diff options
author | Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> | 2025-03-14 18:21:12 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> | 2025-03-17 22:07:01 -0700 |
commit | 200a89c159a7a416115e6e309183c82183bf98aa (patch) | |
tree | 2b15bfa130230fb7b7c6d300dd7076c9f9b0d608 /lib | |
parent | 80a5c494c89f73907ed659a9233a70253774cdae (diff) |
mm/filemap: use xas_try_split() in __filemap_add_folio()
Patch series "Minimize xa_node allocation during xarry split", v3.
When splitting a multi-index entry in XArray from order-n to order-m,
existing xas_split_alloc()+xas_split() approach requires 2^(n %
XA_CHUNK_SHIFT) xa_node allocations. But its callers,
__filemap_add_folio() and shmem_split_large_entry(), use at most 1
xa_node. To minimize xa_node allocation and remove the limitation of no
split from order-12 (or above) to order-0 (or anything between 0 and
5)[1], xas_try_split() was added[2], which allocates (n / XA_CHUNK_SHIFT -
m / XA_CHUNK_SHIFT) xa_node. It is used for non-uniform folio split, but
can be used by __filemap_add_folio() and shmem_split_large_entry().
xas_split_alloc() and xas_split() split an order-9 to order-0:
---------------------------------
| | | | | | | | |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| | | | | | | | |
---------------------------------
| | | |
------- --- --- -------
| | ... | |
V V V V
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
| xa_node | | xa_node | ... | xa_node | | xa_node |
----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
xas_try_split() splits an order-9 to order-0:
---------------------------------
| | | | | | | | |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| | | | | | | | |
---------------------------------
|
|
V
-----------
| xa_node |
-----------
xas_try_split() is designed to be called iteratively with n = m + 1.
xas_try_split_mini_order() is added to minmize the number of calls to
xas_try_split() by telling the caller the next minimal order to split to
instead of n - 1. Splitting order-n to order-m when m= l * XA_CHUNK_SHIFT
does not require xa_node allocation and requires 1 xa_node when n=l *
XA_CHUNK_SHIFT and m = n - 1, so it is OK to use xas_try_split() with n >
m + 1 when no new xa_node is needed.
xfstests quick group test passed on xfs and tmpfs.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Z6YX3RznGLUD07Ao@casper.infradead.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250226210032.2044041-1-ziy@nvidia.com/
This patch (of 2):
During __filemap_add_folio(), a shadow entry is covering n slots and a
folio covers m slots with m < n is to be added. Instead of splitting all
n slots, only the m slots covered by the folio need to be split and the
remaining n-m shadow entries can be retained with orders ranging from m to
n-1. This method only requires
(n/XA_CHUNK_SHIFT) - (m/XA_CHUNK_SHIFT)
new xa_nodes instead of
(n % XA_CHUNK_SHIFT) * ((n/XA_CHUNK_SHIFT) - (m/XA_CHUNK_SHIFT))
new xa_nodes, compared to the original xas_split_alloc() + xas_split()
one. For example, to insert an order-0 folio when an order-9 shadow entry
is present (assuming XA_CHUNK_SHIFT is 6), 1 xa_node is needed instead of
8.
xas_try_split_min_order() is introduced to reduce the number of calls to
xas_try_split() during split.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250314222113.711703-1-ziy@nvidia.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250314222113.711703-2-ziy@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Mattew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shuemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'lib')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/xarray.c | 25 |
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/xarray.c b/lib/xarray.c index 3bae48558e21..9644b18af18d 100644 --- a/lib/xarray.c +++ b/lib/xarray.c @@ -1135,6 +1135,28 @@ void xas_split(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry, unsigned int order) EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xas_split); /** + * xas_try_split_min_order() - Minimal split order xas_try_split() can accept + * @order: Current entry order. + * + * xas_try_split() can split a multi-index entry to smaller than @order - 1 if + * no new xa_node is needed. This function provides the minimal order + * xas_try_split() supports. + * + * Return: the minimal order xas_try_split() supports + * + * Context: Any context. + * + */ +unsigned int xas_try_split_min_order(unsigned int order) +{ + if (order % XA_CHUNK_SHIFT == 0) + return order == 0 ? 0 : order - 1; + + return order - (order % XA_CHUNK_SHIFT); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xas_try_split_min_order); + +/** * xas_try_split() - Try to split a multi-index entry. * @xas: XArray operation state. * @entry: New entry to store in the array. @@ -1145,6 +1167,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xas_split); * needed, the function will use GFP_NOWAIT to get one if xas->xa_alloc is * NULL. If more new xa_node are needed, the function gives EINVAL error. * + * NOTE: use xas_try_split_min_order() to get next split order instead of + * @order - 1 if you want to minmize xas_try_split() calls. + * * Context: Any context. The caller should hold the xa_lock. */ void xas_try_split(struct xa_state *xas, void *entry, unsigned int order) |