diff options
| author | Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com> | 2025-11-13 12:05:37 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com> | 2025-11-26 12:57:10 +0000 |
| commit | 2c5f4a53476e3cab70adc77b38942c066bd2c17c (patch) | |
| tree | 9ba2bdc64365a716390da74be6e16a5c68c62ef4 /rust/kernel | |
| parent | c3454ac0367fbc38b2558fbd6c7d25acdee71c50 (diff) | |
gfs2: Prevent recursive memory reclaim
Function new_inode() returns a new inode with inode->i_mapping->gfp_mask
set to GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE. This value includes the __GFP_FS flag, so
allocations in that address space can recurse into filesystem memory
reclaim. We don't want that to happen because it can consume a
significant amount of stack memory.
Worse than that is that it can also deadlock: for example, in several
places, gfs2_unstuff_dinode() is called inside filesystem transactions.
This calls filemap_grab_folio(), which can allocate a new folio, which
can trigger memory reclaim. If memory reclaim recurses into the
filesystem and starts another transaction, a deadlock will ensue.
To fix these kinds of problems, prevent memory reclaim from recursing
into filesystem code by making sure that the gfp_mask of inode address
spaces doesn't include __GFP_FS.
The "meta" and resource group address spaces were already using GFP_NOFS
as their gfp_mask (which doesn't include __GFP_FS). The default value
of GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE is less restrictive than GFP_NOFS, though. To
avoid being overly limiting, use the default value and only knock off
the __GFP_FS flag. I'm not sure if this will actually make a
difference, but it also shouldn't hurt.
This patch is loosely based on commit ad22c7a043c2 ("xfs: prevent stack
overflows from page cache allocation").
Fixes xfstest generic/273.
Fixes: dc0b9435238c ("gfs: Don't use GFP_NOFS in gfs2_unstuff_dinode")
Reviewed-by: Andrew Price <anprice@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'rust/kernel')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
