| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The definition of "static const char *const syscalltbl[] = {" is done
in a generated syscalls_32.h or syscalls_64.h that is architecture
dependent. In order to include the appropriate file a syscall_table.h
is found via the perf include path and it includes the syscalls_32.h
or syscalls_64.h as appropriate.
To support having multiple syscall tables, one for 32-bit and one for
64-bit, or for different architectures, an include path cannot be
used. Remove syscall_table.h because of this and inline what it does
into syscalltbl.c.
For architectures without a syscall_table.h this will cause a failure
to include either syscalls_32.h or syscalls_64.h rather than a failure
to include syscall_table.h. For architectures that only included one
or other, the behavior matches BITS_PER_LONG as previously done on
architectures supporting both syscalls_32.h and syscalls_64.h.
Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Howard Chu <howardchu95@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250319050741.269828-4-irogers@google.com
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
|
|
Use the generic scripts to generate headers from the syscall table for
mips.
Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@rivosinc.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linux.dev>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250108-perf_syscalltbl-v6-13-7543b5293098@rivosinc.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
|
|
The macros PERF_REG_{IP|SP} have been replaced by using functions
perf_arch_reg_{ip|sp}(), remove them!
Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Eric Lin <eric.lin@sifive.com>
Cc: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>
Cc: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Ivan Babrou <ivan@cloudflare.com>
Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
Cc: Ming Wang <wangming01@loongson.cn>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-csky@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230606014559.21783-5-leo.yan@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
|
|
When reading a perf.data file with register values, there is a mismatch
between the names and the values of the registers because the tool is
built using only the register names from the local architecture.
Reading a perf.data file that was recorded on ARM64, gives the following
erroneous output on an X86 machine:
# perf report -i perf_arm64.data -D
[...]
24661932634451 0x698 [0x21d0]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x1): 43239/43239: 0xffffc5be8f100f98 period: 1 addr: 0
... user regs: mask 0x1ffffffff ABI 64-bit
.... AX 0x0000ffffd1515817
.... BX 0x0000ffffd1515480
.... CX 0x0000aaaadabf6c80
.... DX 0x000000000000002e
.... SI 0x0000000040100401
.... DI 0x0040600200000080
.... BP 0x0000ffffd1510e10
.... SP 0x0000000000000000
.... IP 0x00000000000000dd
.... FLAGS 0x0000ffffd1510cd0
.... CS 0x0000000000000000
.... SS 0x0000000000000030
.... DS 0x0000ffffa569a208
.... ES 0x0000000000000000
.... FS 0x0000000000000000
.... GS 0x0000000000000000
.... R8 0x0000aaaad3de9650
.... R9 0x0000ffffa57397f0
.... R10 0x0000000000000001
.... R11 0x0000ffffa57fd000
.... R12 0x0000ffffd1515817
.... R13 0x0000ffffd1515480
.... R14 0x0000aaaadabf6c80
.... R15 0x0000000000000000
.... unknown 0x0000000000000001
.... unknown 0x0000000000000000
.... unknown 0x0000000000000000
.... unknown 0x0000000000000000
.... unknown 0x0000000000000000
.... unknown 0x0000ffffd1510d90
.... unknown 0x0000ffffa5739b90
.... unknown 0x0000ffffd1510d80
.... XMM0 0x0000ffffa57392c8
... thread: perf-exec:43239
...... dso: [kernel.kallsyms]
As can be seen, the register names correspond to X86 registers, even
though the perf.data file was recorded on an ARM64 system. After this
patch, the output of the command displays the correct register names:
# perf report -i perf_arm64.data -D
[...]
24661932634451 0x698 [0x21d0]: PERF_RECORD_SAMPLE(IP, 0x1): 43239/43239: 0xffffc5be8f100f98 period: 1 addr: 0
... user regs: mask 0x1ffffffff ABI 64-bit
.... x0 0x0000ffffd1515817
.... x1 0x0000ffffd1515480
.... x2 0x0000aaaadabf6c80
.... x3 0x000000000000002e
.... x4 0x0000000040100401
.... x5 0x0040600200000080
.... x6 0x0000ffffd1510e10
.... x7 0x0000000000000000
.... x8 0x00000000000000dd
.... x9 0x0000ffffd1510cd0
.... x10 0x0000000000000000
.... x11 0x0000000000000030
.... x12 0x0000ffffa569a208
.... x13 0x0000000000000000
.... x14 0x0000000000000000
.... x15 0x0000000000000000
.... x16 0x0000aaaad3de9650
.... x17 0x0000ffffa57397f0
.... x18 0x0000000000000001
.... x19 0x0000ffffa57fd000
.... x20 0x0000ffffd1515817
.... x21 0x0000ffffd1515480
.... x22 0x0000aaaadabf6c80
.... x23 0x0000000000000000
.... x24 0x0000000000000001
.... x25 0x0000000000000000
.... x26 0x0000000000000000
.... x27 0x0000000000000000
.... x28 0x0000000000000000
.... x29 0x0000ffffd1510d90
.... lr 0x0000ffffa5739b90
.... sp 0x0000ffffd1510d80
.... pc 0x0000ffffa57392c8
... thread: perf-exec:43239
...... dso: [kernel.kallsyms]
Tester comments:
Athira reports:
"Looks good to me. Tested this patchset in powerpc by capturing regs in
powerpc and doing perf report to read the data from x86."
Reported-by: Alexandre Truong <alexandre.truong@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>
Tested-by: Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-csky@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211207180653.1147374-4-german.gomez@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
|
|
Map perf APIs (perf_reg_name/get_arch_regstr/unwind__arch_reg_id) with
MIPS specific registers.
[ayan@wavecomp.com: repick this patch for unwinding userstack backtrace
by perf and libunwind on MIPS based CPU.]
[yangtiezhu@loongson.cn: Add sample_reg_masks[] to fix build error,
silence some checkpatch errors and warnings, and also separate the
original patches into two parts (MIPS kernel and perf tools) to merge
easily.]
The original patches:
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1126521/
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1126520/
Committer notes:
Do it as __perf_reg_name() to cope with:
067012974c8ae31a ("perf tools: Fix arm64 build error with gcc-11")
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Archer Yan <ayan@wavecomp.com>
Cc: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Cc: Jianlin Lv <Jianlin.Lv@arm.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Juxin Gao <gaojuxin@loongson.cn>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@loongson.cn>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1612409724-3516-3-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
Signed-off-by: Archer Yan <ayan@wavecomp.com>
Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
|
