summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/include/nolibc/signal.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-05-21tools/nolibc: include nolibc.h early from all header filesThomas Weißschuh
Inclusion of any nolibc header file should also bring all other headers. On the other hand it should also be possible to include any nolibc header files in any order. Currently this is implemented by including the catch-all nolibc.h after the headers own definitions. This is problematic if one nolibc header depends on another one. The first header has to include the other one before defining any symbols. That in turn will include the rest of nolibc while the current header has not defined anything yet. If any other part of nolibc depends on definitions from the current header, errors are encountered. This is already the case today. Effectively nolibc can only be included in the order of nolibc.h. Restructure the way "nolibc.h" is included. Move it to the beginning of the header files and before the include guards. Now any header will behave exactly like "nolibc.h" while the include guards prevent any duplicate definitions. Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250424-nolibc-header-check-v1-2-011576b6ed6f@linutronix.de
2025-02-03tools/nolibc: add prototypes for non-static functionsThomas Weißschuh
With -Wmissing-prototypes the compiler will warn about non-static functions which don't have a prototype defined. This warning doesn't make much sense for nolibc itself but for user code it is still useful. To pacify the compiler add prototypes next to the function definitions, similar to how it is handled elsewhere in the kernel. Acked-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250123-nolibc-prototype-v1-1-e1afc5c1999a@weissschuh.net Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net>
2023-01-09tools/nolibc: fix missing includes causing build issues at -O0Willy Tarreau
After the nolibc includes were split to facilitate portability from standard libcs, programs that include only what they need may miss some symbols which are needed by libgcc. This is the case for raise() which is needed by the divide by zero code in some architectures for example. Regardless, being able to include only the apparently needed files is convenient. Instead of trying to move all exported definitions to a single file, since this can change over time, this patch takes another approach consisting in including the nolibc header at the end of all standard include files. This way their types and functions are already known at the moment of inclusion, and including any single one of them is sufficient to bring all the required ones. Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
2022-04-20tools/nolibc/signal: move raise() to signal.hWilly Tarreau
This function is normally found in signal.h, and providing the file eases porting of existing programs. Let's move it there. Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>