summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/irq/irq_test.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-09-03genirq/test: Ensure CPU 1 is online for hotplug testBrian Norris
It's possible to run these tests on platforms that think they have a hotpluggable CPU1, but for whatever reason, CPU1 is not online and can't be brought online: # irq_cpuhotplug_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at kernel/irq/irq_test.c:210 Expected remove_cpu(1) == 0, but remove_cpu(1) == 1 (0x1) CPU1: failed to boot: -38 # irq_cpuhotplug_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at kernel/irq/irq_test.c:214 Expected add_cpu(1) == 0, but add_cpu(1) == -38 (0xffffffffffffffda) Check that CPU1 is actually online before trying to run the test. Fixes: 66067c3c8a1e ("genirq: Add kunit tests for depth counts") Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250822190140.2154646-7-briannorris@chromium.org
2025-09-03genirq/test: Drop CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_MIGRATION assumptionsBrian Norris
Not all platforms use the generic IRQ migration code, even if they select GENERIC_IRQ_MIGRATION. (See, for example, powerpc / pseries_cpu_disable().) If such platforms don't perform managed shutdown the same way, the interrupt may not actually shut down, and these tests fail: [ 4.357022][ T101] # irq_cpuhotplug_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at kernel/irq/irq_test.c:211 [ 4.357022][ T101] Expected irqd_is_activated(data) to be false, but is true [ 4.358128][ T101] # irq_cpuhotplug_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at kernel/irq/irq_test.c:212 [ 4.358128][ T101] Expected irqd_is_started(data) to be false, but is true [ 4.375558][ T101] # irq_cpuhotplug_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at kernel/irq/irq_test.c:216 [ 4.375558][ T101] Expected irqd_is_activated(data) to be false, but is true [ 4.376088][ T101] # irq_cpuhotplug_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at kernel/irq/irq_test.c:217 [ 4.376088][ T101] Expected irqd_is_started(data) to be false, but is true [ 4.377851][ T1] # irq_cpuhotplug_test: pass:0 fail:1 skip:0 total:1 [ 4.377901][ T1] not ok 4 irq_cpuhotplug_test [ 4.378073][ T1] # irq_test_cases: pass:3 fail:1 skip:0 total:4 Rather than test that PowerPC performs migration the same way as the unterrupt core, just drop the state checks. The point of the test was to ensure that the code kept |depth| balanced, which still can be tested for. Fixes: 66067c3c8a1e ("genirq: Add kunit tests for depth counts") Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250822190140.2154646-6-briannorris@chromium.org
2025-09-03genirq/test: Fail early if interrupt request failsBrian Norris
Requesting an interrupt is part of the basic test setup. If it fails, most of the subsequent tests are likely to fail, and the output gets noisy. Use "assert" to fail early. Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250822190140.2154646-4-briannorris@chromium.org
2025-09-03genirq/test: Factor out fake-virq setupBrian Norris
A few things need to be repeated in tests. Factor out the creation of fake interrupts. Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250822190140.2154646-3-briannorris@chromium.org
2025-09-03genirq/test: Fix depth tests on architectures with NOREQUEST by default.David Gow
The new irq KUnit tests fail on some architectures (notably PowerPC and 32-bit ARM), as the request_irq() call fails due to the ARCH_IRQ_INIT_FLAGS containing IRQ_NOREQUEST, yielding the following errors: [10:17:45] # irq_free_disabled_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at kernel/irq/irq_test.c:88 [10:17:45] Expected ret == 0, but [10:17:45] ret == -22 (0xffffffffffffffea) [10:17:45] # irq_free_disabled_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at kernel/irq/irq_test.c:90 [10:17:45] Expected desc->depth == 0, but [10:17:45] desc->depth == 1 (0x1) [10:17:45] # irq_free_disabled_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at kernel/irq/irq_test.c:93 [10:17:45] Expected desc->depth == 1, but [10:17:45] desc->depth == 2 (0x2) By clearing IRQ_NOREQUEST from the interrupt descriptor, these tests now pass on ARM and PowerPC. Fixes: 66067c3c8a1e ("genirq: Add kunit tests for depth counts") Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Tested-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250816094528.3560222-2-davidgow@google.com
2025-08-06genirq/test: Resolve irq lock inversion warningsBrian Norris
irq_shutdown_and_deactivate() is normally called with the descriptor lock held, and interrupts disabled. Nested a few levels down, it grabs the global irq_resend_lock. Lockdep rightfully complains when interrupts are not disabled: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(irq_resend_lock); local_irq_disable(); lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); lock(irq_resend_lock); <Interrupt> lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); ... _raw_spin_lock+0x2b/0x40 clear_irq_resend+0x14/0x70 irq_shutdown_and_deactivate+0x29/0x80 irq_shutdown_depth_test+0x1ce/0x600 kunit_try_run_case+0x90/0x120 Grab the descriptor lock and disable interrupts, to resolve the problem. Fixes: 66067c3c8a1e ("genirq: Add kunit tests for depth counts") Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aJJONEIoIiTSDMqc@google.com Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/31a761e4-8f81-40cf-aaf5-d220ba11911c@roeck-us.net/
2025-06-13genirq: Add kunit tests for depth countsBrian Norris
There have been a few bugs and/or misunderstandings about the reference counting, and startup/shutdown behaviors in the IRQ core and related CPU hotplug code. These 4 test cases try to capture a few interesting cases. * irq_disable_depth_test: basic request/disable/enable sequence * irq_free_disabled_test: request/disable/free/re-request sequence - this catches errors on previous revisions of my work * irq_cpuhotplug_test: exercises managed-affinity IRQ + CPU hotplug. This captures a problematic test case which was fixed recently. This test requires CONFIG_SMP and a hotpluggable CPU#1. * irq_shutdown_depth_test: exercises similar behavior from irq_cpuhotplug_test, but directly using irq_*() APIs instead of going through CPU hotplug. This still requires CONFIG_SMP, because managed-affinity is stubbed out (and not all APIs are even present) without it. Note the use of 'imply SMP': ARCH=um doesn't support SMP, and kunit is often exercised there. Thus, 'imply' will force SMP on where possible (such as ARCH=x86_64), but leave it off where it's not. Behavior on various SMP and ARCH configurations: $ tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run 'irq_test_cases*' --arch x86_64 --qemu_args '-smp 2' [...] [11:12:24] Testing complete. Ran 4 tests: passed: 4 $ tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run 'irq_test_cases*' --arch x86_64 [...] [11:13:27] [SKIPPED] irq_cpuhotplug_test [11:13:27] ================= [PASSED] irq_test_cases ================== [11:13:27] ============================================================ [11:13:27] Testing complete. Ran 4 tests: passed: 3, skipped: 1 # default: ARCH=um $ tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run 'irq_test_cases*' [11:14:26] [SKIPPED] irq_shutdown_depth_test [11:14:26] [SKIPPED] irq_cpuhotplug_test [11:14:26] ================= [PASSED] irq_test_cases ================== [11:14:26] ============================================================ [11:14:26] Testing complete. Ran 4 tests: passed: 2, skipped: 2 Without commit 788019eb559f ("genirq: Retain disable depth for managed interrupts across CPU hotplug"), this fails as follows: [11:18:55] =============== irq_test_cases (4 subtests) ================ [11:18:55] [PASSED] irq_disable_depth_test [11:18:55] [PASSED] irq_free_disabled_test [11:18:55] # irq_shutdown_depth_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at kernel/irq/irq_test.c:147 [11:18:55] Expected desc->depth == 1, but [11:18:55] desc->depth == 0 (0x0) [11:18:55] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [11:18:55] Unbalanced enable for IRQ 26 [11:18:55] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 36 at kernel/irq/manage.c:792 __enable_irq+0x36/0x60 ... [11:18:55] [FAILED] irq_shutdown_depth_test [11:18:55] #1 [11:18:55] # irq_cpuhotplug_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at kernel/irq/irq_test.c:202 [11:18:55] Expected irqd_is_activated(data) to be false, but is true [11:18:55] # irq_cpuhotplug_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at kernel/irq/irq_test.c:203 [11:18:55] Expected irqd_is_started(data) to be false, but is true [11:18:55] # irq_cpuhotplug_test: EXPECTATION FAILED at kernel/irq/irq_test.c:204 [11:18:55] Expected desc->depth == 1, but [11:18:55] desc->depth == 0 (0x0) [11:18:55] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [11:18:55] Unbalanced enable for IRQ 27 [11:18:55] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 38 at kernel/irq/manage.c:792 __enable_irq+0x36/0x60 ... [11:18:55] [FAILED] irq_cpuhotplug_test [11:18:55] # module: irq_test [11:18:55] # irq_test_cases: pass:2 fail:2 skip:0 total:4 [11:18:55] # Totals: pass:2 fail:2 skip:0 total:4 [11:18:55] ================= [FAILED] irq_test_cases ================== [11:18:55] ============================================================ [11:18:55] Testing complete. Ran 4 tests: passed: 2, failed: 2 Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250522210837.4135244-1-briannorris@chromium.org