O
accessors to permit offset addressing
- kretprobes: acquire regs via a BRK exception (previously done
via a trampoline handler)
- SVE/SME cleanups, comment updates
- Allow CALL_OPS+CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE with clang (previously
disabled due to gcc silently ignoring -falign-functions=N)"
* tag 'arm64-upstream' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux: (134 commits)
Revert "mm: add arch hook to validate mmap() prot flags"
Revert "arm64: mm: add support for WXN memory translation attribute"
Revert "ARM64: Dynamically allocate cpumasks and increase supported CPUs to 512"
ARM64: Dynamically allocate cpumasks and increase supported CPUs to 512
kselftest/arm64: Add 2023 DPISA hwcap test coverage
kselftest/arm64: Add basic FPMR test
kselftest/arm64: Handle FPMR context in generic signal frame parser
arm64/hwcap: Define hwcaps for 2023 DPISA features
arm64/ptrace: Expose FPMR via ptrace
arm64/signal: Add FPMR signal handling
arm64/fpsimd: Support FEAT_FPMR
arm64/fpsimd: Enable host kernel access to FPMR
arm64/cpufeature: Hook new identification registers up to cpufeature
docs: perf: Fix build warning of hisi-pcie-pmu.rst
perf: starfive: Only allow COMPILE_TEST for 64-bit architectures
MAINTAINERS: Add entry for StarFive StarLink PMU
docs: perf: Add description for StarFive's StarLink PMU
dt-bindings: perf: starfive: Add JH8100 StarLink PMU
perf: starfive: Add StarLink PMU support
docs: perf: Update usage for target filter of hisi-pcie-pmu
...
|
|
Assign riscv_pmu_irq_num the value of (256 + 18) for the custome PMU
and add SSCOUNTOVF and SIP alternatives to ALT_SBI_PMU_OVERFLOW()
and ALT_SBI_PMU_OVF_CLEAR_PENDING() macros, respectively.
To make use of Andes PMU extension, "xandespmu" needs to be appended
to the riscv,isa-extensions for each cpu node in device-tree, and
make sure CONFIG_ANDES_CUSTOM_PMU is enabled.
Signed-off-by: Yu Chien Peter Lin <peterlin@andestech.com>
Reviewed-by: Charles Ci-Jyun Wu <dminus@andestech.com>
Reviewed-by: Leo Yu-Chi Liang <ycliang@andestech.com>
Co-developed-by: Locus Wei-Han Chen <locus84@andestech.com>
Signed-off-by: Locus Wei-Han Chen <locus84@andestech.com>
Reviewed-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Tested-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240222083946.3977135-8-peterlin@andestech.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
The interrupt enable/disable operations are already performed by the
IRQ chip functions riscv_intc_irq_unmask()/riscv_intc_irq_mask() during
enable_percpu_irq()/disable_percpu_irq(). It can be done only once.
Signed-off-by: Yu Chien Peter Lin <peterlin@andestech.com>
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240222083946.3977135-7-peterlin@andestech.com
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull MSI updates from Thomas Gleixner:
"Updates for the MSI interrupt subsystem and initial RISC-V MSI
support.
The core changes have been adopted from previous work which converted
ARM[64] to the new per device MSI domain model, which was merged to
support multiple MSI domain per device. The ARM[64] changes are being
worked on too, but have not been ready yet. The core and platform-MSI
changes have been split out to not hold up RISC-V and to avoid that
RISC-V builds on the scheduled for removal interfaces.
The core support provides new interfaces to handle wire to MSI bridges
in a straight forward way and introduces new platform-MSI interfaces
which are built on top of the per device MSI domain model.
Once ARM[64] is converted over the old platform-MSI interfaces and the
related ugliness in the MSI core code will be removed.
The actual MSI parts for RISC-V were finalized late and have been
post-poned for the next merge window.
Drivers:
- Add a new driver for the Andes hart-level interrupt controller
- Rework the SiFive PLIC driver to prepare for MSI suport
- Expand the RISC-V INTC driver to support the new RISC-V AIA
controller which provides the basis for MSI on RISC-V
- A few fixup for the fallout of the core changes"
* tag 'irq-msi-2024-03-10' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (29 commits)
irqchip/riscv-intc: Fix low-level interrupt handler setup for AIA
x86/apic/msi: Use DOMAIN_BUS_GENERIC_MSI for HPET/IO-APIC domain search
genirq/matrix: Dynamic bitmap allocation
irqchip/riscv-intc: Add support for RISC-V AIA
irqchip/sifive-plic: Improve locking safety by using irqsave/irqrestore
irqchip/sifive-plic: Parse number of interrupts and contexts early in plic_probe()
irqchip/sifive-plic: Cleanup PLIC contexts upon irqdomain creation failure
irqchip/sifive-plic: Use riscv_get_intc_hwnode() to get parent fwnode
irqchip/sifive-plic: Use devm_xyz() for managed allocation
irqchip/sifive-plic: Use dev_xyz() in-place of pr_xyz()
irqchip/sifive-plic: Convert PLIC driver into a platform driver
irqchip/riscv-intc: Introduce Andes hart-level interrupt controller
irqchip/riscv-intc: Allow large non-standard interrupt number
genirq/irqdomain: Don't call ops->select for DOMAIN_BUS_ANY tokens
irqchip/imx-intmux: Handle pure domain searches correctly
genirq/msi: Provide MSI_FLAG_PARENT_PM_DEV
genirq/irqdomain: Reroute device MSI create_mapping
genirq/msi: Provide allocation/free functions for "wired" MSI interrupts
genirq/msi: Optionally use dev->fwnode for device domain
genirq/msi: Provide DOMAIN_BUS_WIRED_TO_MSI
...
|
|
The kbuild robot exploded while wasting its time building the Starfive
PMU driver for the 32-bit PA-RISC and Hexagon architectures.
Adjust the Kconfig dependencies so that COMPILE_TEST is only applicable
for 64-bit architectures (which implement writeq()).
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
This patch adds support for StarFive's StarLink PMU (Performance
Monitor Unit). StarLink PMU integrates one or more CPU cores with
a shared L3 memory system. The PMU supports overflow interrupt,
up to 16 programmable 64bit event counters, and an independent
64bit cycle counter. StarLink PMU is accessed via MMIO.
Example Perf stat output:
[root@user]# perf stat -a -e /starfive_starlink_pmu/cycles/ \
-e /starfive_starlink_pmu/read_miss/ \
-e /starfive_starlink_pmu/read_hit/ \
-e /starfive_starlink_pmu/release_request/ \
-e /starfive_starlink_pmu/write_hit/ \
-e /starfive_starlink_pmu/write_miss/ \
-e /starfive_starlink_pmu/write_request/ \
-e /starfive_starlink_pmu/writeback/ \
-e /starfive_starlink_pmu/read_request/ \
-- openssl speed rsa2048
Doing 2048 bits private rsa's for 10s: 5 2048 bits private RSA's in
2.84s
Doing 2048 bits public rsa's for 10s: 169 2048 bits public RSA's in
2.42s
version: 3.0.11
built on: Tue Sep 19 13:02:31 2023 UTC
options: bn(64,64)
CPUINFO: N/A
sign verify sign/s verify/s
rsa 2048 bits 0.568000s 0.014320s 1.8 69.8
/////////
Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
649991998 starfive_starlink_pmu/cycles/
1009690 starfive_starlink_pmu/read_miss/
1079750 starfive_starlink_pmu/read_hit/
2089405 starfive_starlink_pmu/release_request/
129 starfive_starlink_pmu/write_hit/
70 starfive_starlink_pmu/write_miss/
194 starfive_starlink_pmu/write_request/
150080 starfive_starlink_pmu/writeback/
2089423 starfive_starlink_pmu/read_request/
27.062755678 seconds time elapsed
Signed-off-by: Ji Sheng Teoh <jisheng.teoh@starfivetech.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240229072720.3987876-2-jisheng.teoh@starfivetech.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
The function xxx_find_related_event() scan all working events to find
related events. During this process, we also can find the idle counters.
If not found related events, return the first idle counter to simplify
the code.
Signed-off-by: Junhao He <hejunhao3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240223103359.18669-8-yangyicong@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
If we use two events with the same filter and related event type
(see the following example), the driver check whether they are related
events and are in the same group, otherwise the function
hisi_pcie_pmu_find_related_event() return -EINVAL, then the 2nd event
cannot count but the 1st event is running, although the PCIe PMU has
other idle counters.
In this case, The perf event scheduler will make the two events to
multiplex a counter, if the user use the formula
(1st event_value / 2nd event_value) to calculate the bandwidth, he/she
won't get the correct value, because they are not counting at the
same period.
This patch tries to fix this by making the related events to use
different idle counters if they are not in the same event group.
And finally, I'm going to say. The related events are best used in the
same group [1]. There are two ways to know if they are related events.
a) By event name, such as the latency events "xxx_latency, xxx_cnt" or
bandwidth events "xxx_flux, xxx_time".
b) By event type, such as "event=0xXXXX, event=0x1XXXX".
Use group to count the related events:
[1] -e "{pmu_name/xxx_latency,port=1/,pmu_name/xxx_cnt,port=1/}"
example:
1st event: hisi_pcie0_core1/event=0x804,port=1
2nd event: hisi_pcie0_core1/event=0x10804,port=1
test cmd:
perf stat -e hisi_pcie0_core1/event=0x804,port=1/ \
-e hisi_pcie0_core1/event=0x10804,port=1/
before patch:
25,281 hisi_pcie0_core1/event=0x804,port=1/ (49.91%)
470,598 hisi_pcie0_core1/event=0x10804,port=1/ (50.09%)
after patch:
24,147 hisi_pcie0_core1/event=0x804,port=1/
474,558 hisi_pcie0_core1/event=0x10804,port=1/
Signed-off-by: Junhao He <hejunhao3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huwei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240223103359.18669-7-yangyicong@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
The PMU can monitor traffic of certain target Root Port or downstream
target Endpoint. User can specify the target filter by the "port" or
"bdf" option respectively. The PMU can only monitor the Root Port or
Endpoint on the same PCIe core so the value of "port" or "bdf" should
be valid and will be checked by the driver.
Currently at least and only one of "port" and "bdf" option must be set.
If "port" filter is not set or is set explicitly to zero (default),
driver will regard the user specifies a "bdf" option since "port" option
is a bitmask of the target Root Ports and zero is not a valid
value.
If user not explicitly set "port" or "bdf" filter, the driver uses "bdf"
default value (zero) to set target filter, but driver will skip the
check of bdf=0, although it's a valid value (meaning 0000:000:00.0).
Then the user just gets zero.
Therefore, we need to check if both "port" and "bdf" are invalid, then
return failure and report warning.
Testing:
before the patch:
0 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux/
0 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=0/
24,124 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=1/
0 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,bdf=0/
0 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=0x800/
<not supported> hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,bdf=1/
24,132 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,bdf=0x1700/
<not supported> hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=0x0,bdf=0x0/
<not supported> hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=0x0,bdf=0x1/
24,138 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=0x0,bdf=0x1700/
24,126 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=0x1,bdf=0x0/
after the patch:
<not supported> hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux/
<not supported> hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=0/
24,153 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=1/
0 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=0x800/
<not supported> hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,bdf=0/
<not supported> hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,bdf=1/
24,117 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,bdf=0x1700/
<not supported> hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=0x0,bdf=0x0/
<not supported> hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=0x0,bdf=0x1/
24,120 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=0x0,bdf=0x1700/
24,123 hisi_pcie0_core1/rx_mrd_flux,port=0x1,bdf=0x0/
Signed-off-by: Junhao He <hejunhao3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240223103359.18669-6-yangyicong@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
|
A typical PCIe transaction is consisted of various TLP packets in both
direction. For counting bandwidth only memory read events are exported
currently. Add memory write and completion counting events of both
direction to complete the bandwidth counting.
Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240223103359.18669-5-yangyicong@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
|
