diff options
| author | Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> | 2013-09-25 16:53:32 +0530 | 
|---|---|---|
| committer | Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com> | 2013-09-27 16:28:48 +0530 | 
| commit | 6c00350b573c0bd3635436e43e8696951dd6e1b6 (patch) | |
| tree | 1111dec59ef3235b749cd89ab724a8d5a149b00c /lib/mpi/mpi-cmp.c | |
| parent | 0752adfda15f0eca9859a76da3db1800e129ad43 (diff) | |
ARC: Workaround spinlock livelock in SMP SystemC simulation
Some ARC SMP systems lack native atomic R-M-W (LLOCK/SCOND) insns and
can only use atomic EX insn (reg with mem) to build higher level R-M-W
primitives. This includes a SystemC based SMP simulation model.
So rwlocks need to use a protecting spinlock for atomic cmp-n-exchange
operation to update reader(s)/writer count.
The spinlock operation itself looks as follows:
	mov reg, 1		; 1=locked, 0=unlocked
retry:
	EX reg, [lock]		; load existing, store 1, atomically
	BREQ reg, 1, rety	; if already locked, retry
In single-threaded simulation, SystemC alternates between the 2 cores
with "N" insn each based scheduling. Additionally for insn with global
side effect, such as EX writing to shared mem, a core switch is
enforced too.
Given that, 2 cores doing a repeated EX on same location, Linux often
got into a livelock e.g. when both cores were fiddling with tasklist
lock (gdbserver / hackbench) for read/write respectively as the
sequence diagram below shows:
           core1                                   core2
         --------                                --------
1. spin lock [EX r=0, w=1] - LOCKED
2. rwlock(Read)            - LOCKED
3. spin unlock  [ST 0]     - UNLOCKED
                                         spin lock [EX r=0,w=1] - LOCKED
                      -- resched core 1----
5. spin lock [EX r=1] - ALREADY-LOCKED
                      -- resched core 2----
6.                                       rwlock(Write) - READER-LOCKED
7.                                       spin unlock [ST 0]
8.                                       rwlock failed, retry again
9.                                       spin lock  [EX r=0, w=1]
                      -- resched core 1----
10  spinlock locked in #9, retry #5
11. spin lock [EX gets 1]
                      -- resched core 2----
...
...
The fix was to unlock using the EX insn too (step 7), to trigger another
SystemC scheduling pass which would let core1 proceed, eliding the
livelock.
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/mpi/mpi-cmp.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
