|author||Luis R. Rodriguez <firstname.lastname@example.org>||2015-10-07 16:16:33 -0700|
|committer||Michal Marek <email@example.com>||2015-10-08 15:36:16 +0200|
kbuild: document recursive dependency limitation / resolution
Recursive dependency issues with kconfig are unavoidable due to some limitations with kconfig, since these issues are recurring provide a hint to the user how they can resolve these dependency issues and also document why such limitation exists. While at it also document a bit of future prospects of ways to enhance Kconfig, including providing formal semantics and evaluation of use of a SAT solver. If you're interested in this work or prospects of it check out the kconfig-sat project wiki  and mailing list .  http://kernelnewbies.org/KernelProjects/kconfig-sat  https://groups.google.com/d/forum/kconfig-sat Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <firstname.lastname@example.org> Cc: James Bottomley <email@example.com> Cc: Josh Triplett <firstname.lastname@example.org> Cc: Paul Bolle <email@example.com> Cc: Herbert Xu <firstname.lastname@example.org> Cc: Takashi Iwai <email@example.com> Cc: "Yann E. MORIN" <firstname.lastname@example.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <email@example.com> Cc: Mate Soos <firstname.lastname@example.org> Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <email@example.com> Signed-off-by: Michal Marek <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-01')
1 files changed, 57 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-01 b/Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-01
new file mode 100644
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+# Simple Kconfig recursive issue
+# Test with:
+# make KBUILD_KCONFIG=Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-01 allnoconfig
+# This Kconfig file has a simple recursive dependency issue. In order to
+# understand why this recursive dependency issue occurs lets consider what
+# Kconfig needs to address. We iterate over what Kconfig needs to address
+# by stepping through the questions it needs to address sequentially.
+# * What values are possible for CORE?
+# CORE_BELL_A_ADVANCED selects CORE, which means that it influences the values
+# that are possible for CORE. So for example if CORE_BELL_A_ADVANCED is 'y',
+# CORE must be 'y' too.
+# * What influences CORE_BELL_A_ADVANCED ?
+# As the name implies CORE_BELL_A_ADVANCED is an advanced feature of
+# CORE_BELL_A so naturally it depends on CORE_BELL_A. So if CORE_BELL_A is 'y'
+# we know CORE_BELL_A_ADVANCED can be 'y' too.
+# * What influences CORE_BELL_A ?
+# CORE_BELL_A depends on CORE, so CORE influences CORE_BELL_A.
+# But that is a problem, because this means that in order to determine
+# what values are possible for CORE we ended up needing to address questions
+# regarding possible values of CORE itself again. Answering the original
+# question of what are the possible values of CORE would make the kconfig
+# tools run in a loop. When this happens Kconfig exits and complains about
+# the "recursive dependency detected" error.
+# Reading the Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-01 file it may be
+# obvious that an easy to solution to this problem should just be the removal
+# of the "select CORE" from CORE_BELL_A_ADVANCED as that is implicit already
+# since CORE_BELL_A depends on CORE. Recursive dependency issues are not always
+# so trivial to resolve, we provide another example below of practical
+# implications of this recursive issue where the solution is perhaps not so
+# easy to understand. Note that matching semantics on the dependency on
+# CORE also consist of a solution to this recursive problem.
+mainmenu "Simple example to demo kconfig recursive dependency issue"
+ depends on CORE
+ depends on CORE_BELL_A
+ select CORE