summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMichal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co>2025-11-19 15:02:59 +0100
committerJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>2025-11-20 07:40:06 -0800
commit002541ef650b742a198e4be363881439bb9d86b4 (patch)
treecf00c2ee384f6c005829c992b1b3c0c0e5039bb2
parent7d277a7a58578dd62fd546ddaef459ec24ccae36 (diff)
vsock: Ignore signal/timeout on connect() if already established
During connect(), acting on a signal/timeout by disconnecting an already established socket leads to several issues: 1. connect() invoking vsock_transport_cancel_pkt() -> virtio_transport_purge_skbs() may race with sendmsg() invoking virtio_transport_get_credit(). This results in a permanently elevated `vvs->bytes_unsent`. Which, in turn, confuses the SOCK_LINGER handling. 2. connect() resetting a connected socket's state may race with socket being placed in a sockmap. A disconnected socket remaining in a sockmap breaks sockmap's assumptions. And gives rise to WARNs. 3. connect() transitioning SS_CONNECTED -> SS_UNCONNECTED allows for a transport change/drop after TCP_ESTABLISHED. Which poses a problem for any simultaneous sendmsg() or connect() and may result in a use-after-free/null-ptr-deref. Do not disconnect socket on signal/timeout. Keep the logic for unconnected sockets: they don't linger, can't be placed in a sockmap, are rejected by sendmsg(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/e07fd95c-9a38-4eea-9638-133e38c2ec9b@rbox.co/ [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250317-vsock-trans-signal-race-v4-0-fc8837f3f1d4@rbox.co/ [3]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/60f1b7db-3099-4f6a-875e-af9f6ef194f6@rbox.co/ Fixes: d021c344051a ("VSOCK: Introduce VM Sockets") Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co> Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251119-vsock-interrupted-connect-v2-1-70734cf1233f@rbox.co Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r--net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c40
1 files changed, 31 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index 76763247a377..a9ca9c3b87b3 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -1661,18 +1661,40 @@ static int vsock_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
lock_sock(sk);
- if (signal_pending(current)) {
- err = sock_intr_errno(timeout);
- sk->sk_state = sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED ? TCP_CLOSING : TCP_CLOSE;
- sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
- vsock_transport_cancel_pkt(vsk);
- vsock_remove_connected(vsk);
- goto out_wait;
- } else if ((sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED) && (timeout == 0)) {
- err = -ETIMEDOUT;
+ /* Connection established. Whatever happens to socket once we
+ * release it, that's not connect()'s concern. No need to go
+ * into signal and timeout handling. Call it a day.
+ *
+ * Note that allowing to "reset" an already established socket
+ * here is racy and insecure.
+ */
+ if (sk->sk_state == TCP_ESTABLISHED)
+ break;
+
+ /* If connection was _not_ established and a signal/timeout came
+ * to be, we want the socket's state reset. User space may want
+ * to retry.
+ *
+ * sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED implies that socket is not on
+ * vsock_connected_table. We keep the binding and the transport
+ * assigned.
+ */
+ if (signal_pending(current) || timeout == 0) {
+ err = timeout == 0 ? -ETIMEDOUT : sock_intr_errno(timeout);
+
+ /* Listener might have already responded with
+ * VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RESPONSE. Its handling expects our
+ * sk_state == TCP_SYN_SENT, which hereby we break.
+ * In such case VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RST will follow.
+ */
sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
sock->state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
+
+ /* Try to cancel VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_REQUEST skb sent out by
+ * transport->connect().
+ */
vsock_transport_cancel_pkt(vsk);
+
goto out_wait;
}