From c20c297ae617abbfe45a8e886095b8d739d5e64f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: michael <michael@82007160-df01-0410-b94d-b575c5fd34c7>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 19:41:54 +0000
Subject: - m_encap.c:ms_encap(): removed irrelevant comment

git-svn-id: svn://svn.ircd-hybrid.org/svnroot/ircd-hybrid/branches/8.1.x@3038 82007160-df01-0410-b94d-b575c5fd34c7
---
 modules/m_encap.c | 6 +-----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/modules/m_encap.c b/modules/m_encap.c
index b36eecb..b947db7 100644
--- a/modules/m_encap.c
+++ b/modules/m_encap.c
@@ -64,11 +64,7 @@ ms_encap(struct Client *client_p, struct Client *source_p,
     ptr += len;
   }
 
-  /*
-   * If the final parameter crosses our buffer size, should we bail, 
-   * like the rest, or should we truncate?  ratbox seems to think truncate,
-   * so i'll do that for now until i can talk to lee.  -bill
-   */
+  /* If it's a command without parameters, don't prepend a ':' */
   if (parc == 3)
     snprintf(ptr, sizeof(buffer) - cur_len, "%s", parv[2]);
   else
-- 
cgit