summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/security/selinux/include
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-03-25Merge tag 'selinux-pr-20250323' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/selinux Pull selinux updates from Paul Moore: - Add additional SELinux access controls for kernel file reads/loads The SELinux kernel file read/load access controls were never updated beyond the initial kernel module support, this pull request adds support for firmware, kexec, policies, and x.509 certificates. - Add support for wildcards in network interface names There are a number of userspace tools which auto-generate network interface names using some pattern of <XXXX>-<NN> where <XXXX> is a fixed string, e.g. "podman", and <NN> is a increasing counter. Supporting wildcards in the SELinux policy for network interfaces simplifies the policy associted with these interfaces. - Fix a potential problem in the kernel read file SELinux code SELinux should always check the file label in the security_kernel_read_file() LSM hook, regardless of if the file is being read in chunks. Unfortunately, the existing code only considered the file label on the first chunk; this pull request fixes this problem. There is more detail in the individual commit, but thankfully the existing code didn't expose a bug due to multi-stage reads only taking place in one driver, and that driver loading a file type that isn't targeted by the SELinux policy. - Fix the subshell error handling in the example policy loader Minor fix to SELinux example policy loader in scripts/selinux due to an undesired interaction with subshells and errexit. * tag 'selinux-pr-20250323' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/selinux: selinux: get netif_wildcard policycap from policy instead of cache selinux: support wildcard network interface names selinux: Chain up tool resolving errors in install_policy.sh selinux: add permission checks for loading other kinds of kernel files selinux: always check the file label in selinux_kernel_read_file() selinux: fix spelling error
2025-03-25Merge tag 'lsm-pr-20250323' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/lsm Pull lsm updates from Paul Moore: - Various minor updates to the LSM Rust bindings Changes include marking trivial Rust bindings as inlines and comment tweaks to better reflect the LSM hooks. - Add LSM/SELinux access controls to io_uring_allowed() Similar to the io_uring_disabled sysctl, add a LSM hook to io_uring_allowed() to enable LSMs a simple way to enforce security policy on the use of io_uring. This pull request includes SELinux support for this new control using the io_uring/allowed permission. - Remove an unused parameter from the security_perf_event_open() hook The perf_event_attr struct parameter was not used by any currently supported LSMs, remove it from the hook. - Add an explicit MAINTAINERS entry for the credentials code We've seen problems in the past where patches to the credentials code sent by non-maintainers would often languish on the lists for multiple months as there was no one explicitly tasked with the responsibility of reviewing and/or merging credentials related code. Considering that most of the code under security/ has a vested interest in ensuring that the credentials code is well maintained, I'm volunteering to look after the credentials code and Serge Hallyn has also volunteered to step up as an official reviewer. I posted the MAINTAINERS update as a RFC to LKML in hopes that someone else would jump up with an "I'll do it!", but beyond Serge it was all crickets. - Update Stephen Smalley's old email address to prevent confusion This includes a corresponding update to the mailmap file. * tag 'lsm-pr-20250323' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/lsm: mailmap: map Stephen Smalley's old email addresses lsm: remove old email address for Stephen Smalley MAINTAINERS: add Serge Hallyn as a credentials reviewer MAINTAINERS: add an explicit credentials entry cred,rust: mark Credential methods inline lsm,rust: reword "destroy" -> "release" in SecurityCtx lsm,rust: mark SecurityCtx methods inline perf: Remove unnecessary parameter of security check lsm: fix a missing security_uring_allowed() prototype io_uring,lsm,selinux: add LSM hooks for io_uring_setup() io_uring: refactor io_uring_allowed()
2025-03-07selinux: support wildcard network interface namesChristian Göttsche
Add support for wildcard matching of network interface names. This is useful for auto-generated interfaces, for example podman creates network interfaces for containers with the naming scheme podman0, podman1, podman2, ... To maintain backward compatibility guard this feature with a new policy capability 'netif_wildcard'. Netifcon definitions are compared against in the order given by the policy, so userspace tools should sort them in a reasonable order. Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2025-02-27selinux: add FILE__WATCH_MOUNTNSMiklos Szeredi
Watching mount namespaces for changes (mount, umount, move mount) was added by previous patches. This patch adds the file/watch_mountns permission that can be applied to nsfs files (/proc/$$/ns/mnt), making it possible to allow or deny watching a particular namespace for changes. Suggested-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHC9VhTOmCjCSE2H0zwPOmpFopheexVb6jyovz92ZtpKtoVv6A@mail.gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250224154836.958915-1-mszeredi@redhat.com Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
2025-02-26selinux: add permission checks for loading other kinds of kernel files"Kipp N. Davis"
Although the LSM hooks for loading kernel modules were later generalized to cover loading other kinds of files, SELinux didn't implement corresponding permission checks, leaving only the module case covered. Define and add new permission checks for these other cases. Signed-off-by: Cameron K. Williams <ckwilliams.work@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Kipp N. Davis <kippndavis.work@gmx.com> Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com> [PM: merge fuzz, line length, and spacing fixes] Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2025-02-07io_uring,lsm,selinux: add LSM hooks for io_uring_setup()Hamza Mahfooz
It is desirable to allow LSM to configure accessibility to io_uring because it is a coarse yet very simple way to restrict access to it. So, add an LSM for io_uring_allowed() to guard access to io_uring. Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <hamzamahfooz@linux.microsoft.com> Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> [PM: merge fuzz due to changes in preceding patches, subj tweak] Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2025-01-21Merge tag 'selinux-pr-20250121' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/selinux Pull selinux updates from Paul Moore: - Extended permissions supported in conditional policy The SELinux extended permissions, aka "xperms", allow security admins to target individuals ioctls, and recently netlink messages, with their SELinux policy. Adding support for conditional policies allows admins to toggle the granular xperms using SELinux booleans, helping pave the way for greater use of xperms in general purpose SELinux policies. This change bumps the maximum SELinux policy version to 34. - Fix a SCTP/SELinux error return code inconsistency Depending on the loaded SELinux policy, specifically it's EXTSOCKCLASS support, the bind(2) LSM/SELinux hook could return different error codes due to the SELinux code checking the socket's SELinux object class (which can vary depending on EXTSOCKCLASS) and not the socket's sk_protocol field. We fix this by doing the obvious, and looking at the sock->sk_protocol field instead of the object class. - Makefile fixes to properly cleanup av_permissions.h Add av_permissions.h to "targets" so that it is properly cleaned up using the kbuild infrastructure. - A number of smaller improvements by Christian Göttsche A variety of straightforward changes to reduce code duplication, reduce pointer lookups, migrate void pointers to defined types, simplify code, constify function parameters, and correct iterator types. * tag 'selinux-pr-20250121' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/selinux: selinux: make more use of str_read() when loading the policy selinux: avoid unnecessary indirection in struct level_datum selinux: use known type instead of void pointer selinux: rename comparison functions for clarity selinux: rework match_ipv6_addrmask() selinux: constify and reconcile function parameter names selinux: avoid using types indicating user space interaction selinux: supply missing field initializers selinux: add netlink nlmsg_type audit message selinux: add support for xperms in conditional policies selinux: Fix SCTP error inconsistency in selinux_socket_bind() selinux: use native iterator types selinux: add generated av_permissions.h to targets
2025-01-07selinux: constify and reconcile function parameter namesChristian Göttsche
Align the parameter names between declarations and definitions, and constify read-only parameters. Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com> [PM: tweak the subject line] Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2025-01-07selinux: supply missing field initializersChristian Göttsche
Please clang by supplying the missing field initializers in the secclass_map variable and sel_fill_super() function. Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com> [PM: tweak subj and commit description] Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2025-01-04selinux: match extended permissions to their base permissionsThiébaud Weksteen
In commit d1d991efaf34 ("selinux: Add netlink xperm support") a new extended permission was added ("nlmsg"). This was the second extended permission implemented in selinux ("ioctl" being the first one). Extended permissions are associated with a base permission. It was found that, in the access vector cache (avc), the extended permission did not keep track of its base permission. This is an issue for a domain that is using both extended permissions (i.e., a domain calling ioctl() on a netlink socket). In this case, the extended permissions were overlapping. Keep track of the base permission in the cache. A new field "base_perm" is added to struct extended_perms_decision to make sure that the extended permission refers to the correct policy permission. A new field "base_perms" is added to struct extended_perms to quickly decide if extended permissions apply. While it is in theory possible to retrieve the base permission from the access vector, the same base permission may not be mapped to the same bit for each class (e.g., "nlmsg" is mapped to a different bit for "netlink_route_socket" and "netlink_audit_socket"). Instead, use a constant (AVC_EXT_IOCTL or AVC_EXT_NLMSG) provided by the caller. Fixes: d1d991efaf34 ("selinux: Add netlink xperm support") Signed-off-by: Thiébaud Weksteen <tweek@google.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2024-12-13selinux: add support for xperms in conditional policiesChristian Göttsche
Add support for extended permission rules in conditional policies. Currently the kernel accepts such rules already, but evaluating a security decision will hit a BUG() in services_compute_xperms_decision(). Thus reject extended permission rules in conditional policies for current policy versions. Add a new policy version for this feature. Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com> Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com> Tested-by: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2024-11-18Merge tag 'lsm-pr-20241112' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/lsm Pull lsm updates from Paul Moore: "Thirteen patches, all focused on moving away from the current 'secid' LSM identifier to a richer 'lsm_prop' structure. This move will help reduce the translation that is necessary in many LSMs, offering better performance, and make it easier to support different LSMs in the future" * tag 'lsm-pr-20241112' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/lsm: lsm: remove lsm_prop scaffolding netlabel,smack: use lsm_prop for audit data audit: change context data from secid to lsm_prop lsm: create new security_cred_getlsmprop LSM hook audit: use an lsm_prop in audit_names lsm: use lsm_prop in security_inode_getsecid lsm: use lsm_prop in security_current_getsecid audit: update shutdown LSM data lsm: use lsm_prop in security_ipc_getsecid audit: maintain an lsm_prop in audit_context lsm: add lsmprop_to_secctx hook lsm: use lsm_prop in security_audit_rule_match lsm: add the lsm_prop data structure
2024-10-11lsm: add lsmprop_to_secctx hookCasey Schaufler
Add a new hook security_lsmprop_to_secctx() and its LSM specific implementations. The LSM specific code will use the lsm_prop element allocated for that module. This allows for the possibility that more than one module may be called upon to translate a secid to a string, as can occur in the audit code. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> [PM: subject line tweak] Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2024-10-11lsm: use lsm_prop in security_audit_rule_matchCasey Schaufler
Change the secid parameter of security_audit_rule_match to a lsm_prop structure pointer. Pass the entry from the lsm_prop structure for the approprite slot to the LSM hook. Change the users of security_audit_rule_match to use the lsm_prop instead of a u32. The scaffolding function lsmprop_init() fills the structure with the value of the old secid, ensuring that it is available to the appropriate module hook. The sources of the secid, security_task_getsecid() and security_inode_getsecid(), will be converted to use the lsm_prop structure later in the series. At that point the use of lsmprop_init() is dropped. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> [PM: subject line tweak] Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2024-10-07selinux: Add netlink xperm supportThiébaud Weksteen
Reuse the existing extended permissions infrastructure to support policies based on the netlink message types. A new policy capability "netlink_xperm" is introduced. When disabled, the previous behaviour is preserved. That is, netlink_send will rely on the permission mappings defined in nlmsgtab.c (e.g, nlmsg_read for RTM_GETADDR on NETLINK_ROUTE). When enabled, the mappings are ignored and the generic "nlmsg" permission is used instead. The new "nlmsg" permission is an extended permission. The 16 bits of the extended permission are mapped to the nlmsg_type field. Example policy on Android, preventing regular apps from accessing the device's MAC address and ARP table, but allowing this access to privileged apps, looks as follows: allow netdomain self:netlink_route_socket { create read getattr write setattr lock append connect getopt setopt shutdown nlmsg }; allowxperm netdomain self:netlink_route_socket nlmsg ~{ RTM_GETLINK RTM_GETNEIGH RTM_GETNEIGHTBL }; allowxperm priv_app self:netlink_route_socket nlmsg { RTM_GETLINK RTM_GETNEIGH RTM_GETNEIGHTBL }; The constants in the example above (e.g., RTM_GETLINK) are explicitly defined in the policy. It is possible to generate policies to support kernels that may or may not have the capability enabled by generating a rule for each scenario. For instance: allow domain self:netlink_audit_socket nlmsg_read; allow domain self:netlink_audit_socket nlmsg; allowxperm domain self:netlink_audit_socket nlmsg { AUDIT_GET }; The approach of defining a new permission ("nlmsg") instead of relying on the existing permissions (e.g., "nlmsg_read", "nlmsg_readpriv" or "nlmsg_tty_audit") has been preferred because: 1. This is similar to the other extended permission ("ioctl"); 2. With the new extended permission, the coarse-grained mapping is not necessary anymore. It could eventually be removed, which would be impossible if the extended permission was defined below these. 3. Having a single extra extended permission considerably simplifies the implementation here and in libselinux. Signed-off-by: Thiébaud Weksteen <tweek@google.com> Signed-off-by: Bram Bonné <brambonne@google.com> [PM: manual merge fixes for sock_skip_has_perm()] Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2024-10-03selinux: do not include <linux/*.h> headers from host programsMasahiro Yamada
The header, security/selinux/include/classmap.h, is included not only from kernel space but also from host programs. It includes <linux/capability.h> and <linux/socket.h>, which pull in more <linux/*.h> headers. This makes the host programs less portable, specifically causing build errors on macOS. Those headers are included for the following purposes: - <linux/capability.h> for checking CAP_LAST_CAP - <linux/socket.h> for checking PF_MAX These checks can be guarded by __KERNEL__ so they are skipped when building host programs. Testing them when building the kernel should be sufficient. The header, security/selinux/include/initial_sid_to_string.h, includes <linux/stddef.h> for the NULL definition, but this is not portable either. Instead, <stddef.h> should be included for host programs. Reported-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240807-macos-build-support-v1-6-4cd1ded85694@samsung.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240807-macos-build-support-v1-7-4cd1ded85694@samsung.com/ Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2024-09-16Merge tag 'lsm-pr-20240911' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/lsm Pull lsm updates from Paul Moore: - Move the LSM framework to static calls This transitions the vast majority of the LSM callbacks into static calls. Those callbacks which haven't been converted were left as-is due to the general ugliness of the changes required to support the static call conversion; we can revisit those callbacks at a future date. - Add the Integrity Policy Enforcement (IPE) LSM This adds a new LSM, Integrity Policy Enforcement (IPE). There is plenty of documentation about IPE in this patches, so I'll refrain from going into too much detail here, but the basic motivation behind IPE is to provide a mechanism such that administrators can restrict execution to only those binaries which come from integrity protected storage, e.g. a dm-verity protected filesystem. You will notice that IPE requires additional LSM hooks in the initramfs, dm-verity, and fs-verity code, with the associated patches carrying ACK/review tags from the associated maintainers. We couldn't find an obvious maintainer for the initramfs code, but the IPE patchset has been widely posted over several years. Both Deven Bowers and Fan Wu have contributed to IPE's development over the past several years, with Fan Wu agreeing to serve as the IPE maintainer moving forward. Once IPE is accepted into your tree, I'll start working with Fan to ensure he has the necessary accounts, keys, etc. so that he can start submitting IPE pull requests to you directly during the next merge window. - Move the lifecycle management of the LSM blobs to the LSM framework Management of the LSM blobs (the LSM state buffers attached to various kernel structs, typically via a void pointer named "security" or similar) has been mixed, some blobs were allocated/managed by individual LSMs, others were managed by the LSM framework itself. Starting with this pull we move management of all the LSM blobs, minus the XFRM blob, into the framework itself, improving consistency across LSMs, and reducing the amount of duplicated code across LSMs. Due to some additional work required to migrate the XFRM blob, it has been left as a todo item for a later date; from a practical standpoint this omission should have little impact as only SELinux provides a XFRM LSM implementation. - Fix problems with the LSM's handling of F_SETOWN The LSM hook for the fcntl(F_SETOWN) operation had a couple of problems: it was racy with itself, and it was disconnected from the associated DAC related logic in such a way that the LSM state could be updated in cases where the DAC state would not. We fix both of these problems by moving the security_file_set_fowner() hook into the same section of code where the DAC attributes are updated. Not only does this resolve the DAC/LSM synchronization issue, but as that code block is protected by a lock, it also resolve the race condition. - Fix potential problems with the security_inode_free() LSM hook Due to use of RCU to protect inodes and the placement of the LSM hook associated with freeing the inode, there is a bit of a challenge when it comes to managing any LSM state associated with an inode. The VFS folks are not open to relocating the LSM hook so we have to get creative when it comes to releasing an inode's LSM state. Traditionally we have used a single LSM callback within the hook that is triggered when the inode is "marked for death", but not actually released due to RCU. Unfortunately, this causes problems for LSMs which want to take an action when the inode's associated LSM state is actually released; so we add an additional LSM callback, inode_free_security_rcu(), that is called when the inode's LSM state is released in the RCU free callback. - Refactor two LSM hooks to better fit the LSM return value patterns The vast majority of the LSM hooks follow the "return 0 on success, negative values on failure" pattern, however, there are a small handful that have unique return value behaviors which has caused confusion in the past and makes it difficult for the BPF verifier to properly vet BPF LSM programs. This includes patches to convert two of these"special" LSM hooks to the common 0/-ERRNO pattern. - Various cleanups and improvements A handful of patches to remove redundant code, better leverage the IS_ERR_OR_NULL() helper, add missing "static" markings, and do some minor style fixups. * tag 'lsm-pr-20240911' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/lsm: (40 commits) security: Update file_set_fowner documentation fs: Fix file_set_fowner LSM hook inconsistencies lsm: Use IS_ERR_OR_NULL() helper function lsm: remove LSM_COUNT and LSM_CONFIG_COUNT ipe: Remove duplicated include in ipe.c lsm: replace indirect LSM hook calls with static calls lsm: count the LSMs enabled at compile time kernel: Add helper macros for loop unrolling init/main.c: Initialize early LSMs after arch code, static keys and calls. MAINTAINERS: add IPE entry with Fan Wu as maintainer documentation: add IPE documentation ipe: kunit test for parser scripts: add boot policy generation program ipe: enable support for fs-verity as a trust provider fsverity: expose verified fsverity built-in signatures to LSMs lsm: add security_inode_setintegrity() hook ipe: add support for dm-verity as a trust provider dm-verity: expose root hash digest and signature data to LSMs block,lsm: add LSM blob and new LSM hooks for block devices ipe: add permissive toggle ...
2024-09-03selinux: fix style problems in security/selinux/include/audit.hPaul Moore
Remove the needless indent in the function comment header blocks. Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2024-07-29lsm: infrastructure management of the perf_event security blobCasey Schaufler
Move management of the perf_event->security blob out of the individual security modules and into the security infrastructure. Instead of allocating the blobs from within the modules the modules tell the infrastructure how much space is required, and the space is allocated there. There are no longer any modules that require the perf_event_free() hook. The hook definition has been removed. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> [PM: subject tweak] Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2024-07-29lsm: infrastructure management of the infiniband blobCasey Schaufler
Move management of the infiniband security blob out of the individual security modules and into the LSM infrastructure. The security modules tell the infrastructure how much space they require at initialization. There are no longer any modules that require the ib_free() hook. The hook definition has been removed. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> [PM: subject tweak, selinux style fixes] Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2024-07-29lsm: infrastructure management of the dev_tun blobCasey Schaufler
Move management of the dev_tun security blob out of the individual security modules and into the LSM infrastructure. The security modules tell the infrastructure how much space they require at initialization. There are no longer any modules that require the dev_tun_free hook. The hook definition has been removed. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> [PM: subject tweak, selinux style fixes] Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2024-07-29lsm: infrastructure management of the key security blobCasey Schaufler
Move management of the key->security blob out of the individual security modules and into the security infrastructure. Instead of allocating the blobs from within the modules the modules tell the infrastructure how much space is required, and the space is allocated there. There are no existing modules that require a key_free hook, so the call to it and the definition for it have been removed. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> [PM: subject tweak] Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2024-07-29lsm: infrastructure management of the sock securityCasey Schaufler
Move management of the sock->sk_security blob out of the individual security modules and into the security infrastructure. Instead of allocating the blobs from within the modules the modules tell the infrastructure how much space is required, and the space is allocated there. Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Acked-by: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> [PM: subject tweak] Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2024-06-13ima: Avoid blocking in RCU read-side critical sectionGUO Zihua
A panic happens in ima_match_policy: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010 PGD 42f873067 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI CPU: 5 PID: 1286325 Comm: kubeletmonit.sh Kdump: loaded Tainted: P Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:ima_match_policy+0x84/0x450 Code: 49 89 fc 41 89 cf 31 ed 89 44 24 14 eb 1c 44 39 7b 18 74 26 41 83 ff 05 74 20 48 8b 1b 48 3b 1d f2 b9 f4 00 0f 84 9c 01 00 00 <44> 85 73 10 74 ea 44 8b 6b 14 41 f6 c5 01 75 d4 41 f6 c5 02 74 0f RSP: 0018:ff71570009e07a80 EFLAGS: 00010207 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000200 RDX: ffffffffad8dc7c0 RSI: 0000000024924925 RDI: ff3e27850dea2000 RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffffffabfce739 R10: ff3e27810cc42400 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ff3e2781825ef970 R13: 00000000ff3e2785 R14: 000000000000000c R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 00007f5195b51740(0000) GS:ff3e278b12d40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000010 CR3: 0000000626d24002 CR4: 0000000000361ee0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: ima_get_action+0x22/0x30 process_measurement+0xb0/0x830 ? page_add_file_rmap+0x15/0x170 ? alloc_set_pte+0x269/0x4c0 ? prep_new_page+0x81/0x140 ? simple_xattr_get+0x75/0xa0 ? selinux_file_open+0x9d/0xf0 ima_file_check+0x64/0x90 path_openat+0x571/0x1720 do_filp_open+0x9b/0x110 ? page_counter_try_charge+0x57/0xc0 ? files_cgroup_alloc_fd+0x38/0x60 ? __alloc_fd+0xd4/0x250 ? do_sys_open+0x1bd/0x250 do_sys_open+0x1bd/0x250 do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x1d0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x65/0xca Commit c7423dbdbc9e ("ima: Handle -ESTALE returned by ima_filter_rule_match()") introduced call to ima_lsm_copy_rule within a RCU read-side critical section which contains kmalloc with GFP_KERNEL. This implies a possible sleep and violates limitations of RCU read-side critical sections on non-PREEMPT systems. Sleeping within RCU read-side critical section might cause synchronize_rcu() returning early and break RCU protection, allowing a UAF to happen. The root cause of this issue could be described as follows: | Thread A | Thread B | | |ima_match_policy | | | rcu_read_lock | |ima_lsm_update_rule | | | synchronize_rcu | | | | kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL)| | | sleep | ==> synchronize_rcu returns early | kfree(entry) | | | | entry = entry->next| ==> UAF happens and entry now becomes NULL (or could be anything). | | entry->action | ==> Accessing entry might cause panic. To fix this issue, we are converting all kmalloc that is called within RCU read-side critical section to use GFP_ATOMIC. Fixes: c7423dbdbc9e ("ima: Handle -ESTALE returned by ima_filter_rule_match()") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: GUO Zihua <guozihua@huawei.com> Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> [PM: fixed missing comment, long lines, !CONFIG_IMA_LSM_RULES case] Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-12-22selinux: fix style issues in security/selinux/include/initial_sid_to_string.hPaul Moore
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and provide more tools for individual developers to validate their patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code "clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code. Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-12-22selinux: fix style issues in security/selinux/include/xfrm.hPaul Moore
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and provide more tools for individual developers to validate their patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code "clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code. Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-12-22selinux: fix style issues in security/selinux/include/security.hPaul Moore
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and provide more tools for individual developers to validate their patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code "clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code. Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-12-22selinux: fix style issues with security/selinux/include/policycap_names.hPaul Moore
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and provide more tools for individual developers to validate their patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code "clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code. Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-12-22selinux: fix style issues in security/selinux/include/policycap.hPaul Moore
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and provide more tools for individual developers to validate their patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code "clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code. Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-12-22selinux: fix style issues in security/selinux/include/objsec.hPaul Moore
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and provide more tools for individual developers to validate their patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code "clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code. Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-12-22selinux: fix style issues with security/selinux/include/netlabel.hPaul Moore
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and provide more tools for individual developers to validate their patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code "clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code. Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-12-22selinux: fix style issues in security/selinux/include/netif.hPaul Moore
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and provide more tools for individual developers to validate their patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code "clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code. Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-12-22selinux: fix style issues in security/selinux/include/ima.hPaul Moore
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and provide more tools for individual developers to validate their patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code "clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code. Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-12-22selinux: fix style issues in security/selinux/include/conditional.hPaul Moore
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and provide more tools for individual developers to validate their patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code "clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code. Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-12-22selinux: fix style issues in security/selinux/include/classmap.hPaul Moore
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and provide more tools for individual developers to validate their patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code "clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code. Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-12-22selinux: fix style issues in security/selinux/include/avc_ss.hPaul Moore
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and provide more tools for individual developers to validate their patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code "clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code. Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-12-22selinux: align avc_has_perm_noaudit() prototype with definitionPaul Moore
A trivial correction to convert an 'unsigned' parameter into an 'unsigned int' parameter so the prototype matches the function definition. I really thought that someone submitted a patch for this a few years ago but sadly I can't find it now. Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-12-22selinux: fix style issues in security/selinux/include/avc.hPaul Moore
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and provide more tools for individual developers to validate their patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code "clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code. Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-12-22selinux: fix style issues in security/selinux/include/audit.hPaul Moore
As part of on ongoing effort to perform more automated testing and provide more tools for individual developers to validate their patches before submitting, we are trying to make our code "clang-format clean". My hope is that once we have fixed all of our style "quirks", developers will be able to run clang-format on their patches to help avoid silly formatting problems and ensure their changes fit in well with the rest of the SELinux kernel code. Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-11-21selinux: introduce an initial SID for early boot processesOndrej Mosnacek
Currently, SELinux doesn't allow distinguishing between kernel threads and userspace processes that are started before the policy is first loaded - both get the label corresponding to the kernel SID. The only way a process that persists from early boot can get a meaningful label is by doing a voluntary dyntransition or re-executing itself. Reusing the kernel label for userspace processes is problematic for several reasons: 1. The kernel is considered to be a privileged domain and generally needs to have a wide range of permissions allowed to work correctly, which prevents the policy writer from effectively hardening against early boot processes that might remain running unintentionally after the policy is loaded (they represent a potential extra attack surface that should be mitigated). 2. Despite the kernel being treated as a privileged domain, the policy writer may want to impose certain special limitations on kernel threads that may conflict with the requirements of intentional early boot processes. For example, it is a good hardening practice to limit what executables the kernel can execute as usermode helpers and to confine the resulting usermode helper processes. However, a (legitimate) process surviving from early boot may need to execute a different set of executables. 3. As currently implemented, overlayfs remembers the security context of the process that created an overlayfs mount and uses it to bound subsequent operations on files using this context. If an overlayfs mount is created before the SELinux policy is loaded, these "mounter" checks are made against the kernel context, which may clash with restrictions on the kernel domain (see 2.). To resolve this, introduce a new initial SID (reusing the slot of the former "init" initial SID) that will be assigned to any userspace process started before the policy is first loaded. This is easy to do, as we can simply label any process that goes through the bprm_creds_for_exec LSM hook with the new init-SID instead of propagating the kernel SID from the parent. To provide backwards compatibility for existing policies that are unaware of this new semantic of the "init" initial SID, introduce a new policy capability "userspace_initial_context" and set the "init" SID to the same context as the "kernel" SID unless this capability is set by the policy. Another small backwards compatibility measure is needed in security_sid_to_context_core() for before the initial SELinux policy load - see the code comment for explanation. Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com> [PM: edited comments based on feedback/discussion] Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-08-09selinux: revert SECINITSID_INIT supportPaul Moore
This commit reverts 5b0eea835d4e ("selinux: introduce an initial SID for early boot processes") as it was found to cause problems on distros with old SELinux userspace tools/libraries, specifically Ubuntu 16.04. Hopefully we will be able to re-add this functionality at a later date, but let's revert this for now to help ensure a stable and backwards compatible SELinux tree. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/87edkseqf8.fsf@mail.lhotse Acked-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-08-03selinux: avoid implicit conversions in services codeChristian Göttsche
Use u32 as the output parameter type in security_get_classes() and security_get_permissions(), based on the type of the symtab nprim member. Declare the read-only class string parameter of security_get_permissions() const. Avoid several implicit conversions by using the identical type for the destination. Use the type identical to the source for local variables. Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com> [PM: cleanup extra whitespace in subject] Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-07-19selinux: update my email addressStephen Smalley
Update my email address; MAINTAINERS was updated some time ago. Signed-off-by: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-07-18selinux: de-brand SELinuxStephen Smalley
Change "NSA SELinux" to just "SELinux" in Kconfig help text and comments. While NSA was the original primary developer and continues to help maintain SELinux, SELinux has long since transitioned to a wide community of developers and maintainers. SELinux has been part of the mainline Linux kernel for nearly 20 years now [1] and has received contributions from many individuals and organizations. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Pine.LNX.4.44.0308082228470.1852-100000@home.osdl.org/ Signed-off-by: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-07-18selinux: avoid implicit conversions regarding enforcing statusChristian Göttsche
Use the type bool as parameter type in selinux_status_update_setenforce(). The related function enforcing_enabled() returns the type bool, while the struct selinux_kernel_status member enforcing uses an u32. Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com> [PM: subject line tweaks] Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-07-18selinux: consistently use u32 as sequence number type in the status codeChristian Göttsche
Align the type with the one used in selinux_notify_policy_change() and the sequence member of struct selinux_kernel_status. Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com> [PM: subject line tweaks] Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-07-10selinux: introduce an initial SID for early boot processesOndrej Mosnacek
Currently, SELinux doesn't allow distinguishing between kernel threads and userspace processes that are started before the policy is first loaded - both get the label corresponding to the kernel SID. The only way a process that persists from early boot can get a meaningful label is by doing a voluntary dyntransition or re-executing itself. Reusing the kernel label for userspace processes is problematic for several reasons: 1. The kernel is considered to be a privileged domain and generally needs to have a wide range of permissions allowed to work correctly, which prevents the policy writer from effectively hardening against early boot processes that might remain running unintentionally after the policy is loaded (they represent a potential extra attack surface that should be mitigated). 2. Despite the kernel being treated as a privileged domain, the policy writer may want to impose certain special limitations on kernel threads that may conflict with the requirements of intentional early boot processes. For example, it is a good hardening practice to limit what executables the kernel can execute as usermode helpers and to confine the resulting usermode helper processes. However, a (legitimate) process surviving from early boot may need to execute a different set of executables. 3. As currently implemented, overlayfs remembers the security context of the process that created an overlayfs mount and uses it to bound subsequent operations on files using this context. If an overlayfs mount is created before the SELinux policy is loaded, these "mounter" checks are made against the kernel context, which may clash with restrictions on the kernel domain (see 2.). To resolve this, introduce a new initial SID (reusing the slot of the former "init" initial SID) that will be assigned to any userspace process started before the policy is first loaded. This is easy to do, as we can simply label any process that goes through the bprm_creds_for_exec LSM hook with the new init-SID instead of propagating the kernel SID from the parent. To provide backwards compatibility for existing policies that are unaware of this new semantic of the "init" initial SID, introduce a new policy capability "userspace_initial_context" and set the "init" SID to the same context as the "kernel" SID unless this capability is set by the policy. Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-07-10selinux: cleanup the policycap accessor functionsPaul Moore
In the process of reverting back to directly accessing the global selinux_state pointer we left behind some artifacts in the selinux_policycap_XXX() helper functions. This patch cleans up some of that left-behind cruft. Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-05-30selinux: make labeled NFS work when mounted before policy loadOndrej Mosnacek
Currently, when an NFS filesystem that supports passing LSM/SELinux labels is mounted during early boot (before the SELinux policy is loaded), it ends up mounted without the labeling support (i.e. with Fedora policy all files get the generic NFS label system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0). This is because the information that the NFS mount supports passing labels (communicated to the LSM layer via the kern_flags argument of security_set_mnt_opts()) gets lost and when the policy is loaded the mount is initialized as if the passing is not supported. Fix this by noting the "native labeling" in newsbsec->flags (using a new SE_SBNATIVE flag) on the pre-policy-loaded call of selinux_set_mnt_opts() and then making sure it is respected on the second call from delayed_superblock_init(). Additionally, make inode_doinit_with_dentry() initialize the inode's label from its extended attributes whenever it doesn't find it already intitialized by the filesystem. This is needed to properly initialize pre-existing inodes when delayed_superblock_init() is called. It should not trigger in any other cases (and if it does, it's still better to initialize the correct label instead of leaving the inode unlabeled). Fixes: eb9ae686507b ("SELinux: Add new labeling type native labels") Tested-by: Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com> [PM: fixed 'Fixes' tag format] Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
2023-05-30selinux: cleanup exit_sel_fs() declarationXiu Jianfeng
exit_sel_fs() has been removed since commit f22f9aaf6c3d ("selinux: remove the runtime disable functionality"). Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <xiujianfeng@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>