summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/block
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>2025-03-19 16:23:45 +0530
committerJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>2025-03-19 11:35:45 -0600
commit89ed5fa3b5419f04452051fbcb6d3e5b801cdb1b (patch)
treec73f710487b216e4b0c00d4f4b6f0cfb55b2d4af /block
parent989bcd623a8b0c32b76d9258767d8b37e53419e6 (diff)
block: release q->elevator_lock in ioc_qos_write
The ioc_qos_write method acquires q->elevator_lock to protect updates to blk-wbt parameters. Once these updates are complete, the lock should be released before returning from ioc_qos_write. However, in one code path, the release of q->elevator_lock was mistakenly omitted, potentially leading to a lock leak. This commit fixes the issue by ensuring that q->elevator_lock is properly released in all return paths of ioc_qos_write. Fixes: 245618f8e45f ("block: protect wbt_lat_usec using q->elevator_lock") Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202503171650.cc082b66-lkp@intel.com Signed-off-by: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250319105518.468941-2-nilay@linux.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Diffstat (limited to 'block')
-rw-r--r--block/blk-iocost.c1
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/block/blk-iocost.c b/block/blk-iocost.c
index 38e7bf3c3b4f..56e6fb51316d 100644
--- a/block/blk-iocost.c
+++ b/block/blk-iocost.c
@@ -3348,6 +3348,7 @@ static ssize_t ioc_qos_write(struct kernfs_open_file *of, char *input,
wbt_enable_default(disk);
blk_mq_unquiesce_queue(disk->queue);
+ mutex_unlock(&disk->queue->elevator_lock);
blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(disk->queue, memflags);
blkg_conf_exit(&ctx);