From 1800b2ac96d8bc4ccdddc2ea9e83ecaffd54d3f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2022 20:55:00 +0200
Subject: selftests/bpf: Add regression test for pruning fix
Add a test to ensure we do mark_chain_precision for the argument type
ARG_CONST_ALLOC_SIZE_OR_ZERO. For other argument types, this was already
done, but propagation for missing for this case. Without the fix, this
test case loads successfully.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220823185500.467-1-memxor@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
(limited to 'tools')
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c
index 9e754423fa8b..6c03a7d805f9 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/precise.c
@@ -192,3 +192,28 @@
.result = VERBOSE_ACCEPT,
.retval = -1,
},
+{
+ "precise: mark_chain_precision for ARG_CONST_ALLOC_SIZE_OR_ZERO",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_1, offsetof(struct xdp_md, ingress_ifindex)),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_6, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_4, 0, 1),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0x1000),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_ringbuf_reserve),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0, 42),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_ringbuf_submit),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_ringbuf = { 1 },
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP,
+ .flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ,
+ .errstr = "invalid access to memory, mem_size=1 off=42 size=8",
+ .result = REJECT,
+},
--
cgit