summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c82
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c54
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spin_lock.c114
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_or_null.c49
4 files changed, 299 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
index babcec123251..9d993926bf0e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
@@ -2305,3 +2305,85 @@
.errstr = "!read_ok",
.result = REJECT,
},
+/* Make sure that verifier.c:states_equal() considers IDs from all
+ * frames when building 'idmap' for check_ids().
+ */
+{
+ "calls: check_ids() across call boundary",
+ .insns = {
+ /* Function main() */
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ /* fp[-24] = map_lookup_elem(...) ; get a MAP_VALUE_PTR_OR_NULL with some ID */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1,
+ 0),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, -24),
+ /* fp[-32] = map_lookup_elem(...) ; get a MAP_VALUE_PTR_OR_NULL with some ID */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1,
+ 0),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, -32),
+ /* call foo(&fp[-24], &fp[-32]) ; both arguments have IDs in the current
+ * ; stack frame
+ */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_FP),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, -24),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_FP),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -32),
+ BPF_CALL_REL(2),
+ /* exit 0 */
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ /* Function foo()
+ *
+ * r9 = &frame[0].fp[-24] ; save arguments in the callee saved registers,
+ * r8 = &frame[0].fp[-32] ; arguments are pointers to pointers to map value
+ */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_2),
+ /* r7 = ktime_get_ns() */
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_ktime_get_ns),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0),
+ /* r6 = ktime_get_ns() */
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_ktime_get_ns),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
+ /* if r6 > r7 goto +1 ; no new information about the state is derived from
+ * ; this check, thus produced verifier states differ
+ * ; only in 'insn_idx'
+ * r9 = r8
+ */
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_7, 1),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_8),
+ /* r9 = *r9 ; verifier get's to this point via two paths:
+ * ; (I) one including r9 = r8, verified first;
+ * ; (II) one excluding r9 = r8, verified next.
+ * ; After load of *r9 to r9 the frame[0].fp[-24].id == r9.id.
+ * ; Suppose that checkpoint is created here via path (I).
+ * ; When verifying via (II) the r9.id must be compared against
+ * ; frame[0].fp[-24].id, otherwise (I) and (II) would be
+ * ; incorrectly deemed equivalent.
+ * if r9 == 0 goto <exit>
+ */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_9, 0),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_9, 0, 1),
+ /* r8 = *r8 ; read map value via r8, this is not safe
+ * r0 = *r8 ; because r8 might be not equal to r9.
+ */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_8, 0),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_8, 0),
+ /* exit 0 */
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ,
+ .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3, 9 },
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "R8 invalid mem access 'map_value_or_null'",
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "",
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+},
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c
index 11acd1855acf..dce2e28aeb43 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/direct_packet_access.c
@@ -654,3 +654,57 @@
.result = ACCEPT,
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
},
+{
+ "direct packet access: test30 (check_id() in regsafe(), bad access)",
+ .insns = {
+ /* r9 = ctx */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_1),
+ /* r7 = ktime_get_ns() */
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_ktime_get_ns),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0),
+ /* r6 = ktime_get_ns() */
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_ktime_get_ns),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
+ /* r2 = ctx->data
+ * r3 = ctx->data
+ * r4 = ctx->data_end
+ */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_9, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_9, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_9, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
+ /* if r6 > 100 goto exit
+ * if r7 > 100 goto exit
+ */
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_6, 100, 9),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_7, 100, 8),
+ /* r2 += r6 ; this forces assignment of ID to r2
+ * r2 += 1 ; get some fixed off for r2
+ * r3 += r7 ; this forces assignment of ID to r3
+ * r3 += 1 ; get some fixed off for r3
+ */
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_6),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_7),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_3, 1),
+ /* if r6 > r7 goto +1 ; no new information about the state is derived from
+ * ; this check, thus produced verifier states differ
+ * ; only in 'insn_idx'
+ * r2 = r3 ; optionally share ID between r2 and r3
+ */
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_7, 1),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3),
+ /* if r3 > ctx->data_end goto exit */
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_4, 1),
+ /* r5 = *(u8 *) (r2 - 1) ; access packet memory using r2,
+ * ; this is not always safe
+ */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_2, -1),
+ /* exit(0) */
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ,
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "invalid access to packet, off=0 size=1, R2",
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+},
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spin_lock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spin_lock.c
index 781621facae4..eaf114f07e2e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spin_lock.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spin_lock.c
@@ -331,3 +331,117 @@
.errstr = "inside bpf_spin_lock",
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
},
+{
+ "spin_lock: regsafe compare reg->id for map value",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_6, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, -4, 0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_9),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_0),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_7),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_lock),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_6, 0, 1),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_8),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_7),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
+ BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock),
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_spin_lock = { 2 },
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock",
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+ .flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ,
+},
+/* Make sure that regsafe() compares ids for spin lock records using
+ * check_ids():
+ * 1: r9 = map_lookup_elem(...) ; r9.id == 1
+ * 2: r8 = map_lookup_elem(...) ; r8.id == 2
+ * 3: r7 = ktime_get_ns()
+ * 4: r6 = ktime_get_ns()
+ * 5: if r6 > r7 goto <9>
+ * 6: spin_lock(r8)
+ * 7: r9 = r8
+ * 8: goto <10>
+ * 9: spin_lock(r9)
+ * 10: spin_unlock(r9) ; r9.id == 1 || r9.id == 2 and lock is active,
+ * ; second visit to (10) should be considered safe
+ * ; if check_ids() is used.
+ * 11: exit(0)
+ */
+{
+ "spin_lock: regsafe() check_ids() similar id mappings",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, -4, 0),
+ /* r9 = map_lookup_elem(...) */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1,
+ 0),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 24),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_0),
+ /* r8 = map_lookup_elem(...) */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1,
+ 0),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 18),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_0),
+ /* r7 = ktime_get_ns() */
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_ktime_get_ns),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0),
+ /* r6 = ktime_get_ns() */
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_ktime_get_ns),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
+ /* if r6 > r7 goto +5 ; no new information about the state is derived from
+ * ; this check, thus produced verifier states differ
+ * ; only in 'insn_idx'
+ * spin_lock(r8)
+ * r9 = r8
+ * goto unlock
+ */
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_7, 5),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_8),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_spin_lock),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_8),
+ BPF_JMP_A(3),
+ /* spin_lock(r9) */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_9),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_spin_lock),
+ /* spin_unlock(r9) */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_9),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock),
+ /* exit(0) */
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .fixup_map_spin_lock = { 3, 10 },
+ .result = VERBOSE_ACCEPT,
+ .errstr = "28: safe",
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "",
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+ .flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ,
+},
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_or_null.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_or_null.c
index 3ecb70a3d939..52a8bca14f03 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_or_null.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/value_or_null.c
@@ -169,3 +169,52 @@
.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
.result = ACCEPT,
},
+{
+ "MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL check_ids() in regsafe()",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0),
+ /* r9 = map_lookup_elem(...) */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1,
+ 0),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_0),
+ /* r8 = map_lookup_elem(...) */
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
+ BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8),
+ BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1,
+ 0),
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_0),
+ /* r7 = ktime_get_ns() */
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_ktime_get_ns),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0),
+ /* r6 = ktime_get_ns() */
+ BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_ktime_get_ns),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
+ /* if r6 > r7 goto +1 ; no new information about the state is derived from
+ * ; this check, thus produced verifier states differ
+ * ; only in 'insn_idx'
+ * r9 = r8 ; optionally share ID between r9 and r8
+ */
+ BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_7, 1),
+ BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_8),
+ /* if r9 == 0 goto <exit> */
+ BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_9, 0, 1),
+ /* read map value via r8, this is not always
+ * safe because r8 might be not equal to r9.
+ */
+ BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_8, 0),
+ /* exit 0 */
+ BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ,
+ .fixup_map_hash_8b = { 3, 9 },
+ .result = REJECT,
+ .errstr = "R8 invalid mem access 'map_value_or_null'",
+ .result_unpriv = REJECT,
+ .errstr_unpriv = "",
+ .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
+},
generated by cgit (git 2.34.1) at 2025-12-29 06:53:59 +0000