summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/fs/btrfs
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-01-13btrfs: simplify return logic at check_committed_ref()Filipe Manana
Instead of setting the value to return in a local variable 'ret' and then jumping into a label named 'out' that does nothing but return that value, simplify everything by getting rid of the label and directly returning a value. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: avoid redundant call to get inline ref type at check_committed_ref()Filipe Manana
At check_committed_ref() we are calling btrfs_get_extent_inline_ref_type() twice, once before we check if have an inline extent owner ref (for simple qgroups) and then once again sometime after that check. This second call is redundant when we have simple quotas disabled or we found an inline ref that is not of the owner ref type. So avoid this second call unless we have simple quotas enabled and found an owner ref, saving a function call that does inline ref validation again. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: remove the snapshot check from check_committed_ref()Filipe Manana
At check_committed_ref() we have this check to see if the data extent was created in a generation lower than or equals to the generation where the last snapshot for the root was created, and if so we return immediately with 1, since it's very likely the extent is shared, referenced by other root. The only call chain for check_committed_ref() is the following: can_nocow_file_extent() btrfs_cross_ref_exist() check_committed_ref() And we already do that snapshot check at can_nocow_file_extent(), before we call btrfs_cross_ref_exist(). This makes the check done at check_committed_ref() redundant, so remove it. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: remove no longer needed strict argument from can_nocow_extent()Filipe Manana
All callers of can_nocow_extent() now pass a value of false for its 'strict' argument, making it redundant. So remove the argument from can_nocow_extent() as well as can_nocow_file_extent(), btrfs_cross_ref_exist() and check_committed_ref(), because this argument was used just to influence the behavior of check_committed_ref(). Also remove the 'strict' field from struct can_nocow_file_extent_args, which is now always false as well, as its value is taken from the argument to can_nocow_extent(). Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: remove unused variable length in btrfs_insert_one_raid_extent()Johannes Thumshirn
Remove the variable length in btrfs_insert_one_raid_extent() as it is unused. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: output the reason for open_ctree() failureQu Wenruo
There is a recent ML report that mounting a large fs backed by hardware RAID56 controller (with one device missing) took too much time, and systemd seems to kill the mount attempt. In that case, the only error message is: BTRFS error (device sdj): open_ctree failed There is no reason on why the failure happened, making it very hard to understand the reason. At least output the error number (in the particular case it should be -EINTR) to provide some clue. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/9b9c4d2810abcca2f9f76e32220ed9a90febb235.camel@scientia.org/ Reported-by: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: open-code btrfs_copy_from_user()Qu Wenruo
The function btrfs_copy_from_user() handles the folio dirtying for buffered write. The original design is to allow that function to handle multiple folios, but since commit c87c299776e4 ("btrfs: make buffered write to copy one page a time") there is no need to support multiple folios. So here open-code btrfs_copy_from_user() to copy_folio_from_iter_atomic() and flush_dcache_folio() calls. The short-copy check and revert are still kept as-is. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: improve the warning and error message for btrfs_remove_qgroup()Qu Wenruo
[WARNING] There are several warnings about the recently introduced qgroup auto-removal that it triggers WARN_ON() for the non-zero rfer/excl numbers, e.g: ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: CPU: 67 PID: 2882 at fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:1854 btrfs_remove_qgroup+0x3df/0x450 CPU: 67 UID: 0 PID: 2882 Comm: btrfs-cleaner Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.11.6-300.fc41.x86_64 #1 RIP: 0010:btrfs_remove_qgroup+0x3df/0x450 Call Trace: <TASK> btrfs_qgroup_cleanup_dropped_subvolume+0x97/0xc0 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x44e/0xa80 btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0xc3/0x110 cleaner_kthread+0xd8/0x130 kthread+0xd2/0x100 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 </TASK> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- BTRFS warning (device sda): to be deleted qgroup 0/319 has non-zero numbers, rfer 258478080 rfer_cmpr 258478080 excl 0 excl_cmpr 0 [CAUSE] Although the root cause is still unclear, as if qgroup is consistent a fully dropped subvolume (with extra transaction committed) should lead to all zero numbers for the qgroup. My current guess is the subvolume drop triggered the new subtree drop threshold thus marked qgroup inconsistent, then rescan cleared it but some corner case is not properly handled during subvolume dropping. But at least for this particular case, since it's only the rfer/excl not properly reset to 0, and qgroup is already marked inconsistent, there is nothing to be worried for the end users. The user space tool utilizing qgroup would queue a rescan to handle everything, so the kernel wanring is a little overkilled. [ENHANCEMENT] Enhance the warning inside btrfs_remove_qgroup() by: - Only do WARN() if CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG is enabled As explained the kernel can handle inconsistent qgroups by simply do a rescan, there is nothing to bother the end users. - Treat the reserved space leak the same as non-zero numbers By outputting the values and trigger a WARN() if it's a debug build. So far I haven't experienced any case related to reserved space so I hope we will never need to bother them. Fixes: 839d6ea4f86d ("btrfs: automatically remove the subvolume qgroup") Link: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/922 Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: remove detached list from struct btrfs_backref_cacheJosef Bacik
We don't ever look at this list, remove it. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: remove the ->lowest and ->leaves members from struct btrfs_backref_nodeJosef Bacik
Before we were keeping all of our nodes on various lists in order to make sure everything got cleaned up correctly. We used node->lowest to indicate that node->lower was linked into the cache->leaves list. Now that we do cleanup based on the rb-tree both the list and the flag are useless, so delete them both. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: simplify btrfs_backref_release_cache()Josef Bacik
We rely on finding all our nodes on the various lists in the backref cache, when they are all also in the rbtree. Instead just search through the rbtree and free everything. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: do not handle non-shareable roots in backref cacheJosef Bacik
Now that we handle relocation for non-shareable roots without using the backref cache, remove the ->cowonly field from the backref nodes and update the handling to throw an error. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: don't build backref tree for COW-only blocksJosef Bacik
We already determine the owner for any blocks we find when we're relocating, and for COW-only blocks (and the data reloc tree) we COW down to the block and call it good enough. However we still build a whole backref tree for them, even though we're not going to use it, and then just don't put these blocks in the cache. Rework the code to check if the block belongs to a COW-only root or the data reloc root, and then just cow down to the block, skipping the backref cache generation. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: remove clone_backref_node() from relocationJosef Bacik
Since we no longer maintain backref cache across transactions, and this is only called when we're creating the reloc root for a newly created snapshot in the transaction critical section, we will end up doing a bunch of work that will just get thrown away when we start the transaction in the relocation loop. Delete this code as it no longer does anything for us. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: simplify loop in select_reloc_root()Josef Bacik
We have this setup as a loop, but in reality we will never walk back up the backref tree, if we do then it's a bug. Get rid of the loop and handle the case where we have node->new_bytenr set at all. Previous check was only if node->new_bytenr != root->node->start, but if it did then we would hit the WARN_ON() and walk back up the tree. Instead we want to just return error if ->new_bytenr is set, and then do the normal updating of the node for the reloc root and carry on. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: add a comment for new_bytenr in backref_cache_nodeJosef Bacik
Add a comment for this field so we know what it is used for. Previously we used it to update the backref cache, so people may mistakenly think it is useless, but in fact exists to make sure the backref cache makes sense. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: remove the changed list for backref cacheJosef Bacik
Now that we're not updating the backref cache when we switch transids we can remove the changed list. We're going to keep the new_bytenr field because it serves as a good sanity check for the backref cache and relocation, and can prevent us from making extent tree corruption worse. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: convert BUG_ON in btrfs_reloc_cow_block() to proper error handlingJosef Bacik
This BUG_ON is meant to catch backref cache problems, but these can arise from either bugs in the backref cache or corruption in the extent tree. Fix it to be a proper error. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: fix data race when accessing the inode's disk_i_size at ↵Hao-ran Zheng
btrfs_drop_extents() A data race occurs when the function `insert_ordered_extent_file_extent()` and the function `btrfs_inode_safe_disk_i_size_write()` are executed concurrently. The function `insert_ordered_extent_file_extent()` is not locked when reading inode->disk_i_size, causing `btrfs_inode_safe_disk_i_size_write()` to cause data competition when writing inode->disk_i_size, thus affecting the value of `modify_tree`. The specific call stack that appears during testing is as follows: ============DATA_RACE============ btrfs_drop_extents+0x89a/0xa060 [btrfs] insert_reserved_file_extent+0xb54/0x2960 [btrfs] insert_ordered_extent_file_extent+0xff5/0x1760 [btrfs] btrfs_finish_one_ordered+0x1b85/0x36a0 [btrfs] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x37/0x60 [btrfs] finish_ordered_fn+0x3e/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_work_helper+0x9c9/0x27a0 [btrfs] process_scheduled_works+0x716/0xf10 worker_thread+0xb6a/0x1190 kthread+0x292/0x330 ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 ============OTHER_INFO============ btrfs_inode_safe_disk_i_size_write+0x4ec/0x600 [btrfs] btrfs_finish_one_ordered+0x24c7/0x36a0 [btrfs] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x37/0x60 [btrfs] finish_ordered_fn+0x3e/0x50 [btrfs] btrfs_work_helper+0x9c9/0x27a0 [btrfs] process_scheduled_works+0x716/0xf10 worker_thread+0xb6a/0x1190 kthread+0x292/0x330 ret_from_fork+0x4d/0x80 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 ================================= The main purpose of the check of the inode's disk_i_size is to avoid taking write locks on a btree path when we have a write at or beyond EOF, since in these cases we don't expect to find extent items in the root to drop. However if we end up taking write locks due to a data race on disk_i_size, everything is still correct, we only add extra lock contention on the tree in case there's concurrency from other tasks. If the race causes us to not take write locks when we actually need them, then everything is functionally correct as well, since if we find out we have extent items to drop and we took read locks (modify_tree set to 0), we release the path and retry again with write locks. Since this data race does not affect the correctness of the function, it is a harmless data race, use data_race() to check inode->disk_i_size. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Hao-ran Zheng <zhenghaoran154@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: don't BUG_ON() in btrfs_drop_extents()Johannes Thumshirn
btrfs_drop_extents() calls BUG_ON() in case the counter of to be deleted extents is greater than 0. But all of these code paths can handle errors, so there's no need to crash the kernel. Instead WARN() that the condition has been met and gracefully bail out. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: zoned: reclaim unused zone by zone resettingNaohiro Aota
On the zoned mode, once used and freed region is still not reusable after the freeing. The underlying zone needs to be reset before reusing. Btrfs resets a zone when it removes a block group, and then new block group is allocated on the zones to reuse the zones. But, it is sometime too late to catch up with a write side. This commit introduces a new space-info reclaim method ZONE_RESET. That will pick a block group from the unused list and reset its zone to reuse the zone_unusable space. It is faster than removing the block group and re-creating a new block group on the same zones. For the first implementation, the ZONE_RESET is only applied to a block group whose region is fully zone_unusable. Reclaiming partial zone_unusable block group could be implemented later. Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: drop fs_info argument from btrfs_update_space_info_*()Naohiro Aota
Since commit e1e577aafe41 ("btrfs: store fs_info in space_info"), we have the fs_info in a space_info. So, we can drop fs_info argument from btrfs_update_space_info_*. There is no behavior change. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: factor out btrfs_return_free_space()Naohiro Aota
Factor out a part of unpin_extent_range() that returns space back to the space info, prioritizing global block reserve. Also, move the "len" variable into the loop to clarify we don't need to carry it beyond an iteration. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: handle FS_IOC_READ_VERITY_METADATA ioctlAllison Karlitskaya
Commit 146054090b08 ("btrfs: initial fsverity support") introduced fs-verity support for btrfs, but didn't add support for FS_IOC_READ_VERITY_METADATA to directly query the Merkle tree, descriptor and signature blocks for fs-verity enabled files. Add the (trival) implementation: we just need to wire it through to the fs-verity code, the same way as is done in the other two filesystems which support this ioctl (ext4, f2fs). The fs-verity code already has access to the required data. This is also safe to backport to older stable trees (5.15+) if needed. Signed-off-by: Allison Karlitskaya <allison.karlitskaya@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: send: remove redundant assignments to variable retColin Ian King
The variable ret is being initialized to zero and also later re-assigned to zero. In both cases the assignment is redundant since the value is never read after the assignment and hence they can be removed. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: use PTR_ERR() instead of PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO() for btrfs_get_extent()Qu Wenruo
The function btrfs_get_extent() will only return an PTR_ERR() or a valid extent map pointer. It will not return NULL. Thus the usage of PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO() inside submit_one_sector() is not needed, use plain PTR_ERR() instead, and that is the only usage of PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO() after btrfs_get_extent(). Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: selftests: add delayed ref self test casesJosef Bacik
The recent fix for a stupid mistake I made uncovered the fact that we don't have adequate testing in the delayed refs code, as it took a pretty extensive and long running stress test to uncover something that a unit test would have uncovered right away. Fix this by adding a delayed refs self test suite. This will validate that the btrfs_ref transformation does the correct thing, that we do the correct thing when merging delayed refs, and that we get the delayed refs in the order that we expect. These are all crucial to how the delayed refs operate. I introduced various bugs (including the original bug) into the delayed refs code to validate that these tests caught all of the shenanigans that I could think of. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-13btrfs: move select_delayed_ref() and export itJosef Bacik
This helper is how we select the delayed ref to run once we've selected the delayed ref head. I need this exported to add a unit test for delayed refs, and it's more natural home is in delayed-ref.c. Rename it to btrfs_select_delayed_ref and move it into delayed-ref.c. Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-09Merge tag 'for-6.13-rc6-tag' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba: "A few more fixes. Besides the one-liners in Btrfs there's fix to the io_uring and encoded read integration (added in this development cycle). The update to io_uring provides more space for the ongoing command that is then used in Btrfs to handle some cases. - io_uring and encoded read: - provide stable storage for io_uring command data - make a copy of encoded read ioctl call, reuse that in case the call would block and will be called again - properly initialize zlib context for hardware compression on s390 - fix max extent size calculation on filesystems with non-zoned devices - fix crash in scrub on crafted image due to invalid extent tree" * tag 'for-6.13-rc6-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: btrfs: zlib: fix avail_in bytes for s390 zlib HW compression path btrfs: zoned: calculate max_extent_size properly on non-zoned setup btrfs: avoid NULL pointer dereference if no valid extent tree btrfs: don't read from userspace twice in btrfs_uring_encoded_read() io_uring: add io_uring_cmd_get_async_data helper io_uring/cmd: add per-op data to struct io_uring_cmd_data io_uring/cmd: rename struct uring_cache to io_uring_cmd_data
2025-01-06btrfs: zlib: fix avail_in bytes for s390 zlib HW compression pathMikhail Zaslonko
Since the input data length passed to zlib_compress_folios() can be arbitrary, always setting strm.avail_in to a multiple of PAGE_SIZE may cause read-in bytes to exceed the input range. Currently this triggers an assert in btrfs_compress_folios() on the debug kernel (see below). Fix strm.avail_in calculation for S390 hardware acceleration path. assertion failed: *total_in <= orig_len, in fs/btrfs/compression.c:1041 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/compression.c:1041! monitor event: 0040 ilc:2 [#1] PREEMPT SMP CPU: 16 UID: 0 PID: 325 Comm: kworker/u273:3 Not tainted 6.13.0-20241204.rc1.git6.fae3b21430ca.300.fc41.s390x+debug #1 Hardware name: IBM 3931 A01 703 (z/VM 7.4.0) Workqueue: btrfs-delalloc btrfs_work_helper Krnl PSW : 0704d00180000000 0000021761df6538 (btrfs_compress_folios+0x198/0x1a0) R:0 T:1 IO:1 EX:1 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:1 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3 Krnl GPRS: 0000000080000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000047 0000000000000000 0000000000000006 ffffff01757bb000 000001976232fcc0 000000000000130c 000001976232fcd0 000001976232fcc8 00000118ff4a0e30 0000000000000001 00000111821ab400 0000011100000000 0000021761df6534 000001976232fb58 Krnl Code: 0000021761df6528: c020006f5ef4 larl %r2,0000021762be2310 0000021761df652e: c0e5ffbd09d5 brasl %r14,00000217615978d8 #0000021761df6534: af000000 mc 0,0 >0000021761df6538: 0707 bcr 0,%r7 0000021761df653a: 0707 bcr 0,%r7 0000021761df653c: 0707 bcr 0,%r7 0000021761df653e: 0707 bcr 0,%r7 0000021761df6540: c004004bb7ec brcl 0,000002176276d518 Call Trace: [<0000021761df6538>] btrfs_compress_folios+0x198/0x1a0 ([<0000021761df6534>] btrfs_compress_folios+0x194/0x1a0) [<0000021761d97788>] compress_file_range+0x3b8/0x6d0 [<0000021761dcee7c>] btrfs_work_helper+0x10c/0x160 [<0000021761645760>] process_one_work+0x2b0/0x5d0 [<000002176164637e>] worker_thread+0x20e/0x3e0 [<000002176165221a>] kthread+0x15a/0x170 [<00000217615b859c>] __ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60 [<00000217626e72d2>] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x38 INFO: lockdep is turned off. Last Breaking-Event-Address: [<0000021761597924>] _printk+0x4c/0x58 Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception: panic_on_oops Fixes: fd1e75d0105d ("btrfs: make compression path to be subpage compatible") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.12+ Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Zaslonko <zaslonko@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-06btrfs: zoned: calculate max_extent_size properly on non-zoned setupChristoph Hellwig
Since commit 559218d43ec9 ("block: pre-calculate max_zone_append_sectors"), queue_limits's max_zone_append_sectors is default to be 0 and it is only updated when there is a zoned device. So, we have lim->max_zone_append_sectors = 0 when there is no zoned device in the filesystem. That leads to fs_info->max_zone_append_size and thus fs_info->max_extent_size to be 0, which is wrong and can for example lead to a divide by zero in count_max_extents(). Fix this by only capping fs_info->max_extent_size to fs_info->max_zone_append_size when it is non-zero. Based on a patch from Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>, from which much of this commit message is stolen as well. Reported-by: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Fixes: 559218d43ec9 ("block: pre-calculate max_zone_append_sectors") Tested-by: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-06btrfs: avoid NULL pointer dereference if no valid extent treeQu Wenruo
[BUG] Syzbot reported a crash with the following call trace: BTRFS info (device loop0): scrub: started on devid 1 BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000208 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 106e70067 P4D 106e70067 PUD 107143067 PMD 0 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 689 Comm: repro Kdump: loaded Tainted: G O 6.13.0-rc4-custom+ #206 Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS unknown 02/02/2022 RIP: 0010:find_first_extent_item+0x26/0x1f0 [btrfs] Call Trace: <TASK> scrub_find_fill_first_stripe+0x13d/0x3b0 [btrfs] scrub_simple_mirror+0x175/0x260 [btrfs] scrub_stripe+0x5d4/0x6c0 [btrfs] scrub_chunk+0xbb/0x170 [btrfs] scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x2f4/0x5f0 [btrfs] btrfs_scrub_dev+0x240/0x600 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x1dc8/0x2fa0 [btrfs] ? do_sys_openat2+0xa5/0xf0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x97/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x120 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e </TASK> [CAUSE] The reproducer is using a corrupted image where extent tree root is corrupted, thus forcing to use "rescue=all,ro" mount option to mount the image. Then it triggered a scrub, but since scrub relies on extent tree to find where the data/metadata extents are, scrub_find_fill_first_stripe() relies on an non-empty extent root. But unfortunately scrub_find_fill_first_stripe() doesn't really expect an NULL pointer for extent root, it use extent_root to grab fs_info and triggered a NULL pointer dereference. [FIX] Add an extra check for a valid extent root at the beginning of scrub_find_fill_first_stripe(). The new error path is introduced by 42437a6386ff ("btrfs: introduce mount option rescue=ignorebadroots"), but that's pretty old, and later commit b979547513ff ("btrfs: scrub: introduce helper to find and fill sector info for a scrub_stripe") changed how we do scrub. So for kernels older than 6.6, the fix will need manual backport. Reported-by: syzbot+339e9dbe3a2ca419b85d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/67756935.050a0220.25abdd.0a12.GAE@google.com/ Fixes: 42437a6386ff ("btrfs: introduce mount option rescue=ignorebadroots") Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2025-01-06btrfs: don't read from userspace twice in btrfs_uring_encoded_read()Mark Harmstone
If we return -EAGAIN the first time because we need to block, btrfs_uring_encoded_read() will get called twice. Take a copy of args, the iovs, and the iter the first time, as by the time we are called the second time these may have gone out of scope. Reported-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Fixes: 34310c442e17 ("btrfs: add io_uring command for encoded reads (ENCODED_READ ioctl)") Signed-off-by: Mark Harmstone <maharmstone@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-12-29Merge tag 'for-6.13-rc4-tag' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba: "A few more fixes that accumulated over the last two weeks, fixing some user reported problems: - swapfile fixes: - conditional reschedule in the activation loop - fix race with memory mapped file when activating - make activation loop interruptible - rework and fix extent sharing checks - folio fixes: - in send, recheck folio mapping after unlock - in relocation, recheck folio mapping after unlock - fix waiting for encoded read io_uring requests - fix transaction atomicity when enabling simple quotas - move COW block trace point before the block gets freed - print various sizes in sysfs with correct endianity" * tag 'for-6.13-rc4-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: btrfs: sysfs: fix direct super block member reads btrfs: fix transaction atomicity bug when enabling simple quotas btrfs: avoid monopolizing a core when activating a swap file btrfs: allow swap activation to be interruptible btrfs: fix swap file activation failure due to extents that used to be shared btrfs: fix race with memory mapped writes when activating swap file btrfs: check folio mapping after unlock in put_file_data() btrfs: check folio mapping after unlock in relocate_one_folio() btrfs: fix use-after-free when COWing tree bock and tracing is enabled btrfs: fix use-after-free waiting for encoded read endios
2024-12-23btrfs: sysfs: fix direct super block member readsQu Wenruo
The following sysfs entries are reading super block member directly, which can have a different endian and cause wrong values: - sys/fs/btrfs/<uuid>/nodesize - sys/fs/btrfs/<uuid>/sectorsize - sys/fs/btrfs/<uuid>/clone_alignment Thankfully those values (nodesize and sectorsize) are always aligned inside the btrfs_super_block, so it won't trigger unaligned read errors, just endian problems. Fix them by using the native cached members instead. Fixes: df93589a1737 ("btrfs: export more from FS_INFO to sysfs") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-12-23btrfs: fix transaction atomicity bug when enabling simple quotasJulian Sun
Set squota incompat bit before committing the transaction that enables the feature. With the config CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT enabled, an assertion failure occurs regarding the simple quota feature. [5.596534] assertion failed: btrfs_fs_incompat(fs_info, SIMPLE_QUOTA), in fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365 [5.597098] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [5.597371] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:365! [5.597946] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 268 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.13.0-rc2-00031-gf92f4749861b #146 [5.598450] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.2-debian-1.16.2-1 04/01/2014 [5.599008] RIP: 0010:btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.604303] <TASK> [5.605230] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.605538] ? exc_invalid_op+0x56/0x70 [5.605775] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.606066] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1f/0x30 [5.606441] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.606741] ? btrfs_read_qgroup_config+0x74d/0x7a0 [5.607038] ? try_to_wake_up+0x317/0x760 [5.607286] open_ctree+0xd9c/0x1710 [5.607509] btrfs_get_tree+0x58a/0x7e0 [5.608002] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [5.608224] fc_mount+0x16/0x60 [5.608420] btrfs_get_tree+0x2f8/0x7e0 [5.608897] vfs_get_tree+0x2e/0x100 [5.609121] path_mount+0x4c8/0xbc0 [5.609538] __x64_sys_mount+0x10d/0x150 The issue can be easily reproduced using the following reproducer: root@q:linux# cat repro.sh set -e mkfs.btrfs -q -f /dev/sdb mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs btrfs quota enable -s /mnt/btrfs umount /mnt/btrfs mount /dev/sdb /mnt/btrfs The issue is that when enabling quotas, at btrfs_quota_enable(), we set BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE at fs_info->qgroup_flags and persist it in the quota root in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY, but we only set the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA after we commit the transaction used to enable simple quotas. This means that if after that transaction commit we unmount the filesystem without starting and committing any other transaction, or we have a power failure, the next time we mount the filesystem we will find the flag BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE set in the item with the key BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_KEY but we will not find the incompat bit BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA set in the superblock, triggering an assertion failure at: btrfs_read_qgroup_config() -> qgroup_read_enable_gen() To fix this issue, set the BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SIMPLE_QUOTA flag immediately after setting the BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_SIMPLE_MODE. This ensures that both flags are flushed to disk within the same transaction. Fixes: 182940f4f4db ("btrfs: qgroup: add new quota mode for simple quotas") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Julian Sun <sunjunchao2870@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-12-23btrfs: avoid monopolizing a core when activating a swap fileFilipe Manana
During swap activation we iterate over the extents of a file and we can have many thousands of them, so we can end up in a busy loop monopolizing a core. Avoid this by doing a voluntary reschedule after processing each extent. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-12-23btrfs: allow swap activation to be interruptibleFilipe Manana
During swap activation we iterate over the extents of a file, then do several checks for each extent, some of which may take some significant time such as checking if an extent is shared. Since a file can have many thousands of extents, this can be a very slow operation and it's currently not interruptible. I had a bug during development of a previous patch that resulted in an infinite loop when iterating the extents, so a core was busy looping and I couldn't cancel the operation, which is very annoying and requires a reboot. So make the loop interruptible by checking for fatal signals at the end of each iteration and stopping immediately if there is one. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-12-23btrfs: fix swap file activation failure due to extents that used to be sharedFilipe Manana
When activating a swap file, to determine if an extent is shared we use can_nocow_extent(), which ends up at btrfs_cross_ref_exist(). That helper is meant to be quick because it's used in the NOCOW write path, when flushing delalloc and when doing a direct IO write, however it does return some false positives, meaning it may indicate that an extent is shared even if it's no longer the case. For the write path this is fine, we just do a unnecessary COW operation instead of doing a more rigorous check which would be too heavy (calling btrfs_is_data_extent_shared()). However when activating a swap file, the false positives simply result in a failure, which is confusing for users/applications. One particular case where this happens is when a data extent only has 1 reference but that reference is not inlined in the extent item located in the extent tree - this happens when we create more than 33 references for an extent and then delete those 33 references plus every other non-inline reference except one. The function check_committed_ref() assumes that if the size of an extent item doesn't match the size of struct btrfs_extent_item plus the size of an inline reference (plus an owner reference in case simple quotas are enabled), then the extent is shared - that is not the case however, we can have a single reference but it's not inlined - the reason we do this is to be fast and avoid inspecting non-inline references which may be located in another leaf of the extent tree, slowing down write paths. The following test script reproduces the bug: $ cat test.sh #!/bin/bash DEV=/dev/sdi MNT=/mnt/sdi NUM_CLONES=50 umount $DEV &> /dev/null run_test() { local sync_after_add_reflinks=$1 local sync_after_remove_reflinks=$2 mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV > /dev/null #mkfs.xfs -f $DEV > /dev/null mount $DEV $MNT touch $MNT/foo chmod 0600 $MNT/foo # On btrfs the file must be NOCOW. chattr +C $MNT/foo &> /dev/null xfs_io -s -c "pwrite -b 1M 0 1M" $MNT/foo mkswap $MNT/foo for ((i = 1; i <= $NUM_CLONES; i++)); do touch $MNT/foo_clone_$i chmod 0600 $MNT/foo_clone_$i # On btrfs the file must be NOCOW. chattr +C $MNT/foo_clone_$i &> /dev/null cp --reflink=always $MNT/foo $MNT/foo_clone_$i done if [ $sync_after_add_reflinks -ne 0 ]; then # Flush delayed refs and commit current transaction. sync -f $MNT fi # Remove the original file and all clones except the last. rm -f $MNT/foo for ((i = 1; i < $NUM_CLONES; i++)); do rm -f $MNT/foo_clone_$i done if [ $sync_after_remove_reflinks -ne 0 ]; then # Flush delayed refs and commit current transaction. sync -f $MNT fi # Now use the last clone as a swap file. It should work since # its extent are not shared anymore. swapon $MNT/foo_clone_${NUM_CLONES} swapoff $MNT/foo_clone_${NUM_CLONES} umount $MNT } echo -e "\nTest without sync after creating and removing clones" run_test 0 0 echo -e "\nTest with sync after creating clones" run_test 1 0 echo -e "\nTest with sync after removing clones" run_test 0 1 echo -e "\nTest with sync after creating and removing clones" run_test 1 1 Running the test: $ ./test.sh Test without sync after creating and removing clones wrote 1048576/1048576 bytes at offset 0 1 MiB, 1 ops; 0.0017 sec (556.793 MiB/sec and 556.7929 ops/sec) Setting up swapspace version 1, size = 1020 KiB (1044480 bytes) no label, UUID=a6b9c29e-5ef4-4689-a8ac-bc199c750f02 swapon: /mnt/sdi/foo_clone_50: swapon failed: Invalid argument swapoff: /mnt/sdi/foo_clone_50: swapoff failed: Invalid argument Test with sync after creating clones wrote 1048576/1048576 bytes at offset 0 1 MiB, 1 ops; 0.0036 sec (271.739 MiB/sec and 271.7391 ops/sec) Setting up swapspace version 1, size = 1020 KiB (1044480 bytes) no label, UUID=5e9008d6-1f7a-4948-a1b4-3f30aba20a33 swapon: /mnt/sdi/foo_clone_50: swapon failed: Invalid argument swapoff: /mnt/sdi/foo_clone_50: swapoff failed: Invalid argument Test with sync after removing clones wrote 1048576/1048576 bytes at offset 0 1 MiB, 1 ops; 0.0103 sec (96.665 MiB/sec and 96.6651 ops/sec) Setting up swapspace version 1, size = 1020 KiB (1044480 bytes) no label, UUID=916c2740-fa9f-4385-9f06-29c3f89e4764 Test with sync after creating and removing clones wrote 1048576/1048576 bytes at offset 0 1 MiB, 1 ops; 0.0031 sec (314.268 MiB/sec and 314.2678 ops/sec) Setting up swapspace version 1, size = 1020 KiB (1044480 bytes) no label, UUID=06aab1dd-4d90-49c0-bd9f-3a8db4e2f912 swapon: /mnt/sdi/foo_clone_50: swapon failed: Invalid argument swapoff: /mnt/sdi/foo_clone_50: swapoff failed: Invalid argument Fix this by reworking btrfs_swap_activate() to instead of using extent maps and checking for shared extents with can_nocow_extent(), iterate over the inode's file extent items and use the accurate btrfs_is_data_extent_shared(). CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-12-23btrfs: fix race with memory mapped writes when activating swap fileFilipe Manana
When activating the swap file we flush all delalloc and wait for ordered extent completion, so that we don't miss any delalloc and extents before we check that the file's extent layout is usable for a swap file and activate the swap file. We are called with the inode's VFS lock acquired, so we won't race with buffered and direct IO writes, however we can still race with memory mapped writes since they don't acquire the inode's VFS lock. The race window is between flushing all delalloc and locking the whole file's extent range, since memory mapped writes lock an extent range with the length of a page. Fix this by acquiring the inode's mmap lock before we flush delalloc. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-12-23btrfs: check folio mapping after unlock in put_file_data()Boris Burkov
When we call btrfs_read_folio() we get an unlocked folio, so it is possible for a different thread to concurrently modify folio->mapping. We must check that this hasn't happened once we do have the lock. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.12+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-12-23btrfs: check folio mapping after unlock in relocate_one_folio()Boris Burkov
When we call btrfs_read_folio() to bring a folio uptodate, we unlock the folio. The result of that is that a different thread can modify the mapping (like remove it with invalidate) before we call folio_lock(). This results in an invalid page and we need to try again. In particular, if we are relocating concurrently with aborting a transaction, this can result in a crash like the following: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU: 76 PID: 1411631 Comm: kworker/u322:5 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work RIP: 0010:set_page_extent_mapped+0x20/0xb0 RSP: 0018:ffffc900516a7be8 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: ffffea009e851d08 RBX: ffffea009e0b1880 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffc900516a7b90 RDI: ffffea009e0b1880 RBP: 0000000003573000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff88c07fd2f3f0 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000194754b575be R12: 0000000003572000 R13: 0000000003572fff R14: 0000000000100cca R15: 0000000005582fff FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88c07fd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 000000407d00f002 CR4: 00000000007706f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 PKRU: 55555554 Call Trace: <TASK> ? __die+0x78/0xc0 ? page_fault_oops+0x2a8/0x3a0 ? __switch_to+0x133/0x530 ? wq_worker_running+0xa/0x40 ? exc_page_fault+0x63/0x130 ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30 ? set_page_extent_mapped+0x20/0xb0 relocate_file_extent_cluster+0x1a7/0x940 relocate_data_extent+0xaf/0x120 relocate_block_group+0x20f/0x480 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x152/0x320 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x3d/0x120 btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work+0x2ae/0x4e0 process_scheduled_works+0x184/0x370 worker_thread+0xc6/0x3e0 ? blk_add_timer+0xb0/0xb0 kthread+0xae/0xe0 ? flush_tlb_kernel_range+0x90/0x90 ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x40 ? flush_tlb_kernel_range+0x90/0x90 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 </TASK> This occurs because cleanup_one_transaction() calls destroy_delalloc_inodes() which calls invalidate_inode_pages2() which takes the folio_lock before setting mapping to NULL. We fail to check this, and subsequently call set_extent_mapping(), which assumes that mapping != NULL (in fact it asserts that in debug mode) Note that the "fixes" patch here is not the one that introduced the race (the very first iteration of this code from 2009) but a more recent change that made this particular crash happen in practice. Fixes: e7f1326cc24e ("btrfs: set page extent mapped after read_folio in relocate_one_page") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-12-23btrfs: fix use-after-free when COWing tree bock and tracing is enabledFilipe Manana
When a COWing a tree block, at btrfs_cow_block(), and we have the tracepoint trace_btrfs_cow_block() enabled and preemption is also enabled (CONFIG_PREEMPT=y), we can trigger a use-after-free in the COWed extent buffer while inside the tracepoint code. This is because in some paths that call btrfs_cow_block(), such as btrfs_search_slot(), we are holding the last reference on the extent buffer @buf so btrfs_force_cow_block() drops the last reference on the @buf extent buffer when it calls free_extent_buffer_stale(buf), which schedules the release of the extent buffer with RCU. This means that if we are on a kernel with preemption, the current task may be preempted before calling trace_btrfs_cow_block() and the extent buffer already released by the time trace_btrfs_cow_block() is called, resulting in a use-after-free. Fix this by moving the trace_btrfs_cow_block() from btrfs_cow_block() to btrfs_force_cow_block() before the COWed extent buffer is freed. This also has a side effect of invoking the tracepoint in the tree defrag code, at defrag.c:btrfs_realloc_node(), since btrfs_force_cow_block() is called there, but this is fine and it was actually missing there. Reported-by: syzbot+8517da8635307182c8a5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6759a9b9.050a0220.1ac542.000d.GAE@google.com/ CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-12-23btrfs: fix use-after-free waiting for encoded read endiosJohannes Thumshirn
Fix a use-after-free in the I/O completion path for encoded reads by using a completion instead of a wait_queue for synchronizing the destruction of 'struct btrfs_encoded_read_private'. Fixes: 1881fba89bd5 ("btrfs: add BTRFS_IOC_ENCODED_READ ioctl") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-12-18Merge tag 'for-6.13-rc3-tag' of ↵Linus Torvalds
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba: - tree-checker catches invalid number of inline extent references - zoned mode fixes: - enhance zone append IO command so it also detects emulated writes - handle bio splitting at sectorsize boundary - when deleting a snapshot, fix a condition for visiting nodes in reloc trees * tag 'for-6.13-rc3-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: btrfs: tree-checker: reject inline extent items with 0 ref count btrfs: split bios to the fs sector size boundary btrfs: use bio_is_zone_append() in the completion handler btrfs: fix improper generation check in snapshot delete
2024-12-17btrfs: tree-checker: reject inline extent items with 0 ref countQu Wenruo
[BUG] There is a bug report in the mailing list where btrfs_run_delayed_refs() failed to drop the ref count for logical 25870311358464 num_bytes 2113536. The involved leaf dump looks like this: item 166 key (25870311358464 168 2113536) itemoff 10091 itemsize 50 extent refs 1 gen 84178 flags 1 ref#0: shared data backref parent 32399126528000 count 0 <<< ref#1: shared data backref parent 31808973717504 count 1 Notice the count number is 0. [CAUSE] There is no concrete evidence yet, but considering 0 -> 1 is also a single bit flipped, it's possible that hardware memory bitflip is involved, causing the on-disk extent tree to be corrupted. [FIX] To prevent us reading such corrupted extent item, or writing such damaged extent item back to disk, enhance the handling of BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_REF_KEY and BTRFS_SHARED_DATA_REF_KEY keys for both inlined and key items, to detect such 0 ref count and reject them. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/7c69dd49-c346-4806-86e7-e6f863a66f48@app.fastmail.com/ Reported-by: Frankie Fisher <frankie@terrorise.me.uk> Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-12-17btrfs: split bios to the fs sector size boundaryChristoph Hellwig
Btrfs like other file systems can't really deal with I/O not aligned to it's internal block size (which strangely is called sector size in btrfs, for historical reasons), but the block layer split helper doesn't even know about that. Round down the split boundary so that all I/Os are aligned. Fixes: d5e4377d5051 ("btrfs: split zone append bios in btrfs_submit_bio") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.12 Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-12-17btrfs: use bio_is_zone_append() in the completion handlerChristoph Hellwig
Otherwise it won't catch bios turned into regular writes by the block level zone write plugging. The additional test it adds is for emulated zone append. Fixes: 9b1ce7f0c6f8 ("block: Implement zone append emulation") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.12 Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-12-17btrfs: fix improper generation check in snapshot deleteJosef Bacik
We have been using the following check if (generation <= root->root_key.offset) to make decisions about whether or not to visit a node during snapshot delete. This is because for normal subvolumes this is set to 0, and for snapshots it's set to the creation generation. The idea being that if the generation of the node is less than or equal to our creation generation then we don't need to visit that node, because it doesn't belong to us, we can simply drop our reference and move on. However reloc roots don't have their generation stored in root->root_key.offset, instead that is the objectid of their corresponding fs root. This means we can incorrectly not walk into nodes that need to be dropped when deleting a reloc root. There are a variety of consequences to making the wrong choice in two distinct areas. visit_node_for_delete() 1. False positive. We think we are newer than the block when we really aren't. We don't visit the node and drop our reference to the node and carry on. This would result in leaked space. 2. False negative. We do decide to walk down into a block that we should have just dropped our reference to. However this means that the child node will have refs > 1, so we will switch to UPDATE_BACKREF, and then the subsequent walk_down_proc() will notice that btrfs_header_owner(node) != root->root_key.objectid and it'll break out of the loop, and then walk_up_proc() will drop our reference, so this appears to be ok. do_walk_down() 1. False positive. We are in UPDATE_BACKREF and incorrectly decide that we are done and don't need to update the backref for our lower nodes. This is another case that simply won't happen with relocation, as we only have to do UPDATE_BACKREF if the node below us was shared and didn't have FULL_BACKREF set, and since we don't own that node because we're a reloc root we actually won't end up in this case. 2. False negative. Again this is tricky because as described above, we simply wouldn't be here from relocation, because we don't own any of the nodes because we never set btrfs_header_owner() to the reloc root objectid, and we always use FULL_BACKREF, we never actually need to set FULL_BACKREF on any children. Having spent a lot of time stressing relocation/snapshot delete recently I've not seen this pop in practice. But this is objectively incorrect, so fix this to get the correct starting generation based on the root we're dropping to keep me from thinking there's a problem here. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2024-12-11fs: enable pre-content events on supported file systemsJosef Bacik
Now that all the code has been added for pre-content events, and the various file systems that need the page fault hooks for fsnotify have been updated, add SB_I_ALLOW_HSM to the supported file systems. Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/46960dcb2725fa0317895ed66a8409ba1c306a82.1731684329.git.josef@toxicpanda.com