diff options
author | Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> | 2025-03-14 18:21:12 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2025-03-17 22:07:01 -0700 |
commit | 200a89c159a7a416115e6e309183c82183bf98aa (patch) | |
tree | 2b15bfa130230fb7b7c6d300dd7076c9f9b0d608 /mm | |
parent | 80a5c494c89f73907ed659a9233a70253774cdae (diff) |
mm/filemap: use xas_try_split() in __filemap_add_folio()
Patch series "Minimize xa_node allocation during xarry split", v3.
When splitting a multi-index entry in XArray from order-n to order-m,
existing xas_split_alloc()+xas_split() approach requires 2^(n %
XA_CHUNK_SHIFT) xa_node allocations. But its callers,
__filemap_add_folio() and shmem_split_large_entry(), use at most 1
xa_node. To minimize xa_node allocation and remove the limitation of no
split from order-12 (or above) to order-0 (or anything between 0 and
5)[1], xas_try_split() was added[2], which allocates (n / XA_CHUNK_SHIFT -
m / XA_CHUNK_SHIFT) xa_node. It is used for non-uniform folio split, but
can be used by __filemap_add_folio() and shmem_split_large_entry().
xas_split_alloc() and xas_split() split an order-9 to order-0:
---------------------------------
| | | | | | | | |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| | | | | | | | |
---------------------------------
| | | |
------- --- --- -------
| | ... | |
V V V V
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
| xa_node | | xa_node | ... | xa_node | | xa_node |
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
xas_try_split() splits an order-9 to order-0:
---------------------------------
| | | | | | | | |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| | | | | | | | |
---------------------------------
|
|
V
-----------
| xa_node |
-----------
xas_try_split() is designed to be called iteratively with n = m + 1.
xas_try_split_mini_order() is added to minmize the number of calls to
xas_try_split() by telling the caller the next minimal order to split to
instead of n - 1. Splitting order-n to order-m when m= l * XA_CHUNK_SHIFT
does not require xa_node allocation and requires 1 xa_node when n=l *
XA_CHUNK_SHIFT and m = n - 1, so it is OK to use xas_try_split() with n >
m + 1 when no new xa_node is needed.
xfstests quick group test passed on xfs and tmpfs.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Z6YX3RznGLUD07Ao@casper.infradead.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250226210032.2044041-1-ziy@nvidia.com/
This patch (of 2):
During __filemap_add_folio(), a shadow entry is covering n slots and a
folio covers m slots with m < n is to be added. Instead of splitting all
n slots, only the m slots covered by the folio need to be split and the
remaining n-m shadow entries can be retained with orders ranging from m to
n-1. This method only requires
(n/XA_CHUNK_SHIFT) - (m/XA_CHUNK_SHIFT)
new xa_nodes instead of
(n % XA_CHUNK_SHIFT) * ((n/XA_CHUNK_SHIFT) - (m/XA_CHUNK_SHIFT))
new xa_nodes, compared to the original xas_split_alloc() + xas_split()
one. For example, to insert an order-0 folio when an order-9 shadow entry
is present (assuming XA_CHUNK_SHIFT is 6), 1 xa_node is needed instead of
8.
xas_try_split_min_order() is introduced to reduce the number of calls to
xas_try_split() during split.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250314222113.711703-1-ziy@nvidia.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250314222113.711703-2-ziy@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Mattew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shuemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'mm')
-rw-r--r-- | mm/filemap.c | 45 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 27 deletions
diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c index 152993a86de3..cc69f174f76b 100644 --- a/mm/filemap.c +++ b/mm/filemap.c @@ -857,11 +857,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(replace_page_cache_folio); noinline int __filemap_add_folio(struct address_space *mapping, struct folio *folio, pgoff_t index, gfp_t gfp, void **shadowp) { - XA_STATE(xas, &mapping->i_pages, index); - void *alloced_shadow = NULL; - int alloced_order = 0; + XA_STATE_ORDER(xas, &mapping->i_pages, index, folio_order(folio)); bool huge; long nr; + unsigned int forder = folio_order(folio); VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(folio), folio); VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_test_swapbacked(folio), folio); @@ -870,7 +869,6 @@ noinline int __filemap_add_folio(struct address_space *mapping, mapping_set_update(&xas, mapping); VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(index & (folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1), folio); - xas_set_order(&xas, index, folio_order(folio)); huge = folio_test_hugetlb(folio); nr = folio_nr_pages(folio); @@ -880,7 +878,7 @@ noinline int __filemap_add_folio(struct address_space *mapping, folio->index = xas.xa_index; for (;;) { - int order = -1, split_order = 0; + int order = -1; void *entry, *old = NULL; xas_lock_irq(&xas); @@ -898,21 +896,25 @@ noinline int __filemap_add_folio(struct address_space *mapping, order = xas_get_order(&xas); } - /* entry may have changed before we re-acquire the lock */ - if (alloced_order && (old != alloced_shadow || order != alloced_order)) { - xas_destroy(&xas); - alloced_order = 0; - } - if (old) { - if (order > 0 && order > folio_order(folio)) { + if (order > 0 && order > forder) { + unsigned int split_order = max(forder, + xas_try_split_min_order(order)); + /* How to handle large swap entries? */ BUG_ON(shmem_mapping(mapping)); - if (!alloced_order) { - split_order = order; - goto unlock; + + while (order > forder) { + xas_set_order(&xas, index, split_order); + xas_try_split(&xas, old, order); + if (xas_error(&xas)) + goto unlock; + order = split_order; + split_order = + max(xas_try_split_min_order( + split_order), + forder); } - xas_split(&xas, old, order); xas_reset(&xas); } if (shadowp) @@ -936,17 +938,6 @@ noinline int __filemap_add_folio(struct address_space *mapping, unlock: xas_unlock_irq(&xas); - /* split needed, alloc here and retry. */ - if (split_order) { - xas_split_alloc(&xas, old, split_order, gfp); - if (xas_error(&xas)) - goto error; - alloced_shadow = old; - alloced_order = split_order; - xas_reset(&xas); - continue; - } - if (!xas_nomem(&xas, gfp)) break; } |