summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/sched/fair.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2023-11-15sched: Remove vruntime from trace_sched_stat_runtime()Peter Zijlstra
Tracing the runtime delta makes sense, observer can sum over time. Tracing the absolute vruntime makes less sense, inconsistent: absolute-vs-delta, but also vruntime delta can be computed from runtime delta. Removing the vruntime thing also makes the two tracepoint sites identical, allowing to unify the code in a later patch. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2023-11-15sched: Unify runtime accounting across classesPeter Zijlstra
All classes use sched_entity::exec_start to track runtime and have copies of the exact same code around to compute runtime. Collapse all that. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/54d148a144f26d9559698c4dd82d8859038a7380.1699095159.git.bristot@kernel.org
2023-11-15sched/eevdf: O(1) fastpath for task selectionAbel Wu
Since the RB-tree is now sorted by deadline, let's first try the leftmost entity which has the earliest virtual deadline. I've done some benchmarks to see its effectiveness. All the benchmarks are done inside a normal cpu cgroup in a clean environment with cpu turbo disabled, on a dual-CPU Intel Xeon(R) Platinum 8260 with 2 NUMA nodes each of which has 24C/48T. hackbench: process/thread + pipe/socket + 1/2/4/8 groups netperf: TCP/UDP + STREAM/RR + 24/48/72/96/192 threads tbench: loopback 24/48/72/96/192 threads schbench: 1/2/4/8 mthreads direct: cfs_rq has only one entity parity: RUN_TO_PARITY fast: O(1) fastpath slow: heap search (%) direct parity fast slow hackbench 92.95 2.02 4.91 0.12 netperf 68.08 6.60 24.18 1.14 tbench 67.55 11.22 20.61 0.62 schbench 69.91 2.65 25.73 1.71 The above results indicate that this fastpath really makes task selection more efficient. Signed-off-by: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231115033647.80785-4-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com
2023-11-15sched/eevdf: Sort the rbtree by virtual deadlineAbel Wu
Sort the task timeline by virtual deadline and keep the min_vruntime in the augmented tree, so we can avoid doubling the worst case cost and make full use of the cached leftmost node to enable O(1) fastpath picking in next patch. Signed-off-by: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231115033647.80785-3-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com
2023-11-15sched/numa: Fix mm numa_scan_seq based unconditional scanRaghavendra K T
Since commit fc137c0ddab2 ("sched/numa: enhance vma scanning logic") NUMA Balancing allows updating PTEs to trap NUMA hinting faults if the task had previously accessed VMA. However unconditional scan of VMAs are allowed during initial phase of VMA creation until process's mm numa_scan_seq reaches 2 even though current task had not accessed VMA. Rationale: - Without initial scan subsequent PTE update may never happen. - Give fair opportunity to all the VMAs to be scanned and subsequently understand the access pattern of all the VMAs. But it has a corner case where, if a VMA is created after some time, process's mm numa_scan_seq could be already greater than 2. For e.g., values of mm numa_scan_seq when VMAs are created by running mmtest autonuma benchmark briefly looks like: start_seq=0 : 459 start_seq=2 : 138 start_seq=3 : 144 start_seq=4 : 8 start_seq=8 : 1 start_seq=9 : 1 This results in no unconditional PTE updates for those VMAs created after some time. Fix: - Note down the initial value of mm numa_scan_seq in per VMA start_seq. - Allow unconditional scan till start_seq + 2. Result: SUT: AMD EPYC Milan with 2 NUMA nodes 256 cpus. base kernel: upstream 6.6-rc6 with Mels patches [1] applied. kernbench ========== base patched %gain Amean elsp-128 165.09 ( 0.00%) 164.78 * 0.19%* Duration User 41404.28 41375.08 Duration System 9862.22 9768.48 Duration Elapsed 519.87 518.72 Ops NUMA PTE updates 1041416.00 831536.00 Ops NUMA hint faults 263296.00 220966.00 Ops NUMA pages migrated 258021.00 212769.00 Ops AutoNUMA cost 1328.67 1114.69 autonumabench NUMA01_THREADLOCAL ================== Amean elsp-NUMA01_THREADLOCAL 81.79 (0.00%) 67.74 * 17.18%* Duration User 54832.73 47379.67 Duration System 75.00 185.75 Duration Elapsed 576.72 476.09 Ops NUMA PTE updates 394429.00 11121044.00 Ops NUMA hint faults 1001.00 8906404.00 Ops NUMA pages migrated 288.00 2998694.00 Ops AutoNUMA cost 7.77 44666.84 Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/2ea7cbce80ac7c62e90cbfb9653a7972f902439f.1697816692.git.raghavendra.kt@amd.com
2023-11-14sched/fair: Fix the decision for load balanceKeisuke Nishimura
should_we_balance is called for the decision to do load-balancing. When sched ticks invoke this function, only one CPU should return true. However, in the current code, two CPUs can return true. The following situation, where b means busy and i means idle, is an example, because CPU 0 and CPU 2 return true. [0, 1] [2, 3] b b i b This fix checks if there exists an idle CPU with busy sibling(s) after looking for a CPU on an idle core. If some idle CPUs with busy siblings are found, just the first one should do load-balancing. Fixes: b1bfeab9b002 ("sched/fair: Consider the idle state of the whole core for load balance") Signed-off-by: Keisuke Nishimura <keisuke.nishimura@inria.fr> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231031133821.1570861-1-keisuke.nishimura@inria.fr
2023-11-14sched/eevdf: Fix vruntime adjustment on reweightAbel Wu
vruntime of the (on_rq && !0-lag) entity needs to be adjusted when it gets re-weighted, and the calculations can be simplified based on the fact that re-weight won't change the w-average of all the entities. Please check the proofs in comments. But adjusting vruntime can also cause position change in RB-tree hence require re-queue to fix up which might be costly. This might be avoided by deferring adjustment to the time the entity actually leaves tree (dequeue/pick), but that will negatively affect task selection and probably not good enough either. Fixes: 147f3efaa241 ("sched/fair: Implement an EEVDF-like scheduling policy") Signed-off-by: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231107090510.71322-2-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com
2023-11-02Merge tag 'mm-stable-2023-11-01-14-33' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm Pull MM updates from Andrew Morton: "Many singleton patches against the MM code. The patch series which are included in this merge do the following: - Kemeng Shi has contributed some compation maintenance work in the series 'Fixes and cleanups to compaction' - Joel Fernandes has a patchset ('Optimize mremap during mutual alignment within PMD') which fixes an obscure issue with mremap()'s pagetable handling during a subsequent exec(), based upon an implementation which Linus suggested - More DAMON/DAMOS maintenance and feature work from SeongJae Park i the following patch series: mm/damon: misc fixups for documents, comments and its tracepoint mm/damon: add a tracepoint for damos apply target regions mm/damon: provide pseudo-moving sum based access rate mm/damon: implement DAMOS apply intervals mm/damon/core-test: Fix memory leaks in core-test mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: Do DAMOS tried regions update for only one apply interval - In the series 'Do not try to access unaccepted memory' Adrian Hunter provides some fixups for the recently-added 'unaccepted memory' feature. To increase the feature's checking coverage. 'Plug a few gaps where RAM is exposed without checking if it is unaccepted memory' - In the series 'cleanups for lockless slab shrink' Qi Zheng has done some maintenance work which is preparation for the lockless slab shrinking code - Qi Zheng has redone the earlier (and reverted) attempt to make slab shrinking lockless in the series 'use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink' - David Hildenbrand contributes some maintenance work for the rmap code in the series 'Anon rmap cleanups' - Kefeng Wang does more folio conversions and some maintenance work in the migration code. Series 'mm: migrate: more folio conversion and unification' - Matthew Wilcox has fixed an issue in the buffer_head code which was causing long stalls under some heavy memory/IO loads. Some cleanups were added on the way. Series 'Add and use bdev_getblk()' - In the series 'Use nth_page() in place of direct struct page manipulation' Zi Yan has fixed a potential issue with the direct manipulation of hugetlb page frames - In the series 'mm: hugetlb: Skip initialization of gigantic tail struct pages if freed by HVO' has improved our handling of gigantic pages in the hugetlb vmmemmep optimizaton code. This provides significant boot time improvements when significant amounts of gigantic pages are in use - Matthew Wilcox has sent the series 'Small hugetlb cleanups' - code rationalization and folio conversions in the hugetlb code - Yin Fengwei has improved mlock()'s handling of large folios in the series 'support large folio for mlock' - In the series 'Expose swapcache stat for memcg v1' Liu Shixin has added statistics for memcg v1 users which are available (and useful) under memcg v2 - Florent Revest has enhanced the MDWE (Memory-Deny-Write-Executable) prctl so that userspace may direct the kernel to not automatically propagate the denial to child processes. The series is named 'MDWE without inheritance' - Kefeng Wang has provided the series 'mm: convert numa balancing functions to use a folio' which does what it says - In the series 'mm/ksm: add fork-exec support for prctl' Stefan Roesch makes is possible for a process to propagate KSM treatment across exec() - Huang Ying has enhanced memory tiering's calculation of memory distances. This is used to permit the dax/kmem driver to use 'high bandwidth memory' in addition to Optane Data Center Persistent Memory Modules (DCPMM). The series is named 'memory tiering: calculate abstract distance based on ACPI HMAT' - In the series 'Smart scanning mode for KSM' Stefan Roesch has optimized KSM by teaching it to retain and use some historical information from previous scans - Yosry Ahmed has fixed some inconsistencies in memcg statistics in the series 'mm: memcg: fix tracking of pending stats updates values' - In the series 'Implement IOCTL to get and optionally clear info about PTEs' Peter Xu has added an ioctl to /proc/<pid>/pagemap which permits us to atomically read-then-clear page softdirty state. This is mainly used by CRIU - Hugh Dickins contributed the series 'shmem,tmpfs: general maintenance', a bunch of relatively minor maintenance tweaks to this code - Matthew Wilcox has increased the use of the VMA lock over file-backed page faults in the series 'Handle more faults under the VMA lock'. Some rationalizations of the fault path became possible as a result - In the series 'mm/rmap: convert page_move_anon_rmap() to folio_move_anon_rmap()' David Hildenbrand has implemented some cleanups and folio conversions - In the series 'various improvements to the GUP interface' Lorenzo Stoakes has simplified and improved the GUP interface with an eye to providing groundwork for future improvements - Andrey Konovalov has sent along the series 'kasan: assorted fixes and improvements' which does those things - Some page allocator maintenance work from Kemeng Shi in the series 'Two minor cleanups to break_down_buddy_pages' - In thes series 'New selftest for mm' Breno Leitao has developed another MM self test which tickles a race we had between madvise() and page faults - In the series 'Add folio_end_read' Matthew Wilcox provides cleanups and an optimization to the core pagecache code - Nhat Pham has added memcg accounting for hugetlb memory in the series 'hugetlb memcg accounting' - Cleanups and rationalizations to the pagemap code from Lorenzo Stoakes, in the series 'Abstract vma_merge() and split_vma()' - Audra Mitchell has fixed issues in the procfs page_owner code's new timestamping feature which was causing some misbehaviours. In the series 'Fix page_owner's use of free timestamps' - Lorenzo Stoakes has fixed the handling of new mappings of sealed files in the series 'permit write-sealed memfd read-only shared mappings' - Mike Kravetz has optimized the hugetlb vmemmap optimization in the series 'Batch hugetlb vmemmap modification operations' - Some buffer_head folio conversions and cleanups from Matthew Wilcox in the series 'Finish the create_empty_buffers() transition' - As a page allocator performance optimization Huang Ying has added automatic tuning to the allocator's per-cpu-pages feature, in the series 'mm: PCP high auto-tuning' - Roman Gushchin has contributed the patchset 'mm: improve performance of accounted kernel memory allocations' which improves their performance by ~30% as measured by a micro-benchmark - folio conversions from Kefeng Wang in the series 'mm: convert page cpupid functions to folios' - Some kmemleak fixups in Liu Shixin's series 'Some bugfix about kmemleak' - Qi Zheng has improved our handling of memoryless nodes by keeping them off the allocation fallback list. This is done in the series 'handle memoryless nodes more appropriately' - khugepaged conversions from Vishal Moola in the series 'Some khugepaged folio conversions'" [ bcachefs conflicts with the dynamically allocated shrinkers have been resolved as per Stephen Rothwell in https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230913093553.4290421e@canb.auug.org.au/ with help from Qi Zheng. The clone3 test filtering conflict was half-arsed by yours truly ] * tag 'mm-stable-2023-11-01-14-33' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm: (406 commits) mm/damon/sysfs: update monitoring target regions for online input commit mm/damon/sysfs: remove requested targets when online-commit inputs selftests: add a sanity check for zswap Documentation: maple_tree: fix word spelling error mm/vmalloc: fix the unchecked dereference warning in vread_iter() zswap: export compression failure stats Documentation: ubsan: drop "the" from article title mempolicy: migration attempt to match interleave nodes mempolicy: mmap_lock is not needed while migrating folios mempolicy: alloc_pages_mpol() for NUMA policy without vma mm: add page_rmappable_folio() wrapper mempolicy: remove confusing MPOL_MF_LAZY dead code mempolicy: mpol_shared_policy_init() without pseudo-vma mempolicy trivia: use pgoff_t in shared mempolicy tree mempolicy trivia: slightly more consistent naming mempolicy trivia: delete those ancient pr_debug()s mempolicy: fix migrate_pages(2) syscall return nr_failed kernfs: drop shared NUMA mempolicy hooks hugetlbfs: drop shared NUMA mempolicy pretence mm/damon/sysfs-test: add a unit test for damon_sysfs_set_targets() ...
2023-10-25sched/fair: use folio_xchg_last_cpupid() in should_numa_migrate_memory()Kefeng Wang
Convert to use folio_xchg_last_cpupid() in should_numa_migrate_memory(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231018140806.2783514-14-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-10-25sched/fair: use folio_xchg_access_time() in numa_hint_fault_latency()Kefeng Wang
Convert to use folio_xchg_access_time() in numa_hint_fault_latency(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231018140806.2783514-9-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-10-24sched/fair: Remove SIS_PROPPeter Zijlstra
SIS_UTIL seems to work well, lets remove the old thing. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231020134337.GD33965@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
2023-10-24sched/fair: Use candidate prev/recent_used CPU if scanning failed for ↵Yicong Yang
cluster wakeup Chen Yu reports a hackbench regression of cluster wakeup when hackbench threads equal to the CPU number [1]. Analysis shows it's because we wake up more on the target CPU even if the prev_cpu is a good wakeup candidate and leads to the decrease of the CPU utilization. Generally if the task's prev_cpu is idle we'll wake up the task on it without scanning. On cluster machines we'll try to wake up the task in the same cluster of the target for better cache affinity, so if the prev_cpu is idle but not sharing the same cluster with the target we'll still try to find an idle CPU within the cluster. This will improve the performance at low loads on cluster machines. But in the issue above, if the prev_cpu is idle but not in the cluster with the target CPU, we'll try to scan an idle one in the cluster. But since the system is busy, we're likely to fail the scanning and use target instead, even if the prev_cpu is idle. Then leads to the regression. This patch solves this in 2 steps: o record the prev_cpu/recent_used_cpu if they're good wakeup candidates but not sharing the cluster with the target. o on scanning failure use the prev_cpu/recent_used_cpu if they're recorded as idle [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZGzDLuVaHR1PAYDt@chenyu5-mobl1/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZGsLy83wPIpamy6x@chenyu5-mobl1/ Reported-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com> Tested-and-reviewed-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231019033323.54147-4-yangyicong@huawei.com
2023-10-24sched/fair: Scan cluster before scanning LLC in wake-up pathBarry Song
For platforms having clusters like Kunpeng920, CPUs within the same cluster have lower latency when synchronizing and accessing shared resources like cache. Thus, this patch tries to find an idle cpu within the cluster of the target CPU before scanning the whole LLC to gain lower latency. This will be implemented in 2 steps in select_idle_sibling(): 1. When the prev_cpu/recent_used_cpu are good wakeup candidates, use them if they're sharing cluster with the target CPU. Otherwise trying to scan for an idle CPU in the target's cluster. 2. Scanning the cluster prior to the LLC of the target CPU for an idle CPU to wakeup. Testing has been done on Kunpeng920 by pinning tasks to one numa and two numa. On Kunpeng920, Each numa has 8 clusters and each cluster has 4 CPUs. With this patch, We noticed enhancement on tbench and netperf within one numa or cross two numa on top of tip-sched-core commit 9b46f1abc6d4 ("sched/debug: Print 'tgid' in sched_show_task()") tbench results (node 0): baseline patched 1: 327.2833 372.4623 ( 13.80%) 4: 1320.5933 1479.8833 ( 12.06%) 8: 2638.4867 2921.5267 ( 10.73%) 16: 5282.7133 5891.5633 ( 11.53%) 32: 9810.6733 9877.3400 ( 0.68%) 64: 7408.9367 7447.9900 ( 0.53%) 128: 6203.2600 6191.6500 ( -0.19%) tbench results (node 0-1): baseline patched 1: 332.0433 372.7223 ( 12.25%) 4: 1325.4667 1477.6733 ( 11.48%) 8: 2622.9433 2897.9967 ( 10.49%) 16: 5218.6100 5878.2967 ( 12.64%) 32: 10211.7000 11494.4000 ( 12.56%) 64: 13313.7333 16740.0333 ( 25.74%) 128: 13959.1000 14533.9000 ( 4.12%) netperf results TCP_RR (node 0): baseline patched 1: 76546.5033 90649.9867 ( 18.42%) 4: 77292.4450 90932.7175 ( 17.65%) 8: 77367.7254 90882.3467 ( 17.47%) 16: 78519.9048 90938.8344 ( 15.82%) 32: 72169.5035 72851.6730 ( 0.95%) 64: 25911.2457 25882.2315 ( -0.11%) 128: 10752.6572 10768.6038 ( 0.15%) netperf results TCP_RR (node 0-1): baseline patched 1: 76857.6667 90892.2767 ( 18.26%) 4: 78236.6475 90767.3017 ( 16.02%) 8: 77929.6096 90684.1633 ( 16.37%) 16: 77438.5873 90502.5787 ( 16.87%) 32: 74205.6635 88301.5612 ( 19.00%) 64: 69827.8535 71787.6706 ( 2.81%) 128: 25281.4366 25771.3023 ( 1.94%) netperf results UDP_RR (node 0): baseline patched 1: 96869.8400 110800.8467 ( 14.38%) 4: 97744.9750 109680.5425 ( 12.21%) 8: 98783.9863 110409.9637 ( 11.77%) 16: 99575.0235 110636.2435 ( 11.11%) 32: 95044.7250 97622.8887 ( 2.71%) 64: 32925.2146 32644.4991 ( -0.85%) 128: 12859.2343 12824.0051 ( -0.27%) netperf results UDP_RR (node 0-1): baseline patched 1: 97202.4733 110190.1200 ( 13.36%) 4: 95954.0558 106245.7258 ( 10.73%) 8: 96277.1958 105206.5304 ( 9.27%) 16: 97692.7810 107927.2125 ( 10.48%) 32: 79999.6702 103550.2999 ( 29.44%) 64: 80592.7413 87284.0856 ( 8.30%) 128: 27701.5770 29914.5820 ( 7.99%) Note neither Kunpeng920 nor x86 Jacobsville supports SMT, so the SMT branch in the code has not been tested but it supposed to work. Chen Yu also noticed this will improve the performance of tbench and netperf on a 24 CPUs Jacobsville machine, there are 4 CPUs in one cluster sharing L2 Cache. [https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Ytfjs+m1kUs0ScSn@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net] Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com> Signed-off-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Tested-and-reviewed-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Tested-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231019033323.54147-3-yangyicong@huawei.com
2023-10-23Merge tag 'v6.6-rc7' into sched/core, to pick up fixesIngo Molnar
Pick up recent sched/urgent fixes merged upstream. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2023-10-20sched/fair: Remove unused 'curr' argument from pick_next_entity()Yiwei Lin
The 'curr' argument of pick_next_entity() has become unused after the EEVDF changes. [ mingo: Updated the changelog. ] Signed-off-by: Yiwei Lin <s921975628@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231020055617.42064-1-s921975628@gmail.com
2023-10-20sched/nohz: Update comments about NEWILB_KICKJoel Fernandes (Google)
How ILB is triggered without IPIs is cryptic. Out of mercy for future code readers, document it in code comments. The comments are derived from a discussion with Vincent in a past review. Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231020014031.919742-2-joel@joelfernandes.org
2023-10-18sched/fair: Remove duplicate #includeJiapeng Chong
./kernel/sched/fair.c: linux/sched/cond_resched.h is included more than once. Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231018062759.44375-1-jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=6907
2023-10-18sched/eevdf: Fix heap corruption morePeter Zijlstra
Because someone is a flaming idiot... and forgot we have current as se->on_rq but not actually in the tree itself, and walking rb_parent() on an entry not in the tree is 'funky' and KASAN complains. Fixes: 8dafa9d0eb1a ("sched/eevdf: Fix min_deadline heap integrity") Reported-by: 0599jiangyc@gmail.com Reported-by: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218020 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAJwJo6ZGXO07%3DQvW4fgQfbsDzQPs9xj5sAQ1zp%3DmAyPMNbHYww%40mail.gmail.com
2023-10-16sched/numa, mm: make numa migrate functions to take a folioKefeng Wang
The cpupid (or access time) is stored in the head page for THP, so it is safely to make should_numa_migrate_memory() and numa_hint_fault_latency() to take a folio. This is in preparation for large folio numa balancing. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230921074417.24004-7-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-10-13sched: Fix stop_one_cpu_nowait() vs hotplugPeter Zijlstra
Kuyo reported sporadic failures on a sched_setaffinity() vs CPU hotplug stress-test -- notably affine_move_task() remains stuck in wait_for_completion(), leading to a hung-task detector warning. Specifically, it was reported that stop_one_cpu_nowait(.fn = migration_cpu_stop) returns false -- this stopper is responsible for the matching complete(). The race scenario is: CPU0 CPU1 // doing _cpu_down() __set_cpus_allowed_ptr() task_rq_lock(); takedown_cpu() stop_machine_cpuslocked(take_cpu_down..) <PREEMPT: cpu_stopper_thread() MULTI_STOP_PREPARE ... __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked() affine_move_task() task_rq_unlock(); <PREEMPT: cpu_stopper_thread()\> ack_state() MULTI_STOP_RUN take_cpu_down() __cpu_disable(); stop_machine_park(); stopper->enabled = false; /> /> stop_one_cpu_nowait(.fn = migration_cpu_stop); if (stopper->enabled) // false!!! That is, by doing stop_one_cpu_nowait() after dropping rq-lock, the stopper thread gets a chance to preempt and allows the cpu-down for the target CPU to complete. OTOH, since stop_one_cpu_nowait() / cpu_stop_queue_work() needs to issue a wakeup, it must not be ran under the scheduler locks. Solve this apparent contradiction by keeping preemption disabled over the unlock + queue_stopper combination: preempt_disable(); task_rq_unlock(...); if (!stop_pending) stop_one_cpu_nowait(...) preempt_enable(); This respects the lock ordering contraints while still avoiding the above race. That is, if we find the CPU is online under rq-lock, the targeted stop_one_cpu_nowait() must succeed. Apply this pattern to all similar stop_one_cpu_nowait() invocations. Fixes: 6d337eab041d ("sched: Fix migrate_disable() vs set_cpus_allowed_ptr()") Reported-by: "Kuyo Chang (張建文)" <Kuyo.Chang@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: "Kuyo Chang (張建文)" <Kuyo.Chang@mediatek.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231010200442.GA16515@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
2023-10-12sched/topology: Rename 'DIE' domain to 'PKG'Peter Zijlstra
While reworking the x86 topology code Thomas tripped over creating a 'DIE' domain for the package mask. :-) Since these names are CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y only, rename them to make the name less ambiguous. [ Shrikanth Hegde: rename on s390 as well. ] [ Valentin Schneider: also rename it in the comments. ] [ mingo: port to recent kernels & find all remaining occurances. ] Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@amd.com> Acked-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230712141056.GI3100107@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
2023-10-10sched/numa: Complete scanning of inactive VMAs when there is no alternativeMel Gorman
VMAs are skipped if there is no recent fault activity but this represents a chicken-and-egg problem as there may be no fault activity if the PTEs are never updated to trap NUMA hints. There is an indirect reliance on scanning to be forced early in the lifetime of a task but this may fail to detect changes in phase behaviour. Force inactive VMAs to be scanned when all other eligible VMAs have been updated within the same scan sequence. Test results in general look good with some changes in performance, both negative and positive, depending on whether the additional scanning and faulting was beneficial or not to the workload. The autonuma benchmark workload NUMA01_THREADLOCAL was picked for closer examination. The workload creates two processes with numerous threads and thread-local storage that is zero-filled in a loop. It exercises the corner case where unrelated threads may skip VMAs that are thread-local to another thread and still has some VMAs that inactive while the workload executes. The VMA skipping activity frequency with and without the patch: 6.6.0-rc2-sched-numabtrace-v1 ============================= 649 reason=scan_delay 9,094 reason=unsuitable 48,915 reason=shared_ro 143,919 reason=inaccessible 193,050 reason=pid_inactive 6.6.0-rc2-sched-numabselective-v1 ============================= 146 reason=seq_completed 622 reason=ignore_pid_inactive 624 reason=scan_delay 6,570 reason=unsuitable 16,101 reason=shared_ro 27,608 reason=inaccessible 41,939 reason=pid_inactive Note that with the patch applied, the PID activity is ignored (ignore_pid_inactive) to ensure a VMA with some activity is completely scanned. In addition, a small number of VMAs are scanned when no other eligible VMA is available during a single scan window (seq_completed). The number of times a VMA is skipped due to no PID activity from the scanning task (pid_inactive) drops dramatically. It is expected that this will increase the number of PTEs updated for NUMA hinting faults as well as hinting faults but these represent PTEs that would otherwise have been missed. The tradeoff is scan+fault overhead versus improving locality due to migration. On a 2-socket Cascade Lake test machine, the time to complete the workload is as follows; 6.6.0-rc2 6.6.0-rc2 sched-numabtrace-v1 sched-numabselective-v1 Min elsp-NUMA01_THREADLOCAL 174.22 ( 0.00%) 117.64 ( 32.48%) Amean elsp-NUMA01_THREADLOCAL 175.68 ( 0.00%) 123.34 * 29.79%* Stddev elsp-NUMA01_THREADLOCAL 1.20 ( 0.00%) 4.06 (-238.20%) CoeffVar elsp-NUMA01_THREADLOCAL 0.68 ( 0.00%) 3.29 (-381.70%) Max elsp-NUMA01_THREADLOCAL 177.18 ( 0.00%) 128.03 ( 27.74%) The time to complete the workload is reduced by almost 30%: 6.6.0-rc2 6.6.0-rc2 sched-numabtrace-v1 sched-numabselective-v1 / Duration User 91201.80 63506.64 Duration System 2015.53 1819.78 Duration Elapsed 1234.77 868.37 In this specific case, system CPU time was not increased but it's not universally true. From vmstat, the NUMA scanning and fault activity is as follows; 6.6.0-rc2 6.6.0-rc2 sched-numabtrace-v1 sched-numabselective-v1 Ops NUMA base-page range updates 64272.00 26374386.00 Ops NUMA PTE updates 36624.00 55538.00 Ops NUMA PMD updates 54.00 51404.00 Ops NUMA hint faults 15504.00 75786.00 Ops NUMA hint local faults % 14860.00 56763.00 Ops NUMA hint local percent 95.85 74.90 Ops NUMA pages migrated 1629.00 6469222.00 Both the number of PTE updates and hint faults is dramatically increased. While this is superficially unfortunate, it represents ranges that were simply skipped without the patch. As a result of the scanning and hinting faults, many more pages were also migrated but as the time to completion is reduced, the overhead is offset by the gain. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Tested-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231010083143.19593-7-mgorman@techsingularity.net
2023-10-10sched/numa: Complete scanning of partial VMAs regardless of PID activityMel Gorman
NUMA Balancing skips VMAs when the current task has not trapped a NUMA fault within the VMA. If the VMA is skipped then mm->numa_scan_offset advances and a task that is trapping faults within the VMA may never fully update PTEs within the VMA. Force tasks to update PTEs for partially scanned PTEs. The VMA will be tagged for NUMA hints by some task but this removes some of the benefit of tracking PID activity within a VMA. A follow-on patch will mitigate this problem. The test cases and machines evaluated did not trigger the corner case so the performance results are neutral with only small changes within the noise from normal test-to-test variance. However, the next patch makes the corner case easier to trigger. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Tested-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@amd.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231010083143.19593-6-mgorman@techsingularity.net
2023-10-10sched/numa: Move up the access pid reset logicRaghavendra K T
Recent NUMA hinting faulting activity is reset approximately every VMA_PID_RESET_PERIOD milliseconds. However, if the current task has not accessed a VMA then the reset check is missed and the reset is potentially deferred forever. Check if the PID activity information should be reset before checking if the current task recently trapped a NUMA hinting fault. [ mgorman@techsingularity.net: Rewrite changelog ] Suggested-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231010083143.19593-5-mgorman@techsingularity.net
2023-10-10sched/numa: Trace decisions related to skipping VMAsMel Gorman
NUMA balancing skips or scans VMAs for a variety of reasons. In preparation for completing scans of VMAs regardless of PID access, trace the reasons why a VMA was skipped. In a later patch, the tracing will be used to track if a VMA was forcibly scanned. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231010083143.19593-4-mgorman@techsingularity.net
2023-10-10sched/numa: Rename vma_numab_state::access_pids[] => ::pids_active[], ↵Mel Gorman
::next_pid_reset => ::pids_active_reset The access_pids[] field name is somewhat ambiguous as no PIDs are accessed. Similarly, it's not clear that next_pid_reset is related to access_pids[]. Rename the fields to more accurately reflect their purpose. [ mingo: Rename in the comments too. ] Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231010083143.19593-3-mgorman@techsingularity.net
2023-10-09sched/topology: Consolidate and clean up access to a CPU's max compute capacityVincent Guittot
Remove the rq::cpu_capacity_orig field and use arch_scale_cpu_capacity() instead. The scheduler uses 3 methods to get access to a CPU's max compute capacity: - arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu) which is the default way to get a CPU's capacity. - cpu_capacity_orig field which is periodically updated with arch_scale_cpu_capacity(). - capacity_orig_of(cpu) which encapsulates rq->cpu_capacity_orig. There is no real need to save the value returned by arch_scale_cpu_capacity() in struct rq. arch_scale_cpu_capacity() returns: - either a per_cpu variable. - or a const value for systems which have only one capacity. Remove rq::cpu_capacity_orig and use arch_scale_cpu_capacity() everywhere. No functional changes. Some performance tests on Arm64: - small SMP device (hikey): no noticeable changes - HMP device (RB5): hackbench shows minor improvement (1-2%) - large smp (thx2): hackbench and tbench shows minor improvement (1%) Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231009103621.374412-2-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
2023-10-09sched/nohz: Remove unnecessarily complex error handling pattern from ↵Ingo Molnar
find_new_ilb() find_new_ilb() returns nr_cpu_ids on failure - which is the usual cpumask bitops return pattern, but is weird & unnecessary in this context: not only is it a global variable, it it is a +1 out of bounds CPU index and also has different signedness ... Its only user, kick_ilb(), then checks the return against nr_cpu_ids to decide to return. There's no other use. So instead of this, use a standard -1 return on failure to find an idle CPU, as the argument is signed already. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231006102518.2452758-4-mingo@kernel.org
2023-10-09sched/nohz: Use consistent variable names in find_new_ilb() and kick_ilb()Ingo Molnar
Use 'ilb_cpu' consistently in both functions. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231006102518.2452758-3-mingo@kernel.org
2023-10-09sched/nohz: Update idle load-balancing (ILB) commentsIngo Molnar
- Fix incorrect/misleading comments, - clarify some others, - fix typos & grammar, - and use more consistent style throughout. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231006102518.2452758-2-mingo@kernel.org
2023-10-09sched/eevdf: Fix pick_eevdf()Benjamin Segall
The old pick_eevdf() could fail to find the actual earliest eligible deadline when it descended to the right looking for min_deadline, but it turned out that that min_deadline wasn't actually eligible. In that case we need to go back and search through any left branches we skipped looking for the actual best _eligible_ min_deadline. This is more expensive, but still O(log n), and at worst should only involve descending two branches of the rbtree. I've run this through a userspace stress test (thank you tools/lib/rbtree.c), so hopefully this implementation doesn't miss any corner cases. Fixes: 147f3efaa241 ("sched/fair: Implement an EEVDF-like scheduling policy") Signed-off-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/xm261qego72d.fsf_-_@google.com
2023-10-09sched/eevdf: Fix min_deadline heap integrityPeter Zijlstra
Marek and Biju reported instances of: "EEVDF scheduling fail, picking leftmost" which Mike correlated with cgroup scheduling and the min_deadline heap getting corrupted; some trace output confirms: > And yeah, min_deadline is hosed somehow: > > validate_cfs_rq: --- / > __print_se: ffff88845cf48080 w: 1024 ve: -58857638 lag: 870381 vd: -55861854 vmd: -66302085 E (11372/tr) > __print_se: ffff88810d165800 w: 25 ve: -80323686 lag: 22336429 vd: -41496434 vmd: -66302085 E (-1//autogroup-31) > __print_se: ffff888108379000 w: 25 ve: 0 lag: -57987257 vd: 114632828 vmd: 114632828 N (-1//autogroup-33) > validate_cfs_rq: min_deadline: -55861854 avg_vruntime: -62278313462 / 1074 = -57987256 Turns out that reweight_entity(), which tries really hard to be fast, does not do the normal dequeue+update+enqueue pattern but *does* scale the deadline. However, it then fails to propagate the updated deadline value up the heap. Fixes: 147f3efaa241 ("sched/fair: Implement an EEVDF-like scheduling policy") Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Reported-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> Tested-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> Tested-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231006192445.GE743@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
2023-10-07Merge branch 'sched/urgent' into sched/core, to pick up fixes and refresh ↵Ingo Molnar
the branch Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2023-10-03sched/eevdf: Fix avg_vruntime()Peter Zijlstra
The expectation is that placing a task at avg_vruntime() makes it eligible. Turns out there is a corner case where this is not the case. Specifically, avg_vruntime() relies on the fact that integer division is a flooring function (eg. it discards the remainder). By this property the value returned is slightly left of the true average. However! when the average is a negative (relative to min_vruntime) the effect is flipped and it becomes a ceil, with the result that the returned value is just right of the average and thus not eligible. Fixes: af4cf40470c2 ("sched/fair: Add cfs_rq::avg_vruntime") Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2023-10-03sched/eevdf: Also update slice on placementPeter Zijlstra
Tasks that never consume their full slice would not update their slice value. This means that tasks that are spawned before the sysctl scaling keep their original (UP) slice length. Fixes: 147f3efaa241 ("sched/fair: Implement an EEVDF-like scheduling policy") Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230915124822.847197830@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
2023-09-29sched/debug: Add new tracepoint to track compute energy computationQais Yousef
It was useful to track feec() placement decision and debug the spare capacity and optimization issues vs uclamp_max. Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef (Google) <qyousef@layalina.io> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230916232955.2099394-4-qyousef@layalina.io
2023-09-29sched/uclamp: Ignore (util == 0) optimization in feec() when p_util_max = 0Qais Yousef
find_energy_efficient_cpu() bails out early if effective util of the task is 0 as the delta at this point will be zero and there's nothing for EAS to do. When uclamp is being used, this could lead to wrong decisions when uclamp_max is set to 0. In this case the task is capped to performance point 0, but it is actually running and consuming energy and we can benefit from EAS energy calculations. Rework the condition so that it bails out when both util and uclamp_min are 0. We can do that without needing to use uclamp_task_util(); remove it. Fixes: d81304bc6193 ("sched/uclamp: Cater for uclamp in find_energy_efficient_cpu()'s early exit condition") Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef (Google) <qyousef@layalina.io> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230916232955.2099394-3-qyousef@layalina.io
2023-09-29sched/uclamp: Set max_spare_cap_cpu even if max_spare_cap is 0Qais Yousef
When uclamp_max is being used, the util of the task could be higher than the spare capacity of the CPU, but due to uclamp_max value we force-fit it there. The way the condition for checking for max_spare_cap in find_energy_efficient_cpu() was constructed; it ignored any CPU that has its spare_cap less than or _equal_ to max_spare_cap. Since we initialize max_spare_cap to 0; this lead to never setting max_spare_cap_cpu and hence ending up never performing compute_energy() for this cluster and missing an opportunity for a better energy efficient placement to honour uclamp_max setting. max_spare_cap = 0; cpu_cap = capacity_of(cpu) - cpu_util(p); // 0 if cpu_util(p) is high ... util_fits_cpu(...); // will return true if uclamp_max forces it to fit ... // this logic will fail to update max_spare_cap_cpu if cpu_cap is 0 if (cpu_cap > max_spare_cap) { max_spare_cap = cpu_cap; max_spare_cap_cpu = cpu; } prev_spare_cap suffers from a similar problem. Fix the logic by converting the variables into long and treating -1 value as 'not populated' instead of 0 which is a viable and correct spare capacity value. We need to be careful signed comparison is used when comparing with cpu_cap in one of the conditions. Fixes: 1d42509e475c ("sched/fair: Make EAS wakeup placement consider uclamp restrictions") Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef (Google) <qyousef@layalina.io> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230916232955.2099394-2-qyousef@layalina.io
2023-09-24sched/fair: Fix warning in bandwidth distributionJosh Don
We've observed the following warning being hit in distribute_cfs_runtime(): SCHED_WARN_ON(cfs_rq->runtime_remaining > 0) We have the following race: - CPU 0: running bandwidth distribution (distribute_cfs_runtime). Inspects the local cfs_rq and makes its runtime_remaining positive. However, we defer unthrottling the local cfs_rq until after considering all remote cfs_rq's. - CPU 1: starts running bandwidth distribution from the slack timer. When it finds the cfs_rq for CPU 0 on the throttled list, it observers the that the cfs_rq is throttled, yet is not on the CSD list, and has a positive runtime_remaining, thus triggering the warning in distribute_cfs_runtime. To fix this, we can rework the local unthrottling logic to put the local cfs_rq on a local list, so that any future bandwidth distributions will realize that the cfs_rq is about to be unthrottled. Signed-off-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230922230535.296350-2-joshdon@google.com
2023-09-24sched/fair: Make cfs_rq->throttled_csd_list available on !SMPJosh Don
This makes the following patch cleaner by avoiding extra CONFIG_SMP conditionals on the availability of rq->throttled_csd_list. Signed-off-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230922230535.296350-1-joshdon@google.com
2023-09-21sched/debug: Remove the /proc/sys/kernel/sched_child_runs_first sysctlSebastian Andrzej Siewior
The /proc/sys/kernel/sched_child_runs_first knob is no longer connected since: 5e963f2bd4654 ("sched/fair: Commit to EEVDF") Remove it. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230920130025.412071-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de
2023-09-19sched/fair: Rename check_preempt_curr() to wakeup_preempt()Ingo Molnar
The name is a bit opaque - make it clear that this is about wakeup preemption. Also rename the ->check_preempt_curr() methods similarly. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2023-09-19sched/fair: Rename check_preempt_wakeup() to check_preempt_wakeup_fair()Ingo Molnar
Other scheduling classes already postfix their similar methods with the class name. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2023-09-18sched/fair: Ratelimit update to tg->load_avgAaron Lu
When using sysbench to benchmark Postgres in a single docker instance with sysbench's nr_threads set to nr_cpu, it is observed there are times update_cfs_group() and update_load_avg() shows noticeable overhead on a 2sockets/112core/224cpu Intel Sapphire Rapids(SPR): 13.75% 13.74% [kernel.vmlinux] [k] update_cfs_group 10.63% 10.04% [kernel.vmlinux] [k] update_load_avg Annotate shows the cycles are mostly spent on accessing tg->load_avg with update_load_avg() being the write side and update_cfs_group() being the read side. tg->load_avg is per task group and when different tasks of the same taskgroup running on different CPUs frequently access tg->load_avg, it can be heavily contended. E.g. when running postgres_sysbench on a 2sockets/112cores/224cpus Intel Sappire Rapids, during a 5s window, the wakeup number is 14millions and migration number is 11millions and with each migration, the task's load will transfer from src cfs_rq to target cfs_rq and each change involves an update to tg->load_avg. Since the workload can trigger as many wakeups and migrations, the access(both read and write) to tg->load_avg can be unbound. As a result, the two mentioned functions showed noticeable overhead. With netperf/nr_client=nr_cpu/UDP_RR, the problem is worse: during a 5s window, wakeup number is 21millions and migration number is 14millions; update_cfs_group() costs ~25% and update_load_avg() costs ~16%. Reduce the overhead by limiting updates to tg->load_avg to at most once per ms. The update frequency is a tradeoff between tracking accuracy and overhead. 1ms is chosen because PELT window is roughly 1ms and it delivered good results for the tests that I've done. After this change, the cost of accessing tg->load_avg is greatly reduced and performance improved. Detailed test results below. ============================== postgres_sysbench on SPR: 25% base: 42382±19.8% patch: 50174±9.5% (noise) 50% base: 67626±1.3% patch: 67365±3.1% (noise) 75% base: 100216±1.2% patch: 112470±0.1% +12.2% 100% base: 93671±0.4% patch: 113563±0.2% +21.2% ============================== hackbench on ICL: group=1 base: 114912±5.2% patch: 117857±2.5% (noise) group=4 base: 359902±1.6% patch: 361685±2.7% (noise) group=8 base: 461070±0.8% patch: 491713±0.3% +6.6% group=16 base: 309032±5.0% patch: 378337±1.3% +22.4% ============================= hackbench on SPR: group=1 base: 100768±2.9% patch: 103134±2.9% (noise) group=4 base: 413830±12.5% patch: 378660±16.6% (noise) group=8 base: 436124±0.6% patch: 490787±3.2% +12.5% group=16 base: 457730±3.2% patch: 680452±1.3% +48.8% ============================ netperf/udp_rr on ICL 25% base: 114413±0.1% patch: 115111±0.0% +0.6% 50% base: 86803±0.5% patch: 86611±0.0% (noise) 75% base: 35959±5.3% patch: 49801±0.6% +38.5% 100% base: 61951±6.4% patch: 70224±0.8% +13.4% =========================== netperf/udp_rr on SPR 25% base: 104954±1.3% patch: 107312±2.8% (noise) 50% base: 55394±4.6% patch: 54940±7.4% (noise) 75% base: 13779±3.1% patch: 36105±1.1% +162% 100% base: 9703±3.7% patch: 28011±0.2% +189% ============================================== netperf/tcp_stream on ICL (all in noise range) 25% base: 43092±0.1% patch: 42891±0.5% 50% base: 19278±14.9% patch: 22369±7.2% 75% base: 16822±3.0% patch: 17086±2.3% 100% base: 18216±0.6% patch: 18078±2.9% =============================================== netperf/tcp_stream on SPR (all in noise range) 25% base: 34491±0.3% patch: 34886±0.5% 50% base: 19278±14.9% patch: 22369±7.2% 75% base: 16822±3.0% patch: 17086±2.3% 100% base: 18216±0.6% patch: 18078±2.9% Reported-by: Nitin Tekchandani <nitin.tekchandani@intel.com> Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Reviewed-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Tested-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Tested-by: Swapnil Sapkal <Swapnil.Sapkal@amd.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230912065808.2530-2-aaron.lu@intel.com
2023-09-15sched/fair: Fix cfs_rq_is_decayed() on !SMPChengming Zhou
We don't need to maintain per-queue leaf_cfs_rq_list on !SMP, since it's used for cfs_rq load tracking & balancing on SMP. But sched debug interface uses it to print per-cfs_rq stats. This patch fixes the !SMP version of cfs_rq_is_decayed(), so the per-queue leaf_cfs_rq_list is also maintained correctly on !SMP, to fix the warning in assert_list_leaf_cfs_rq(). Fixes: 0a00a354644e ("sched/fair: Delete useless condition in tg_unthrottle_up()") Reported-by: Leo Yu-Chi Liang <ycliang@andestech.com> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Tested-by: Leo Yu-Chi Liang <ycliang@andestech.com> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZN87UsqkWcFLDxea@swlinux02/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230913132031.2242151-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev
2023-09-15sched/fair: Fix open-coded numa_nearest_node()Yury Norov
task_numa_placement() searches for a nearest node to migrate by calling for_each_node_state(). Now that we have numa_nearest_node(), switch to using it. Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230819141239.287290-3-yury.norov@gmail.com
2023-09-13sched/fair: Fix SMT4 group_smt_balance handlingTim Chen
For SMT4, any group with more than 2 tasks will be marked as group_smt_balance. Retain the behaviour of group_has_spare by marking the busiest group as the group which has the least number of idle_cpus. Also, handle rounding effect of adding (ncores_local + ncores_busy) when the local is fully idle and busy group imbalance is less than 2 tasks. Local group should try to pull at least 1 task in this case so imbalance should be set to 2 instead. Fixes: fee1759e4f04 ("sched/fair: Determine active load balance for SMT sched groups") Acked-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/6cd1633036bb6b651af575c32c2a9608a106702c.camel@linux.intel.com
2023-09-02sched/fair: Optimize should_we_balance() for large SMT systemsShrikanth Hegde
should_we_balance() is called in load_balance() to find out if the CPU that is trying to do the load balance is the right one or not. With commit: b1bfeab9b002("sched/fair: Consider the idle state of the whole core for load balance") the code tries to find an idle core to do the load balancing and falls back on an idle sibling CPU if there is no idle core. However, on larger SMT systems, it could be needlessly iterating to find a idle by scanning all the CPUs in an non-idle core. If the core is not idle, and first SMT sibling which is idle has been found, then its not needed to check other SMT siblings for idleness Lets say in SMT4, Core0 has 0,2,4,6 and CPU0 is BUSY and rest are IDLE. balancing domain is MC/DIE. CPU2 will be set as the first idle_smt and same process would be repeated for CPU4 and CPU6 but this is unnecessary. Since calling is_core_idle loops through all CPU's in the SMT mask, effect is multiplied by weight of smt_mask. For example,when say 1 CPU is busy, we would skip loop for 2 CPU's and skip iterating over 8CPU's. That effect would be more in DIE/NUMA domain where there are more cores. Testing and performance evaluation ================================== The test has been done on this system which has 12 cores, i.e 24 small cores with SMT=4: lscpu Architecture: ppc64le Byte Order: Little Endian CPU(s): 96 On-line CPU(s) list: 0-95 Model name: POWER10 (architected), altivec supported Thread(s) per core: 8 Used funclatency bcc tool to evaluate the time taken by should_we_balance(). For base tip/sched/core the time taken is collected by making the should_we_balance() noinline. time is in nanoseconds. The values are collected by running the funclatency tracer for 60 seconds. values are average of 3 such runs. This represents the expected reduced time with patch. tip/sched/core was at commit: 2f88c8e802c8 ("sched/eevdf/doc: Modify the documented knob to base_slice_ns as well") Results: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ workload tip/sched/core with_patch(%gain) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ idle system 809.3 695.0(16.45) stress ng – 12 threads -l 100 1013.5 893.1(13.49) stress ng – 24 threads -l 100 1073.5 980.0(9.54) stress ng – 48 threads -l 100 683.0 641.0(6.55) stress ng – 96 threads -l 100 2421.0 2300(5.26) stress ng – 96 threads -l 15 375.5 377.5(-0.53) stress ng – 96 threads -l 25 635.5 637.5(-0.31) stress ng – 96 threads -l 35 934.0 891.0(4.83) Ran schbench(old), hackbench and stress_ng to evaluate the workload performance between tip/sched/core and with patch. No modification to tip/sched/core TL;DR: Good improvement is seen with schbench. when hackbench and stress_ng runs for longer good improvement is seen. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ schbench(old) tip +patch(%gain) 10 iterations sched/core ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 Threads 50.0th: 8.00 9.00(-12.50) 75.0th: 9.60 9.00(6.25) 90.0th: 11.80 10.20(13.56) 95.0th: 12.60 10.40(17.46) 99.0th: 13.60 11.90(12.50) 99.5th: 14.10 12.60(10.64) 99.9th: 15.90 14.60(8.18) 2 Threads 50.0th: 9.90 9.20(7.07) 75.0th: 12.60 10.10(19.84) 90.0th: 15.50 12.00(22.58) 95.0th: 17.70 14.00(20.90) 99.0th: 21.20 16.90(20.28) 99.5th: 22.60 17.50(22.57) 99.9th: 30.40 19.40(36.18) 4 Threads 50.0th: 12.50 10.60(15.20) 75.0th: 15.30 12.00(21.57) 90.0th: 18.60 14.10(24.19) 95.0th: 21.30 16.20(23.94) 99.0th: 26.00 20.70(20.38) 99.5th: 27.60 22.50(18.48) 99.9th: 33.90 31.40(7.37) 8 Threads 50.0th: 16.30 14.30(12.27) 75.0th: 20.20 17.40(13.86) 90.0th: 24.50 21.90(10.61) 95.0th: 27.30 24.70(9.52) 99.0th: 35.00 31.20(10.86) 99.5th: 46.40 33.30(28.23) 99.9th: 89.30 57.50(35.61) 16 Threads 50.0th: 22.70 20.70(8.81) 75.0th: 30.10 27.40(8.97) 90.0th: 36.00 32.80(8.89) 95.0th: 39.60 36.40(8.08) 99.0th: 49.20 44.10(10.37) 99.5th: 64.90 50.50(22.19) 99.9th: 143.50 100.60(29.90) 32 Threads 50.0th: 34.60 35.50(-2.60) 75.0th: 48.20 50.50(-4.77) 90.0th: 59.20 62.40(-5.41) 95.0th: 65.20 69.00(-5.83) 99.0th: 80.40 83.80(-4.23) 99.5th: 102.10 98.90(3.13) 99.9th: 727.10 506.80(30.30) schbench does improve in general. There is some run to run variation with schbench. Did a validation run to confirm that trend is similar. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ hackbench tip +patch(%gain) 20 iterations, 50000 loops sched/core ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Process 10 groups : 11.74 11.70(0.34) Process 20 groups : 22.73 22.69(0.18) Process 30 groups : 33.39 33.40(-0.03) Process 40 groups : 43.73 43.61(0.27) Process 50 groups : 53.82 54.35(-0.98) Process 60 groups : 64.16 65.29(-1.76) thread 10 Time : 12.81 12.79(0.16) thread 20 Time : 24.63 24.47(0.65) Process(Pipe) 10 Time : 6.40 6.34(0.94) Process(Pipe) 20 Time : 10.62 10.63(-0.09) Process(Pipe) 30 Time : 15.09 14.84(1.66) Process(Pipe) 40 Time : 19.42 19.01(2.11) Process(Pipe) 50 Time : 24.04 23.34(2.91) Process(Pipe) 60 Time : 28.94 27.51(4.94) thread(Pipe) 10 Time : 6.96 6.87(1.29) thread(Pipe) 20 Time : 11.74 11.73(0.09) hackbench shows slight improvement with pipe. Slight degradation in process. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ stress_ng tip +patch(%gain) 10 iterations 100000 cpu_ops sched/core ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --cpu=96 -util=100 Time taken : 5.30, 5.01(5.47) --cpu=48 -util=100 Time taken : 7.94, 6.73(15.24) --cpu=24 -util=100 Time taken : 11.67, 8.75(25.02) --cpu=12 -util=100 Time taken : 15.71, 15.02(4.39) --cpu=96 -util=10 Time taken : 22.71, 22.19(2.29) --cpu=96 -util=20 Time taken : 12.14, 12.37(-1.89) --cpu=96 -util=30 Time taken : 8.76, 8.86(-1.14) --cpu=96 -util=40 Time taken : 7.13, 7.14(-0.14) --cpu=96 -util=50 Time taken : 6.10, 6.13(-0.49) --cpu=96 -util=60 Time taken : 5.42, 5.41(0.18) --cpu=96 -util=70 Time taken : 4.94, 4.94(0.00) --cpu=96 -util=80 Time taken : 4.56, 4.53(0.66) --cpu=96 -util=90 Time taken : 4.27, 4.26(0.23) Good improvement seen with 24 CPUs. In this case only one CPU is busy, and no core is idle. Decent improvement with 100% utilization case. no difference in other utilization. Fixes: b1bfeab9b002 ("sched/fair: Consider the idle state of the whole core for load balance") Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230902081204.232218-1-sshegde@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2023-08-29sched/fair: Make update_entity_lag() staticHao Jia
The function update_entity_lag() is only used inside the kernel/sched/fair.c file. Make it static. Signed-off-by: Hao Jia <jiahao.os@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230829030325.69128-1-jiahao.os@bytedance.com
2023-08-28Merge tag 'x86-cleanups-2023-08-28' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull misc x86 cleanups from Ingo Molnar: "The following commit deserves special mention: 22dc02f81cddd Revert "sched/fair: Move unused stub functions to header" This is in x86/cleanups, because the revert is a re-application of a number of cleanups that got removed inadvertedly" [ This also effectively undoes the amd_check_microcode() microcode declaration change I had done in my microcode loader merge in commit 42a7f6e3ffe0 ("Merge tag 'x86_microcode_for_v6.6_rc1' [...]"). I picked the declaration change by Arnd from this branch instead, which put it in <asm/processor.h> instead of <asm/microcode.h> like I had done in my merge resolution - Linus ] * tag 'x86-cleanups-2023-08-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: x86/platform/uv: Refactor code using deprecated strncpy() interface to use strscpy() x86/hpet: Refactor code using deprecated strncpy() interface to use strscpy() x86/platform/uv: Refactor code using deprecated strcpy()/strncpy() interfaces to use strscpy() x86/qspinlock-paravirt: Fix missing-prototype warning x86/paravirt: Silence unused native_pv_lock_init() function warning x86/alternative: Add a __alt_reloc_selftest() prototype x86/purgatory: Include header for warn() declaration x86/asm: Avoid unneeded __div64_32 function definition Revert "sched/fair: Move unused stub functions to header" x86/apic: Hide unused safe_smp_processor_id() on 32-bit UP x86/cpu: Fix amd_check_microcode() declaration