diff options
author | Ge Yang <yangge1116@126.com> | 2025-02-10 09:56:06 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2025-03-21 22:03:10 -0700 |
commit | 24ac6fb6e3647fff3646b3ea1811095441380560 (patch) | |
tree | 60eb376880ca04cf5d7a0e693ea9ce1f5de40aab | |
parent | a211c6550efcc87aa2459ca347bda10721c7a46a (diff) |
mm/cma: using per-CMA locks to improve concurrent allocation performance
For different CMAs, concurrent allocation of CMA memory ideally should not
require synchronization using locks. Currently, a global cma_mutex lock
is employed to synchronize all CMA allocations, which can impact the
performance of concurrent allocations across different CMAs.
To test the performance impact, follow these steps:
1. Boot the kernel with the command line argument hugetlb_cma=30G to
allocate a 30GB CMA area specifically for huge page allocations. (note:
on my machine, which has 3 nodes, each node is initialized with 10G of
CMA)
2. Use the dd command with parameters if=/dev/zero of=/dev/shm/file bs=1G
count=30 to fully utilize the CMA area by writing zeroes to a file in
/dev/shm.
3. Open three terminals and execute the following commands simultaneously:
(Note: Each of these commands attempts to allocate 10GB [2621440 * 4KB
pages] of CMA memory.)
On Terminal 1: time echo 2621440 > /sys/kernel/debug/cma/hugetlb1/alloc
On Terminal 2: time echo 2621440 > /sys/kernel/debug/cma/hugetlb2/alloc
On Terminal 3: time echo 2621440 > /sys/kernel/debug/cma/hugetlb3/alloc
We attempt to allocate pages through the CMA debug interface and use the
time command to measure the duration of each allocation.
Performance comparison:
Without this patch With this patch
Terminal1 ~7s ~7s
Terminal2 ~14s ~8s
Terminal3 ~21s ~7s
To solve problem above, we could use per-CMA locks to improve concurrent
allocation performance. This would allow each CMA to be managed
independently, reducing the need for a global lock and thus improving
scalability and performance.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1739152566-744-1-git-send-email-yangge1116@126.com
Signed-off-by: Ge Yang <yangge1116@126.com>
Reviewed-by: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-rw-r--r-- | mm/cma.c | 7 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | mm/cma.h | 1 |
2 files changed, 5 insertions, 3 deletions
@@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ struct cma cma_areas[MAX_CMA_AREAS]; unsigned int cma_area_count; -static DEFINE_MUTEX(cma_mutex); static int __init __cma_declare_contiguous_nid(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t limit, @@ -175,6 +174,8 @@ static void __init cma_activate_area(struct cma *cma) spin_lock_init(&cma->lock); + mutex_init(&cma->alloc_mutex); + #ifdef CONFIG_CMA_DEBUGFS INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&cma->mem_head); spin_lock_init(&cma->mem_head_lock); @@ -813,9 +814,9 @@ static int cma_range_alloc(struct cma *cma, struct cma_memrange *cmr, spin_unlock_irq(&cma->lock); pfn = cmr->base_pfn + (bitmap_no << cma->order_per_bit); - mutex_lock(&cma_mutex); + mutex_lock(&cma->alloc_mutex); ret = alloc_contig_range(pfn, pfn + count, MIGRATE_CMA, gfp); - mutex_unlock(&cma_mutex); + mutex_unlock(&cma->alloc_mutex); if (ret == 0) { page = pfn_to_page(pfn); break; @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ struct cma { unsigned long available_count; unsigned int order_per_bit; /* Order of pages represented by one bit */ spinlock_t lock; + struct mutex alloc_mutex; #ifdef CONFIG_CMA_DEBUGFS struct hlist_head mem_head; spinlock_t mem_head_lock; |