diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2025-05-02 14:41:56 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2025-05-02 14:41:56 -0700 |
commit | b6a218ff8b88d09f86a17167772e7aaff1724e54 (patch) | |
tree | b73ada97ab0914040fe981ef45c0dc11415b38de /include | |
parent | daad00c063a1b3ae4a7814a6047009d471f21073 (diff) | |
parent | 23203ed263f0701368468952d5004e320e5af6db (diff) |
Merge tag 'pm-6.15-rc5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm
Pull power management fixes from Rafael Wysocki:
"These fix three recent regressions, two in cpufreq and one in the
Intel Soundwire driver, and an unchecked MSR access in the
intel_pstate driver:
- Fix a recent regression causing systems where frequency tables are
used by cpufreq to have issues with setting frequency limits
(Rafael Wysocki)
- Fix a recent regressions causing frequency boost settings to become
out-of-sync if platform firmware updates the registers associated
with frequency boost during system resume (Viresh Kumar)
- Fix a recent regression causing resume failures to occur in the
Intel Soundwire driver if the device handled by it is in runtime
suspend before a system-wide suspend (Rafael Wysocki)
- Fix an unchecked MSR aceess in the intel_pstate driver occurring
when CPUID indicates no turbo, but the driver attempts to enable
turbo frequencies due to a misleading value read from an MSR
(Srinivas Pandruvada)"
* tag 'pm-6.15-rc5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm:
cpufreq: intel_pstate: Unchecked MSR aceess in legacy mode
soundwire: intel_auxdevice: Fix system suspend/resume handling
cpufreq: Fix setting policy limits when frequency tables are used
cpufreq: ACPI: Re-sync CPU boost state on system resume
Diffstat (limited to 'include')
-rw-r--r-- | include/linux/cpufreq.h | 83 |
1 files changed, 54 insertions, 29 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h index 400fee6427a5..7a5b391dcc01 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h @@ -776,8 +776,8 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy, int cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy_data *policy); int cpufreq_table_index_unsorted(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, - unsigned int target_freq, - unsigned int relation); + unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int min, + unsigned int max, unsigned int relation); int cpufreq_frequency_table_get_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int freq); @@ -840,12 +840,12 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_dl(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, return best; } -/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */ -static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_l(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, - unsigned int target_freq, - bool efficiencies) +static inline int find_index_l(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, + unsigned int target_freq, + unsigned int min, unsigned int max, + bool efficiencies) { - target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, policy->min, policy->max); + target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, min, max); if (policy->freq_table_sorted == CPUFREQ_TABLE_SORTED_ASCENDING) return cpufreq_table_find_index_al(policy, target_freq, @@ -855,6 +855,14 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_l(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, efficiencies); } +/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */ +static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_l(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, + unsigned int target_freq, + bool efficiencies) +{ + return find_index_l(policy, target_freq, policy->min, policy->max, efficiencies); +} + /* Find highest freq at or below target in a table in ascending order */ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_ah(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, @@ -908,12 +916,12 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_dh(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, return best; } -/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */ -static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_h(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, - unsigned int target_freq, - bool efficiencies) +static inline int find_index_h(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, + unsigned int target_freq, + unsigned int min, unsigned int max, + bool efficiencies) { - target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, policy->min, policy->max); + target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, min, max); if (policy->freq_table_sorted == CPUFREQ_TABLE_SORTED_ASCENDING) return cpufreq_table_find_index_ah(policy, target_freq, @@ -923,6 +931,14 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_h(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, efficiencies); } +/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */ +static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_h(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, + unsigned int target_freq, + bool efficiencies) +{ + return find_index_h(policy, target_freq, policy->min, policy->max, efficiencies); +} + /* Find closest freq to target in a table in ascending order */ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_ac(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, @@ -993,12 +1009,12 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_dc(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, return best; } -/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */ -static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_c(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, - unsigned int target_freq, - bool efficiencies) +static inline int find_index_c(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, + unsigned int target_freq, + unsigned int min, unsigned int max, + bool efficiencies) { - target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, policy->min, policy->max); + target_freq = clamp_val(target_freq, min, max); if (policy->freq_table_sorted == CPUFREQ_TABLE_SORTED_ASCENDING) return cpufreq_table_find_index_ac(policy, target_freq, @@ -1008,7 +1024,17 @@ static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_c(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, efficiencies); } -static inline bool cpufreq_is_in_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int idx) +/* Works only on sorted freq-tables */ +static inline int cpufreq_table_find_index_c(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, + unsigned int target_freq, + bool efficiencies) +{ + return find_index_c(policy, target_freq, policy->min, policy->max, efficiencies); +} + +static inline bool cpufreq_is_in_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, + unsigned int min, unsigned int max, + int idx) { unsigned int freq; @@ -1017,11 +1043,13 @@ static inline bool cpufreq_is_in_limits(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int idx) freq = policy->freq_table[idx].frequency; - return freq == clamp_val(freq, policy->min, policy->max); + return freq == clamp_val(freq, min, max); } static inline int cpufreq_frequency_table_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq, + unsigned int min, + unsigned int max, unsigned int relation) { bool efficiencies = policy->efficiencies_available && @@ -1032,29 +1060,26 @@ static inline int cpufreq_frequency_table_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, relation &= ~CPUFREQ_RELATION_E; if (unlikely(policy->freq_table_sorted == CPUFREQ_TABLE_UNSORTED)) - return cpufreq_table_index_unsorted(policy, target_freq, - relation); + return cpufreq_table_index_unsorted(policy, target_freq, min, + max, relation); retry: switch (relation) { case CPUFREQ_RELATION_L: - idx = cpufreq_table_find_index_l(policy, target_freq, - efficiencies); + idx = find_index_l(policy, target_freq, min, max, efficiencies); break; case CPUFREQ_RELATION_H: - idx = cpufreq_table_find_index_h(policy, target_freq, - efficiencies); + idx = find_index_h(policy, target_freq, min, max, efficiencies); break; case CPUFREQ_RELATION_C: - idx = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(policy, target_freq, - efficiencies); + idx = find_index_c(policy, target_freq, min, max, efficiencies); break; default: WARN_ON_ONCE(1); return 0; } - /* Limit frequency index to honor policy->min/max */ - if (!cpufreq_is_in_limits(policy, idx) && efficiencies) { + /* Limit frequency index to honor min and max */ + if (!cpufreq_is_in_limits(policy, min, max, idx) && efficiencies) { efficiencies = false; goto retry; } |