diff options
author | Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com> | 2025-04-14 14:01:23 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2025-05-07 23:39:37 -0700 |
commit | bd1261b16d9131d79723d982d54295e7f309797a (patch) | |
tree | c6257740c2064b74b57c37ade934c13245fae95a | |
parent | df84d2fd35c6f2d6b2241e47f26e1829eab26186 (diff) |
ocfs2: fix the issue with discontiguous allocation in the global_bitmap
commit 4eb7b93e0310 ("ocfs2: improve write IO performance when
fragmentation is high") introduced another regression.
The following ocfs2-test case can trigger this issue:
> discontig_runner.sh => activate_discontig_bg.sh => resv_unwritten:
> ${RESV_UNWRITTEN_BIN} -f ${WORK_PLACE}/large_testfile -s 0 -l \
> $((${FILE_MAJOR_SIZE_M}*1024*1024))
In my env, test disk size (by "fdisk -l <dev>"):
> 53687091200 bytes, 104857600 sectors.
Above command is:
> /usr/local/ocfs2-test/bin/resv_unwritten -f \
> /mnt/ocfs2/ocfs2-activate-discontig-bg-dir/large_testfile -s 0 -l \
> 53187969024
Error log:
> [*] Reserve 50724M space for a LARGE file, reserve 200M space for future test.
> ioctl error 28: "No space left on device"
> resv allocation failed Unknown error -1
> reserve unwritten region from 0 to 53187969024.
Call flow:
__ocfs2_change_file_space //by ioctl OCFS2_IOC_RESVSP64
ocfs2_allocate_unwritten_extents //start:0 len:53187969024
while()
+ ocfs2_get_clusters //cpos:0, alloc_size:1623168 (cluster number)
+ ocfs2_extend_allocation
+ ocfs2_lock_allocators
| + choose OCFS2_AC_USE_MAIN & ocfs2_cluster_group_search
|
+ ocfs2_add_inode_data
ocfs2_add_clusters_in_btree
__ocfs2_claim_clusters
ocfs2_claim_suballoc_bits
+ During the allocation of the final part of the large file
(after ~47GB), no chain had the required contiguous
bits_wanted. Consequently, the allocation failed.
How to fix:
When OCFS2 is encountering fragmented allocation, the file system should
stop attempting bits_wanted contiguous allocation and instead provide the
largest available contiguous free bits from the cluster groups.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250414060125.19938-2-heming.zhao@suse.com
Fixes: 4eb7b93e0310 ("ocfs2: improve write IO performance when fragmentation is high")
Signed-off-by: Heming Zhao <heming.zhao@suse.com>
Reported-by: Gautham Ananthakrishna <gautham.ananthakrishna@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn>
Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-rw-r--r-- | fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c | 38 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | fs/ocfs2/suballoc.h | 1 |
2 files changed, 33 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c index f7b483f0de2a..6ac4dcd54588 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.c @@ -698,10 +698,12 @@ static int ocfs2_block_group_alloc(struct ocfs2_super *osb, bg_bh = ocfs2_block_group_alloc_contig(osb, handle, alloc_inode, ac, cl); - if (PTR_ERR(bg_bh) == -ENOSPC) + if (PTR_ERR(bg_bh) == -ENOSPC) { + ac->ac_which = OCFS2_AC_USE_MAIN_DISCONTIG; bg_bh = ocfs2_block_group_alloc_discontig(handle, alloc_inode, ac, cl); + } if (IS_ERR(bg_bh)) { status = PTR_ERR(bg_bh); bg_bh = NULL; @@ -1794,6 +1796,7 @@ static int ocfs2_search_chain(struct ocfs2_alloc_context *ac, { int status; u16 chain; + u32 contig_bits; u64 next_group; struct inode *alloc_inode = ac->ac_inode; struct buffer_head *group_bh = NULL; @@ -1819,10 +1822,21 @@ static int ocfs2_search_chain(struct ocfs2_alloc_context *ac, status = -ENOSPC; /* for now, the chain search is a bit simplistic. We just use * the 1st group with any empty bits. */ - while ((status = ac->ac_group_search(alloc_inode, group_bh, - bits_wanted, min_bits, - ac->ac_max_block, - res)) == -ENOSPC) { + while (1) { + if (ac->ac_which == OCFS2_AC_USE_MAIN_DISCONTIG) { + contig_bits = le16_to_cpu(bg->bg_contig_free_bits); + if (!contig_bits) + contig_bits = ocfs2_find_max_contig_free_bits(bg->bg_bitmap, + le16_to_cpu(bg->bg_bits), 0); + if (bits_wanted > contig_bits && contig_bits >= min_bits) + bits_wanted = contig_bits; + } + + status = ac->ac_group_search(alloc_inode, group_bh, + bits_wanted, min_bits, + ac->ac_max_block, res); + if (status != -ENOSPC) + break; if (!bg->bg_next_group) break; @@ -1982,6 +1996,7 @@ static int ocfs2_claim_suballoc_bits(struct ocfs2_alloc_context *ac, victim = ocfs2_find_victim_chain(cl); ac->ac_chain = victim; +search: status = ocfs2_search_chain(ac, handle, bits_wanted, min_bits, res, &bits_left); if (!status) { @@ -2022,6 +2037,16 @@ static int ocfs2_claim_suballoc_bits(struct ocfs2_alloc_context *ac, } } + /* Chains can't supply the bits_wanted contiguous space. + * We should switch to using every single bit when allocating + * from the global bitmap. */ + if (i == le16_to_cpu(cl->cl_next_free_rec) && + status == -ENOSPC && ac->ac_which == OCFS2_AC_USE_MAIN) { + ac->ac_which = OCFS2_AC_USE_MAIN_DISCONTIG; + ac->ac_chain = victim; + goto search; + } + set_hint: if (status != -ENOSPC) { /* If the next search of this group is not likely to @@ -2365,7 +2390,8 @@ int __ocfs2_claim_clusters(handle_t *handle, BUG_ON(ac->ac_bits_given >= ac->ac_bits_wanted); BUG_ON(ac->ac_which != OCFS2_AC_USE_LOCAL - && ac->ac_which != OCFS2_AC_USE_MAIN); + && ac->ac_which != OCFS2_AC_USE_MAIN + && ac->ac_which != OCFS2_AC_USE_MAIN_DISCONTIG); if (ac->ac_which == OCFS2_AC_USE_LOCAL) { WARN_ON(min_clusters > 1); diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.h b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.h index b481b834857d..bcf2ed4a8631 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.h +++ b/fs/ocfs2/suballoc.h @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ struct ocfs2_alloc_context { #define OCFS2_AC_USE_MAIN 2 #define OCFS2_AC_USE_INODE 3 #define OCFS2_AC_USE_META 4 +#define OCFS2_AC_USE_MAIN_DISCONTIG 5 u32 ac_which; /* these are used by the chain search */ |