summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/perf/scripts/python/export-to-sqlite.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>2023-06-12 17:10:44 -0700
committerRick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>2023-07-11 14:12:19 -0700
commitae1f05a617dcbc0a732fbeba0893786cd009536c (patch)
tree7bc96e4ab50af87de9dda602be0535a526b917c0 /tools/perf/scripts/python/export-to-sqlite.py
parente5136e876581ba5b63220378e25fec9dcec7bad1 (diff)
x86/mm: Warn if create Write=0,Dirty=1 with raw prot
When user shadow stack is in use, Write=0,Dirty=1 is treated by the CPU as shadow stack memory. So for shadow stack memory this bit combination is valid, but when Dirty=1,Write=1 (conventionally writable) memory is being write protected, the kernel has been taught to transition the Dirty=1 bit to SavedDirty=1, to avoid inadvertently creating shadow stack memory. It does this inside pte_wrprotect() because it knows the PTE is not intended to be a writable shadow stack entry, it is supposed to be write protected. However, when a PTE is created by a raw prot using mk_pte(), mk_pte() can't know whether to adjust Dirty=1 to SavedDirty=1. It can't distinguish between the caller intending to create a shadow stack PTE or needing the SavedDirty shift. The kernel has been updated to not do this, and so Write=0,Dirty=1 memory should only be created by the pte_mkfoo() helpers. Add a warning to make sure no new mk_pte() start doing this, like, for example, set_memory_rox() did. Signed-off-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@intel.com> Tested-by: John Allen <john.allen@amd.com> Tested-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230613001108.3040476-19-rick.p.edgecombe%40intel.com
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/perf/scripts/python/export-to-sqlite.py')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions