summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/arch/ia64/kernel/ftrace.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2023-09-11arch: Remove Itanium (IA-64) architectureArd Biesheuvel
The Itanium architecture is obsolete, and an informal survey [0] reveals that any residual use of Itanium hardware in production is mostly HP-UX or OpenVMS based. The use of Linux on Itanium appears to be limited to enthusiasts that occasionally boot a fresh Linux kernel to see whether things are still working as intended, and perhaps to churn out some distro packages that are rarely used in practice. None of the original companies behind Itanium still produce or support any hardware or software for the architecture, and it is listed as 'Orphaned' in the MAINTAINERS file, as apparently, none of the engineers that contributed on behalf of those companies (nor anyone else, for that matter) have been willing to support or maintain the architecture upstream or even be responsible for applying the odd fix. The Intel firmware team removed all IA-64 support from the Tianocore/EDK2 reference implementation of EFI in 2018. (Itanium is the original architecture for which EFI was developed, and the way Linux supports it deviates significantly from other architectures.) Some distros, such as Debian and Gentoo, still maintain [unofficial] ia64 ports, but many have dropped support years ago. While the argument is being made [1] that there is a 'for the common good' angle to being able to build and run existing projects such as the Grid Community Toolkit [2] on Itanium for interoperability testing, the fact remains that none of those projects are known to be deployed on Linux/ia64, and very few people actually have access to such a system in the first place. Even if there were ways imaginable in which Linux/ia64 could be put to good use today, what matters is whether anyone is actually doing that, and this does not appear to be the case. There are no emulators widely available, and so boot testing Itanium is generally infeasible for ordinary contributors. GCC still supports IA-64 but its compile farm [3] no longer has any IA-64 machines. GLIBC would like to get rid of IA-64 [4] too because it would permit some overdue code cleanups. In summary, the benefits to the ecosystem of having IA-64 be part of it are mostly theoretical, whereas the maintenance overhead of keeping it supported is real. So let's rip off the band aid, and remove the IA-64 arch code entirely. This follows the timeline proposed by the Debian/ia64 maintainer [5], which removes support in a controlled manner, leaving IA-64 in a known good state in the most recent LTS release. Other projects will follow once the kernel support is removed. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMj1kXFCMh_578jniKpUtx_j8ByHnt=s7S+yQ+vGbKt9ud7+kQ@mail.gmail.com/ [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/0075883c-7c51-00f5-2c2d-5119c1820410@web.de/ [2] https://gridcf.org/gct-docs/latest/index.html [3] https://cfarm.tetaneutral.net/machines/list/ [4] https://lore.kernel.org/all/87bkiilpc4.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de/ [5] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ff58a3e76e5102c94bb5946d99187b358def688a.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de/ Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
2021-10-08ftrace: Cleanup ftrace_dyn_arch_init()Weizhao Ouyang
Most of ARCHs use empty ftrace_dyn_arch_init(), introduce a weak common ftrace_dyn_arch_init() to cleanup them. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210909090216.1955240-1-o451686892@gmail.com Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com> (s390) Acked-by: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de> (parisc) Signed-off-by: Weizhao Ouyang <o451686892@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2020-06-17maccess: rename probe_kernel_{read,write} to copy_{from,to}_kernel_nofaultChristoph Hellwig
Better describe what these functions do. Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-12-23ia64: ftrace: Fix the comments for ftrace_modify_code()Li Bin
There is no need to worry about module and __init text disappearing case, because that ftrace has a module notifier that is called when a module is being unloaded and before the text goes away and this code grabs the ftrace_lock mutex and removes the module functions from the ftrace list, such that it will no longer do any modifications to that module's text, the update to make functions be traced or not is done under the ftrace_lock mutex as well. And by now, __init section codes should not been modified by ftrace, because it is black listed in recordmcount.c and ignored by ftrace. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1449214067-12177-2-git-send-email-huawei.libin@huawei.com Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Li Bin <huawei.libin@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2014-03-07ftrace: Do not pass data to ftrace_dyn_arch_initJiri Slaby
As the data parameter is not really used by any ftrace_dyn_arch_init, remove that from ftrace_dyn_arch_init. This also removes the addr local variable from ftrace_init which is now unused. Note the documentation was imprecise as it did not suggest to set (*data) to 0. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1393268401-24379-4-git-send-email-jslaby@suse.cz Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2014-03-07ftrace: Pass retval through return in ftrace_dyn_arch_init()Jiri Slaby
No architecture uses the "data" parameter in ftrace_dyn_arch_init() in any way, it just sets the value to 0. And this is used as a return value in the caller -- ftrace_init, which just checks the retval against zero. Note there is also "return 0" in every ftrace_dyn_arch_init. So it is enough to check the retval and remove all the indirect sets of data on all archs. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1393268401-24379-3-git-send-email-jslaby@suse.cz Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
2009-01-14ftrace, ia64: IA64 dynamic ftrace supportShaohua Li
IA64 dynamic ftrace support. The original _mcount stub for each function is like: alloc r40=ar.pfs,12,8,0 mov r43=r0;; mov r42=b0 mov r41=r1 nop.i 0x0 br.call.sptk.many b0 = _mcount;; The patch convert it to below for nop: [MII] nop.m 0x0 mov r3=ip nop.i 0x0 [MLX] nop.m 0x0 nop.x 0x0;; This isn't completely nop, as there is one instuction 'mov r3=ip', but it should be light and harmless for code follow it. And below is for call [MII] nop.m 0x0 mov r3=ip nop.i 0x0 [MLX] nop.m 0x0 brl.many .;; In this way, only one instruction is changed to convert code between nop and call. This should meet dyn-ftrace's requirement. But this requires CPU support brl instruction, so dyn-ftrace isn't supported for old Itanium system. Assume there are quite few such old system running. Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>