summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs/file.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-05-15btrfs: use a single variable to track return value at btrfs_page_mkwrite()Filipe Manana
We have two variables to track return values, ret and ret2, with types vm_fault_t (an unsigned int type) and int, which makes it a bit confusing and harder to keep track. So use a single variable, of type int, and under the 'out' label return vmf_error(ret) in case ret contains an error, otherwise return VM_FAULT_NOPAGE. This is equivalent to what we had before and it's simpler. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: don't return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS on failure to set delalloc for mmap writeFilipe Manana
If the call to btrfs_set_extent_delalloc() fails we are always returning VM_FAULT_SIGBUS, which is odd since the error means "bad access" and the most likely cause for btrfs_set_extent_delalloc() is -ENOMEM, which should be translated to VM_FAULT_OOM. Instead of returning VM_FAULT_SIGBUS return vmf_error(ret2), which gives us a more appropriate return value, and we use that everywhere else too. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: simplify early error checking in btrfs_page_mkwrite()Filipe Manana
We have this entangled error checks early at btrfs_page_mkwrite(): 1) Try to reserve delalloc space by calling btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space() and storing the return value in the ret2 variable; 2) If the reservation succeed, call file_update_time() and store the return value in ret2 and also set the local variable 'reserved' to true (1); 3) Then do an error check on ret2 to see if any of the previous calls failed and if so, jump either to the 'out' label or to the 'out_noreserve' label, depending on whether 'reserved' is true or not. This is unnecessarily complex. Instead change this to a simpler and more straightforward approach: 1) Call btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space(), if that returns an error jump to the 'out_noreserve' label; 2) The call file_update_time() and if that returns an error jump to the 'out' label. Like this there's less nested if statements, no need to use a local variable to track if space was reserved and if statements are used only to check errors. Also move the call to extent_changeset_free() out of the 'out_noreserve' label and under the 'out' label since the changeset is allocated only if the call to reserve delalloc space succeeded. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: pass true to btrfs_delalloc_release_space() at btrfs_page_mkwrite()Filipe Manana
In the last call to btrfs_delalloc_release_space() where the value of the variable 'ret' is never zero, we pass the expression 'ret != 0' as the value for the argument 'qgroup_free', which always evaluates to true. Make this less confusing and more clear by explicitly passing true instead. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: fix wrong start offset for delalloc space release during mmap writeFilipe Manana
If we're doing a mmap write against a folio that has i_size somewhere in the middle and we have multiple sectors in the folio, we may have to release excess space previously reserved, for the range going from the rounded up (to sector size) i_size to the folio's end offset. We are calculating the right amount to release and passing it to btrfs_delalloc_release_space(), but we are passing the wrong start offset of that range - we're passing the folio's start offset instead of the end offset, plus 1, of the range for which we keep the reservation. This may result in releasing more space then we should and eventually trigger an underflow of the data space_info's bytes_may_use counter. So fix this by passing the start offset as 'end + 1' instead of 'page_start' to btrfs_delalloc_release_space(). Fixes: d0b7da88f640 ("Btrfs: btrfs_page_mkwrite: Reserve space in sectorsized units") Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: simplify error return logic when getting folio at prepare_one_folio()Filipe Manana
There's no need to have special logic to return -EAGAIN in case the call to __filemap_get_folio() fails, because when FGP_NOWAIT is passed to __filemap_get_folio() it returns ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN) if it needs to do something that would imply blocking. The reason we have this logic is from the days before we migrated to the folio interface, when we called pagecache_get_page() which would return NULL instead of an error pointer. So remove this special casing and always return the error that the call to __filemap_get_folio() returned. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: handle unaligned EOF truncation correctly for subpage casesQu Wenruo
[BUG] The following fsx sequence will fail on btrfs with 64K page size and 4K fs block size: #fsx -d -e 1 -N 4 $mnt/junk -S 36386 READ BAD DATA: offset = 0xe9ba, size = 0x6dd5, fname = /mnt/btrfs/junk OFFSET GOOD BAD RANGE 0xe9ba 0x0000 0x03ac 0x0 operation# (mod 256) for the bad data may be 3 ... LOG DUMP (4 total operations): 1( 1 mod 256): WRITE 0x6c62 thru 0x1147d (0xa81c bytes) HOLE ***WWWW 2( 2 mod 256): TRUNCATE DOWN from 0x1147e to 0x5448 ******WWWW 3( 3 mod 256): ZERO 0x1c7aa thru 0x28fe2 (0xc839 bytes) 4( 4 mod 256): MAPREAD 0xe9ba thru 0x1578e (0x6dd5 bytes) ***RRRR*** [CAUSE] Only 2 operations are really involved in this case: 3 pollute_eof 0x5448 thru 0xffff (0xabb8 bytes) 3 zero from 0x1c7aa to 0x28fe3, (0xc839 bytes) 4 mapread 0xe9ba thru 0x1578e (0x6dd5 bytes) At operation 3, fsx pollutes beyond EOF, that is done by mmap() and write into that mmap() range beyond EOF. Such write will fill the range beyond EOF, but it will never reach disk as ranges beyond EOF will not be marked dirty nor uptodate. Then we zero_range for [0x1c7aa, 0x28fe3], and since the range is beyond our isize (which was 0x5448), we should zero out any range beyond EOF (0x5448). During btrfs_zero_range(), we call btrfs_truncate_block() to dirty the unaligned head block. But that function only really zeroes out the block at [0x5000, 0x5fff], it doesn't bother any range other that that block, since those ranges will not be marked dirty nor written back. So the range [0x6000, 0xffff] is still polluted, and later mapread() will return the poisoned value. [FIX] Enhance btrfs_truncate_block() by: - Pass a @start/@end pair to indicate the full truncation range This is to handle the following truncation case: Page size is 64K, fs block size is 4K, truncate range is [6K, 60K] 0 32K 64K | |///////////////////////////////////| | 6K 60K The range is not aligned for its head block, so we need to call btrfs_truncate_block() with @from = 6K, @front = 0, @len = 0. But with that information we only know to zero the range [6K, 8K), if we zero out the range [6K, 64K), the last block will also be zeroed, causing data loss. So here we need the full range we're truncating, so that we can avoid over-truncation. - Rename @from to @offset As now the parameter is only utilized to locate a block, it's not really carrying the old @from meaning well. - Remove @front parameter With the full truncate range passed in, we can determine if the @offset is at the head or tail block. - Skip truncation if @offset is not in the head nor tail blocks The call site in hole punch unconditionally call btrfs_truncate_block() without even checking the range is aligned or not. If the @offset is neither in the head nor in tail block, it means we can safely ignore it. - Skip truncate if the range inside the target block is already aligned - Make btrfs_truncate_block() zero all blocks beyond EOF Since we have the original range, we know exactly if we're doing truncation beyond EOF (the @end will be (u64)-1). If we're doing truncation beyond EOF, then enlarge the truncation range to the folio end, to address the possibly polluted ranges. Otherwise still keep the zero range inside the block, as we can have large data folios soon, always truncating every blocks inside the same folio can be costly for large folios. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: trivial conversion to return bool instead of intDavid Sterba
Old code has a lot of int for bool return values, bool is recommended and done in new code. Convert the trivial cases that do simple 0/false and 1/true. Functions comment are updated if needed. Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: rename iov_iter iterator parameter in btrfs_buffered_write()David Sterba
Using 'i' for a parameter is confusing and conforming to current preferences, so rename it to 'iter'. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: rename functions to allocate and free extent mapsFilipe Manana
These functions are exported and don't have a 'btrfs_' prefix in their names, which goes against coding style conventions. Rename them to have such prefix, making it clear they are from btrfs and avoiding potential collisions in the future with functions defined elsewhere outside btrfs. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: rename extent map functions to get block start, end and check if in treeFilipe Manana
These functions are exported and don't have a 'btrfs_' prefix in their names, which goes against coding style conventions. Rename them to have such prefix, making it clear they are from btrfs and avoiding potential collisions in the future with functions defined elsewhere outside btrfs. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: rename free_extent_state() to include a btrfs prefixFilipe Manana
This is an exported function so it should have a 'btrfs_' prefix by convention, to make it clear it's btrfs specific and to avoid collisions with functions from elsewhere in the kernel. Rename the function to add 'btrfs_' prefix to it. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: rename the functions to count, test and get bit ranges in io treesFilipe Manana
These functions are exported so they should have a 'btrfs_' prefix by convention, to make it clear they are btrfs specific and to avoid collisions with functions from elsewhere in the kernel. So add a 'btrfs_' prefix to their names to make it clear they are from btrfs. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: rename the functions to clear bits for an extent rangeFilipe Manana
These functions are exported so they should have a 'btrfs_' prefix by convention, to make it clear they are btrfs specific and to avoid collisions with functions from elsewhere in the kernel. One of them has a double underscore prefix which is also discouraged. So remove double underscore prefix where applicable and add a 'btrfs_' prefix to their name to make it clear they are from btrfs. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: add btrfs prefix to main lock, try lock and unlock extent functionsFilipe Manana
These functions are exported so they should have a 'btrfs_' prefix by convention, to make it clear they are btrfs specific and to avoid collisions with functions from elsewhere in the kernel. So add a prefix to their name. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: prepare prepare_one_folio() for large data foliosQu Wenruo
The only blockage is the ASSERT() rejecting large folios, just remove it. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: prepare btrfs_page_mkwrite() for large data foliosQu Wenruo
The function btrfs_page_mkwrite() has an explicit ASSERT() checking the folio order. To make it support large data folios, we need to: - Remove the ASSERT(folio_order(folio) == 0) - Use folio_contains() to check if the folio covers the last page Otherwise the code is already supporting large folios well. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: do more trivial BTRFS_PATH_AUTO_FREE conversionsDavid Sterba
The most trivial pattern for the auto freeing when the variable is declared with the macro and the final btrfs_free_path() is removed. There are almost none goto -> return conversions and there's no other function cleanup. Reviewed-by: Daniel Vacek <neelx@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: prepare btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range() for large data foliosQu Wenruo
The function btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range() needs to make sure there is no other folio in the range, thus it goes with filemap_range_has_page(), which works pretty fine. But if we have large folios, under the following case filemap_range_has_page() will always return true, forcing btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range() to do a very time consuming busy loop: start end | | |//|//|//|//| | | | | | | | |//|//| \ / \ / Folio A Folio B In the above case, folio A and B contain our start/end indexes, and there are no other folios in the range. Thus we do not need to retry inside btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range(). To prepare for large data folios, introduce a helper, check_range_has_page(), which will: - Shrink the search range towards page boundaries If the rounded down end (exclusive, otherwise it can underflow when @end is inside the folio at file offset 0) is no larger than the rounded up start, it means the range contains no other pages other than the ones covering @start and @end. Can return false directly in that case. - Grab all the folios inside the range - Skip any large folios that cover the start and end indexes - If any other folios are found return true - Otherwise return false This new helper is going to handle both large folios and regular ones. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: prepare btrfs_buffered_write() for large data foliosQu Wenruo
This involves the following modifications: - Set the order flags for __filemap_get_folio() inside prepare_one_folio() This will allow __filemap_get_folio() to create a large folio if the address space supports it. - Limit the initial @write_bytes inside copy_one_range() If the largest folio boundary splits the initial write range, there is no way we can write beyond the largest folio boundary. This is done by a simple helper calc_write_bytes(). - Release exceeding reserved space if the folio is smaller than expected Which is doing the same handling when short copy happens. All the preparations should not change the behavior when the largest folio order is 0. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: refactor how we handle reserved space inside copy_one_range()Qu Wenruo
There are several things not ideal in copy_one_range(): - Unnecessary temporary variables * block_offset * reserve_bytes * dirty_blocks * num_blocks * release_bytes These are utilized to handle short-copy cases. - Inconsistent handling of btrfs_delalloc_release_extents() There is a hidden behavior that, after reserving metadata for X bytes of data write, we have to call btrfs_delalloc_release_extents() with X once and only once. Calling btrfs_delalloc_release_extents(X - 4K) and btrfs_delalloc_release_extents(4K) will cause outstanding extents accounting to go wrong. This is because the outstanding extents mechanism is not designed to handle shrinking of reserved space. Improve above situations by: - Use a single @reserved_start and @reserved_len pair Now we reserve space for the initial range, and if a short copy happened and we need to shrink the reserved space, we can easily calculate the new length, and update @reserved_len. - Introduce helpers to shrink reserved data and metadata space This is done by two new helpers, shrink_reserved_space() and btrfs_delalloc_shrink_extents(). The later will do a better calculation if we need to modify the outstanding extents, and the first one will be utilized inside copy_one_range(). - Manually unlock, release reserved space and return if no byte is copied Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: factor out the main loop of btrfs_buffered_write() into a helperQu Wenruo
Inside the main loop of btrfs_buffered_write() we are doing a lot of heavy lifting inside a while() loop. This makes it pretty hard to read, factor out the content into a helper, copy_one_range() to do the work. This has no functional change, but with some minor variable renames, e.g. rename all "sector" into "block". Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: factor out space reservation code from btrfs_buffered_write()Qu Wenruo
Inside the main loop of btrfs_buffered_write(), we have a complex data and metadata space reservation code, which tries to reserve space for a COW write, if failed then fallback to check if we can do a NOCOW write. Factor out that part of code into a dedicated helper, reserve_space(), to make the main loop a little easier to read. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: cleanup the reserved space inside loop of btrfs_buffered_write()Qu Wenruo
Inside the main loop of btrfs_buffered_write(), if something wrong happened, there is a out-of-loop cleanup path to release the reserved space. This behavior saves some code lines, but makes it much harder to read, as we need to check release_bytes to make sure when we need to do the cleanup. Factor out the cleanup part into a helper, release_reserved_space(), to do the cleanup inside the main loop, so that we can move @release_bytes inside the loop. This will make later refactoring of the main loop much easier. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-05-15btrfs: remove force_page_uptodate variable from btrfs_buffered_write()Qu Wenruo
Commit c87c299776e4 ("btrfs: make buffered write to copy one page a time") changed how the variable @force_page_uptodate was updated. Before that commit the variable was only initialized to false at the beginning of the function, and after hitting a short copy, the next retry on the same folio would force the folio to be read from the disk. But after the commit, the variable is always initialized to false at the beginning of the loop's scope, causing prepare_one_folio() never to get a true value passed in. The change in behavior is not a huge deal, it only makes a difference on how we handle short copies: Old: Allow the buffer to be split The first short copy will be rejected, that's the same for both cases. But for the next retry, we require the folio to be read from disk. Then even if we hit a short copy again, since the folio is already uptodate, we do not need to handle partial uptodate range, and can continue, marking the short copied range as dirty and continue. This will split the buffer write into the folio as two buffered writes. New: Do not allow the buffer to be split The first short copy will be rejected, that's the same for both cases. For the next retry, we do nothing special, thus if the short copy happened again, we reject it again, until either the short copy is gone, or we failed to fault in the buffer. This will mean the buffer write into the folio will either fail or succeed, no splitting will happen. To me, either solution is fine, but the new one makes it simpler and requires no special handling, so I prefer that solution. And since @force_page_uptodate is always false when passed into prepare_one_folio(), we can just remove the variable. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-04-17btrfs: avoid page_lockend underflow in btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range()Qu Wenruo
[BUG] When running btrfs/004 with 4K fs block size and 64K page size, sometimes fsstress workload can take 100% CPU for a while, but not long enough to trigger a 120s hang warning. [CAUSE] When such 100% CPU usage happens, btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range() is always in the call trace. One example when this problem happens, the function btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range() got the following parameters: lock_start = 4096, lockend = 20469 Then we calculate @page_lockstart by rounding up lock_start to page boundary, which is 64K (page size is 64K). For @page_lockend, we round down the value towards page boundary, which result 0. Then since we need to pass an inclusive end to filemap_range_has_page(), we subtract 1 from the rounded down value, resulting in (u64)-1. In the above case, the range is inside the same page, and we do not even need to call filemap_range_has_page(), not to mention to call it with (u64)-1 at the end. This behavior will cause btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range() to busy loop waiting for irrelevant range to have its pages dropped. [FIX] Calculate @page_lockend by just rounding down @lockend, without decreasing the value by one. So @page_lockend will no longer overflow. Then exit early if @page_lockend is no larger than @page_lockstart. As it means either the range is inside the same page, or the two pages are adjacent already. Finally only decrease @page_lockend when calling filemap_range_has_page(). Fixes: 0528476b6ac7 ("btrfs: fix the filemap_range_has_page() call in btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range()") Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-03-18btrfs: prepare btrfs_page_mkwrite() for large foliosQu Wenruo
This changes the assumption that the folio is always page sized. (Although the ASSERT() for folio order is still kept as-is). Just replace the PAGE_SIZE with folio_size(). Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-03-18btrfs: allow buffered write to avoid full page read if it's block alignedQu Wenruo
[BUG] Since the support of block size (sector size) < page size for btrfs, test case generic/563 fails with 4K block size and 64K page size: --- tests/generic/563.out 2024-04-25 18:13:45.178550333 +0930 +++ /home/adam/xfstests-dev/results//generic/563.out.bad 2024-09-30 09:09:16.155312379 +0930 @@ -3,7 +3,8 @@ read is in range write is in range write -> read/write -read is in range +read has value of 8388608 +read is NOT in range -33792 .. 33792 write is in range ... [CAUSE] The test case creates a 8MiB file, then does buffered write into the 8MiB using 4K block size, to overwrite the whole file. On 4K page sized systems, since the write range covers the full block and page, btrfs will not bother reading the page, just like what XFS and EXT4 do. But on 64K page sized systems, although the 4K sized write is still block aligned, it's not page aligned anymore, thus btrfs will read the full page, which will be accounted by cgroup and fail the test. As the test case itself expects such 4K block aligned write should not trigger any read. Such expected behavior is an optimization to reduce folio reads when possible, and unfortunately btrfs does not implement such optimization. [FIX] To skip the full page read, we need to do the following modification: - Do not trigger full page read as long as the buffered write is block aligned This is pretty simple by modifying the check inside prepare_uptodate_page(). - Skip already uptodate blocks during full page read Or we can lead to the following data corruption: 0 32K 64K |///////| | Where the file range [0, 32K) is dirtied by buffered write, the remaining range [32K, 64K) is not. When reading the full page, since [0,32K) is only dirtied but not written back, there is no data extent map for it, but a hole covering [0, 64k). If we continue reading the full page range [0, 64K), the dirtied range will be filled with 0 (since there is only a hole covering the whole range). This causes the dirtied range to get lost. With this optimization, btrfs can pass generic/563 even if the page size is larger than fs block size. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-03-18btrfs: pass struct btrfs_inode to can_nocow_extent()David Sterba
Pass a struct btrfs_inode to can_nocow_extent() as it's an internal interface, allowing to remove some use of BTRFS_I. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-03-18btrfs: expose per-inode stable writes flagQu Wenruo
The address space flag AS_STABLE_WRITES determine if FGP_STABLE for will wait for the folio to finish its writeback. For btrfs, due to the default data checksum behavior, if we modify the folio while it's still under writeback, it will cause data checksum mismatch. Thus for quite some call sites we manually call folio_wait_writeback() to prevent such problem from happening. Currently there is only one call site inside btrfs really utilizing FGP_STABLE, and in that case we also manually call folio_wait_writeback() to do the waiting. But it's better to properly expose the stable writes flag to a per-inode basis, to allow call sites to fully benefit from FGP_STABLE flag. E.g. for inodes with NODATASUM allowing beginning dirtying the page without waiting for writeback. This involves: - Update the mapping's stable write flag when setting/clearing NODATASUM inode flag using ioctl This only works for empty files, so it should be fine. - Update the mapping's stable write flag when reading an inode from disk - Remove the explicit folio_wait_writeback() for FGP_BEGINWRITE call site Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-02-21btrfs: fix data overwriting bug during buffered write when block size < page ↵Qu Wenruo
size [BUG] When running generic/418 with a btrfs whose block size < page size (subpage cases), it always fails. And the following minimal reproducer is more than enough to trigger it reliably: workload() { mkfs.btrfs -s 4k -f $dev > /dev/null dmesg -C mount $dev $mnt $fsstree_dir/src/dio-invalidate-cache -r -b 4096 -n 3 -i 1 -f $mnt/diotest ret=$? umount $mnt stop_trace if [ $ret -ne 0 ]; then fail fi } for (( i = 0; i < 1024; i++)); do echo "=== $i/$runtime ===" workload done [CAUSE] With extra trace printk added to the following functions: - btrfs_buffered_write() * Which folio is touched * The file offset (start) where the buffered write is at * How many bytes are copied * The content of the write (the first 2 bytes) - submit_one_sector() * Which folio is touched * The position inside the folio * The content of the page cache (the first 2 bytes) - pagecache_isize_extended() * The parameters of the function itself * The parameters of the folio_zero_range() Which are enough to show the problem: 22.158114: btrfs_buffered_write: folio pos=0 start=0 copied=4096 content=0x0101 22.158161: submit_one_sector: r/i=5/257 folio=0 pos=0 content=0x0101 22.158609: btrfs_buffered_write: folio pos=0 start=4096 copied=4096 content=0x0101 22.158634: btrfs_buffered_write: folio pos=0 start=8192 copied=4096 content=0x0101 22.158650: pagecache_isize_extended: folio=0 from=4096 to=8192 bsize=4096 zero off=4096 len=8192 22.158682: submit_one_sector: r/i=5/257 folio=0 pos=4096 content=0x0000 22.158686: submit_one_sector: r/i=5/257 folio=0 pos=8192 content=0x0101 The tool dio-invalidate-cache will start 3 threads, each doing a buffered write with 0x01 at offset 0, 4096 and 8192, do a fsync, then do a direct read, and compare the read buffer with the write buffer. Note that all 3 btrfs_buffered_write() are writing the correct 0x01 into the page cache. But at submit_one_sector(), at file offset 4096, the content is zeroed out, by pagecache_isize_extended(). The race happens like this: Thread A is writing into range [4K, 8K). Thread B is writing into range [8K, 12k). Thread A | Thread B -------------------------------------+------------------------------------ btrfs_buffered_write() | btrfs_buffered_write() |- old_isize = 4K; | |- old_isize = 4096; |- btrfs_inode_lock() | | |- write into folio range [4K, 8K) | | |- pagecache_isize_extended() | | | extend isize from 4096 to 8192 | | | no folio_zero_range() called | | |- btrfs_inode_lock() | | | |- btrfs_inode_lock() | |- write into folio range [8K, 12K) | |- pagecache_isize_extended() | | calling folio_zero_range(4K, 8K) | | This is caused by the old_isize is | | grabbed too early, without any | | inode lock. | |- btrfs_inode_unlock() The @old_isize is grabbed without inode lock, causing race between two buffered write threads and making pagecache_isize_extended() to zero range which is still containing cached data. And this is only affecting subpage btrfs, because for regular blocksize == page size case, the function pagecache_isize_extended() will do nothing if the block size >= page size. [FIX] Grab the old i_size while holding the inode lock. This means each buffered write thread will have a stable view of the old inode size, thus avoid the above race. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+ Fixes: 5e8b9ef30392 ("btrfs: move pos increment and pagecache extension to btrfs_buffered_write") Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-02-11btrfs: fix hole expansion when writing at an offset beyond EOFFilipe Manana
At btrfs_write_check() if our file's i_size is not sector size aligned and we have a write that starts at an offset larger than the i_size that falls within the same page of the i_size, then we end up not zeroing the file range [i_size, write_offset). The code is this: start_pos = round_down(pos, fs_info->sectorsize); oldsize = i_size_read(inode); if (start_pos > oldsize) { /* Expand hole size to cover write data, preventing empty gap */ loff_t end_pos = round_up(pos + count, fs_info->sectorsize); ret = btrfs_cont_expand(BTRFS_I(inode), oldsize, end_pos); if (ret) return ret; } So if our file's i_size is 90269 bytes and a write at offset 90365 bytes comes in, we get 'start_pos' set to 90112 bytes, which is less than the i_size and therefore we don't zero out the range [90269, 90365) by calling btrfs_cont_expand(). This is an old bug introduced in commit 9036c10208e1 ("Btrfs: update hole handling v2"), from 2008, and the buggy code got moved around over the years. Fix this by discarding 'start_pos' and comparing against the write offset ('pos') without any alignment. This bug was recently exposed by test case generic/363 which tests this scenario by polluting ranges beyond EOF with an mmap write and than verify that after a file increases we get zeroes for the range which is supposed to be a hole and not what we wrote with the previous mmaped write. We're only seeing this exposed now because generic/363 used to run only on xfs until last Sunday's fstests update. The test was failing like this: $ ./check generic/363 FSTYP -- btrfs PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 debian0 6.13.0-rc7-btrfs-next-185+ #17 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Feb 3 12:28:46 WET 2025 MKFS_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdc MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdc /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1 generic/363 0s ... [failed, exit status 1]- output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/363.out.bad) --- tests/generic/363.out 2025-02-05 15:31:14.013646509 +0000 +++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/363.out.bad 2025-02-05 17:25:33.112630781 +0000 @@ -1 +1,46 @@ QA output created by 363 +READ BAD DATA: offset = 0xdcad, size = 0xd921, fname = /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/dev/junk +OFFSET GOOD BAD RANGE +0x1609d 0x0000 0x3104 0x0 +operation# (mod 256) for the bad data may be 4 +0x1609e 0x0000 0x0472 0x1 +operation# (mod 256) for the bad data may be 4 ... (Run 'diff -u /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/tests/generic/363.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/363.out.bad' to see the entire diff) Ran: generic/363 Failures: generic/363 Failed 1 of 1 tests Fixes: 9036c10208e1 ("Btrfs: update hole handling v2") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: file: remove unnecessary calls to btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty()Filipe Manana
We have several places explicitly calling btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty() but that is not necessarily since the target leaf came from a path that was obtained for a btree search function that modifies the btree, something like btrfs_insert_empty_item() or anything else that ends up calling btrfs_search_slot() with a value of 1 for its 'cow' argument. These just make the code more verbose, confusing and add a little extra overhead and well as increase the module's text size, so remove them. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: remove no longer needed strict argument from can_nocow_extent()Filipe Manana
All callers of can_nocow_extent() now pass a value of false for its 'strict' argument, making it redundant. So remove the argument from can_nocow_extent() as well as can_nocow_file_extent(), btrfs_cross_ref_exist() and check_committed_ref(), because this argument was used just to influence the behavior of check_committed_ref(). Also remove the 'strict' field from struct can_nocow_file_extent_args, which is now always false as well, as its value is taken from the argument to can_nocow_extent(). Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: open-code btrfs_copy_from_user()Qu Wenruo
The function btrfs_copy_from_user() handles the folio dirtying for buffered write. The original design is to allow that function to handle multiple folios, but since commit c87c299776e4 ("btrfs: make buffered write to copy one page a time") there is no need to support multiple folios. So here open-code btrfs_copy_from_user() to copy_folio_from_iter_atomic() and flush_dcache_folio() calls. The short-copy check and revert are still kept as-is. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: fix data race when accessing the inode's disk_i_size at ↵Hao-ran Zheng
btrfs_drop_extents() A data race occurs when the function `insert_ordered_extent_file_extent()` and the function `btrfs_inode_safe_disk_i_size_write()` are executed concurrently. The function `insert_ordered_extent_file_extent()` is not locked when reading inode->disk_i_size, causing `btrfs_inode_safe_disk_i_size_write()` to cause data competition when writing inode->disk_i_size, thus affecting the value of `modify_tree`. The specific call stack that appears during testing is as follows: ============DATA_RACE============ btrfs_drop_extents+0x89a/0xa060 [btrfs] insert_reserved_file_extent+0xb54/0x2960 [btrfs] insert_ordered_extent_file_extent+0xff5/0x1760 [btrfs] btrfs_finish_one_ordered+0x1b85/0x36a0 [btrfs] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x37/0x60 [btrfs] finish_ordered_fn+0x3e/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_work_helper+0x9c9/0x27a0 [btrfs] process_scheduled_works+0x716/0xf10 worker_thread+0xb6a/0x1190 kthread+0x292/0x330 ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 ============OTHER_INFO============ btrfs_inode_safe_disk_i_size_write+0x4ec/0x600 [btrfs] btrfs_finish_one_ordered+0x24c7/0x36a0 [btrfs] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x37/0x60 [btrfs] finish_ordered_fn+0x3e/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_work_helper+0x9c9/0x27a0 [btrfs] process_scheduled_works+0x716/0xf10 worker_thread+0xb6a/0x1190 kthread+0x292/0x330 ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 ================================= The main purpose of the check of the inode's disk_i_size is to avoid taking write locks on a btree path when we have a write at or beyond EOF, since in these cases we don't expect to find extent items in the root to drop. However if we end up taking write locks due to a data race on disk_i_size, everything is still correct, we only add extra lock contention on the tree in case there's concurrency from other tasks. If the race causes us to not take write locks when we actually need them, then everything is functionally correct as well, since if we find out we have extent items to drop and we took read locks (modify_tree set to 0), we release the path and retry again with write locks. Since this data race does not affect the correctness of the function, it is a harmless data race, use data_race() to check inode->disk_i_size. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Hao-ran Zheng <zhenghaoran154@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: don't BUG_ON() in btrfs_drop_extents()Johannes Thumshirn
btrfs_drop_extents() calls BUG_ON() in case the counter of to be deleted extents is greater than 0. But all of these code paths can handle errors, so there's no need to crash the kernel. Instead WARN() that the condition has been met and gracefully bail out. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-12-10Merge tag 'for-6.13-rc2-tag' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba: "A few more fixes. Apart from the one liners and updated bio splitting error handling there's a fix for subvolume mount with different flags. This was known and fixed for some time but I've delayed it to give it more testing. - fix unbalanced locking when swapfile activation fails when the subvolume gets deleted in the meantime - add btrfs error handling after bio_split() calls that got error handling recently - during unmount, flush delalloc workers at the right time before the cleaner thread is shut down - fix regression in buffered write folio conversion, explicitly wait for writeback as FGP_STABLE flag is currently a no-op on btrfs - handle race in subvolume mount with different flags, the conversion to the new mount API did not handle the case where multiple subvolumes get mounted in parallel, which is a distro use case" * tag 'for-6.13-rc2-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: btrfs: flush delalloc workers queue before stopping cleaner kthread during unmount btrfs: handle bio_split() errors btrfs: properly wait for writeback before buffered write btrfs: fix missing snapshot drew unlock when root is dead during swap activation btrfs: fix mount failure due to remount races
2024-12-06btrfs: properly wait for writeback before buffered writeQu Wenruo
[BUG] Before commit e820dbeb6ad1 ("btrfs: convert btrfs_buffered_write() to use folios"), function prepare_one_folio() will always wait for folio writeback to finish before returning the folio. However commit e820dbeb6ad1 ("btrfs: convert btrfs_buffered_write() to use folios") changed to use FGP_STABLE to do the writeback wait, but FGP_STABLE is calling folio_wait_stable(), which only calls folio_wait_writeback() if the address space has AS_STABLE_WRITES, which is not set for btrfs inodes. This means we will not wait for the folio writeback at all. [CAUSE] The cause is FGP_STABLE is not waiting for writeback unconditionally, but only for address spaces with AS_STABLE_WRITES, normally such flag is set when the super block has SB_I_STABLE_WRITES flag. Such super block flag is set when the block device has hardware digest support or has internal checksum requirement. I'd argue btrfs should set such super block due to its default data checksum behavior, but it is not set yet, so this means FGP_STABLE flag will have no effect at all. (For NODATASUM inodes, we can skip the waiting in theory but that should be an optimization in the future.) This can lead to data checksum mismatch, as we can modify the folio while it's still under writeback, this will make the contents differ from the contents at submission and checksum calculation. [FIX] Instead of fully relying on FGP_STABLE, manually do the folio writeback waiting, until we set the address space or super flag. Fixes: e820dbeb6ad1 ("btrfs: convert btrfs_buffered_write() to use folios") Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-11-18Merge tag 'for-6.13-tag' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux Pull btrfs updates from David Sterba: "Changes outside of btrfs: add io_uring command flag to track a dying task (the rest will go via the block git tree). User visible changes: - wire encoded read (ioctl) to io_uring commands, this can be used on itself, in the future this will allow 'send' to be asynchronous. As a consequence, the encoded read ioctl can also work in non-blocking mode - new ioctl to wait for cleaned subvolumes, no need to use the generic and root-only SEARCH_TREE ioctl, will be used by "btrfs subvol sync" - recognize different paths/symlinks for the same devices and don't report them during rescanning, this can be observed with LVM or DM - seeding device use case change, the sprout device (the one capturing new writes) will not clear the read-only status of the super block; this prevents accumulating space from deleted snapshots Performance improvements: - reduce lock contention when traversing extent buffers - reduce extent tree lock contention when searching for inline backref - switch from rb-trees to xarray for delayed ref tracking, improvements due to better cache locality, branching factors and more compact data structures - enable extent map shrinker again (prevent memory exhaustion under some types of IO load), reworked to run in a single worker thread (there used to be problems causing long stalls under memory pressure) Core changes: - raid-stripe-tree feature updates: - make device replace and scrub work - implement partial deletion of stripe extents - new selftests - split the config option BTRFS_DEBUG and add EXPERIMENTAL for features that are experimental or with known problems so we don't misuse debugging config for that - subpage mode updates (sector < page): - update compression implementations - update writepage, writeback - continued folio API conversions: - buffered writes - make buffered write copy one page at a time, preparatory work for future integration with large folios, may cause performance drop - proper locking of root item regarding starting send - error handling improvements - code cleanups and refactoring: - dead code removal - unused parameter reduction - lockdep assertions" * tag 'for-6.13-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: (119 commits) btrfs: send: check for read-only send root under critical section btrfs: send: check for dead send root under critical section btrfs: remove check for NULL fs_info at btrfs_folio_end_lock_bitmap() btrfs: fix warning on PTR_ERR() against NULL device at btrfs_control_ioctl() btrfs: fix a typo in btrfs_use_zone_append btrfs: avoid superfluous calls to free_extent_map() in btrfs_encoded_read() btrfs: simplify logic to decrement snapshot counter at btrfs_mksnapshot() btrfs: remove hole from struct btrfs_delayed_node btrfs: update stale comment for struct btrfs_delayed_ref_node::add_list btrfs: add new ioctl to wait for cleaned subvolumes btrfs: simplify range tracking in cow_file_range() btrfs: remove conditional path allocation in btrfs_read_locked_inode() btrfs: push cleanup into btrfs_read_locked_inode() io_uring/cmd: let cmds to know about dying task btrfs: add struct io_btrfs_cmd as type for io_uring_cmd_to_pdu() btrfs: add io_uring command for encoded reads (ENCODED_READ ioctl) btrfs: move priv off stack in btrfs_encoded_read_regular_fill_pages() btrfs: don't sleep in btrfs_encoded_read() if IOCB_NOWAIT is set btrfs: change btrfs_encoded_read() so that reading of extent is done by caller btrfs: remove pointless iocb::ki_pos addition in btrfs_encoded_read() ...
2024-11-11btrfs: add io_uring command for encoded reads (ENCODED_READ ioctl)Mark Harmstone
Add an io_uring command for encoded reads, using the same interface as the existing BTRFS_IOC_ENCODED_READ ioctl. btrfs_uring_encoded_read() is an io_uring version of btrfs_ioctl_encoded_read(), which validates the user input and calls btrfs_encoded_read() to read the appropriate metadata. If we determine that we need to read an extent from disk, we call btrfs_encoded_read_regular_fill_pages() through btrfs_uring_read_extent() to prepare the bio. The existing btrfs_encoded_read_regular_fill_pages() is changed so that if it is passed a valid uring_ctx, rather than waking up any waiting threads it calls btrfs_uring_read_extent_endio(). This in turn copies the read data back to userspace, and calls io_uring_cmd_done() to complete the io_uring command. Because we're potentially doing a non-blocking read, btrfs_uring_read_extent() doesn't clean up after itself if it returns -EIOCBQUEUED. Instead, it allocates a priv struct, populates the fields there that we will need to unlock the inode and free our allocations, and defers this to the btrfs_uring_read_finished() that gets called when the bio completes. Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-11-11btrfs: convert btrfs_buffered_write() to use foliosQu Wenruo
The buffered write path is still heavily utilizing the page interface. Since we have converted it to do a page-by-page copying, it's much easier to convert all involved functions to folio interface, this involves: - btrfs_copy_from_user() - btrfs_drop_folio() - prepare_uptodate_page() - prepare_one_page() - lock_and_cleanup_extent_if_need() - btrfs_dirty_page() All function are changed to accept a folio parameter, and if the word "page" is in the function name, change that to "folio" too. The function btrfs_dirty_page() is exported for v1 space cache, convert v1 cache call site to convert its page to folio for the new interface. And there is a small enhancement for prepare_one_folio(), instead of manually waiting for the page writeback, let __filemap_get_folio() to handle that by using FGP_WRITEBEGIN, which implies (FGP_LOCK | FGP_WRITE | FGP_CREAT | FGP_STABLE). Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-11-11btrfs: make buffered write to copy one page a timeQu Wenruo
Currently the btrfs_buffered_write() is preparing multiple page a time, allowing a better performance. But the current trend is to support larger folio as an optimization, instead of implementing own multi-page optimization. This is inspired by generic_perform_write(), which is copying one folio a time. Such change will prepare us to migrate to implement the write_begin() and write_end() callbacks, and make every involved function a little easier. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-11-11btrfs: drop unused parameter iov_iter from btrfs_write_check()David Sterba
The parameter 'from' has never been used since commit b8d8e1fd570a ("btrfs: introduce btrfs_write_check()"), this is for buffered write. Direct io write needs it so it was probably an interface thing, but we can drop it. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-11-11btrfs: simplify the page uptodate preparation for prepare_pages()Qu Wenruo
Currently inside prepare_pages(), we handle the leading and tailing page differently, and skip the middle pages (if any). This is to avoid reading pages which are fully covered by the dirty range. Refactor the code by moving all checks (alignment check, range check, force read check) into prepare_uptodate_page(). So that prepare_pages() only needs to iterate all the pages unconditionally. And since we're here, also update prepare_uptodate_page() to use folio API other than the old page API. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-11-11btrfs: remove the dirty_page local variableQu Wenruo
Inside btrfs_buffered_write(), we have a local variable @dirty_pages, recording the number of pages we dirtied in the current iteration. However we do not really need that variable, since it can be calculated from @pos and @copied. In fact there is already a problem inside the short copy path, where we use @dirty_pages to calculate the range we need to release. But that usage assumes sectorsize == PAGE_SIZE, which is no longer true. Instead of keeping @dirty_pages and cause incorrect usage, just calculate the number of dirtied pages inside btrfs_dirty_pages(). Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-10-10Merge patch series "timekeeping/fs: multigrain timestamp redux"Christian Brauner
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> says: The VFS has always used coarse-grained timestamps when updating the ctime and mtime after a change. This has the benefit of allowing filesystems to optimize away a lot metadata updates, down to around 1 per jiffy, even when a file is under heavy writes. Unfortunately, this has always been an issue when we're exporting via NFSv3, which relies on timestamps to validate caches. A lot of changes can happen in a jiffy, so timestamps aren't sufficient to help the client decide when to invalidate the cache. Even with NFSv4, a lot of exported filesystems don't properly support a change attribute and are subject to the same problems with timestamp granularity. Other applications have similar issues with timestamps (e.g backup applications). If we were to always use fine-grained timestamps, that would improve the situation, but that becomes rather expensive, as the underlying filesystem would have to log a lot more metadata updates. What we need is a way to only use fine-grained timestamps when they are being actively queried. Use the (unused) top bit in inode->i_ctime_nsec as a flag that indicates whether the current timestamps have been queried via stat() or the like. When it's set, we allow the kernel to use a fine-grained timestamp iff it's necessary to make the ctime show a different value. This solves the problem of being able to distinguish the timestamp between updates, but introduces a new problem: it's now possible for a file being changed to get a fine-grained timestamp. A file that is altered just a bit later can then get a coarse-grained one that appears older than the earlier fine-grained time. This violates timestamp ordering guarantees. To remedy this, keep a global monotonic atomic64_t value that acts as a timestamp floor. When we go to stamp a file, we first get the latter of the current floor value and the current coarse-grained time. If the inode ctime hasn't been queried then we just attempt to stamp it with that value. If it has been queried, then first see whether the current coarse time is later than the existing ctime. If it is, then we accept that value. If it isn't, then we get a fine-grained time and try to swap that into the global floor. Whether that succeeds or fails, we take the resulting floor time, convert it to realtime and try to swap that into the ctime. We take the result of the ctime swap whether it succeeds or fails, since either is just as valid. Filesystems can opt into this by setting the FS_MGTIME fstype flag. Others should be unaffected (other than being subject to the same floor value as multigrain filesystems). * patches from https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241002-mgtime-v10-0-d1c4717f5284@kernel.org: tmpfs: add support for multigrain timestamps btrfs: convert to multigrain timestamps ext4: switch to multigrain timestamps xfs: switch to multigrain timestamps Documentation: add a new file documenting multigrain timestamps fs: add percpu counters for significant multigrain timestamp events fs: tracepoints around multigrain timestamp events fs: handle delegated timestamps in setattr_copy_mgtime fs: have setattr_copy handle multigrain timestamps appropriately fs: add infrastructure for multigrain timestamps Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241002-mgtime-v10-0-d1c4717f5284@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-10-10btrfs: convert to multigrain timestampsJeff Layton
Enable multigrain timestamps, which should ensure that there is an apparent change to the timestamp whenever it has been written after being actively observed via getattr. Beyond enabling the FS_MGTIME flag, this patch eliminates update_time_for_write, which goes to great pains to avoid in-memory stores. Just have it overwrite the timestamps unconditionally. Note that this also drops the IS_I_VERSION check and unconditionally bumps the change attribute, since SB_I_VERSION is always set on btrfs. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> # documentation bits Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241002-mgtime-v10-11-d1c4717f5284@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2024-09-17btrfs: fix race setting file private on concurrent lseek using same fdFilipe Manana
When doing concurrent lseek(2) system calls against the same file descriptor, using multiple threads belonging to the same process, we have a short time window where a race happens and can result in a memory leak. The race happens like this: 1) A program opens a file descriptor for a file and then spawns two threads (with the pthreads library for example), lets call them task A and task B; 2) Task A calls lseek with SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE and ends up at file.c:find_desired_extent() while holding a read lock on the inode; 3) At the start of find_desired_extent(), it extracts the file's private_data pointer into a local variable named 'private', which has a value of NULL; 4) Task B also calls lseek with SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE, locks the inode in shared mode and enters file.c:find_desired_extent(), where it also extracts file->private_data into its local variable 'private', which has a NULL value; 5) Because it saw a NULL file private, task A allocates a private structure and assigns to the file structure; 6) Task B also saw a NULL file private so it also allocates its own file private and then assigns it to the same file structure, since both tasks are using the same file descriptor. At this point we leak the private structure allocated by task A. Besides the memory leak, there's also the detail that both tasks end up using the same cached state record in the private structure (struct btrfs_file_private::llseek_cached_state), which can result in a use-after-free problem since one task can free it while the other is still using it (only one task took a reference count on it). Also, sharing the cached state is not a good idea since it could result in incorrect results in the future - right now it should not be a problem because it end ups being used only in extent-io-tree.c:count_range_bits() where we do range validation before using the cached state. Fix this by protecting the private assignment and check of a file while holding the inode's spinlock and keep track of the task that allocated the private, so that it's used only by that task in order to prevent user-after-free issues with the cached state record as well as potentially using it incorrectly in the future. Fixes: 3c32c7212f16 ("btrfs: use cached state when looking for delalloc ranges with lseek") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-09-10btrfs: add and use helper to verify the calling task has locked the inodeFilipe Manana
We have a few places that check if we have the inode locked by doing: ASSERT(inode_is_locked(vfs_inode)); This actually proved to be useful several times as if assertions are enabled (and by default they are in many distros) it immediately triggers a crash which is impossible for users to miss. However that doesn't check if the lock is held by the calling task, so the check passes if some other task locked the inode. Using one of the lockdep functions to check the lock is held, like lockdep_assert_held() for example, does check that the calling task holds the lock, and if that's not the case it produces a warning and stack trace in dmesg. However, despite the misleading "assert" in the name of the lockdep helpers, it does not trigger a crash/BUG_ON(), just a warning and splat in dmesg, which is easy to get unnoticed by users who may have lockdep enabled. So add a helper that does the ASSERT() and calls lockdep_assert_held() immediately after and use it every where we check the inode is locked. Like this if the lock is held by some other task we get the warning in dmesg which is caught by fstests, very helpful during development, and may also be occassionaly noticed by users with lockdep enabled. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>