| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This is similar to GCC's behavior and makes it more obvious why the
build failed.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0ea76f4b0e7a370711ed9f75fd0792bb5979c2bf.1743481539.git.jpoimboe@kernel.org
|
|
The objtool program need to analysis the control flow of each object file
generated by compiler toolchain, it needs to know all the locations that
a branch instruction may jump into, if a jump table is used, objtool has
to correlate the jump instruction with the table.
On x86 (which is the only port supported by objtool before LoongArch),
there is a relocation type on the jump instruction and directly points
to the table. But on LoongArch, the relocation is on another kind of
instruction prior to the jump instruction, and also with scheduling it
is not very easy to tell the offset of that instruction from the jump
instruction. Furthermore, because LoongArch has -fsection-anchors (often
enabled at -O1 or above) the relocation may actually points to a section
anchor instead of the table itself.
For the jump table of switch cases, a GCC patch "LoongArch: Add support
to annotate tablejump" and a Clang patch "[LoongArch] Add options for
annotate tablejump" have been merged into the upstream mainline, it can
parse the additional section ".discard.tablejump_annotate" which stores
the jump info as pairs of addresses, each pair contains the address of
jump instruction and the address of jump table.
For the jump table of computed gotos, it is indeed not easy to implement
in the compiler, especially if there is more than one computed goto in a
function such as ___bpf_prog_run(). objdump kernel/bpf/core.o shows that
there are many table jump instructions in ___bpf_prog_run(), but there are
no relocations on the table jump instructions and to the table directly on
LoongArch.
Without the help of compiler, in order to figure out the address of goto
table for the special case of ___bpf_prog_run(), since the instruction
sequence is relatively single and stable, it makes sense to add a helper
find_reloc_of_rodata_c_jump_table() to find the relocation which points
to the section ".rodata..c_jump_table".
If find_reloc_by_table_annotate() failed, it means there is no relocation
info of switch table address in ".rela.discard.tablejump_annotate", then
objtool may find the relocation info of goto table ".rodata..c_jump_table"
with find_reloc_of_rodata_c_jump_table().
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250211115016.26913-6-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
Acked-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
|
|
The objtool program need to analysis the control flow of each object file
generated by compiler toolchain, it needs to know all the locations that
a branch instruction may jump into, if a jump table is used, objtool has
to correlate the jump instruction with the table.
On x86 (which is the only port supported by objtool before LoongArch),
there is a relocation type on the jump instruction and directly points
to the table. But on LoongArch, the relocation is on another kind of
instruction prior to the jump instruction, and also with scheduling it
is not very easy to tell the offset of that instruction from the jump
instruction. Furthermore, because LoongArch has -fsection-anchors (often
enabled at -O1 or above) the relocation may actually points to a section
anchor instead of the table itself.
The good news is that after continuous analysis and discussion, at last
a GCC patch "LoongArch: Add support to annotate tablejump" and a Clang
patch "[LoongArch] Add options for annotate tablejump" have been merged
into the upstream mainline, the compiler changes make life much easier
for switch table support of objtool on LoongArch.
By now, there is an additional section ".discard.tablejump_annotate" to
store the jump info as pairs of addresses, each pair contains the address
of jump instruction and the address of jump table.
In order to find switch table, it is easy to parse the relocation section
".rela.discard.tablejump_annotate" to get table_sec and table_offset, the
rest process is somehow like x86.
Additionally, it needs to get each table size. When compiling on LoongArch,
there are unsorted table offsets of rodata if there exist many jump tables,
it will get the wrong table end and find the wrong table jump destination
instructions in add_jump_table().
Sort the rodata table offset by parsing ".rela.discard.tablejump_annotate"
and then get each table size of rodata corresponded with each table jump
instruction, it is used to check the table end and will break the process
when parsing ".rela.rodata" to avoid getting the wrong jump destination
instructions.
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=0ee028f55640
Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4c2c17756739
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250211115016.26913-5-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
Acked-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
|
|
For the most part, an absolute relocation type is used for rodata.
In the case of STT_SECTION, reloc->sym->offset is always zero, for
the other symbol types, reloc_addend(reloc) is always zero, thus it
can use a simple statement "reloc->sym->offset + reloc_addend(reloc)"
to obtain the symbol offset for various symbol types.
When compiling on LoongArch, there exist PC relative relocation types
for rodata, it needs to calculate the symbol offset with "S + A - PC"
according to the spec of "ELF for the LoongArch Architecture".
If there is only one jump table in the rodata, the "PC" is the entry
address which is equal with the value of reloc_offset(reloc), at this
time, reloc_offset(table) is 0.
If there are many jump tables in the rodata, the "PC" is the offset
of the jump table's base address which is equal with the value of
reloc_offset(reloc) - reloc_offset(table).
So for LoongArch, if the relocation type is PC relative, it can use a
statement "reloc_offset(reloc) - reloc_offset(table)" to get the "PC"
value when calculating the symbol offset with "S + A - PC" for one or
many jump tables in the rodata.
Add an arch-specific function arch_jump_table_sym_offset() to assign
the symbol offset, for the most part that is an absolute relocation,
the default value is "reloc->sym->offset + reloc_addend(reloc)" in
the weak definition, it can be overridden by each architecture that
has different requirements.
Link: https://github.com/loongson/la-abi-specs/blob/release/laelf.adoc
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250211115016.26913-4-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
Acked-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
|
|
In the most cases, the entry size of rodata is 8 bytes because the
relocation type is 64 bit. There are also 32 bit relocation types,
the entry size of rodata should be 4 bytes in this case.
Add an arch-specific function arch_reloc_size() to assign the entry
size of rodata for x86, powerpc and LoongArch.
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250211115016.26913-3-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
Acked-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
|
|
In preparation for adding support for annotated jump tables, where
ELF relocations and symbols are used to describe the locations of jump
tables in the executable, refactor the jump table discovery logic so the
table size can be returned from arch_find_switch_table().
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241011170847.334429-12-ardb+git@google.com
|
|
After commit a0f7085f6a63 ("LoongArch: Add RANDOMIZE_KSTACK_OFFSET
support"), there are three new instructions "addi.d $fp, $sp, 32",
"sub.d $sp, $sp, $t0" and "addi.d $sp, $fp, -32" for the secondary
stack in do_syscall(), then there is a objtool warning "return with
modified stack frame" and no handle_syscall() which is the previous
frame of do_syscall() in the call trace when executing the command
"echo l > /proc/sysrq-trigger".
objdump shows something like this:
0000000000000000 <do_syscall>:
0: 02ff8063 addi.d $sp, $sp, -32
4: 29c04076 st.d $fp, $sp, 16
8: 29c02077 st.d $s0, $sp, 8
c: 29c06061 st.d $ra, $sp, 24
10: 02c08076 addi.d $fp, $sp, 32
...
74: 0011b063 sub.d $sp, $sp, $t0
...
a8: 4c000181 jirl $ra, $t0, 0
...
dc: 02ff82c3 addi.d $sp, $fp, -32
e0: 28c06061 ld.d $ra, $sp, 24
e4: 28c04076 ld.d $fp, $sp, 16
e8: 28c02077 ld.d $s0, $sp, 8
ec: 02c08063 addi.d $sp, $sp, 32
f0: 4c000020 jirl $zero, $ra, 0
The instruction "sub.d $sp, $sp, $t0" changes the stack bottom and the
new stack size is a random value, in order to find the return address of
do_syscall() which is stored in the original stack frame after executing
"jirl $ra, $t0, 0", it should use fp which points to the original stack
top.
At the beginning, the thought is tended to decode the secondary stack
instruction "sub.d $sp, $sp, $t0" and set it as a label, then check this
label for the two frame pointer instructions to change the cfa base and
cfa offset during the period of secondary stack in update_cfi_state().
This is valid for GCC but invalid for Clang due to there are different
secondary stack instructions for ClangBuiltLinux on LoongArch, something
like this:
0000000000000000 <do_syscall>:
...
88: 00119064 sub.d $a0, $sp, $a0
8c: 00150083 or $sp, $a0, $zero
...
Actually, it equals to a single instruction "sub.d $sp, $sp, $a0", but
there is no proper condition to check it as a label like GCC, and so the
beginning thought is not a good way.
Essentially, there are two special frame pointer instructions which are
"addi.d $fp, $sp, imm" and "addi.d $sp, $fp, imm", the first one points
fp to the original stack top and the second one restores the original
stack bottom from fp.
Based on the above analysis, in order to avoid adding an arch-specific
update_cfi_state(), we just add a member "frame_pointer" in the "struct
symbol" as a label to avoid affecting the current normal case, then set
it as true only if there is "addi.d $sp, $fp, imm". The last is to check
this label for the two frame pointer instructions to change the cfa base
and cfa offset in update_cfi_state().
Tested with the following two configs:
(1) CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_KSTACK_OFFSET=y &&
CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_KSTACK_OFFSET_DEFAULT=n
(2) CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_KSTACK_OFFSET=y &&
CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_KSTACK_OFFSET_DEFAULT=y
By the way, there is no effect for x86 with this patch, tested on the
x86 machine with Fedora 40 system.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.9+
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
|
|
Implement arch-specific init_orc_entry(), write_orc_entry(), reg_name(),
orc_type_name(), print_reg() and orc_print_dump(), then set BUILD_ORC as
y to build the orc related files.
Co-developed-by: Jinyang He <hejinyang@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jinyang He <hejinyang@loongson.cn>
Co-developed-by: Youling Tang <tangyouling@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Youling Tang <tangyouling@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
|
|
Only copy the minimal definitions of instruction opcodes and formats
in inst.h from arch/loongarch to tools/arch/loongarch, and also copy
the definition of sign_extend64() to tools/include/linux/bitops.h to
decode the following kinds of instructions:
(1) stack pointer related instructions
addi.d, ld.d, st.d, ldptr.d and stptr.d
(2) branch and jump related instructions
beq, bne, blt, bge, bltu, bgeu, beqz, bnez, bceqz, bcnez, b, bl and jirl
(3) other instructions
break, nop and ertn
See more info about instructions in LoongArch Reference Manual:
https://loongson.github.io/LoongArch-Documentation/LoongArch-Vol1-EN.html
Co-developed-by: Jinyang He <hejinyang@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jinyang He <hejinyang@loongson.cn>
Co-developed-by: Youling Tang <tangyouling@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Youling Tang <tangyouling@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
|
|
Add the minimal changes to enable objtool build on LoongArch,
most of the functions are stubs to only fix the build errors
when make -C tools/objtool.
This is similar with commit e52ec98c5ab1 ("objtool/powerpc:
Enable objtool to be built on ppc").
Co-developed-by: Jinyang He <hejinyang@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jinyang He <hejinyang@loongson.cn>
Co-developed-by: Youling Tang <tangyouling@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Youling Tang <tangyouling@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
|
