diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/admin-guide')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/index.rst | 2 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/indirect-target-selection.rst | 168 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/rsb.rst | 268 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 23 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/admin-guide/xfs.rst | 37 |
5 files changed, 494 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/index.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/index.rst index ff0b440ef2dc..ce296b8430fc 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/index.rst @@ -22,3 +22,5 @@ are configurable at compile, boot or run time. srso gather_data_sampling reg-file-data-sampling + rsb + indirect-target-selection diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/indirect-target-selection.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/indirect-target-selection.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..d9ca64108d23 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/indirect-target-selection.rst @@ -0,0 +1,168 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +Indirect Target Selection (ITS) +=============================== + +ITS is a vulnerability in some Intel CPUs that support Enhanced IBRS and were +released before Alder Lake. ITS may allow an attacker to control the prediction +of indirect branches and RETs located in the lower half of a cacheline. + +ITS is assigned CVE-2024-28956 with a CVSS score of 4.7 (Medium). + +Scope of Impact +--------------- +- **eIBRS Guest/Host Isolation**: Indirect branches in KVM/kernel may still be + predicted with unintended target corresponding to a branch in the guest. + +- **Intra-Mode BTI**: In-kernel training such as through cBPF or other native + gadgets. + +- **Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier (IBPB)**: After an IBPB, indirect + branches may still be predicted with targets corresponding to direct branches + executed prior to the IBPB. This is fixed by the IPU 2025.1 microcode, which + should be available via distro updates. Alternatively microcode can be + obtained from Intel's github repository [#f1]_. + +Affected CPUs +------------- +Below is the list of ITS affected CPUs [#f2]_ [#f3]_: + + ======================== ============ ==================== =============== + Common name Family_Model eIBRS Intra-mode BTI + Guest/Host Isolation + ======================== ============ ==================== =============== + SKYLAKE_X (step >= 6) 06_55H Affected Affected + ICELAKE_X 06_6AH Not affected Affected + ICELAKE_D 06_6CH Not affected Affected + ICELAKE_L 06_7EH Not affected Affected + TIGERLAKE_L 06_8CH Not affected Affected + TIGERLAKE 06_8DH Not affected Affected + KABYLAKE_L (step >= 12) 06_8EH Affected Affected + KABYLAKE (step >= 13) 06_9EH Affected Affected + COMETLAKE 06_A5H Affected Affected + COMETLAKE_L 06_A6H Affected Affected + ROCKETLAKE 06_A7H Not affected Affected + ======================== ============ ==================== =============== + +- All affected CPUs enumerate Enhanced IBRS feature. +- IBPB isolation is affected on all ITS affected CPUs, and need a microcode + update for mitigation. +- None of the affected CPUs enumerate BHI_CTRL which was introduced in Golden + Cove (Alder Lake and Sapphire Rapids). This can help guests to determine the + host's affected status. +- Intel Atom CPUs are not affected by ITS. + +Mitigation +---------- +As only the indirect branches and RETs that have their last byte of instruction +in the lower half of the cacheline are vulnerable to ITS, the basic idea behind +the mitigation is to not allow indirect branches in the lower half. + +This is achieved by relying on existing retpoline support in the kernel, and in +compilers. ITS-vulnerable retpoline sites are runtime patched to point to newly +added ITS-safe thunks. These safe thunks consists of indirect branch in the +second half of the cacheline. Not all retpoline sites are patched to thunks, if +a retpoline site is evaluated to be ITS-safe, it is replaced with an inline +indirect branch. + +Dynamic thunks +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ +From a dynamically allocated pool of safe-thunks, each vulnerable site is +replaced with a new thunk, such that they get a unique address. This could +improve the branch prediction accuracy. Also, it is a defense-in-depth measure +against aliasing. + +Note, for simplicity, indirect branches in eBPF programs are always replaced +with a jump to a static thunk in __x86_indirect_its_thunk_array. If required, +in future this can be changed to use dynamic thunks. + +All vulnerable RETs are replaced with a static thunk, they do not use dynamic +thunks. This is because RETs get their prediction from RSB mostly that does not +depend on source address. RETs that underflow RSB may benefit from dynamic +thunks. But, RETs significantly outnumber indirect branches, and any benefit +from a unique source address could be outweighed by the increased icache +footprint and iTLB pressure. + +Retpoline +~~~~~~~~~ +Retpoline sequence also mitigates ITS-unsafe indirect branches. For this +reason, when retpoline is enabled, ITS mitigation only relocates the RETs to +safe thunks. Unless user requested the RSB-stuffing mitigation. + +RSB Stuffing +~~~~~~~~~~~~ +RSB-stuffing via Call Depth Tracking is a mitigation for Retbleed RSB-underflow +attacks. And it also mitigates RETs that are vulnerable to ITS. + +Mitigation in guests +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +All guests deploy ITS mitigation by default, irrespective of eIBRS enumeration +and Family/Model of the guest. This is because eIBRS feature could be hidden +from a guest. One exception to this is when a guest enumerates BHI_DIS_S, which +indicates that the guest is running on an unaffected host. + +To prevent guests from unnecessarily deploying the mitigation on unaffected +platforms, Intel has defined ITS_NO bit(62) in MSR IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES. When +a guest sees this bit set, it should not enumerate the ITS bug. Note, this bit +is not set by any hardware, but is **intended for VMMs to synthesize** it for +guests as per the host's affected status. + +Mitigation options +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +The ITS mitigation can be controlled using the "indirect_target_selection" +kernel parameter. The available options are: + + ======== =================================================================== + on (default) Deploy the "Aligned branch/return thunks" mitigation. + If spectre_v2 mitigation enables retpoline, aligned-thunks are only + deployed for the affected RET instructions. Retpoline mitigates + indirect branches. + + off Disable ITS mitigation. + + vmexit Equivalent to "=on" if the CPU is affected by guest/host isolation + part of ITS. Otherwise, mitigation is not deployed. This option is + useful when host userspace is not in the threat model, and only + attacks from guest to host are considered. + + stuff Deploy RSB-fill mitigation when retpoline is also deployed. + Otherwise, deploy the default mitigation. When retpoline mitigation + is enabled, RSB-stuffing via Call-Depth-Tracking also mitigates + ITS. + + force Force the ITS bug and deploy the default mitigation. + ======== =================================================================== + +Sysfs reporting +--------------- + +The sysfs file showing ITS mitigation status is: + + /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/indirect_target_selection + +Note, microcode mitigation status is not reported in this file. + +The possible values in this file are: + +.. list-table:: + + * - Not affected + - The processor is not vulnerable. + * - Vulnerable + - System is vulnerable and no mitigation has been applied. + * - Vulnerable, KVM: Not affected + - System is vulnerable to intra-mode BTI, but not affected by eIBRS + guest/host isolation. + * - Mitigation: Aligned branch/return thunks + - The mitigation is enabled, affected indirect branches and RETs are + relocated to safe thunks. + * - Mitigation: Retpolines, Stuffing RSB + - The mitigation is enabled using retpoline and RSB stuffing. + +References +---------- +.. [#f1] Microcode repository - https://github.com/intel/Intel-Linux-Processor-Microcode-Data-Files + +.. [#f2] Affected Processors list - https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/topic-technology/software-security-guidance/processors-affected-consolidated-product-cpu-model.html + +.. [#f3] Affected Processors list (machine readable) - https://github.com/intel/Intel-affected-processor-list diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/rsb.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/rsb.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..21dbf9cf25f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/rsb.rst @@ -0,0 +1,268 @@ +.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 + +======================= +RSB-related mitigations +======================= + +.. warning:: + Please keep this document up-to-date, otherwise you will be + volunteered to update it and convert it to a very long comment in + bugs.c! + +Since 2018 there have been many Spectre CVEs related to the Return Stack +Buffer (RSB) (sometimes referred to as the Return Address Stack (RAS) or +Return Address Predictor (RAP) on AMD). + +Information about these CVEs and how to mitigate them is scattered +amongst a myriad of microarchitecture-specific documents. + +This document attempts to consolidate all the relevant information in +once place and clarify the reasoning behind the current RSB-related +mitigations. It's meant to be as concise as possible, focused only on +the current kernel mitigations: what are the RSB-related attack vectors +and how are they currently being mitigated? + +It's *not* meant to describe how the RSB mechanism operates or how the +exploits work. More details about those can be found in the references +below. + +Rather, this is basically a glorified comment, but too long to actually +be one. So when the next CVE comes along, a kernel developer can +quickly refer to this as a refresher to see what we're actually doing +and why. + +At a high level, there are two classes of RSB attacks: RSB poisoning +(Intel and AMD) and RSB underflow (Intel only). They must each be +considered individually for each attack vector (and microarchitecture +where applicable). + +---- + +RSB poisoning (Intel and AMD) +============================= + +SpectreRSB +~~~~~~~~~~ + +RSB poisoning is a technique used by SpectreRSB [#spectre-rsb]_ where +an attacker poisons an RSB entry to cause a victim's return instruction +to speculate to an attacker-controlled address. This can happen when +there are unbalanced CALLs/RETs after a context switch or VMEXIT. + +* All attack vectors can potentially be mitigated by flushing out any + poisoned RSB entries using an RSB filling sequence + [#intel-rsb-filling]_ [#amd-rsb-filling]_ when transitioning between + untrusted and trusted domains. But this has a performance impact and + should be avoided whenever possible. + + .. DANGER:: + **FIXME**: Currently we're flushing 32 entries. However, some CPU + models have more than 32 entries. The loop count needs to be + increased for those. More detailed information is needed about RSB + sizes. + +* On context switch, the user->user mitigation requires ensuring the + RSB gets filled or cleared whenever IBPB gets written [#cond-ibpb]_ + during a context switch: + + * AMD: + On Zen 4+, IBPB (or SBPB [#amd-sbpb]_ if used) clears the RSB. + This is indicated by IBPB_RET in CPUID [#amd-ibpb-rsb]_. + + On Zen < 4, the RSB filling sequence [#amd-rsb-filling]_ must be + always be done in addition to IBPB [#amd-ibpb-no-rsb]_. This is + indicated by X86_BUG_IBPB_NO_RET. + + * Intel: + IBPB always clears the RSB: + + "Software that executed before the IBPB command cannot control + the predicted targets of indirect branches executed after the + command on the same logical processor. The term indirect branch + in this context includes near return instructions, so these + predicted targets may come from the RSB." [#intel-ibpb-rsb]_ + +* On context switch, user->kernel attacks are prevented by SMEP. User + space can only insert user space addresses into the RSB. Even + non-canonical addresses can't be inserted due to the page gap at the + end of the user canonical address space reserved by TASK_SIZE_MAX. + A SMEP #PF at instruction fetch prevents the kernel from speculatively + executing user space. + + * AMD: + "Finally, branches that are predicted as 'ret' instructions get + their predicted targets from the Return Address Predictor (RAP). + AMD recommends software use a RAP stuffing sequence (mitigation + V2-3 in [2]) and/or Supervisor Mode Execution Protection (SMEP) + to ensure that the addresses in the RAP are safe for + speculation. Collectively, we refer to these mitigations as "RAP + Protection"." [#amd-smep-rsb]_ + + * Intel: + "On processors with enhanced IBRS, an RSB overwrite sequence may + not suffice to prevent the predicted target of a near return + from using an RSB entry created in a less privileged predictor + mode. Software can prevent this by enabling SMEP (for + transitions from user mode to supervisor mode) and by having + IA32_SPEC_CTRL.IBRS set during VM exits." [#intel-smep-rsb]_ + +* On VMEXIT, guest->host attacks are mitigated by eIBRS (and PBRSB + mitigation if needed): + + * AMD: + "When Automatic IBRS is enabled, the internal return address + stack used for return address predictions is cleared on VMEXIT." + [#amd-eibrs-vmexit]_ + + * Intel: + "On processors with enhanced IBRS, an RSB overwrite sequence may + not suffice to prevent the predicted target of a near return + from using an RSB entry created in a less privileged predictor + mode. Software can prevent this by enabling SMEP (for + transitions from user mode to supervisor mode) and by having + IA32_SPEC_CTRL.IBRS set during VM exits. Processors with + enhanced IBRS still support the usage model where IBRS is set + only in the OS/VMM for OSes that enable SMEP. To do this, such + processors will ensure that guest behavior cannot control the + RSB after a VM exit once IBRS is set, even if IBRS was not set + at the time of the VM exit." [#intel-eibrs-vmexit]_ + + Note that some Intel CPUs are susceptible to Post-barrier Return + Stack Buffer Predictions (PBRSB) [#intel-pbrsb]_, where the last + CALL from the guest can be used to predict the first unbalanced RET. + In this case the PBRSB mitigation is needed in addition to eIBRS. + +AMD RETBleed / SRSO / Branch Type Confusion +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +On AMD, poisoned RSB entries can also be created by the AMD RETBleed +variant [#retbleed-paper]_ [#amd-btc]_ or by Speculative Return Stack +Overflow [#amd-srso]_ (Inception [#inception-paper]_). The kernel +protects itself by replacing every RET in the kernel with a branch to a +single safe RET. + +---- + +RSB underflow (Intel only) +========================== + +RSB Alternate (RSBA) ("Intel Retbleed") +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Some Intel Skylake-generation CPUs are susceptible to the Intel variant +of RETBleed [#retbleed-paper]_ (Return Stack Buffer Underflow +[#intel-rsbu]_). If a RET is executed when the RSB buffer is empty due +to mismatched CALLs/RETs or returning from a deep call stack, the branch +predictor can fall back to using the Branch Target Buffer (BTB). If a +user forces a BTB collision then the RET can speculatively branch to a +user-controlled address. + +* Note that RSB filling doesn't fully mitigate this issue. If there + are enough unbalanced RETs, the RSB may still underflow and fall back + to using a poisoned BTB entry. + +* On context switch, user->user underflow attacks are mitigated by the + conditional IBPB [#cond-ibpb]_ on context switch which effectively + clears the BTB: + + * "The indirect branch predictor barrier (IBPB) is an indirect branch + control mechanism that establishes a barrier, preventing software + that executed before the barrier from controlling the predicted + targets of indirect branches executed after the barrier on the same + logical processor." [#intel-ibpb-btb]_ + +* On context switch and VMEXIT, user->kernel and guest->host RSB + underflows are mitigated by IBRS or eIBRS: + + * "Enabling IBRS (including enhanced IBRS) will mitigate the "RSBU" + attack demonstrated by the researchers. As previously documented, + Intel recommends the use of enhanced IBRS, where supported. This + includes any processor that enumerates RRSBA but not RRSBA_DIS_S." + [#intel-rsbu]_ + + However, note that eIBRS and IBRS do not mitigate intra-mode attacks. + Like RRSBA below, this is mitigated by clearing the BHB on kernel + entry. + + As an alternative to classic IBRS, call depth tracking (combined with + retpolines) can be used to track kernel returns and fill the RSB when + it gets close to being empty. + +Restricted RSB Alternate (RRSBA) +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ + +Some newer Intel CPUs have Restricted RSB Alternate (RRSBA) behavior, +which, similar to RSBA described above, also falls back to using the BTB +on RSB underflow. The only difference is that the predicted targets are +restricted to the current domain when eIBRS is enabled: + +* "Restricted RSB Alternate (RRSBA) behavior allows alternate branch + predictors to be used by near RET instructions when the RSB is + empty. When eIBRS is enabled, the predicted targets of these + alternate predictors are restricted to those belonging to the + indirect branch predictor entries of the current prediction domain. + [#intel-eibrs-rrsba]_ + +When a CPU with RRSBA is vulnerable to Branch History Injection +[#bhi-paper]_ [#intel-bhi]_, an RSB underflow could be used for an +intra-mode BTI attack. This is mitigated by clearing the BHB on +kernel entry. + +However if the kernel uses retpolines instead of eIBRS, it needs to +disable RRSBA: + +* "Where software is using retpoline as a mitigation for BHI or + intra-mode BTI, and the processor both enumerates RRSBA and + enumerates RRSBA_DIS controls, it should disable this behavior." + [#intel-retpoline-rrsba]_ + +---- + +References +========== + +.. [#spectre-rsb] `Spectre Returns! Speculation Attacks using the Return Stack Buffer <https://arxiv.org/pdf/1807.07940.pdf>`_ + +.. [#intel-rsb-filling] "Empty RSB Mitigation on Skylake-generation" in `Retpoline: A Branch Target Injection Mitigation <https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/technical-documentation/retpoline-branch-target-injection-mitigation.html#inpage-nav-5-1>`_ + +.. [#amd-rsb-filling] "Mitigation V2-3" in `Software Techniques for Managing Speculation <https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/processor-tech-docs/programmer-references/software-techniques-for-managing-speculation.pdf>`_ + +.. [#cond-ibpb] Whether IBPB is written depends on whether the prev and/or next task is protected from Spectre attacks. It typically requires opting in per task or system-wide. For more details see the documentation for the ``spectre_v2_user`` cmdline option in Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt. + +.. [#amd-sbpb] IBPB without flushing of branch type predictions. Only exists for AMD. + +.. [#amd-ibpb-rsb] "Function 8000_0008h -- Processor Capacity Parameters and Extended Feature Identification" in `AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Volume 3: General-Purpose and System Instructions <https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/processor-tech-docs/programmer-references/24594.pdf>`_. SBPB behaves the same way according to `this email <https://lore.kernel.org/5175b163a3736ca5fd01cedf406735636c99a>`_. + +.. [#amd-ibpb-no-rsb] `Spectre Attacks: Exploiting Speculative Execution <https://comsec.ethz.ch/wp-content/files/ibpb_sp25.pdf>`_ + +.. [#intel-ibpb-rsb] "Introduction" in `Post-barrier Return Stack Buffer Predictions / CVE-2022-26373 / INTEL-SA-00706 <https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/advisory-guidance/post-barrier-return-stack-buffer-predictions.html>`_ + +.. [#amd-smep-rsb] "Existing Mitigations" in `Technical Guidance for Mitigating Branch Type Confusion <https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/resources/technical-guidance-for-mitigating-branch-type-confusion.pdf>`_ + +.. [#intel-smep-rsb] "Enhanced IBRS" in `Indirect Branch Restricted Speculation <https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/technical-documentation/indirect-branch-restricted-speculation.html>`_ + +.. [#amd-eibrs-vmexit] "Extended Feature Enable Register (EFER)" in `AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Volume 2: System Programming <https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/processor-tech-docs/programmer-references/24593.pdf>`_ + +.. [#intel-eibrs-vmexit] "Enhanced IBRS" in `Indirect Branch Restricted Speculation <https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/technical-documentation/indirect-branch-restricted-speculation.html>`_ + +.. [#intel-pbrsb] `Post-barrier Return Stack Buffer Predictions / CVE-2022-26373 / INTEL-SA-00706 <https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/advisory-guidance/post-barrier-return-stack-buffer-predictions.html>`_ + +.. [#retbleed-paper] `RETBleed: Arbitrary Speculative Code Execution with Return Instruction <https://comsec.ethz.ch/wp-content/files/retbleed_sec22.pdf>`_ + +.. [#amd-btc] `Technical Guidance for Mitigating Branch Type Confusion <https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/resources/technical-guidance-for-mitigating-branch-type-confusion.pdf>`_ + +.. [#amd-srso] `Technical Update Regarding Speculative Return Stack Overflow <https://www.amd.com/content/dam/amd/en/documents/corporate/cr/speculative-return-stack-overflow-whitepaper.pdf>`_ + +.. [#inception-paper] `Inception: Exposing New Attack Surfaces with Training in Transient Execution <https://comsec.ethz.ch/wp-content/files/inception_sec23.pdf>`_ + +.. [#intel-rsbu] `Return Stack Buffer Underflow / Return Stack Buffer Underflow / CVE-2022-29901, CVE-2022-28693 / INTEL-SA-00702 <https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/advisory-guidance/return-stack-buffer-underflow.html>`_ + +.. [#intel-ibpb-btb] `Indirect Branch Predictor Barrier' <https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/technical-documentation/indirect-branch-predictor-barrier.html>`_ + +.. [#intel-eibrs-rrsba] "Guidance for RSBU" in `Return Stack Buffer Underflow / Return Stack Buffer Underflow / CVE-2022-29901, CVE-2022-28693 / INTEL-SA-00702 <https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/advisory-guidance/return-stack-buffer-underflow.html>`_ + +.. [#bhi-paper] `Branch History Injection: On the Effectiveness of Hardware Mitigations Against Cross-Privilege Spectre-v2 Attacks <http://download.vusec.net/papers/bhi-spectre-bhb_sec22.pdf>`_ + +.. [#intel-bhi] `Branch History Injection and Intra-mode Branch Target Injection / CVE-2022-0001, CVE-2022-0002 / INTEL-SA-00598 <https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/technical-documentation/branch-history-injection.html>`_ + +.. [#intel-retpoline-rrsba] "Retpoline" in `Branch History Injection and Intra-mode Branch Target Injection / CVE-2022-0001, CVE-2022-0002 / INTEL-SA-00598 <https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/software-security-guidance/technical-documentation/branch-history-injection.html>`_ diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt index 76e538c77e31..8f75ec177399 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt @@ -1407,18 +1407,15 @@ earlyprintk=serial[,0x...[,baudrate]] earlyprintk=ttySn[,baudrate] earlyprintk=dbgp[debugController#] + earlyprintk=mmio32,membase[,{nocfg|baudrate}] earlyprintk=pciserial[,force],bus:device.function[,{nocfg|baudrate}] earlyprintk=xdbc[xhciController#] earlyprintk=bios - earlyprintk=mmio,membase[,{nocfg|baudrate}] earlyprintk is useful when the kernel crashes before the normal console is initialized. It is not enabled by default because it has some cosmetic problems. - Only 32-bit memory addresses are supported for "mmio" - and "pciserial" devices. - Use "nocfg" to skip UART configuration, assume BIOS/firmware has configured UART correctly. @@ -2205,6 +2202,23 @@ different crypto accelerators. This option can be used to achieve best performance for particular HW. + indirect_target_selection= [X86,Intel] Mitigation control for Indirect + Target Selection(ITS) bug in Intel CPUs. Updated + microcode is also required for a fix in IBPB. + + on: Enable mitigation (default). + off: Disable mitigation. + force: Force the ITS bug and deploy default + mitigation. + vmexit: Only deploy mitigation if CPU is affected by + guest/host isolation part of ITS. + stuff: Deploy RSB-fill mitigation when retpoline is + also deployed. Otherwise, deploy the default + mitigation. + + For details see: + Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/indirect-target-selection.rst + init= [KNL] Format: <full_path> Run specified binary instead of /sbin/init as init @@ -3696,6 +3710,7 @@ expose users to several CPU vulnerabilities. Equivalent to: if nokaslr then kpti=0 [ARM64] gather_data_sampling=off [X86] + indirect_target_selection=off [X86] kvm.nx_huge_pages=off [X86] l1tf=off [X86] mds=off [X86] diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/xfs.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/xfs.rst index b67772cf36d6..5becb441c3cb 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/xfs.rst +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/xfs.rst @@ -124,6 +124,14 @@ When mounting an XFS filesystem, the following options are accepted. controls the size of each buffer and so is also relevant to this case. + lifetime (default) or nolifetime + Enable data placement based on write life time hints provided + by the user. This turns on co-allocation of data of similar + life times when statistically favorable to reduce garbage + collection cost. + + These options are only available for zoned rt file systems. + logbsize=value Set the size of each in-memory log buffer. The size may be specified in bytes, or in kilobytes with a "k" suffix. @@ -143,6 +151,14 @@ When mounting an XFS filesystem, the following options are accepted. optional, and the log section can be separate from the data section or contained within it. + max_open_zones=value + Specify the max number of zones to keep open for writing on a + zoned rt device. Many open zones aids file data separation + but may impact performance on HDDs. + + If ``max_open_zones`` is not specified, the value is determined + by the capabilities and the size of the zoned rt device. + noalign Data allocations will not be aligned at stripe unit boundaries. This is only relevant to filesystems created @@ -542,3 +558,24 @@ The interesting knobs for XFS workqueues are as follows: nice Relative priority of scheduling the threads. These are the same nice levels that can be applied to userspace processes. ============ =========== + +Zoned Filesystems +================= + +For zoned file systems, the following attributes are exposed in: + + /sys/fs/xfs/<dev>/zoned/ + + max_open_zones (Min: 1 Default: Varies Max: UINTMAX) + This read-only attribute exposes the maximum number of open zones + available for data placement. The value is determined at mount time and + is limited by the capabilities of the backing zoned device, file system + size and the max_open_zones mount option. + + zonegc_low_space (Min: 0 Default: 0 Max: 100) + Define a percentage for how much of the unused space that GC should keep + available for writing. A high value will reclaim more of the space + occupied by unused blocks, creating a larger buffer against write + bursts at the cost of increased write amplification. Regardless + of this value, garbage collection will always aim to free a minimum + amount of blocks to keep max_open_zones open for data placement purposes. |