diff options
| author | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2025-01-28 15:39:49 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2025-04-16 21:09:12 +0200 |
| commit | c70fc32f44431bb30f9025ce753ba8be25acbba3 (patch) | |
| tree | ca2cbb94f5d37f2fa17ff57f8503f42f4c3abf60 | |
| parent | 44671e21e3463f36f6c6e4b691216f60e85840e4 (diff) | |
sched/fair: Adhere to place_entity() constraints
Mike reports that commit 6d71a9c61604 ("sched/fair: Fix EEVDF entity
placement bug causing scheduling lag") relies on commit 4423af84b297
("sched/fair: optimize the PLACE_LAG when se->vlag is zero") to not
trip a WARN in place_entity().
What happens is that the lag of the very last entity is 0 per
definition -- the average of one element matches the value of that
element. Therefore place_entity() will match the condition skipping
the lag adjustment:
if (sched_feat(PLACE_LAG) && cfs_rq->nr_queued && se->vlag) {
Without the 'se->vlag' condition -- it will attempt to adjust the zero
lag even though we're inserting into an empty tree.
Notably, we should have failed the 'cfs_rq->nr_queued' condition, but
don't because they didn't get updated.
Additionally, move update_load_add() after placement() as is
consistent with other place_entity() users -- this change is
non-functional, place_entity() does not use cfs_rq->load.
Fixes: 6d71a9c61604 ("sched/fair: Fix EEVDF entity placement bug causing scheduling lag")
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c216eb4ef0e0e0029c600aefc69d56681cee5581.camel@gmx.de
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/fair.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c index 5e1bd9e8464c..eb5a2572b4f8 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c @@ -3795,6 +3795,7 @@ static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, update_entity_lag(cfs_rq, se); se->deadline -= se->vruntime; se->rel_deadline = 1; + cfs_rq->nr_queued--; if (!curr) __dequeue_entity(cfs_rq, se); update_load_sub(&cfs_rq->load, se->load.weight); @@ -3821,10 +3822,11 @@ static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, enqueue_load_avg(cfs_rq, se); if (se->on_rq) { - update_load_add(&cfs_rq->load, se->load.weight); place_entity(cfs_rq, se, 0); + update_load_add(&cfs_rq->load, se->load.weight); if (!curr) __enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se); + cfs_rq->nr_queued++; /* * The entity's vruntime has been adjusted, so let's check |