summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mm
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorZi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>2025-03-14 18:21:12 -0400
committerAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>2025-03-17 22:07:01 -0700
commit200a89c159a7a416115e6e309183c82183bf98aa (patch)
tree2b15bfa130230fb7b7c6d300dd7076c9f9b0d608 /mm
parent80a5c494c89f73907ed659a9233a70253774cdae (diff)
mm/filemap: use xas_try_split() in __filemap_add_folio()
Patch series "Minimize xa_node allocation during xarry split", v3. When splitting a multi-index entry in XArray from order-n to order-m, existing xas_split_alloc()+xas_split() approach requires 2^(n % XA_CHUNK_SHIFT) xa_node allocations. But its callers, __filemap_add_folio() and shmem_split_large_entry(), use at most 1 xa_node. To minimize xa_node allocation and remove the limitation of no split from order-12 (or above) to order-0 (or anything between 0 and 5)[1], xas_try_split() was added[2], which allocates (n / XA_CHUNK_SHIFT - m / XA_CHUNK_SHIFT) xa_node. It is used for non-uniform folio split, but can be used by __filemap_add_folio() and shmem_split_large_entry(). xas_split_alloc() and xas_split() split an order-9 to order-0: --------------------------------- | | | | | | | | | | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | | | | | | | | | | --------------------------------- | | | | ------- --- --- ------- | | ... | | V V V V ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- | xa_node | | xa_node | ... | xa_node | | xa_node | ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- xas_try_split() splits an order-9 to order-0: --------------------------------- | | | | | | | | | | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | | | | | | | | | | --------------------------------- | | V ----------- | xa_node | ----------- xas_try_split() is designed to be called iteratively with n = m + 1. xas_try_split_mini_order() is added to minmize the number of calls to xas_try_split() by telling the caller the next minimal order to split to instead of n - 1. Splitting order-n to order-m when m= l * XA_CHUNK_SHIFT does not require xa_node allocation and requires 1 xa_node when n=l * XA_CHUNK_SHIFT and m = n - 1, so it is OK to use xas_try_split() with n > m + 1 when no new xa_node is needed. xfstests quick group test passed on xfs and tmpfs. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Z6YX3RznGLUD07Ao@casper.infradead.org/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250226210032.2044041-1-ziy@nvidia.com/ This patch (of 2): During __filemap_add_folio(), a shadow entry is covering n slots and a folio covers m slots with m < n is to be added. Instead of splitting all n slots, only the m slots covered by the folio need to be split and the remaining n-m shadow entries can be retained with orders ranging from m to n-1. This method only requires (n/XA_CHUNK_SHIFT) - (m/XA_CHUNK_SHIFT) new xa_nodes instead of (n % XA_CHUNK_SHIFT) * ((n/XA_CHUNK_SHIFT) - (m/XA_CHUNK_SHIFT)) new xa_nodes, compared to the original xas_split_alloc() + xas_split() one. For example, to insert an order-0 folio when an order-9 shadow entry is present (assuming XA_CHUNK_SHIFT is 6), 1 xa_node is needed instead of 8. xas_try_split_min_order() is introduced to reduce the number of calls to xas_try_split() during split. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250314222113.711703-1-ziy@nvidia.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250314222113.711703-2-ziy@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Mattew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shuemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> Cc: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com> Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r--mm/filemap.c45
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 27 deletions
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
index 152993a86de3..cc69f174f76b 100644
--- a/mm/filemap.c
+++ b/mm/filemap.c
@@ -857,11 +857,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(replace_page_cache_folio);
noinline int __filemap_add_folio(struct address_space *mapping,
struct folio *folio, pgoff_t index, gfp_t gfp, void **shadowp)
{
- XA_STATE(xas, &mapping->i_pages, index);
- void *alloced_shadow = NULL;
- int alloced_order = 0;
+ XA_STATE_ORDER(xas, &mapping->i_pages, index, folio_order(folio));
bool huge;
long nr;
+ unsigned int forder = folio_order(folio);
VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio);
VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_swapbacked(folio), folio);
@@ -870,7 +869,6 @@ noinline int __filemap_add_folio(struct address_space *mapping,
mapping_set_update(&xas, mapping);
VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(index & (folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1), folio);
- xas_set_order(&xas, index, folio_order(folio));
huge = folio_test_hugetlb(folio);
nr = folio_nr_pages(folio);
@@ -880,7 +878,7 @@ noinline int __filemap_add_folio(struct address_space *mapping,
folio->index = xas.xa_index;
for (;;) {
- int order = -1, split_order = 0;
+ int order = -1;
void *entry, *old = NULL;
xas_lock_irq(&xas);
@@ -898,21 +896,25 @@ noinline int __filemap_add_folio(struct address_space *mapping,
order = xas_get_order(&xas);
}
- /* entry may have changed before we re-acquire the lock */
- if (alloced_order && (old != alloced_shadow || order != alloced_order)) {
- xas_destroy(&xas);
- alloced_order = 0;
- }
-
if (old) {
- if (order > 0 && order > folio_order(folio)) {
+ if (order > 0 && order > forder) {
+ unsigned int split_order = max(forder,
+ xas_try_split_min_order(order));
+
/* How to handle large swap entries? */
BUG_ON(shmem_mapping(mapping));
- if (!alloced_order) {
- split_order = order;
- goto unlock;
+
+ while (order > forder) {
+ xas_set_order(&xas, index, split_order);
+ xas_try_split(&xas, old, order);
+ if (xas_error(&xas))
+ goto unlock;
+ order = split_order;
+ split_order =
+ max(xas_try_split_min_order(
+ split_order),
+ forder);
}
- xas_split(&xas, old, order);
xas_reset(&xas);
}
if (shadowp)
@@ -936,17 +938,6 @@ noinline int __filemap_add_folio(struct address_space *mapping,
unlock:
xas_unlock_irq(&xas);
- /* split needed, alloc here and retry. */
- if (split_order) {
- xas_split_alloc(&xas, old, split_order, gfp);
- if (xas_error(&xas))
- goto error;
- alloced_shadow = old;
- alloced_order = split_order;
- xas_reset(&xas);
- continue;
- }
-
if (!xas_nomem(&xas, gfp))
break;
}