summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/mm/slub.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>2021-10-04 14:45:51 +0100
committerVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>2022-01-06 12:25:40 +0100
commitd122019bf061cccc4583eb9ad40bf58c2fe517be (patch)
tree5488e5e9b595fc47e34c1a3f766978ee9bbc50be /mm/slub.c
parentae16d059f8c9409eba0c412639def0494765b761 (diff)
mm: Split slab into its own type
Make struct slab independent of struct page. It still uses the underlying memory in struct page for storing slab-specific data, but slab and slub can now be weaned off using struct page directly. Some of the wrapper functions (slab_address() and slab_order()) still need to cast to struct folio, but this is a significant disentanglement. [ vbabka@suse.cz: Rebase on folios, use folio instead of page where possible. Do not duplicate flags field in struct slab, instead make the related accessors go through slab_folio(). For testing pfmemalloc use the folio_*_active flag accessors directly so the PageSlabPfmemalloc wrappers can be removed later. Make folio_slab() expect only folio_test_slab() == true folios and virt_to_slab() return NULL when folio_test_slab() == false. Move struct slab to mm/slab.h. Don't represent with struct slab pages that are not true slab pages, but just a compound page obtained directly rom page allocator (with large kmalloc() for SLUB and SLOB). ] Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm/slub.c')
-rw-r--r--mm/slub.c8
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 2ccb1c71fc36..a211d96011ba 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -3787,7 +3787,7 @@ static unsigned int slub_min_objects;
* requested a higher minimum order then we start with that one instead of
* the smallest order which will fit the object.
*/
-static inline unsigned int slab_order(unsigned int size,
+static inline unsigned int calc_slab_order(unsigned int size,
unsigned int min_objects, unsigned int max_order,
unsigned int fract_leftover)
{
@@ -3851,7 +3851,7 @@ static inline int calculate_order(unsigned int size)
fraction = 16;
while (fraction >= 4) {
- order = slab_order(size, min_objects,
+ order = calc_slab_order(size, min_objects,
slub_max_order, fraction);
if (order <= slub_max_order)
return order;
@@ -3864,14 +3864,14 @@ static inline int calculate_order(unsigned int size)
* We were unable to place multiple objects in a slab. Now
* lets see if we can place a single object there.
*/
- order = slab_order(size, 1, slub_max_order, 1);
+ order = calc_slab_order(size, 1, slub_max_order, 1);
if (order <= slub_max_order)
return order;
/*
* Doh this slab cannot be placed using slub_max_order.
*/
- order = slab_order(size, 1, MAX_ORDER, 1);
+ order = calc_slab_order(size, 1, MAX_ORDER, 1);
if (order < MAX_ORDER)
return order;
return -ENOSYS;