| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
irq_domain_add_*() interfaces are going away as being obsolete now.
Switch to the preferred irq_domain_create_*() ones. Those differ in the
node parameter: They take more generic struct fwnode_handle instead of
struct device_node. Therefore, of_fwnode_handle() is added around the
original parameter.
Note some of the users can likely use dev->fwnode directly instead of
indirect of_fwnode_handle(dev->of_node). But dev->fwnode is not
guaranteed to be set for all, so this has to be investigated on case to
case basis (by people who can actually test with the HW).
[ tglx: Fix up subject prefix ]
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250319092951.37667-18-jirislaby@kernel.org
|
|
Add missing '@' to the kernel doc for the new of_node_instance_match
field of struct gpio_chip.
Fixes: bd3ce71078bd ("gpiolib: of: Handle threecell GPIO chips")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250305203929.70283b9b@canb.auug.org.au/
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250305094939.40011-1-brgl@bgdev.pl
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
The valid_mask member of the struct gpio_chip is unconditionally written
by the GPIO core at driver registration. Current documentation does not
mention this but just says the valid_mask is used if it's not NULL. This
lured me to try populating it directly in the GPIO driver probe instead
of using the init_valid_mask() callback. It took some retries with
different bitmaps and eventually a bit of code-reading to understand why
the valid_mask was not obeyed. I could've avoided this trial and error if
the valid_mask was hidden in the struct gpio_device instead of being a
visible member of the struct gpio_chip.
Help the next developer who decides to directly populate the valid_mask
in struct gpio_chip by hiding the valid_mask in struct gpio_device and
keep it internal to the GPIO core.
Suggested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/4547ca90d910d60cab3d56d864d59ddde47a5e93.1741180097.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
The valid_mask member of the struct gpio_chip is unconditionally written
by the GPIO core at driver registration. It shouldn't be directly
populated by drivers. This can be prevented by moving it from the struct
gpio_chip to struct gpio_device, which is internal to the GPIO core.
As a preparatory step, provide a getter function which can be used by
those drivers which need the valid_mask information.
Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/026f9d78502eca883bfe3faeb684e23d5d6c5e84.1741180097.git.mazziesaccount@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
When describing GPIO controllers in the device tree, the ambition
of device tree to describe the hardware may require a three-cell
scheme:
gpios = <&gpio instance offset flags>;
This implements support for this scheme in the gpiolib OF core.
Drivers that want to handle multiple gpiochip instances from one
OF node need to implement a callback similar to this to
determine if a certain gpio chip is a pointer to the right
instance (pseudo-code):
struct my_gpio {
struct gpio_chip gcs[MAX_CHIPS];
};
static bool my_of_node_instance_match(struct gpio_chip *gc
unsigned int instance)
{
struct my_gpio *mg = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
if (instance >= MAX_CHIPS)
return false;
return (gc == &mg->gcs[instance]);
}
probe() {
struct my_gpio *mg;
struct gpio_chip *gc;
int i, ret;
for (i = 0; i++; i < MAX_CHIPS) {
gc = &mg->gcs[i];
/* This tells gpiolib we have several instances per node */
gc->of_gpio_n_cells = 3;
gc->of_node_instance_match = my_of_node_instance_match;
gc->base = -1;
...
ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, gc, mg);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
}
Rename the "simple" of_xlate function to "twocell" which is closer
to what it actually does.
In the device tree bindings, the provide node needs
to specify #gpio-cells = <3>; where the first cell is the instance
number:
gpios = <&gpio instance offset flags>;
Conversely ranges need to have four cells:
gpio-ranges = <&pinctrl instance gpio_offset pin_offset count>;
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@riscstar.com>
Tested-by: Yixun Lan <dlan@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250225-gpio-ranges-fourcell-v3-2-860382ba4713@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
We now have setter callbacks that allow us to indicate success or
failure using the integer return value. Deprecate the older callbacks so
that no new code is tempted to use them.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250227083748.22400-1-brgl@bgdev.pl
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
Add new variants of the set() and set_multiple() callbacks that have
integer return values allowing to indicate failures to users of the GPIO
consumer API. Until we convert all GPIO providers treewide to using
them, they will live in parallel to the existing ones.
Make sure that providers cannot define both. Prefer the new ones and
only use the old ones as fallback.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250220-gpio-set-retval-v2-5-bc4cfd38dae3@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
It turns out that with this flag we can switch over an entire
driver to use gpio-mmio instead of a bunch of custom code,
also providing get/set_multiple() to it in the process, so it
seems like a reasonable feature to add.
The generic pin control backend requires us to call the
gpiochip_generic_request(), gpiochip_generic_free(),
pinctrl_gpio_direction_output() and pinctrl_gpio_direction_input()
callbacks, so if the new flag for a pin control back-end
is set, we make sure these functions get called as
expected.
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250219-vf610-mmio-v3-1-588b64f0b689@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
The return value of the set_config() callback may be propagated to
user-space. If a bad driver returns a positive number, it may confuse
user programs. Tighten the API contract and check for positive numbers
returned by GPIO controllers.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250210-gpio-sanitize-retvals-v1-3-12ea88506cb2@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
The return value of the request() callback may be propagated to
user-space. If a bad driver returns a positive number, it may confuse
user programs. Tighten the API contract and check for positive numbers
returned by GPIO controllers.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250210-gpio-sanitize-retvals-v1-2-12ea88506cb2@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
The for_each_*() APIs that are conditional can be written shorter and
less error prone with for_each_if() helper in use. Switch them to use
this helper.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250213182527.3092371-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
The whole purpose of the custom CLASS() is to have possibility
to initialise the counter variable _i to 0. This can't be done
with simple __free() macro as it will be not allowed by C language.
OTOH, the CLASS() operates with the pointers and explicit usage of
the scoped variable _data is not needed, since the pointers are kept
the same over the iterations. Simplify the implementation of
for_each_hwgpio_in_range().
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250207151149.2119765-3-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
Refactor for_each_requested_gpio_in_range() to deduplicate some code
which is basically repeats the for_each_hwgpio(). In order to achieve
this, split the latter to two, for_each_hwgpio_in_range() and
for_each_hwgpio().
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250207151149.2119765-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
This function has been deprecated for some time and is now only used
within the GPIOLIB core. Remove it from the public header and unexport
it as all current users are linked against the compilation unit where
it is defined.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240625073815.12376-1-brgl@bgdev.pl
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
GPIO chips should be added with driver-private data associated with the
chip. If none is needed, NULL can be used. All users already do this
except one, fix that here. With no more users of the base gpiochip_add()
we can drop this function so no more users show up later.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com>
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240610135313.142571-1-afd@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
Currently the documentation for line names allows to use %u inside
the alternative name. This is broken in character device approach
from day 1 and being in use solely in sysfs.
Character device interface has a line number as a part of its address,
so the users better rely on it. Hence remove the misleading documentation.
On top of that, there are no in-kernel users (out of 6, if I'm correct)
for such names and moreover if one exists it won't help in distinguishing
lines with the same naming as '%u' will also be in them and we will get
a warning in gpiochip_set_desc_names() for such cases.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240505141420.627398-1-andy.shevchenko@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
The gpio_device_find_by_() functions do not have stubs which means that if
they are referenced from code with an optiona dependency on gpiolib then
the code will fail to link. Add stubs for lookups via fwnode and label. I
have not added a stub for plain gpio_device_find() since it seems harder to
see a use case for that which does not depend on gpiolib.
With the addition of the GPIO reset controller (which lacks a gpiolib
dependency) to the arm64 defconfig this is causing build breaks for arm64
virtconfig in -next:
aarch64-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/reset/core.o: in function `__reset_add_reset_gpio_lookup':
/build/stage/linux/drivers/reset/core.c:861:(.text+0xccc): undefined reference to `gpio_device_find_by_fwnode'
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
Linux 6.8-rc7
|
|
We only provide iterators for requested GPIOs to provider drivers. In
order to allow them to display debug information about all GPIOs, let's
provide a variant for iterating over all GPIOs.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
The opaque pointer "data" in each match function used by
gpio_device_find() is a pointer to const, thus the same argument passed
to gpio_device_find() can adjusted similarly.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
Add empty stub of gpio_device_get_label() when GPIOLIB is not enabled.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Fixes: d1f7728259ef ("gpiolib: provide gpio_device_get_label()")
Suggested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
Add empty stub of gpio_device_get_base() when GPIOLIB is not enabled.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Fixes: 8c85a102fc4e ("gpiolib: provide gpio_device_get_base()")
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
Add empty stub of gpiod_to_gpio_device() when GPIOLIB is not enabled.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Fixes: 370232d096e3 ("gpiolib: provide gpiod_to_gpio_device()")
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
The match function used in gpio_device_find() should not modify the
contents of passed opaque pointer, because such modification would not
be necessary for actual matching and it could lead to quite unreadable,
spaghetti code.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
[Bartosz: fix coding style in header]
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
If a GPIO driver returns a positive integer from one of the direction
setter callbacks, we'll end up propagating it to user-space. Whether we
should sanitize the values returned by callbacks is a different question
but let's first improve the documentation and fortify the contract with
GPIO providers.
Reported-by: José Guilherme de Castro Rodrigues <joseguilhermebh@hotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>
|
|
There are no external users for the irq domain helpers so unexport them
and remove the prototypes from the driver header.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
Commit 9e4555d1e54a ("gpiolib: add support for scope-based management to
gpio_device") sought to add scope-based gpio_device refcounting, but
erroneously forgot a negation of IS_ERR_OR_NULL().
As a result, gpio_device_put() is not called if the gpio_device pointer
is valid (meaning the ref is leaked), but only called if the pointer is
NULL or an ERR_PTR().
While at it drop a superfluous trailing semicolon.
Fixes: 9e4555d1e54a ("gpiolib: add support for scope-based management to gpio_device")
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
Remove second `#include <linux/err.h>`. Remove `#include <asm/errno.h>`
too as it's included by `err.h`.
Signed-off-by: Wang Jinchao <wangjinchao@xfusion.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
gpio: remove gpiochip_is_requested()
- provide a safer alternative to gpiochip_is_requested()
- convert all existing users
- remove gpiochip_is_requested()
|
|
We have no external users of gpiochip_is_requested(). Let's remove it
and replace its internal calls with direct testing of the REQUESTED flag.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
Rework for_each_requested_gpio_in_range() to use the new helper to
retrieve a dynamically allocated copy of the descriptor label and free
it at the end of each iteration. We need to leverage the CLASS()'
destructor to make sure that the label is freed even when breaking out
of the loop.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
gpiochip_is_requested() not only has a misleading name but it returns
a pointer to a string that is freed when the descriptor is released.
Provide a new helper meant to replace it, which returns a copy of the
label string instead.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
Provide a getter for the GPIO device label string so that users don't
have to dereference struct gpio_chip directly.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
With all users of gpiochip_find() converted to using gpio_device_find(),
we can now remove this function from the kernel.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
Let's start adding getters for the opaque struct gpio_device. Start with
a function allowing to retrieve the base GPIO number.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
Accessing struct gpio_chip backing a GPIO device is only allowed for the
actual providers of that chip.
Similarly to how we introduced gpio_device_find() in order to replace
the abused gpiochip_find(), let's introduce a counterpart to
gpiod_to_chip() that returns a reference to the GPIO device owning the
descriptor. This is done in order to later remove gpiod_to_chip()
entirely.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
There are users in the kernel who need to retrieve the address of the
struct device backing the GPIO device. Currently they needlessly poke in
the internals of GPIOLIB. Add a dedicated getter function.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
One of the ways of looking up GPIO devices is using their fwnode.
Provide a helper for that to avoid every user implementing their
own matching function.
Reviewed-by: Dipen Patel <dipenp@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Dipen Patel <dipenp@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231010151709.4104747-2-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
The process of converting all unauthorized users of struct gpio_chip to
using dedicated struct gpio_device function will be long so in the
meantime we must provide a way of retrieving the pointer to struct
gpio_chip from a GPIO device.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
Getting the GPIO descriptor directly from the gpio_chip struct is
dangerous as we don't take the reference to the underlying GPIO device.
In order to start working towards removing gpiochip_get_desc(), let's
provide a safer variant that works with an existing reference to struct
gpio_device.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
By far the most common way of looking up GPIO devices is using their
label. Provide a helpers for that to avoid every user implementing their
own matching function.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
gpiochip_find() is wrong and its kernel doc is misleading as the
function doesn't return a reference to the gpio_chip but just a raw
pointer. The chip itself is not guaranteed to stay alive, in fact it can
be deleted at any point. Also: other than GPIO drivers themselves,
nobody else has any business accessing gpio_chip structs.
Provide a new gpio_device_find() function that returns a real reference
to the opaque gpio_device structure that is guaranteed to stay alive for
as long as there are active users of it.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
As the few users that need to get the reference to the GPIO device often
release it right after inspecting its properties, let's add support for
the automatic reference release to struct gpio_device.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
|
|
In order to start migrating away from accessing struct gpio_chip by
users other than their owners, let's first make the reference management
functions for the opaque struct gpio_device public in the driver.h
header.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
|
|
It makes sense for a GPIO driver to want to get its own descriptor
without requesting it. After all, the driver knows that it'll still be
valid. Let's move this helper to linux/gpio/driver.h.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
'extern' doesn't do anything for function declarations. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
|
|
Fix a double newline in the GPIO provider header.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brgl/linux
Pull gpio updates from Bartosz Golaszewski:
"We have two new drivers, some improvements to the core code, lots of
different updates to existing GPIO drivers and some dt-bindings on
top.
There's nothing controversial in here and almost everything has been
in next for more than a week (95% a lot longer than this). The only
thing that has spent less time in next is a new driver so no risk of
regressions.
The single merge pulls in changes that remove all usage of global GPIO
numbers from arch/arm/mach-omap.
Core GPIO library:
- remove unused symbols
- don't spam the kernel log with messages about hogs
- remove old sysfs API cruft
- improve handling of GPIO masks
New drivers:
- add a driver for the BlueField-3 GPIO controller
- add GPIO support for the TPS65219 PMIC
Driver improvements:
- extend the gpio-aggregator driver to support ramp-up/ramp-down
delay
- remove unnecessary CONFIG_OF guards from gpio-aggregator
- readability improvements in gpio-tangier
- switch i2c drivers back to using probe() now that it's been
converted in the i2c subsystem to not taking the id parameter
- remove unused inclusions of of_gpio.h in several drivers
- make pm ops static in gpio-davinci and fix a comment
- use more devres in drivers to shrink and simplify the code
- add missing include in gpio-sa1100
- add HAS_IOPORT KConfig dependency where needed
- add permissions checks before accessing pins in gpio-tegra186
- convert the gpio-zynq driver to using immutable irqchips
- preserve output settings set by the bootloader in gpio-mpc8xxx
Selftests:
- tweak the variable naming in script tests
Device tree updates:
- convert gpio-mmio and gpio-stmpe to YAML
- add parsing of GPIO hogs to gpio-vf610
- add bindings for the Cirrus EP93xx GPIO controller
- add gpio-line-names property to the gpio-pca9570 bindings
- extend the binding for x-powers,axp209 with another block"
* tag 'gpio-updates-for-v6.5' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brgl/linux: (58 commits)
of: unittest: drop assertions for GPIO hog messages
gpiolib: Drop unused domain_ops memeber of GPIO IRQ chip
gpio: synq: remove unused zynq_gpio_irq_reqres/zynq_gpio_irq_relres
dt-bindings: gpio: gpio-vf610: Add parsing of hogs
gpio: lpc18xx: Remove unused of_gpio.h inclusion
gpio: xra1403: Remove unused of_gpio.h inclusion
gpio: mpc8xxx: Remove unused of_gpio.h inclusion
dt-bindings: gpio: Add Cirrus EP93xx
gpio: mpc8xxx: latch GPIOs state on module load when configured as output
selftests: gpio: gpio-sim: Use same variable name for sysfs pathname
gpio: mlxbf3: Add gpio driver support
gpio: delay: Remove duplicative functionality
gpio: aggregator: Set up a parser of delay line parameters
gpio: aggregator: Support delay for setting up individual GPIOs
gpio: aggregator: Remove CONFIG_OF and of_match_ptr() protections
dt-bindings: gpio: pca9570: add gpio-line-names property
gpiolib: remove unused gpio_cansleep()
gpio: tps65219: add GPIO support for TPS65219 PMIC
gpio: zynq: fix zynqmp_gpio not an immutable chip warning
gpio: davinci: make davinci_gpio_dev_pm_ops static
...
|
|
It seems there is no driver that requires custom IRQ chip
domain options. Drop the member and respective code.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
|
Up until commit 6a45b0e2589f ("gpiolib: Introduce
gpiochip_irqchip_add_domain()") all irq_domains were allocated
by gpiolib itself and thus gpiolib also takes care of freeing it.
With gpiochip_irqchip_add_domain() a user of gpiolib can associate an
irq_domain with the gpio_chip. This irq_domain is not managed by
gpiolib and therefore must not be freed by gpiolib.
Fixes: 6a45b0e2589f ("gpiolib: Introduce gpiochip_irqchip_add_domain()")
Reported-by: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
|
